This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 4/2/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 2, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

SACRAMENTO FLOOD ISSUES:

Fargo urges flood tax; $326 million assessment vital to lure government funds to area, she says - Sacramento Bee

 

LEVEE INSPECTIONS:

New Tool In The Local Fight Against Flooding - CBS Channel 13 (Sacramento)

 

DEVELOPMENT:

Guest Opinion: Solution is better levees, not building moratorium - Sacramento Bee

 

YUBA CITY LEVEES:

YC leaders take levees to Congress - Marysville Appeal Democrat

 

FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT:

Corps of Engineers begins flood-control work to protect Corona - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

IRRIGATION DAM:

Irrigation dam nearing completion; District official says recent dry period likely won't disrupt water deliveries - Redding Record Searchlight

 

FOLSOM BRIDGE:

Feds come through with funding for Folsom bridge; Another $14 million will help completion by 2008

Auburn Journal

 

CLIMATE CHANGE CONCERNS:

Santa Cruz ahead of curve in sea-level rise preparations - Santa Cruz Sentinel

 

 

SACRAMENTO FLOOD ISSUES:

Fargo urges flood tax; $326 million assessment vital to lure government funds to area, she says

Sacramento Bee – 3/31/07

By Matt Weiser, staff writer

 

Calling flood protection vital to Sacramento's economy, Mayor Heather Fargo on Friday urged residents to support a $326 million property tax assessment that would lure more than $2 billion in state and federal funds to the region for flood control projects.

 

The assessment, proposed by the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, is now being decided by local property owners in a special vote-by-mail election. Ballots are due back to the agency by April 19.

 

About 140,000 property owners are affected by the election, which would replace two existing flood assessment districts.

 

The average property tax increase under the new assessment would be $35 per year.

 

"The entire region would be affected if we ever did have a flood," said Fargo, who is also SAFCA's current chairwoman. "That is why we are working so hard to get this assessment approved. This is clearly an investment worth making."

 

Fargo's remarks came in her annual State of the City address to the Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, an early supporter of the assessment. About 760 people attended the event.

 

"We're not going to have a very viable economy if we're all under 5 or 15 feet of water," said chamber CEO Matt Mahood.

 

"We're the chamber of commerce. We're not for taxes and fees on business. But in this case, it seemed to make a lot of sense to invest in our own infrastructure on this public safety issue."

 

Also Friday, federal agencies rolled out a final environmental impact report on the region's largest flood-control project: the mammoth plan to modify Folsom Dam, which protects Sacramento from the volatile American River.

 

The project has seen its share of trouble. In 2005, it was thrown off track when initial construction bids came in three times higher than expected.

 

Since then, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and Army Corps of Engineers have worked together on a redesign. The project now centers on a new auxiliary spillway to be built just east of the existing main dam.

 

The new spillway would serve two purposes: It would have six new outlet gates below the water surface to release water faster, effectively boosting flood-storage capacity; and the spillway itself would allow much bigger flows from the surface that might otherwise destroy the dam.

 

The project also calls for a 3.5-foot height increase in the main dam and the earthen dikes that contain Folsom Reservoir to increase flood storage, said Army Corps project manager Creg Hucks.

 

Cooperation by the two agencies resulted in huge cost and time savings. Officials now estimate the dam modifications and the raise will cost $1.35 billion.

 

That is several hundred million dollars cheaper than the most recent estimates, and about $1 billion cheaper than the previous design, said Jeff McCracken, Bureau of Reclamation spokesman.

 

SAFCA's share of the dam project is about $146 million.

 

Construction is expected to begin in September and finish in 2014, providing 200-year flood protection or the ability to withstand a flood with a half-percent chance of occurring in any year.

 

The dam raise would boost protection to the 240-year level, said Hucks. But more study is needed to determine whether the raise can also be finished by 2014.

 

"Our goal is to deliver the most flood protection at the earliest possible date to the city of Sacramento," Hucks said. "The outlook is good."

 

Hucks said the two agencies took extra steps to ensure confidence in their new cost estimates. Economic experts from the Army Corps' Walla Walla District were more deeply involved in reviewing costs, and the corps hired a Colorado consultant for a peer review of the costs.

 

Another key change in the project is that planners now intend to keep Folsom Point open to the public during construction, said McCracken.

The popular area had been proposed as a construction staging area.

 

But plans now calls for staging equipment elsewhere and moving construction vehicles through the area in a huge trench. Public traffic would cross the trench on a bridge to reach Folsom Point.

 

On Sunday and Monday, the state Department of Water Resources will conduct aerial levee surveys in the Sacramento area.

 

A helicopter will fly low over levees in Sacramento and West Sacramento using laser imaging to gather levee elevation data.

 

The data will help the state decide how to spend $4.1 billion in bond funds that voters approved in November for flood projects.

 

Fargo said Sacramento needs the local tax assessment to ensure its share of this state money.

 

"Sacramento is a leader in showing the rest of the state how to do flood protection right, and we need to ensure the state rewards our good behavior," she said. #

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/147323.html

 

 

LEVEE INSPECTIONS:

New Tool In The Local Fight Against Flooding

CBS Channel 13 (Sacramento) – 4/1/07

Steve Large, reporting

 

(CBS13) SACRAMENTO Those of us who live in the Sacramento valley know that we are in a massive flood zone. Today new technology brought into our area, will help figure out the best way to protect us, from disaster.

It’s no ordinary helicopter.

Its been transformed into a hovering, radar imaging machine, helping California geologists figure out what levees in our valley, need to be fixed to protect us from a 200-year flood.

Sacramento most recently got a taste of mother nature's power on news years of 2006.

With that as a reminder, lawmakers and scientists are trying to move fast, to prevent a deadly scenario. The helicopter is helping.

“This method of using a helicopter based radar system will allow us to rapidly collect data over the 350 miles of urban levees in under a week,” says Steve Mahnke with the Department of Water Resources.

Scientists doing this work from the ground would have taken up to four months. California will use the detailed images this low flying copter brings in, to help decide how to spend 4-point-one billion dollars in bond funds. That's money that could save lives the next time we see these blue skies bring severe weather.

You may have seen that helicopter flying at about 500 feet overhead today. The survey will continue tomorrow.  #

http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_092013042.html

 

 

DEVELOPMENT:

Guest Opinion: Solution is better levees, not building moratorium

Sacramento Bee – 4/1/07

By Wes Keusder, 2007 chairman of the California Building Industry Association

 

We're all wiser now about flood risk in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, but it's time to stop using the disaster as a guise for promoting limits on growth in areas like Sacramento, where Californians want to live, work and play.

 

The issue is public safety -- everyone's -- so just saying, "No more housing," as the column says, won't fix levees or improve flood protection. Flooding at any depth is undesirable but with housing in such high demand in the region, fixing levees and making it safe to build new homes should be the objective.

 

In the aftermath of natural disasters such as the Loma Prieta and Northridge earthquakes, most Californians ignored calls for limits and instead insisted that freeways be fixed and homes be rebuilt. San Francisco would be no more than pastureland today had the "let's-give-up" attitude prevailed following the devastating earthquake and fires of 1906. What San Franciscans said then has been the typical response of Americans throughout history to catastrophes of all kinds, including natural disasters:

 

"Let's rebuild."

 

California has used ingenuity, technology and a sense of public interest to meet challenges created by its geography, seismology and climate. As a result, California has more durable roadways and safer buildings. This kind of can-do attitude has been at work in California for decades -- building a transcontinental railroad, a bridge over the state's Golden Gate and 1,600 miles of levees, which allowed the city of Sacramento and other Central Valley communities to flourish.

 

Demonizing homebuilders to support the let's-give-up attitude about flood risk and growth in the region is unfortunate. From San Joaquin County to Yuba County, homebuilders and their local partners have built new levees that are stronger and far more technologically advanced than their predecessors, and will protect tens of thousands of people from flooding. Recently, homebuilders proposed to the Legislature a concept for more systematically accomplishing the same type of flood protection along California's major waterways.

 

Making suburban homes and urban homes safe from floodwaters is not only possible, it should be the focus of any discussions on flood protections. Simply imposing new and unnecessary building moratoria will only serve to exacerbate the state's housing shortage and is counter to the spirit of California. Responsible policies are possible if California has the will and desire to meet its flood-risk challenges and solve its housing problems.

 

Wes Keusder, 2007 chairman of the California Building Industry Association, is responding to the Stuart Leavenworth's March 2 column "Time to restrict building in the deepest floodplains." #
http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/147051.html

 

 

YUBA CITY LEVEES:

YC leaders take levees to Congress

Marysville Appeal Democrat – 4/1/07

By John Dickey, staff writer

 

A levee trouble spot that could threaten Yuba City still hasn’t been fixed five years after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recommended emergency repairs.

Sutter County and Yuba City officials want the Wadsworth Canal levee repaired – and they took the issue to elected officials and to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during a three-day trip to Washington, D.C., on March 21-23.

“If that ever broke it, would really flood Yuba City from the backside,” said Yuba City Mayor John Miller.

Miller was joined by Sutter County Supervisors Dan Silva and Larry Munger, Yuba City City Manager Steven Jepsen and Sutter County Administrator Larry Combs in trying to shake loose federal money for levee work, highway and sewer projects, and jobs programs.

“For the time we were there, we were extremely effective,” said Silva.

Miller said the trip, estimated to cost about $6,000 for the five officials, was likely to bring some additional federal funds to the area.

“I think we will see some definite benefit,” said Miller.

One benefit may be focusing attention on a Wadsworth Canal levee problem that has existed for years. Funding from Congress is needed to finish the job.

Underseepage problems in the levee appeared after the 1997 floods, which prompted a round of repairs by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

One piece still remains – a 3,000-foot, $5 million slurry wall near the intersection of the canal with the Sutter Bypass. After small boils were seen near the levee in 1997 and 1998, the Army Corps recommended in 2002 that a slurry wall be built using emergency funding, according to Corps records.

“It’s the Army Corps levee, and that’s the question we asked, ‘Why hasn’t it been fixed?,’” said Miller.

Corps spokesman Dave Killam says the project is well under way, with its design work 65 percent complete.

The complicated project has required time to develop the best engineering solution, according to Killam.

A seepage berm was first proposed but would have required that nearby real estate be condemned. Because of that, and for environmental reasons, the Corps decided a slurry wall would be a better alternative.

Once the Corps receives $3.5 million in funding, the design work can be completed and a contract awarded in about three months, said Killam.

Money was included in the Fiscal Year 2007 Emergency Supplemental Bill that was passed by the Senate on Thursday.
The Senate Appropriations Committee on March 22 included $94.1 million to shore up California’s levees with repairs by the Army Corps, according to U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein’s office.

But the legislation still has to clear several hurdles including a possible presidential veto over Iraq war deadlines inserted into the legislation.

The Wadsworth Canal collects runoff from northeastern Sutter County and the Sutter Buttes and funnels it into the Sutter Bypass. While the tiny canal is only about a hundredth of the size of the Feather River during high water, it could cause a flood if it broke and allowed water to escape from the much larger Sutter Bypass.

Once the canal levee is fixed, there is likely to be more work needed to improve levees protecting Yuba City and the basin down to Dingville. To further that effort, local officials also asked for $1.5 million to complete the Sutter County Feasibility Study, an Army Corps project that is examining how to reduce flood risks for the county and Yuba City.

“The main thing we want is for the Corps to finish the feasibility study,” said Jepsen.

The hope is that the Army Corps would accelerate work on the study and generate information that Sutter County can use to start fixing levee problems while the study is finished.

Local officials hope to pick up the pace of work as Yuba City faces the possibility of being mapped into a special flood hazard insurance zone. Areas south of the city in Sutter County have already been proposed for the high risk flood zones by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. New FEMA flood maps for Yuba City and Live Oak are expected in 2008.

Local officials also spoke with officials in Washington on the following items:

$750,000 for studies to enhance traffic capacity in Highway 99 through Yuba City.
$100,000 to start a restoration project on Willow Island.
$2,500,000 for wastewater and drinking water service to Sutter.
$500,000 for the Plumas Street Streetscape Project.
$150,000 for a Sutter County Youth Employment and Pilot Training Program. #

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/onset?id=551&template=article.html

 

 

FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT:

Corps of Engineers begins flood-control work to protect Corona

Riverside Press Enterprise – 3/30/07

By Melaine C. Johnson, staff writer

 

CORONA - After more than two decades in the works, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has started to move dirt on the first two of several dikes planned in the area as part of a regional flood-control project.

 

Crews recently began preliminary site work on the national housing tract dike, which runs below a hilltop neighborhood near Rincon and Auburndale streets and another dike that loops around the rear of Corona's sewage-treatment plant off of Railroad Street.

 

Construction of the dikes is part of the $500 million Prado Dam project, which also includes raising the dam 28.4 feet, increasing the height of the spillway 20 feet and building a new outlet system, said Girish Desai, project manager.

 

The project will provide protection from a 190-year flood, the worst possible flood imaginable, Desai said.

 

"We have a choice," he said. "Move people or protect them by building the dikes."

 

The Army Corps is partnering with the Orange County Resources and Development Management Department, the agency responsible for acquiring the lands needed to build the dikes.

 

The improvements to Prado Dam, built in 1941, are a segment of the $1.7 billion Santa Ana River Flood Control Project, with levee, creek and dam projects stretching from Orange County to the San Bernardino Mountains, Desai said.

 

The dikes are two of nine planned for the area, including the completed SR-71 dike and one in the design phase slated for the Green River area, he said.

 

Others planned include the auxiliary dike, the closest to Prado Dam, the prison dike at the California Institution for Women, the Yorba Slaughter Adobe dike in Chino, the River Road dike and the River Road flood wall.

 

In early 2005, more than 2,000 people living in a housing tract and a mobile-home community near Green River were ordered to evacuate after some seepage from Prado Dam stoked fears that it might burst.

 

Another low-lying area prone to flooding, the Corona Municipal Airport, blanketed with water after record rains in early 2005, will not benefit from a dike because of its lack of altitude, officials said.

 

The city of Corona leases the land for the airport from the Army Corps of Engineers.

 

"Even if you built a dike, the dike would be so high, that it would disturb the landing and take off," Desai said.

 

Ati Eskandari, Corona's assistant public works director, said there are a few properties that won't be protected from flooding in the city, one of them being the airport. The city won't move the airport out of the flood plain though because it would be too costly, she said.

 

Steven Rosko, an airport master leaseholder with several properties at the site, said he accepts that the airport won't be protected in case of flood because of where it sits, but it is not a huge deal.

 

"When we get that 10- or 20-year flood, yes we're going to get a little bit wet," Rosko said. "We know that. My buildings are metal so if it happens, we'll get them cleaned up and move on."

 

The Army Corps and the Orange County Flood Control District hosted a community meeting earlier this month regarding construction of the two dikes. About 40 people attended, officials said.

 

Fernando Cano, project manager, said the contractor has put up sound walls around the site of the treatment plant dike to protect wildlife. He said crews also are working on landscape design as a buffer between homes and the national housing tract dike.

 

Crews at both sites are using water trucks to keep down the dust, he said.

 

Mayor Eugene Montanez said most of Corona has been built to survive a 100-year flood, but the project will offer more protection.

 

Corona residents have been safe from the threat of the worst kind of flood for years, but this project will aid Orange County in its need for more protection, he said.

 

"We have dams further upstream to help the Inland areas," he said. "These will help the downstream areas into Orange County." #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_C_cdikes31.d65cb7.html

 

 

IRRIGATION DAM:

Irrigation dam nearing completion; District official says recent dry period likely won't disrupt water deliveries

Redding Record Searchlight – 4/1/07

By Tim Hearden, staff writer

 

Let the water flow.

 

Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District work crews Saturday were finishing the nearly weeklong task of installing the seasonal diversion dam at Caldwell Park in Redding, sending irrigation water to the district's roughly 865 customers.

 

"I know our customers are anxious to get some water because it has been dry," ACID general manager Stan Wangberg said. "I'm sure there's someone who can use the water, so (crews have) been working hard" to finish, he said.

 

Crews were supposed to begin Monday installing the roughly 500 planks of wood that complete the 91-year-old diversion dam, but rain prevented them from starting until Tuesday, Wangberg said. The dam stays up during the warm months of the year and is typically taken down in early November, to make way for stronger river flows during the winter.

 

To install the dam, workers raise iron bays hinged to the permanent concrete pylons and insert wood planks that are 3 inches thick and 6 inches wide. The structure includes a catwalk on which the workers can proceed across the river.

 

The dam raises the water so that about 275 cubic feet per second can be sent down ACID's main canal. Last year, the district irrigated about 6,700 acres from Redding to Cottonwood.

 

The installment comes as the north state is on a pace to have one of its driest years on record. The lack of rain likely won't affect water deliveries, however.

 

Under ACID's water contract with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, cutbacks kick in if less than 3.2 million acre-feet of runoff flows into Lake Shasta, Wangberg said. The lake is on a pace to finish the season with about 4.5 million acre-feet of runoff, he said. #

http://www.redding.com/news/2007/apr/01/irrigation-dam-nearing-completion/

 

 

FOLSOM BRIDGE:

Feds come through with funding for Folsom bridge; Another $14 million will help completion by 2008

Auburn Journal – 4/1/07

By Gus Thompson, staff writer

 

U.S. Rep. John Doolittle lauded U.S. Army Corps of Engineers officials and the Bush Administration on Thursday for keeping federal funding on track for the new Folsom bridge over the American River in time to complete construction by the end of 2008.

With work already started this month on the two-mile-long bridge project downstream of the Folsom Dam, the corps informed Doolittle this past week that it has allocated $48.7 million in its new 2007 fiscal budget.

At the same time, the Bush Administration's proposed budget for fiscal 2008 contains another $14 million -- which is enough to complete bridge construction in time for cars to cross it before the end of the 2008 year.

Doolittle said that he had received assurances that the funding would be there but that a change in personnel with the corps meant new people were unaware of previous pledges. Doolittle said he worked hard with past and current officials to reinforce that previous promises could be met.

"Defense Assistant Secretary of Civil Works John Paul Woodley, who participated in the bridge groundbreaking ceremony in February, proved a key contact and made the bridge a top priority," Doolittle said. "He understands how important this bridge is for our community and he has done everything possible to keep it on track." #

http://www.auburnjournal.com/articles/2007/03/30/news/top_stories/03folsombridge30.txt

 

 

CLIMATE CHANGE CONCERNS:

Santa Cruz ahead of curve in sea-level rise preparations

Santa Cruz Sentinel – 4/2/07

By Roger Sideman, staff writer

 

The city of Santa Cruz is one of a small number of governments along the California coast that has begun to prepare for the possible effects of climate change.

 

Last week, city leaders authorized a program to study ways to buffer the river levee against ocean intrusion and counter coastal erosion, both likely problems associated with global warming.

 

The city also is remapping flood zones to reflect the encroaching coastline under sea-level-rise projections.

 

But while Santa Cruz is looking ahead at the threats of global warming, most cities up and down the coast have done little to prepare, and at least one state legislator has taken notice.

 

"People are worried, there's a readiness to take action, but hardly anything is being done," said Susanne Moser, a research scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., who surveyed 300 planners, public works engineers and other officials from city and county governments.

 

When the study was conducted last year, only the city of Berkeley and Sonoma and San Luis Obispo counties had plans that consider the effects of global warming — namely changes to planning along the coastline.

 

Eight other California cities and counties, in addition to Santa Cruz, are now preparing plans.

 

Those surveyed said it's tough to act due to lack of money and other obligations.

 

"It's not that they need better information," Moser said, "it's that few have time to think about it. There's too much else on their plate"

 

Complicating the problem is that responsibility for coastal management — protecting homes, providing water, preserving natural habitat — is spread over multiple state agencies, state commissions and local governments.

 

Legislation proposed by Assemblyman John Laird, D-Santa Cruz, would force cities to better prepare for impacts associated with climate change, such as sea-level rise, by revising local plans and seeking state funding for communities to understand, mitigate and adapt to climate change.

 

"We're learning quickly how important it is to expand the climate-change discussion to include preparing for future impacts, while also working today to reduce consumption that results in global warming," Laird said in a statement.

 

The bill was prompted by the results of Moser's government survey.

 

Specifically, it would require coastal cities and counties to consider the impact of climate change when preparing, updating or amending a Local Coastal Plan as required by the state Coastal Commission.

 

Last week, city Planning Director Greg Larson, visiting Silicon Valley, told a crowd of city planners from around the state that Santa Cruz is better prepared than other cities.

 

The downtown river levees are built for a 100-year flood level, Larson said, and the city's water supply is not dependent on Sierra snow pack, an essential part of California's water supply that some projections suggest will drop 30 to 70 percent by the end of the century.

 

A desalination plant in the works would protect the city against draught and the city is researching appropriate responses to coastal erosion.

 

But there's more to be done, Larson acknowledged.

 

Most of Santa Cruz will be submerged if Antarctica and Greenland's ice sheets calve or melt entirely, a scenario that climate scientists say will play out in anywhere from 100 to 1,000 years if current trends continue.

 

Mission Street would be the shoreline if glacial melt follows even the more conservative projections of some researchers, causing sea levels to rise 70 feet.

 

The city will reveal a clearer picture later this month when it completes mapping new flood zones.

 

A new report to be released next week from the United Nations panel on climate change will highlight a growing climate divide, with wealthy nations like the United States not following through on long-standing commitments to help poor countries limit coastal hazards in the world's most vulnerable regions. #

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

No comments:

Blog Archive