This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Items for 5/25/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

May 25, 2007

 

1.  Top Items

 

State set to reveal Salton Sea plan; Torres Martinez tribe objects to ideas in its sneak preview - Desert Sun

 

Sea plan out today - Imperial Valley Press

 

 

State set to reveal Salton Sea plan; Torres Martinez tribe objects to ideas in its sneak preview

Desert Sun – 5/25/07

Erica Solvig, Keith Matheny and Jake Henshaw, staff writers

 

The state is expected today to unveil its answer to saving the Salton Sea, an idea that will cost more than the nearly $7 billion proposal it released just two months ago.

 

Though state officials didn't release details Thursday, a key stakeholder did. Officials with the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians blasted a plan they said was leaked to them, saying it fails to address unhealthy air pollution that will occur as the sea recedes.

 

State officials couldn't confirm that the dark, faxed copy of the plan the tribe sent to The Desert Sun was in fact what state Secretary of Resources Mike Chrisman plans to release today.

 

But in its pre-emptive strike, the tribe reiterated concerns the state may allow too much exposed lake bed on its land and make managing the resulting dust the tribe's responsibility.

 

"If the state of California moves forward with this plan, it will have a direct impact on air quality that has not been mitigated," tribal resource manager Joe Loya said.

 

The unilateral action from the tribe - a well-connected, major landowner along the lake - has some sea advocates worried the unified local support may begin to unravel.

 

The state's plan will shrink the sea but prevent it from dying up. Left alone, it will dry up, cause major air quality issues for the Coachella and Imperial valleys, eliminate fish and bird habitat and impact the region's economic growth and tourism.

 

Hints of what the state's plan includes emerged late Thursday:

 

The plan would cost "significantly more" than the $6.9 billion draft Chrisman released in March, spokesman Sandy Cooney said.

 

The bulk of the money is needed by 2020, state records show.

 

Those who have seen a sneak preview of the plan, including state Sen. Jim Battin, say it includes a much-requested habitat area at the north end of the lake.

 

The northern recreational lake will remain, but one of its proposed arms will extend farther south, past Salton City.

 

Imperial County officials have pressed for a recreational lake in their jurisdiction. Battin, R-La Quinta, said, "Imperial should be happy about" the plan, including the extended lake arm.

 

State, local and federal officials have worked for years to address growing problems at the sea, roughly the size of the Coachella Valley.

 

A water deal signed in 2003 sends less water to local farmers, resulting in less runoff to flow into the sea. Eventually, the sea will begin to recede and already-high salinity levels will rise at what once was a major recreation lake that drew more visitors than Yellowstone National Park.

 

Experts predict this will kill off fish and smaller aquatic life, forcing millions of birds to go elsewhere.

 

Negotiations continue

 

Chrisman's office since March has worked to address the concerns of locals, who had a lukewarm reaction to his draft plan.

 

State law requires Chrisman to submit a proposal to lawmakers for their approval - and ultimately for funding.

 

Many restoration supporters have traveled to Sacramento in recent weeks to ensure their needs are met before Chrisman presents the plan. But Torres Martinez officials said their concerns have fallen on deaf ears.

 

On Thursday, the tribe sent a call to action to 60 other California Indian tribes seeking their help in getting sea restoration plan concerns addressed.

 

"We're not going to wait," Loya said. "We need to inform agencies now that the decisions now being made are not being made with the tribe's concerns considered."

 

Cooney said Chrisman's office "went to great lengths to do as much as we could with (the tribe). How is it they can be critical of a plan that hasn't been released?"

 

Initial reaction lukewarm

 

Clashes already existed between locals who would be most impacted by a shrunken Salton Sea and state officials trying to appease many interests.

 

Many elements in the most locally supported plan - set forth by the La Quinta-based Salton Sea Authority - weren't part of Chrisman's draft proposal. But some appear to be in the revised plan.

 

Lawmakers have said a multi-billion-dollar plan only stands a chance if there's some agreement between those involved.

 

With the tribe going out on its own to protest Thursday, several advocates raised concerns there may be divisions that ultimately could hinder the project's success.

 

"My concern is the Salton Sea Authority is made up of five agencies (that have) really supported one another," Imperial County supervisor and authority member Larry Grogan said.

 

"It's going to be awkward for the authority to wholly support (the state's plan) when one of the members is, let's say, left out."

 

Added authority director Rick Daniels: "I'm hoping the authority doesn't blow up."

 

Even if there is discontent among the players, the plan can be tweaked after it's handed to lawmakers.

 

But several advocates have admitted that selling the plan to state and federal lawmakers is going to be difficult enough without making major changes.

 

Still, Assemblyman John Benoit says Thursday's release is "not the end of the game. This is a beginning step" of a 75-year process to save the sea.

 

"I am hopeful it will bring people to the table for further discussion rather than drive them to harden their positions," the Palm Desert Republican said. #

http://www.desertsunonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070525/NEWS0701/705250351/1006/news01

 

 

Sea plan out today

Imperial Valley Press – 5/25/07

By Jonathan Athens, staff writer

 

SACRAMENTO — Years of political debate and public wrangling over how to best restore the decaying Salton Sea will begin anew starting today.

California Resources Secretary Mike Chrisman today will publicly unveil and turn over to the California Legislature his final plan to restore and revitalize the long decaying Salton Sea.

Stakeholders in Imperial County and elsewhere have been anxiously awaiting Chrisman’s plan which was expected to be finished last month.

The Salton Sea Authority is one of the major proponents for restoring the sea in such a manner as to economically benefit Imperial County. The authority and the Imperial County Board of Supervisors have maintained political pressure on Chrisman’s office, mincing no words about their position: Any final plan that doesn’t include a recreational lake on the south shore won’t get their support.

And if they don’t get what they want, they are willing to take the fight to state lawmakers who will begin debating the final plan and how to pay for it.

 

 

Political players here have complained that Chrisman’s draft plan did not provide features that would economically benefit Imperial County despite 70 percent of the Salton Sea being within the county’s boundaries.

Authority Executive Director Rick Daniels said, “Hopefully, the secretary has included the comments and requests that the authority and member agencies have been asking for.”

County District 4 Supervisor Gary Wyatt reiterated what stakeholders here have said.

“Hopefully, they (concerns) will be adequately addressed … If not, we’ve given ample notice of how we are feeling and we will act according to what we’ve said.”

Chrisman spokesman Sandy Cooney said, “We know everybody is not going to be happy” with the final plan.

Although Cooney would not release any details about the plan prior to a 2 p.m. press conference in Sacramento, he did say the final plan “has been expanded to include 27 preferred alternative designs.”

The $6 billion price tag that came with the draft plan will be “significantly” higher given the scope of new designs incorporated into the final plan, Cooney said.

 

He declined to release the revised estimated cost to fix the sea.


The 75-year plan has been one of the more hotly contested and long drawn out debates here and in Riverside County, which has about 30 percent of the sea within its boundaries. #

http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2007/05/25/news/news03.txt
#####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive