This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 11/1/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

November 1, 2007

 

3. Watersheds

 

CHINOOK SALMON RUNS:

Chinook salmon shortfall puzzles anglers, experts; The numbers of fish returning are far below expectations - Sacramento Bee

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Guest Opinion: Projects serve needs of Delta ecosystem - Sacramento Bee

 

DEVELOPMENT:

Plans by Cargill to build homes on salt-flat acreage alarms some - San Francisco Chronicle

 

BEAVER DAMS:

City to leave Five Mile beavers alone - Chico Enterprise Record

 

 

CHINOOK SALMON RUNS:

Chinook salmon shortfall puzzles anglers, experts; The numbers of fish returning are far below expectations

Sacramento Bee – 11/1/07

By Matt Weiser, staff writer

 

For fishermen and biologists, fall has become a season for fretting in California.

 

For the second year in a row, spawning fall-run chinook salmon are not returning to the Central Valley's rivers in the numbers that anglers and experts anticipated, touching off what may be a record year for nail-biting and hand-wringing.

 

"Horrible. Slowest year in their lifetime. Never seen salmon fishing this bad," said Ron Howe, summing up the feelings of many salmon fishermen this fall. He has pursued the mighty chinook, also known as king salmon, in the American River for 17 years.

 

"Everybody's saying the same exact things. This is just unbelievable that the fishing's so poor," he said.

 

Hard numbers on the American River are difficult to come by until the run is over at the end of the year, said Terry West, manager of the state fish hatchery at Nimbus Dam. That's because there is no way to count natural spawners in the river.

 

But the 11th Annual American River Salmon Festival, held Oct. 13 and 14, offered one sad indicator. There were no salmon climbing the hatchery's fish ladder that weekend, normally the festival's star attraction.

 

West managed to collect just 22 fish in five hours – compared to 120 in prior years – just to put some salmon in a big tank as a display for festival-goers.

 

He said he has never seen so few salmon in the river at festival time.

 

"We're kinda lucky we caught enough," he said. "I try to always have a positive outlook on Mother Nature. So I'm going to continue that until I get all the figures in."

 

The most reliable running tally of spawning chinook in the Central Valley comes from the Coleman National Fish Hatchery on Battle Creek, a Sacramento River tributary in Shasta County.

 

Through Oct. 24, about 20,700 chinook returned to Battle Creek to spawn. That's only about 20 percent of average for that date compared to the previous four years, according to state Department of Fish and Game records.

 

The numbers baffle experts and laymen alike, because all indicators are that this fall should produce a vigorous salmon run.

 

"We just don't understand why there aren't more fish around," said Roger Thomas, who has run salmon fishing charters out of Sausalito since 1968. "We had some lean years in the 1970s, but this kinda looks like the leanest in a long, long time. All of us are seeing the same conditions and share the same concerns."

 

Regulations limited the commercial salmon fishing in the ocean the past two years, which should have left more fish to return upriver.

 

A strong, cold upwelling in the Pacific Ocean this summer also produced ample food along the California coast, resulting in a bumper crop of herring, sardine and anchovy, said Frank Schwing, director of environmental research at the Southwest Fisheries Science Center in Santa Cruz, a division of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

 

But there's a gaping hole in that news: Schwing said the population of krill has mysteriously crashed in the ocean. This zooplankton, which resembles a tiny shrimp, is a key salmon food.

 

Several bird species that depend on krill have also crashed, Schwing said, such as the Cassin's auklet, a seabird that nests on the Farallone Islands. Also, whales that normally gorge on krill shifted to eating fish.

 

"Historically there's a strong relationship between abundance of krill and the amount of upwelling that occurs," said Schwing.

 

"But this year that model has broken down for some reason."

 

Everyone recognizes it's still early in the fall run, said Allen Grover, a biologist who monitors the ocean salmon fishery for Fish and Game. The run normally continues through December and even into January, and it's normal for the run's peak to shift each year.

 

"I'm concerned, but it's too early to say 'Sell your boat,' " said Grover. "Trying to correlate oceanographic events to fish survival is pretty hard to do."

 

A combination of plumbing problems in the Central Valley may also be hurting the run this year. State and federal water managers had to slash water exports from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta early this summer to protect the Delta smelt, a threatened fingerling.

 

This put water deliveries to cities and farms behind schedule, forcing water officials to ramp up reservoir releases for most of the summer.

 

This, combined with a drought year, left many of the state's reservoirs with below-normal storage, including Folsom Reservoir, which feeds the American River.

 

A question lingers as to whether the water left behind the dam is still cold enough to trigger the salmon run. The fish need water at 60 degrees or colder to start migrating. This week, those flows are leaving Nimbus Dam at around 63 degrees, said West.

 

For now, anglers are hoping the best of the run is still to come. Veterans say anglers can still find salmon in the ocean and rivers: Howe hooked three and caught two in two days on the American River this week, both over 20 pounds.

 

But they'll need to balance their worries with fistfuls of those other fishermen's friends: luck and patience.

 

"Normally I would hook over 50 fish in the last two days, and I hooked three," said Howe. "And I was lucky to do that, because other guys were out there not hooking any." #

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/465062.html

 

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Guest Opinion: Projects serve needs of Delta ecosystem

Sacramento Bee – 11/1/07

By Mike Chrisman, California's resources secretary

 

The headlines are as old as 1991, and as new as today:

 

• Water allotments cut in order to protect endangered fish in California's Delta.

 

Kern County farmers worry about how they will irrigate their fields.

 

Silicon Valley businesses worry about water for their manufacturing processes.

 

It may seem like déjà vu, but it isn't.

 

The water crisis in the late 1980s and early '90s was caused by a drought combined with regulatory actions to protect winter-run Chinook salmon as endangered. The potential consequences to both the economy and the environment were dire and led to the creation of a joint state and federal program known as CalFed to deal with the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta's water supply and ecological crises.

 

Now, 12 years since CALFED's formation and seven years into a 30-year plan for the Delta, some are asking, "What's changed?" The answer is both "a lot" and "not nearly enough."

 

Since the 25 state and federal CALFED agencies agreed to a plan of action called the Record of Decision in 2000, they have funded nearly $5 billion in research and project improvements throughout California – upstream and downstream of the Delta and in the Delta itself. While this funding has enabled us to learn much more about the Delta than we knew in the early 1990s, it has provided us with a sobering look at how much more we need to know and – more importantly – accomplish.

 

To the good, almost 1 million acre-feet of water has been added to the state's water supply through CALFED-funded groundwater storage and water recycling projects – enough water for nearly 2 million families each year.

 

Ecological improvements and fish screens upstream of the Delta have contributed to improved Sacramento River salmon runs; investments in science have led us to rethink how the Delta's ecosystem really works.

 

On the other hand, the numbers of Delta smelt and other pelagic "open water" fish are at all-time lows, and the number of lawsuits filed over Delta issues is approaching an all-time high.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger quickly recognized that California's Delta was vulnerable to collapse and that its problems were a critical priority. He moved forward with a course correction and refining of CALFED's mission through a 10-Year action plan in 2006, then followed with establishment of Delta Vision, an initiative to find long-term sustainability for the Delta. He also supported the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan to offer added protection to many Delta species. He also champions a second strategic growth plan that would provide $2.5 billion in immediate and long-term repairs and restoration in the Delta, as well as funding for needed water storage and environmental stewardship programs.

 

Building on what CALFED has learned in the past seven years, these initiatives will propel us in our efforts to better understand and manage the Delta's ecology and provide more reliability to California's water needs.

 

The Delta is a difficult system to manage. Any problem can be the result of numerous complex interactions that must be sorted through, guided by science. Today's most complex issue is understanding the dynamics of the decline of Delta smelt – the little fish that has caused a big problem. Pumping water from the Delta is a factor but so, too, are urban and/or agricultural runoff and the impacts of undesirable, invasive species on the Delta smelt's food supply.

 

That said, the state and federal CALFED agencies will continue to fund good science and projects that help the Delta serve both the needs of the ecosystem and the state's water supply. In the meantime, we will continue to increase our understanding of the Delta with the hope that someday headlines such as those from 1991 and 2007 will conjure up thoughts not of déjà vu, but rather of problems resolved. #

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/464746.html

 

 

DEVELOPMENT:

Plans by Cargill to build homes on salt-flat acreage alarms some

San Francisco Chronicle – 11/1/07

By Jonathan Curiel, staff writer

 

The owner of one of the largest undeveloped swaths of bay shoreline says it is considering building houses on the land - a controversial idea opposed by environmentalists who say the property should be restored to its natural state and protected.

 

Cargill Inc. uses the 1,433-acre site on the edge of San Francisco Bay in Redwood City to produce commercial salt, but John Bruno, a spokesman for a joint venture between Cargill and a real estate development firm, told The Chronicle that the corporation is studying the possibility of building housing there.

 

The land is just southeast of Bair Island, a marshy, 2,600-acre restoration project that is part of the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge. On that former salt pond, where Redwood City voters in 1982 forbade development, harbor seals have found a place to sunbathe and rare species like the salt harvest mouse thrive.

 

Although Cargill has not actually produced any plans for the nearby 1,433-acre site, environmentalists say they would fight to prevent Cargill from getting permits to build residences there. Instead, they say the land should be used to further the state's goal of restoring the thousands of acres of bay wetlands destroyed over the past 200 years.

 

The idea of building housing on the land is supported by at least one local official, a key member of the Redwood City Planning Commission who says the city has an immense need for housing and amenities like playing fields and trails. And the executive director of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, which has jurisdiction over land within 100 feet of the bay's shoreline, said Cargill could pursue a development plan if it first restored at least half of the site to a natural setting.

 

Cargill is phasing out its salt production on the land and wants to convert it into some type of mixed development, including some housing. For the past year, Redwood City Industrial Saltworks - a joint venture between Cargill and a real estate development firm called DMB Associates - has solicited comments from Redwood City residents on what they want Cargill to do with the property.

 

More than 6,000 people have responded through mailings and comments during the company's forums, "and the vast majority of what we've heard is that people are looking for a mixture of uses, and that runs the gamut from housing to parks to bay trails," said Bruno, general manager of Redwood City Industrial Saltworks.

 

Bruno wouldn't specify the type of housing Cargill envisions nor what percentage of land the housing would occupy, but any development is opposed by groups such as Save the Bay. That group recently started a campaign to protect the last remaining undeveloped properties that ring the bay.

 

"It's not the place to put housing," said the group's executive director, David Lewis. "If Cargill thinks this can be approved, they're living in the past."

 

Cargill's Redwood City property is zoned "tidal plain," meaning the corporation would have to get an exemption from the Redwood City Planning Commission to pursue any development.

 

Before it does, Cargill would have to restore at least 50 percent of the area to natural habitat under state laws governing bay salt ponds, said Will Travis, head of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission.

 

"Our position is that when you take a salt pond and use it for something other than salt making, a substantial portion of it should be restored to the bay or wetlands. The issue of what the (rest of the) property can be used for is the call of local government," Travis said.

 

And Lewis said the company would face additional development hurdles under the federal Clean Water Act, which he said prohibits former waterways from being filled with development if there are alternatives to put the development in another area.

 

And, Lewis said, state water quality regulations would also severely limit what Cargill could build on the site, which has been used for salt production since 1901.

 

Development in that area has been controversial since the first home at Redwood Shores was built in 1969. Dozens of office developments were built up to the bay shoreline - land that environmentalists said should have been restored to its natural state.

 

That battle in part led to the campaign to protect Bair Island, which once also was eyed for development. In 2004, Redwood City voters rejected a proposed high-rise development near the bay, Marina Shores Village, which the City Council had approved.

 

Cargill won't formally submit a development application to Redwood City until sometime next year, Bruno said. Last month, the Minnesota corporation hired three firms - including one called Biohabitats that specializes in ecological restoration - to help develop the property. In the next few months, Cargill will hold more community meetings.

 

Construction probably wouldn't begin for at least several years.

 

The vice chairwoman of Redwood City's Planning Commission, Nancy Radcliffe, said she would favorably consider any housing plan by Cargill because Redwood City is in desperate need of residences for people who work in the Peninsula city.

 

Such housing would reduce the number of commuters on Bay Area roads, thereby reducing car emissions and helping the environment, Radcliffe said.

 

"Housing would ... lessen the amount of commuters, and then you look at the affects of global warming, so it's not just a one-issue thing," Radcliffe said. "At the moment, Redwood City has a huge housing imbalance. So that's an issue that's in front of us. The less people have to commute, the better it is for the environment and for family life."

 

Bruno said that those who oppose any housing on the site are "by far a very small minority opinion."

 

But Save the Bay's Lewis and Ralph Nobles, a former Redwood City planning commissioner who heads the group Friends of Redwood City, said there is a growing sentiment that preserving environmentally sensitive land is more important than building condominiums or apartment complexes.

 

Cargill, Nobles said, "can't develop (its saltworks) land unless they convince the people of Redwood City that it should be housing rather than bay lands. I don't think the people of Redwood City want to put housing on a bay front that's below sea level at a time when sea levels are rising."

 

About 40,000 acres of wetlands rim the San Francisco Bay. Save the Bay wants Cargill to sell the property to the state or federal government so it can add the land to the national wildlife refuge. In 2002, Cargill sold 16,500 acres of commercial salt ponds to state and federal governments for $243 million in cash and tax credits.

 

Even if housing is ultimately put on the property, Bruno said, it probably would be accompanied by open habitat spaces, a recreation area and other places that will reflect the area's natural setting.

 

Redwood City Councilman Jeff Ira said he would like a youth sports facility on the land that would "be able to host Little League and soccer tournaments and those types of things. The No. 1 complaint I hear on a regular basis is that we just don't have enough playing fields. That wouldn't require zoning changes since that's one of the few things allowed."

 

"There's no question we need housing," Ira said. "But do we want to build housing for housing's sake? Never. You have to do something that is a good use of the land. I think everyone wants to build open space, but how much - that's a tough question." #

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/01/MNAET3ET0.DTL&hw=water&sn=008&sc=189

 

 

BEAVER DAMS:

City to leave Five Mile beavers alone

Chico Enterprise Record – 11/1/07

By Jenn Klein, staff writer

 

Beavers who have moved in at the Five-Mile won't get an eviction notice from the city, but will eventually be ousted by Mother Nature.

 

Interim Assistant City Manager Dennis Beardsley said Wednesday the city won't be touching a beaver dam about 10 yards north of the Five-Mile Dam in Bidwell Park. The beaver dam is now diverting water from Big Chico Creek down Lindo Channel, which is normally dry at this time of year.

 

"We're treating this as a natural occurrence right now and leaving it alone," said Beardsley, who is in charge of the city's parks.

He said as soon as Chico gets its first strong winter rain storm, the beaver dam will wash out.

 

The water in Big Chico Creek is lower than normal, but the beaver engineers will not be able to completely shut the water out, Beardsley said.

 

The city's No. 2 administrator said beavers have been active for the past three to four years in another area around Five-Mile.

 

"We just don't have a mailing address for Mr. Beaver to tell him he's being a nuisance," Beardsley said jokingly.

 

Beardsley said he does not know if the Department of Fish and Game has a separate plan, but said historically when beaver dams are knocked down, the animals build them back.  #

http://www.chicoer.com//ci_7337275?IADID=Search-www.chicoer.com-www.chicoer.com

####

No comments:

Blog Archive