This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 5/16/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

May 16, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

RUSSIAN RIVER FLOWS:

County to study low river flows; Supervisors approve three-year assessment of effects of reducing water into Russian River, Dry Creek - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

Redwood Valley fears critical water shortage - Ukiah Daily Journal

 

AG SUPPLY ISSUES:

Farmers, vintners cool to prospect of recycled water for irrigation - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

YUMA DESALTING PLANT:

Yuma Desalting Plant draws global visitors - Yuma Sun (Arizona)

 

 

RUSSIAN RIVER FLOWS:

County to study low river flows; Supervisors approve three-year assessment of effects of reducing water into Russian River, Dry Creek

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 5/16/07

By Bleys Rose, staff writer

 

Sonoma County supervisors voted 4-1 Tuesday to launch three years' worth of environmental studies on the effects of permanently reducing flows in the Russian River and Dry Creek.

ADVERTISEMENT


Water Agency officials said it would be an extensive study examining potential effects on residents and businesses, ranchers and grape growers, fish habitat and recreation.

"Conditions on the Russian River are different" than the 1980s when water releases from upstream dams were first set by state regulation, said Amy Harris Mai, Water Agency senior environmental specialist. "Now, there are many different interests, and sometimes conflicting interests."

With Mike Reilly, the supervisor whose west county district encompasses the lower Russian River, dissenting, a majority decided to seek long-term changes in the county's right to draw water out of Lake Mendocino, the state-regulated reservoir behind Coyote Dam that provides most of the water for 600,000 residents to the south.

The county Water Agency last week received temporary authority to reduce river flows this summer as a result of low rainfall and reduced amounts available from the upstream Potter Valley Project reservoir. Water Agency officials contend that so much has changed in the two decades since water rights formulas were drafted that new standards, or "trigger points," are necessary.

Paul Kelley, the north county supervisor who represents the upper Russian River and Dry Creek Valley areas, said an environmental review "is a reasonable approach in that it takes a long time . . . the current trigger points do not fit with the current situation."

Water Agency officials say state water rights formulas went into effect long before extension of federal protections for three endangered fish, new water reductions from the Potter Valley project that feeds Lake Mendocino, and climate changes that make summer weather patterns start earlier and last longer.

But Reilly sharply disagreed with his colleagues, saying the process for applying to the state Water Resources Control Board for temporary flow reductions had worked well in recent years so there's no need for permanent reductions.

"It is not broken. I am not clear what the emergency is this time," Reilly said. "It is an artificial drought."

During a brief public hearing on whether the county should perform an environmental review, leaders from the Sierra Club, Russian River Keeper and Russian River Watershed Protection said they oppose giving the Water Agency permanent low-flow authority.

Don McEnhill of Russian River Keeper said he saw no data to support contentions that fish habitat would be protected with lower flows.

No representatives of Russian River-area businesses that would be affected by lower river levels testified at the hearing, although Reilly said "this is an area of high concern in my community."

Supervisors accepted the Water Agency's proposal to convene meetings this summer of groups with interests in river flows. Those sessions are steps toward a draft environmental review that is scheduled for completion in 2011, Mai said.

"This will not be a quick process. It will take two to three years," she said.

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070516/NEWS/705160328/1033/NEWS01

 

 

Redwood Valley fears critical water shortage

Ukiah Daily Journal – 5/15/07

By Katie Mintz, staff writer

 

From Mendocino to Marin County, people who rely on the Russian River for water are fearing a summer shortage, but for one local water district the issue hits especially close to home.

 

The Redwood Valley County Water District, the only agency that gets its water directly from that lake that feeds the river, projects that without conservation and a little luck, by August it may no longer be able to provide water to the approximate 3,500 residents of Redwood Valley or the 4,000 acres of grapes grown there.

 

"We'll suffer first and worst because we have the only intake that's directly out of the Lake Mendocino," Bill Koehler, general manager of the Redwood Valley County Water District, said.

 

Levels in Lake Mendocino have been a concern since Pacific Gas and Electric Company announced early this winter that it would have to reduce the flow through the Potter Valley Project, which diverts water from the Eel River into the lake, to comply with its federal license.

 

Currently, the lake is holding approximately 65,000 acre-feet of water -- about 20,000 acre-feet less than it would have been had the Potter Valley Project flow not been reduced -- and Koehler said the outlook is not great.

 

"If everything goes right, we're going to worry a lot," Koehler said. "If anything goes wrong, we're out of water."

 

He estimates that if storage gets down to 24,000 acre-feet, the district's pump station on the western shore of Lake Mendocino won't be able to draw water, and any number of factors, such as a bad fire season or heavy evaporation, could push the lake to that level.

 

At present, the RVCWD is asking for immediate voluntary conservation of 10-15 percent from its customers to keep water in the lake. To help the effort, the district will soon distribute 1,500 water conservation kits that'll include low-flow shower heads and faucet diffusers, as well as other water-saving measures, to its customers free of charge.

 

Many other water agencies along the Russian River are asking for voluntary conservation as well, including the Sonoma County Water Agency, which is charged with managing the release of water from the lake through the Coyote Valley Dam. Just last week, the SCWA was granted permission from the State Water Resources Control Board to temporarily reduce in-stream flows in the river, meaning less will have to be released from the lake to meet flow requirements, especially if people conserve.

 

Before cut-back was authorized, the SCWA had predicted that storage in Lake Mendocino will decline to about 14,000 acre-feet at the beginning of fall and to 8,000 acre-feet by the end of the fall without conservation.

 

"It's going to take some real cooperative planning and implementing all the way down the line in order to make things work," John Growth, director of the RVCWD, said.

 

If voluntary conservation does not work, the RVCWD will be prepared to take action. On Thursday evening, at its regularly scheduled board meeting, the district will discuss with its constituents provisions for an ordinance that would make conservation mandatory should the need arise.

 

"We can conceive of, as the lake falls, increasing the level of conservation, making it mandatory," Koehler said. "At some point, if the lake falls low enough, we're going to start with a tiered structure of who gets cut off completely."

 

The challenge, he said, will be working to balance the needs of all customers.

 

"The only way we can get through this is to share the pain," Koehler said. "We can't place the burden entirely on any one class or customer."

 

Because Lake Mendocino is meant for flood-control rather than storage, however, water supply has never been a guarantee.

 

Every winter, until April 15, water must be incrementally released from the lake to prevent flooding.

 

Though Koehler said the lake contains more than enough water for the district in the wetter, winter months, since 1988, the RVCWD has had a moratorium on providing new water hook-ups because of a court ruling that found the lake was not a reliable water source.

 

In this way, Donald Butow, chairman of the RVCWD Board of Directors, said the looming water shortage might do some good.

 

"In one respect, this is really a blessing," Butow said. "Over the last 20 years, 30 years, even 50 years, the (Mendocino County) Board of Supervisors has never really worried about a water situation or storage because we have the lake. Now, all of the sudden, it's come to the forefront that we don't have a storage area and we better start looking."

 

For more information about Redwood Valley County Water District and conservation, visit the district's Web site, www.rvcwd.org. #

http://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/local/ci_5900822

 

 

AG SUPPLY ISSUES:

Farmers, vintners cool to prospect of recycled water for irrigation

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 5/16/07

By Bleys Rose, staff writer

 

Farmers, vintners, environmentalists and north Sonoma County residents told supervisors Tuesday that they have little use for a $385 million recycled water project that would provide highly treated wastewater for agriculture.

ADVERTISEMENT


During a 90-minute public hearing on the north county water recycling project, supervisors heard vineyard operators say they are firmly opposed to putting recycled water on their grapes and farmers say they feared it would damage groundwater quality.

Environmental group leaders said they welcome the idea of recycled wastewater, but fear that technology isn't good enough to assure the public on water quality.

Katie Murphy, vice-president of the Alexander Valley Association, said any hint of tainted wastewater being spread on the county's foremost cash crop would send the local economy into a tailspin.

"I am worried that there is a huge backlash on recycled water on our grapes," Murphy said. "I fear negative publicity and that could linger over our wine industry for a long time."

Murphy's comments reflected opinions of many farmers, ranchers and vintners at the public hearing, although Clos du Bois executive Keith Horn said he represented 20 grape growers in the Coalition for Sustainable Agriculture who would welcome recycled, highly treated wastewater.

"The water quality issues can be overcome," Horn said.

The public hearing was one of the last opportunities for comment on the North Sonoma County Agricultural Reuse Project that would create 19 reservoirs and 112 miles of pipeline through the Dry Creek, Alexander and Russian River valleys. Water Agency officials say primary customers are the vineyard operators of some of the county's premier grape growers that comprise almost half the 47,000 acres covered under the project.

Treated wastewater would come from Santa Rosa's pipeline to The Geysers geothermal fields. The city has plans to use much of that water in southeast and southwest Santa Rosa, which led some critics to point out the project may lack supply and demand.

"Santa Rosa wants to get rid of its wastewater for its uncontrolled growth," said Alexander Valley farmer David Fanucchi. "The Water Agency's long-term program is to get water away from the farmers and sell it to the highest bidders."

The water reuse project is part of the Water Agency's effort to convince state regulators that the county is making best use of current supply and, therefore, should gain approval for more water from Lake Sonoma and Lake Mendocino reservoirs. The Water Agency proposed a smaller-scale recycled water project for Sonoma Valley last year, but its water was aimed more at lawns, fields and open space than agriculture.

Water Agency officials say the massive water project would ensure long-term supplies for agriculture, reduce reliance on groundwater, reduce water drawn out of Dry Creek and leave water in reservoirs for management of endangered fish.

David Cuneo, the project environmental review specialist, said state water quality and health standards allow use of highly treated wastewater on crops, adding "but we do recognize it is an ongoing debate."

Leaders of environmental groups such as Russian River Keeper, the Sierra Club and the Russian River Watershed Protection Committee said using recycled wastewater is a laudable goal, but they could not support the project because there's not enough evidence that treatment plants filter out chemical compounds that could appear in crops and groundwater.

"It is not a high enough quality to pursue this project," said Don McEnhill of Russian River Keeper.

However, Cynthia Murray, president of the North Bay Leadership Council, a business group, said agriculture elsewhere in California is making use of recycled water with no problem.

"We are way behind the curve on use of recycled water," Murray said. "I am very confidant that we can provide a level of protection, but we may need to have more public education."

The Water Agency is accepting written comment on the draft environmental review until Friday. The full 603-page report is available at www.sonomacountywater.org. Supervisors expect to get the final environmental review document back for review this summer along with a financial analysis of the project costs. #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070516/NEWS/705160349/1033/NEWS01

 

 

YUMA DESALTING PLANT:

Yuma Desalting Plant draws global visitors

Yuma Sun (Arizona) – 5/15/07

By Joyce Lobeck, staff writer

 

Since the "on" switch was flipped for a 90-day demonstration run of the Yuma Desalting Plant, a number of visitors have shown up at the doorstep wanting a tour.

They've come from around the nation and around the world, said U.S. Bureau of Reclamation public relations official Jack Simes, who has been kept busy as a tour guide of the 60-acre facility west of Yuma.

The latest was the Colorado River Citizens' Forum, which serves as a link between the public and the International Boundary and Water Commission.

After hearing a presentation about the desalting plant during a meeting Tuesday afternoon, several members of the forum wanted to see the facility for themselves.

The desalting plant, once the largest in the world and still the largest in the U.S., was built at a cost of $250 million in the 1980s and early 1990s, said Jim Cherry, head of the Yuma-area USBR office. It was meant to reduce salt in water the U.S. delivers to Mexico under a 1944 treaty.

The plant only ran for about nine months, then was shut after the 1993 Gila River flood. Since then, it has been mothballed at a cost of $6 million a year because the treated water wasn't needed, Cherry said.

But there's been pressure to start up the plant as drought continues to grip the Southwest while population growth is increasing demand for water.

After 1-1/2 decades on standby, however, there were questions about whether the plant could still function and at what cost, Cherry said. The demonstration of 10 percent of the plant's capacity, begun March 1 and running until May 31, is proving it can - more efficiently and cheaper than projected with improved technology that has been incorporated into the plant over the years.

It's also drawn considerable interest. International visitors since March 1 have included delegations from Egypt, Libya, Mexico's Institute of Water Technology and the city of Hermosillo, Mexico. A group from Korea are next on the guest list, Simes said.

Closer to home, visitors have come from Yuma County Water Users Association, Yuma Mesa Irrigation District, city of Phoenix, Arizona House of Representatives, Water Education Foundation and Metropolitan Water District. They've been part of Arizona Western College's Advanced Water Treatment Program, Northern Arizona University Department of Geography and the University of Arizona.

The plant has also drawn media attention from the New York Times, Arizona Republic and National Public Radio, which labeled its report "Boondoggle to Boom," referring to the desalting plant's reputation as a waste of considerable taxpayer money.

Just this week, Jean Simon Gagne, a journalist with a major newspaper in Quebec, visited as part of the International Leadership Program sponsored by the U.S. State Department. He said he chose water as the focus of his trip because of his interest in the Middle East, where water is a major concern.

At the end of the demonstration, Cherry said he expects the trial run will have returned 1 billion gallons of water to the Colorado River. That's water that won't have to be drawn from Lake Mead, which as of Tuesday morning was at 48 percent, he said.

At this time, there are no plans to continue to operate the plant, nor is there funding to do so, he said.

"The plant has run well," he said. "The challenge now is how the plant fits into the water supply picture for the lower Colorado River." #

http://www.yumasun.com/news/water_34036___article.html/plant_yuma.html

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive