This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 4/27/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 27, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

DESALINATION PLANT:

Judge won't halt desal plant; Moss Landing: Work stoppage sought until lawsuit decided - Monterey Herald

 

REGIONAL PLANNING:

3-agency water project proposed - Sonora Union Democrat

 

SACRAMENTO FLOOD ISSUES:

Guest Opinion: Bringing new vision to flood control - Sacramento Bee

 

 

DESALINATION PLANT:

Judge won't halt desal plant; Moss Landing: Work stoppage sought until lawsuit decided

Monterey Herald – 4/27/07

By Kevin Howe, staff writer

 

An injunction against California American Water's pilot desalination project at Moss Landing was denied by Superior Court Judge Robert O'Farrell early Thursday.

 

Monterey Peninsula residents George Riley and Manuel Fierro sought to halt further development of the pilot plant until the suit they filed in January against it can be decided. The suit contends the plant's authorization is at odds with a 1989 county law that requires public ownership of water desalination facilities.

 

O'Farrell heeded pleas by attorneys for Monterey County, the state of California and Cal Am, who challenged the request for a court injunction that would have vacated permits for the plant issued by the county and the state Coastal Commission until the suit was adjudicated.

 

The request for an injunction contended that the Coastal Commission, not the county, had jurisdiction as the final permitting authority. It also contended no evidence was presented of immediate environmental harm from the project and that the county ordinance covered plants producing water for human consumption, not an experimental test plant.

 

Riley and Fierro were represented in court by attorneys Robert Rosenthal and Barbara May.

 

May said the clear intent of the supervisors in 1989 was to assure public ownership of desalination plants and cited a decision in January by the U.S. Court of Appeal that ruled the Environmental Protection Agency cannot allow power plants to kill fish through their cooling water intakes.

 

Cal Am's proposed pilot plant would use Moss Landing Power Plant's cooling water intake and outfall system as its water source.

 

Attorney Pat Breen, representing the water company, argued that no evidence of environmental harm had been presented to qualify the plaintiffs' demand for an injunction as an urgent matter for the public good. The pilot plant, he said, "is not drawing water from the ocean, but using water that's already been taken by the power plant."

 

The pilot plant is a one-year project and its water will be used for test purposes only, Breen said.

 

Rosenthal said he would confer with his clients about the possibility of appealing the ruling or waiting until Cal Am applies for a county permit to build its proposed regional desalination plant, and then challenge that action.

 

At that point, he said, the county ordinance would come into play.

 

That legislation — the first such ordinance in the state — came in response to improvements in water desalination technology, fears of a diminishing water supply and a flurry of proposals for desalination plants to serve particular development projects and, in one case, a private homeowner.

 

"The county's position is that it issued the permit because there is no guarantee there would be a permanent project," Rosenthal said. "My guess is that the county will seek to amend the environmental health ordinance prior to issuing that permit."

 

At a hearing in March before the county Board of Supervisors, county Environmental Health Director Allen Stroh described desalination as "a very complex area" and that the ordinance may need additional study.

 

The supervisors approved the permit for Cal Am's pilot seawater desalination plant at Moss Landing last August. In December, the state Coastal Commission approved a coastal development permit for the experimental desalination plant.

 

Cal Am is under the gun to find a new water source for its Monterey Peninsula service area customers.

 

In 1995, the state Water Resources Control Board advised Cal Am that it was taking 14,106 acre-feet per year from the Carmel River aquifer, 10,730 acre-feet more than the state allows. The water company has rights to only 3,376 acre-feet of water from that aquifer, but the state allowed Cal Am to continue drawing water over that amount to meet public needs until it can find a new source.

 

The river aquifer is the major source of water for the cities of Seaside, Sand City, Del Rey Oaks, Monterey, Pacific Grove and Carmel, as well as Carmel Valley, Pebble Beach and the Monterey Peninsula Airport District.

 

In addition to the Carmel River order, a court has ordered that producers of water from the Seaside basin aquifer — Sand City, Seaside, Cal-Am and others — reduce their pumping from the aquifer's coastal subareas by 2,219 acre-feet and their pumping from the Laguna Seca Subarea by 381 acre-feet for a total reduction for the entire Seaside basin of 2,600 acre-feet by 2027. #

http://www.montereyherald.com/search/ci_5762785

 

 

REGIONAL PLANNING:

3-agency water project proposed

Sonora Union Democrat – 4/26/07

By Katy Brandenburg, staff writer

 

The Calaveras County Water District may team up with two other water agencies for a project that could help ease seasonal drought in western parts of the county.

 

The Amador Water Agency has asked CCWD to join in studying the feasibility of expanding Bear River Reservoir in Amador County. CCWD directors Wednesday authorized General Manager Dave Andres to reply that the district is indeed interested.

 

Bear River is a tributary of the Mokelumne River, to which CCWD has water rights. However, due to complicated agreements and procedures going back decades, the district does not have the necessary permission or facilities to store or divert water from the north or middle forks of the Mokelumne right now, said Assistant Manager Larry Diamond.

 

CCWD currently diverts water from one point on the South Fork of the Mokelumne to supply water to the West Point-Wilseyville area.

 

The Amador Water Agency is asking CCWD and the East Bay Municipal Utilities District to join in a project that would benefit each agency. Both EBMUD and CCWD would gain water space and Amador County would get about 5,000 more acre-feet of water, to accommodate new growth.

 

How much water CCWD would gain from the deal is not yet clear, Diamond said, but the extra stored water could function as an emergency source for the greater Valley Springs area if groundwater — or the Calaveras River, which CCWD draws from now — dries up.

 

"It could provide long-term system reliability in years of extended drought," Diamond said.

 

The snow-fed Mokelumne River is a more reliable source than the natural flowing and seasonably variable Calaveras River, he said.

 

The project would raise the existing Bear River Reservoir dam to allow 15,000-25,000 more acre feet of water to be stored, according to a CCWD memo. PG&E owns the dam now, and uses it to produce hydroelectric power, Diamond said. Additional power generated by the extra water could possibly be used to reduce the overall cost of the project, depending on how the agreement is made.

 

"It'll be interesting to see what comes of it," he said.

 

If EBMUD agrees to participate, the feasibility study would cost each agency about $40,000. If it is a two-agency deal, CCWD would have to chip in $60,000. Agencies have not yet estimated what the project would cost.

 

In a separate agreement with East Bay, CCWD has reserved a half-million-gallon-per-day share in a future combined South Shore-Camanche treatment plant East Bay may build. Part of the agreement requires CCWD to find its own source of stored water though, before it can use that capacity, Diamond said. The Bear River Reservoir would provide such a space.

 

Diamond said developers wanting to build in the Wallace area have already inquired about the future capacity, though officials don't know if it would be sufficient.

 

For any county in California, "water storage rights are always an issue," he said.  #

http://www.uniondemocrat.com/news/story.cfm?story_no=23316

 

 

SACRAMENTO FLOOD ISSUES:

Guest Opinion: Bringing new vision to flood control

Sacramento Bee – 4/27/07

By Doris O. Matsui, a Democrat, a congresswoman from Sacramento

 

This month the House of Representatives passed the Water Resources Development Act, providing the first opportunity in more than seven years for our country to put in place a national water resources policy.

 

While the legislation was long overdue and includes a new spillway project at Folsom Dam to provide vastly improved flood protection for Sacramento, it does only part of the job for our region.

 

The farm bill, which comes before Congress later this spring, could be another vehicle to take on our other major flood protection challenge -- the Sacramento River watershed. The farm bill gives us a chance to increase voluntary incentives for farmers in the Sacramento Valley and, where it makes sense, allow farmland to become part of new or expanded flood bypasses.

 

Locally, the value of the Water Resources Development Act cannot be underestimated. It includes the Folsom Dam Joint Federal Project -- a top priority of mine since taking office. When a new spillway is completed at Folsom in 2015, it will provide Sacramento and those communities along the American River with a 240-year level of protection. The project combines the resources and expertise of two federal agencies, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, and solidifies it with strong state and local partnerships. This project will serve as an example of how government should work.

 

We experienced record floods in 1964, 1986 and again in 1997. And while our flood control system on the American and Sacramento rivers did its best to stave off a massive flood, I am convinced that nationally and regionally we must take a broader approach and create new partnerships to expand the flood protection infrastructure we dearly depend upon.

 

Regionally, partnering with communities along the Sacramento River and its many tributaries makes sense for everyone. Within the Sacramento River watershed, we have a variety of land-use patterns: sprawling urban areas, emerging suburban plains, small communities and productive agricultural land. While our communities may differ in individual needs, we do share broader goals -- to protect, preserve and enhance our landscape and natural resources. As residents of Sacramento, we should understand that the need for flood protection must be coupled with wise land-use planning.

 

We need to look ahead. We, as a nation, can't afford to look only at immediate needs -- we need long-term solutions and innovative approaches. California continues to be the No. 1 agriculture producer in our country. But it is losing nearly 50,000 acres of irrigated farmland a year. It only makes sense that we pursue a comprehensive approach to meet our region's many needs.

 

The Sacramento River watershed has an important role to play when Congress debates the farm bill. One of the bill's missions is to preserve agricultural land while providing other benefits as well. The farm bill contains a way to address the problems facing what matters to communities bordering the Sacramento River -- pristine farmland, natural habitat, beautiful landscapes and flood protection. Most of all, creating incentives to address those issues will enable farmers to continue farming.

 

Earlier this month, I took the chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, Rep. Collin Peterson, on a tour of the Yolo Bypass and briefed him on the importance of the Sacramento River watershed. I pointed out that we have innovative watershed conservation successes such as the Yolo Bypass that we can build upon in the farm bill.

 

We have an important story to tell. Now is the time to combine innovative solutions and different funding opportunities. With public safety and the regional economy at stake, those of us who live and work along Sacramento's two mighty rivers deserve the best solutions possible. #

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

No comments:

Blog Archive