This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY - 4/16/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

April 16, 2007

 

4. Water Quality

 

WASTEWATER EFFECTS:

SR to take careful look at its wastewater; Session will focus on whether residue from household products adversely affects fish - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

CONTAMINATION ISSUES:

Contamination at old waterfront mill site confirmed - Eureka Times Standard

 

 

WASTEWATER EFFECTS:

SR to take careful look at its wastewater; Session will focus on whether residue from household products adversely affects fish

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 4/15/07

By Mike McCoy, staff writer

 

Santa Rosa wastewater is among the highest quality in the nation, but city leaders Thursday will consider if it has the potential to turn male fish into females.

ADVERTISEMENT


By California water quality standards, the wastewater produced by Santa Rosa for itself, Rohnert Park, Sebastopol and Cotati can legally be used to fill a swimming pool.

But over the past few years there has been a growing national concern over what remains in processed wastewater, particularly household products ranging from pharmaceuticals to shampoos and cosmetics.

Studies in Europe dating back 12 years, and a 2003 study of the Potomac River near Washington, D.C., found evidence of male fish sprouting female organs, a fact scientists believe can be traced to the increasing amounts of chemicals found in wastewater, including those that can stimulate estrogen production in male fish.

So far, there has been no scientific evidence to indicate the minute levels of chemicals have been harmful to humans.

But the issue has generated enough concern that Santa Rosa's Board of Public Utilities will host a 90-minute study session at 1:30 p.m. Thursday at City Hall to hear from experts about the potential dangers and what regulations might lie ahead.

Santa Rosa wastewater consultant Dave Smith said most studies have been conducted in areas where the quality of effluent is substantially lower than that produced along California's North Coast.

"The presence of male fish developing female reproductive organs has not been found here," Smith said. Still, "We're trying to stay out in front of the research" so the city can take action when and if necessary, he said.

Santa Rosa operates the largest sewage treatment system in the county, but is not alone in what it might face, board member Carol Dean said.

"We're the big city and everyone looks at us as the 500-pound gorilla," Dean said. More than a dozen sewage treatment operations from Petaluma in Sonoma County to Ukiah in Mendocino County, all of which are pouring the bulk of their effluent into nearby creeks and rivers, also will have to tackle the issue, she said. Private septic systems also add to the problem.

Among those to first raise the issue locally of wastewater's hormonal impact on fish was Brenda Adelman, who heads the Russian River Watershed Protection Committee. She first talked about the "feminization" of male fish 12 years ago based on wastewater studies in England.

"It's on par with global warming," Adelman said of what she sees as the severity of the problem.

While there have been no definitive studies to link the impact of wastewater and its constituents on drinking water supplies and human health, Adelman said "Some (scientists) believe it has played a role in increases in cancer rates, birth defects and diseases."

The issue received little attention in the past, but has been gaining more scientific urgency with an aging and more medicated population.

Dean and Adelman don't expect Thursday's meeting to result in a decision.

Dean said the information should help guide city decisions on how and where it should discharge wastewater in the face of what likely will be even more stringent discharge regulations.

Adelman said removing all chemical constituents may be a near impossibility. Many of the compounds found in wastewater do break down into harmless elements, scientists say.

"We're not saying get rid of all the chemicals, but let's find the worst offenders and find substitutes for them," Adelman said.

Consultant Smith said dealing with the issue is important now as Santa Rosa looks to find alternative ways to dispose of increasing amounts of wastewater and anticipate what regulatory standards it might face.

Smith said Santa Rosa took a major step in 1996 to reduce problematic chemicals contained in wastewater when it replaced chlorine with 1,000 ultraviolet lights to disinfect its wastewater.

More than 80 percent of the 8 billion gallons of wastewater Santa Rosa and its regional sewage treatment partners produce annually is used to regenerate The Geysers steam fields and irrigate 6,400 acres of agricultural and other land. The rest is discharged during the rainy season into waterways that drain into the Russian River.

Among the treatment options Santa Rosa is considering is reverse osmosis, a process that can result in wastewater that meets drinking-water standards.

But Smith said scientists don't know if that process removes everything harmful.

"Clearly, it removes a vast majority of compounds. There may be something that remains, but I don't think anyone knows that yet," he said. #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070415/NEWS/704150523/1033/NEWS01

 

 

CONTAMINATION ISSUES:

Contamination at old waterfront mill site confirmed

Eureka Times Standard – 4/13/07

By John Driscoll, staff writer

 

EUREKA -- A consultant for the Simpson Timber Co. has found an area next to the company's old plywood mill off Del Norte Street is heavily contaminated with the potent carcinogen dioxin.

 

A byproduct of a now-banned wood preservative containing pentachlorophenol, the dioxins are present at their highest levels in a ditch not far from a booth where the chemical was sprayed on lumber. The Geomatrix report said the dioxins might have moved to the ditch in runoff or migrated through the soil, and recommended further removal efforts.

 

The site has undergone cleanup before. In 2003, after tests showed pentachlorophenol contamination, Simpson removed 1,900 tons of material from the site as called for by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board.

 

In 2005, the environmental group Humboldt Baykeeper tested sediment in the drainage ditch and found high levels of dioxins.

 

Later that year, the group sued Simpson -- which no longer owns the property -- the current owner Preston Properties, the North Coast Railroad Authority and SHN Consulting Engineers for alleged federal Clean Water Act violations.

 

Geomatrix's most recent round of testing roughly confirmed Baykeeper's findings, and in some cases found higher levels of dioxin in shallow sediment. The deeper the testing, generally the less dioxin was found, according to the report.

 

”Dioxin-containing sediments identified in the swale by the current investigation should be addressed to minimize the potential for human contact and reduce the potential for them to erode or scour to off-site locations,” the report reads.

 

The site has been a lumber yard and mill since the 1800s. Simpson bought it in 1956 and operated a plywood mill there until 1968.

 

Simpson spokeswoman Bev Holland said the company will continue to work with the water board to determine how to handle the contamination.

 

”Simpson is committed to doing whatever is necessary to clean it up,” Holland said.

 

The Geomatrix report said that Simpson is considering either diverting water away from the hot spot and capping the ditch, or removing more material.

 

Water board Executive Officer Catherine Kuhlman said her agency is evaluating the alternatives, but if it's possible to remove the tainted soil that's what will be ordered.

 

”It's preferable to get it, pick it up and haul it away,” Kuhlman said.

 

On a broader scale, Kuhlman said the discovery of dioxins in the absence of pentachlorophenol will prompt a second look at previously contaminated sites around Humboldt Bay and at other properties where historic activities suggest dioxins might be present.

 

Humboldt Baykeeper Executive Director Pete Nichols said his group is asking for a full inspection at the property to determine exactly where the dioxins are coming from, and for a full cleanup. He also said that testing for pentachlorophenol alone is clearly not a way to exclude the possibility of dioxin contamination.

 

”The water board needs to start utilizing dioxin as the trigger for cleanups around the bay,” Nichols said. #

http://www.times-standard.com/fastsearchresults/ci_5658465

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive