This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 4/6/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

April 6, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

CLIMATE ISSUES:

Study to affirm climate change warnings - Sacramento Bee

 

WESTERN WATER CONSERVATION ISSUES:

Water Wars: Quenching Las Vegas' Ferocious Thirst; Proposed Pipeline From Snake Valley to Sin City Meets Local Opposition - ABC News (National)

 

Scientists predict next "dust bowl" - KOVA Channel 4 – Tucson

 

Editorial: Megadrought in our future; The next one may not be as bad as in the year 1112, but it wouldn't hurt to prepare - Long Beach Press Telegram

 

Editorial: Conserve water during repair - and for long haul - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

 

CLIMATE ISSUES:

Study to affirm climate change warnings

Sacramento Bee – 4/6/07

By Jim Downing and Matt Weiser, staff writers

 

The message stays the same, but it gets clearer every year: As greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere rise, California likely will suffer more severe droughts, floods, forest fires and wildlife extinctions.

 

The same is true for many other water-scarce areas of the world, according to a major international study set for release today in Brussels.

 

"If there's a key theme, it's that there are vulnerable regions and vulnerable people in almost every area of the world," said Chris Field, who directs the Department of Global Ecology at the Carnegie Institution at Stanford University and is a lead author of the study.

 

The report will reiterate many already-accepted projections about the impact of climate change on the planet's coastlines, rivers, farm fields and wildlands, Field said. But new scientific evidence gives those predictions greater certainty and credibility than ever before.

 

Among the new conclusions:

 

• Drought-prone areas, including the already-arid American Southwest, will become drier. Rainfall is expected to decline up to 20 percent by century's end because an area of hot air over the equatorial Pacific is expanding, suppressing storms.

 

• Isolated "extreme precipitation" events are likely to become more frequent and severe, causing more floods. In California, this additional runoff currently can't be stored for the long term because reservoirs also must be operated to prevent floods. More than 1 billion people worldwide could face water shortages because of shrinking glaciers, snowpacks and ice fields.

 

• Global agriculture production may increase in the near term, but will probably decline after a global temperature increase of 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit (the report assessed the long-term effects of warming from 1.8 to 10.8 degrees Fahrenheit).

 

• Between 20 percent and 30 percent of the world's species "are likely to be at high risk of irreversible extinction" if global temperatures rise between 2.4 and 4.5 degrees Fahrenheit. This may have many consequences, including reduced pollination of food crops, leading to further shortages.

 

• It won't be enough to simply adapt to these changes, the report states. Instead, adaptation strategies such as new flood control systems or crop varieties must be combined with dramatic cuts in greenhouse gases.

 

Today's report, released by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, represents the global consensus on the likely impacts of climate change. It is the first such report since 2001. More than 500 scientists contributed to a massive review of published research. The report was then edited by delegations from more than 100 nations, including the United States.

 

The 20-page executive summary scheduled for release today is considered critical because it will become the basis for international climate change discussions for years to come. The full report will be published later.

 

Early this morning, Field and many of the other authors still were editing the document in Brussels along with the national delegates. Each sentence was being projected on a screen in a United Nations-style auditorium, Field said, and revised until no objections remained.

 

On topics like wildfires and water supply, today's report represents the first global-scale version of the sort of studies that scientists have been doing for decades in the western United States.

 

Biologist Anthony Janetos said his research shows that global warming is driving an increase in insect infestations and fire frequency in mountain forests.

 

"There really is a climate response here," said Janetos, who directs the Joint Global Change Research Institute, a project of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash. "That obviously is a concern for loss of biodiversity and habitat, but also for the impact on people's homes and property."

 

Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute, an Oakland-based think tank, has studied the impacts of climate change on California's water systems since the early 1980s.

 

"The basic message has not changed that much," he said. "With a very high degree of confidence, we know that California is going to lose water in the mountains. Every single study that's been done on climate and California's water shows the same effect," he said.

 

The growing certainty of those conclusions has pushed state water managers to think seriously about a declining water supply.

 

"We are looking at how to adapt," said Jerry Johns, deputy director for water management and planning at the state Department of Water Resources. The state is now studying everything from how to cope with rising sea levels that could salt the Delta to how to manage reservoirs as winter snowpack shrinks, Johns said. Anxiety about long-term water shortage is also driving support for a new wave of controversial large dams in the state.

 

While frugal water use and clever engineering may ease at least some of the impacts of climate change for California residents, many other species are likely to find it difficult to adapt.

 

Terry Root, a biologist and research fellow at Stanford University and an author of today's study, said there is now "very, very good" scientific evidence that many wildlife species are already on the move because of human-induced climate change.

 

Thousands of species are moving poleward and upward in elevation to escape warmer weather. But none can move fast enough to find suitable habitat before a changed environment overtakes it, she said, and thousands are "functionally extinct" as a result.

Potentially hundreds of thousands of species are at risk.

 

Surprises may include fewer bird species in urban areas, which could mean fewer predators for insect pests, followed by a higher risk of disease.

 

"We're always going to have a green community when you look out your window," Root said. "But it may just be a monoculture. And is that going to be catastrophic in some places? It will be." #

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/150418.html

 

 

WESTERN WATER CONSERVATION ISSUES:

Water Wars: Quenching Las Vegas' Ferocious Thirst; Proposed Pipeline From Snake Valley to Sin City Meets Local Opposition

ABC News (National) – 4/6/07

By Terry Moran and Katie Hinman

 

April 5, 2007 — It's a stunningly beautiful corner of the country: the Snake Valley, in White Pine County, Nev., straddling the Utah border.

 

Home to cattle ranches, alfalfa farms and endangered species, it's people who are few and far between along this desert landscape. That's because the Snake Valley is dry — one of the driest parts of the driest state in the union, getting only about 8 inches of rainfall every year.

 

Dean Baker, who's been ranching in the valley for almost 50 years, says that's what makes the land unique. "Water in this country is always the determining factor," he says. "You could make this whole valley green, or put cities in it, if you had enough water. Water has always been the limiting factor, and it always will be. If there were more water here, there'd be more people."

 

The Inescapable Equation

 

People need water. It's an inescapable equation, and one that faces this western state. Las Vegas, that glimmering city rising out of the desert, is 250 miles south of Baker's ranch.

 

Once little more than a gambling outpost, Las Vegas has become the fastest-growing city in the nation. Its population is currently 1.8 million, and is projected to hit 3 million by 2020. Las Vegas is a city with a ferocious thirst that it's having a hard time slaking.

 

The major water supply for Las Vegas comes from the Colorado River, which has undergone a drought as a result of climate change, says Pat Mulroy of the Southern Nevada Water Authority.

 

"Climate change is here," Mulroy says. "We've been living it for the last eight years. The drought on the Colorado River was a rude wake-up call. Frankly, when 90 percent of your water comes from one river that is predicted to have massive water shortages, you'd be irresponsible not to develop water supplies that are independent of that river system in order to diversify."

 

The plan for diversification is controversial. Mulroy, the city's water czar for almost 20 years, has proposed a plan to build a $2 billion pipeline that would pump water out of White Pine County and send it down to feed the growing water needs of southern Nevada.

 

Keeping the Puzzle Together

 

"People are moving to Las Vegas for the jobs, for the economic opportunities, and because they like living here. These people are going to come — we can't wall ourselves off," Mulroy argues. "It is our job as the authority to make sure that there's an adequate water supply for them. And that is a delicate jigsaw puzzle," she says.

 

But Baker is adamant that his valley not become a piece of that puzzle. Baker argues that the amount of water in the ground is so limited that any additional pumping will wreak havoc on the area's environment, and economy.

 

Baker says there have already been problems caused by the amount of water used in the valley, which is a "drop in the bucket" compared with the amount that Mulroy hopes to use.

 

"Our experience says those springs will dry up and those meadows will go away," he says. "They're the home of livestock and wildlife and all kinds of things. I just so strongly believe it will not work without leaving an environmental problem that will live for years."

 

Threatening the Rural Lifestyle?

 

Mulroy says the project will be able to respond to the environment on the spot, by drilling additional wells if the original locations start to show signs of damage.

 

"We're already staying away from those environmentally sensitive areas in Spring Valley that could potentially have an impact, where there are sensitive springs or there are endangered species. I promise you, if you come back in 15 years, Spring Valley will be the most beautiful valley in the state of Nevada," she says.

 

"There will be eco-tourism there. There will be species brought back that don't exist there today, and there will be a valley that this state will be very, very proud of. We have the financial wherewithal and the commitment as an organization to do what is necessary and appropriate to protect both the rural lifestyle and the environment."

 

Baker and his four sons, who work the ranch with him, say it is that rural lifestyle that is being threatened by the overwhelming growth of the city to the south. Living on a ranch is "a great way and a great place to raise a family, and we're doing that," says Dave Baker. "But secondly, as ranchers, it's ingrained in you to take care of the livestock and the land. And to sell it and send the water south would not be good stewardship."

 

That's why, when the Southern Nevada Water Authority offered to buy the Bakers' ranch, the family sat down for a meeting, and all voted no.

 

Baker says the water authority never actually named a price, but other ranches in the county have gone for as much as $40 million, thanks to the value of their water rights. "I thought about it a long time, and thought, what would I do if I had a pile of money?"

 

Las Vegas' Hand in the Matter

 

But piles of money and the excess that accompanies that are what Las Vegas is all about. The dazzling fountains in front of the Bellagio Hotel and the canals that snake through the lobby of the Venetian Hotel are as emblematic of the Strip as showgirls and slot machines.

 

Mulroy argues that while it might look like the casinos are awash in water, they're actually using it very effectively. "The entire Las Vegas Strip uses 3 percent of our water. With that, it generates over 70 percent of this state's gross product. If you ask me from a purely economic perspective, is that a waste of our resources? Is that a poor investment of our water resources?" she asks. "No, it's not. It is the largest employer, and it continues to use water as efficiently as is humanly possible."

 

Indeed, the basement of the Treasure Island casino is home to a water recycling plant that cleans 100,000 gallons of water from its rooms and restaurants every day and reuses it for outdoor landscaping.

 

Mulroy says most water waste in Las Vegas is happening because people are simply watering their lawns, a statistic they're trying to change. "We've removed 80 million square feet of turf in this community. That's enough to go half way around the world. We have banned new construction from putting in turf in the front yards."

 

Development in the Desert

 

Mulroy is also enthusiastic about new housing like Mountain's Edge, developed by John Ritter. His complex, which will eventually house 40,000 people, is designed with yards that feature golden barrel cactus and lava rocks, rather than freshly watered grass.

 

"The whole landscape here is drought-tolerant," explains Ritter. "That means it uses a fraction of the water that, for instance, turf would use in the desert, or subtropical plants … And it also thrives in the desert. It loves the heat."

 

Ritter says he's been surprised by how willing people are to adjust, even though many of his homebuyers are from other, wetter parts of the country where they might have prided themselves on their lush lawns.

 

"If you're going to develop in the desert, this is the way you should be developing. That's the first thing. The second thing is, and we underestimated this, what a great marketing tool [it] is," Ritter says. "And it's great, because you can do the right thing and be profitable."

 

But when it comes to solving Nevada's water problem, what the right thing is, is still very much up for debate. "There's got to be another solution," Baker says. "To make an environmental disaster out of this area is not the solution for Las Vegas. It'll be a pipeline that doesn't have enough water to justify the cost of it. It just … isn't good for Las Vegas in the long run, either. It's a Band-Aid that'll be more costly in the end than seeking a better plan."

 

Mulroy admits that the pipeline wouldn't solve all Las Vegas' water needs, but it's a start. "It doesn't solve our drought problems to not do it. We have to do it. We have to do this project. This is not a matter of choice; it's a matter of necessity."

 

And, she says, fighting over it will only amplify the crisis. "To think that it's not possible because we won't work with one another, that we so like conflict, is ludicrous to me. What kind of a legacy is that to our children? … That's not the kind of legacy I'd like to leave behind." #

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=3012250&page=3

 

 

Scientists predict next "dust bowl"

KOVA Channel 4 – Tucson – 4/5/07

Jay Gray reporting

 

Experts say the climate is changing to a point where drought conditions will increase in the Southwest, leading to our nation's next "dust bowl."

 

That's a phenomenon that devastated communities back in the 1930's.

 

Most of the Western U.S. has been suffering through drought conditions for almost a decade. A report released Thursday in the journal of science, based on evidence from 20 independent climate studies, indicates things may only get worse.

 

Nevada's Lake Meade is 80' below it's normal level.

 

The dry conditions across the region have crippled farmers and fed huge wildfires.

 

Another problem: not enough snow in the Rockies. Which, in turn, means not enough snow melt to feed the Colorado River which provides water to more than 20 million people in 7 states.

 

Add to that the huge population shift to the West.

 

Cities like Phoenix and Las Vegas are growing at a record pace, using more water than ever before.

 

At least four western states are spending billions of dollars on projects aimed at boosting the falling water line.

 

The question now is whether they can change the water supply as quickly as scientists believe the climate is shifting. #

http://kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=6333445&nav=HMO6HMaW

 

 

Editorial: Megadrought in our future; The next one may not be as bad as in the year 1112, but it wouldn't hurt to prepare

Long Beach Press Telegram – 4/5/07

 

Southern Californians have learned better than most to be careful not to waste much water. But that may not be nearly good enough.

 

A study released this week by the journal Science says the entire Southwest, from Southern California to southern Colorado, by 2050 could become a Dust Bowl reminiscent of the great drought of the 1930s.

 

The prediction is based on data in 19 computer models that show a high level of agreement. Only one of the models produced results that are happier, from a consumer's point of view.

 

Those of us old enough to remember California's last serious drought, which reached a low point in about 1991, won't be around long enough to worry about dry times in 2050. But if this is the beginning of a long, gradual decline in wet years, we'd be wise to start changing our behavior now.

 

Things could get grim. Jonathan Overpeck, a climate researcher at the University of Arizona, told the L.A. Times the study results are "pretty darned scary." Such a drought could force dramatic changes in the region's economy and in the way ordinary people live.

 

In 1991, water authorities cut supplies to agriculture by 75 percent and to urban areas by 25 percent. Everybody survived nicely, which is a good sign, although the conservation techniques of that era wouldn't do the job if things really dry up.

 

The authors of the recent study were inclined to blame global warming for the latest drying trends. But even if you reject the global warming theory, don't bother arguing the point. This region has been capable of spectacular droughts, judging by evidence of climate trends going back thousands of years.

 

According to the state's Department of Water Resources, one of the dry spells in the so-called Medieval Megadrought lasted more than two centuries prior to the year 1112. Turning down your lawn sprinklers is not going to get you through one of those.

 

Still, there's room for optimism. Long Beach's Water Department, for example, is well along in testing a desalination pilot project that could turn brackish water to drinkable water for only double what you're paying for water now. And you could replace that thirsty landscaping, which drinks a whole lot more water than your family does, with the kind of desert plants that belong in these parts.

 

Or we could just change our thinking about water. We don't actually drink enough of it to matter. What we really do is waste it on toilets, showers, plantings and industrial uses that could do just as well with recycled, lesser quality stuff. As long as there's enough water to irrigate food crops and wet our palates, we ought to be able to figure out a way to get by.

 

Meantime, though, it wouldn't be a bad idea to turn down the sprinklers or even replant your yard with something hardier. #
http://www.presstelegram.com/opinions/ci_5604436

 

 

Editorial: Conserve water during repair - and for long haul

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 4/5/07

 

Inland Valley residents are again being called upon to reduce their water use for about nine days so that a critical pipeline can be repaired.

 

Local water customers have responded quite well to such calls in the past, and we're confident they will do so in this instance.

 

We'd like to see them not only cut back significantly for the nine days, but also use the occasion to make some reductions in their long-term water consumption. Signs of drought are gathering.

 

Here's the immediate problem: The Rialto Feeder pipeline, which provides water imported from Northern California to nine local cities, has a severely damaged section. Repairs are scheduled from April 16 to 24. The damage was discovered last week in Rancho Cucamonga, and the Metropolitan Water District wants to fix its pipeline before summer heat drives up water demand.

 

It varies widely from city to city, but overall about 30 percent of the water used in the nine affected cities is imported.

 

Customers in Chino, Chino Hills, Claremont, Fontana, La Verne, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga and Upland will need to conserve water for the nine days or so

 

Residents who have helped to accommodate pipeline repairs in the past few years know the drill. It's especially important to cut outdoor water use to almost nothing as of April 16: Don't water lawns and landscapes, don't fill swimming pools and spas, don't hand wash cars, don't hose down driveways or sidewalks. And don't put in your spring plantings until the shutdown is over.

 

Indoors, cut back by running only full loads in clothes washers and dishwashers, taking shorter showers, and not running the water while you hand-wash dishes, brush your teeth or shave.

 

And obviously, it would be best to water your lawn, fill your spa and wash your clothes and your car on April 15, so you can start out the conservation period in good shape.

 

When a Claremont section of the same major pipeline needed repair in June 2004, water agencies hoped for 20 percent to 30 percent conservation, but instead saw as much as 50 percent cutbacks. So we're confident local residents will rise to the temporary challenge once again.

 

But there are water challenges that go far beyond this repair job.

 

This has so far been the driest rain year on record for parts of Southern California. The Sierra snowpack, which provides the Northern California water we import, is 46 percent of normal for this time of year. And the Colorado River Basin is experiencing one of the worst droughts in centuries, according to scientists.

 

Southern California does not have a water delivery problem this year, but if next year is as dry as this one both locally and in the Sierra Nevada, we could be in trouble.

 

That's why it makes sense to make small changes now that will save you water over the long haul.

 

When you put in your spring plants - after April 24, of course - why not use native plants such as ceonothus and toyon? Once they're established, you almost never have to water them; after all, they have lived on our foothill and mountain slopes for millennia, so they're suited for dry conditions. Take a look at the possibilities at the Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden in Claremont, or head to your nursery and ask for native plants and other species that require little water.

 

And wherever possible, install drip irrigation instead of sprinklers to avoid water loss from evaporation.

 

A few little changes in your yard will save you water - and lots of money - and help boost the local water supply for years to come.  #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/opinions/ci_5596777

####

No comments:

Blog Archive