This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 5/5/08

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

May 5, 2008

 

2. Supply –

 

 

 

Growers' frost fight squeezes water supplies: Efforts to prevent grape damage reduce Russian River flows

The Press Democrat – 5/3/08

 

Editorial:
Every precious drop: Dry weather drives home need for water conservation in California

Stockton Record- 5/5/08

 

Editorial:

Dry spell raises tensions over state's future

The Sacramento Bee- 5/4/08

 

Editorial:

Water rationing isn't in Bakersfield's (immediate) future

The Bakersfield Californian – 5/4/08

 

Farmers struggle with water price, cuts: 'A tree is a wonderful thing to take care of'

North County Times- 5/3/08

 

Editorial

With drought a possibility, it's time for change

The Sacramento Bee – 5/3/08

 

Roseville Issues a Stage One Drought Alert

YubaNet - 5/1/08

 

Water conservation blitz hits street: But water officials stressing conservation 'more than ever'

North County Times: 5/2/08

 

Californians urged to conserve water amid drought worries

The Associated Press – 5/2/08

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Growers' frost fight squeezes water supplies: Efforts to prevent grape damage reduce Russian River flows

The Press Democrat – 5/3/08

By Bob Norberg

 

The use of water by grape growers for frost protection during this unusually cold spring has taxed North Bay water resources, which are already so low that conservation measures will be needed this summer.

When growers turned on their sprinklers the morning of April 21, the Russian River dropped noticeably at Hopland and Healdsburg, where the agency measures the flow.

"It didn't drop a little bit -- it dropped significantly, a 30 or 40 percent drop," said Pam Jeane, the Sonoma County Water Agency's deputy director of operations.

The flow dropped from 230 cubic feet per second to 140 at Hopland, below the state minimum of 185 cubic feet per second, triggering a release of extra water from Lake Mendocino.

Lake Mendocino on Friday had 74,199 acre-feet, more than the 66,452 acre-feet at this time last year.

"It has impacted the flows of the Russian River, which impacts our overall system," said Brad Sherwood, spokesman for the water agency. "We have to release more water from Lake Mendocino when we see the river doesn't meet flow requirements."

The water released from Lake Mendocino then reduces the amount of water available for release during the fall spawning run of the Chinook salmon.

"It is extremely dry, and some form of conservation is going to be needed to ensure we have enough water in Lake Mendocino in the fall for our fish," Sherwood said. "That is driving our efforts, just like last year."

Growers also tapped into ponds and reservoirs, which could affect how much water is available for irrigation later this year, and they used ground water and reclaimed wastewater from Santa Rosa's Llano Road treatment plant.

"I have heard some people have used most if not all of their water for the summer," said Nick Frey, president of the Sonoma County Winegrape Commission. "Some guys have wells to replenish reservoirs, but some that are catching surface flow from winter rains, they are locked into a fixed supply."

There are 10 growers who have contracts with Santa Rosa for treated wastewater to provide frost protection and irrigation for a dozen vineyards, said Randy Piazza, Santa Rosa's superintendent of reclamation.

"When they were really cranking up, they were collectively using between 3 (million) and 4 million gallons a night," Piazza said.

Frost and freezing temperatures in March and April were a major problem for growers this year. Keeping water flowing over the vines protects grape buds from freezing.

Grower Saralee Kunde said she and her husband used sprinklers and reclaimed wastewater for frost protection on their Slusser Road vineyards 31 times in 37 days, resulting in a lot of sleepless nights, but little damage.

Growers have said that compares with a half-dozen times that frost was an issue last year. This year, frost has damaged as much as 15 percent of the Sonoma County crop and 30 percent of the Mendocino County crop, agriculture and industry officials have estimated.

"We know frost damage occurred throughout the county, but not at every vineyard," Frey said. "The impact on the yield you don't know until you see how the secondary buds grow and then you have to get through flowering -- that is the next big window."

Last year, the Sonoma County Water Agency was under a state order to cut back the amount of water it took from the Russian River by 15 percent, and in turn passed on the cutback to its customers.

The agency is meeting with its water customers Monday morning to discuss conservation measures.

Those customers include the cities of Windsor, Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Cotati and Petaluma, and several special water agencies, serving 600,000 residents and businesses as far south as San Rafael.#

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080503/NEWS/805030322/1033/NEWS&template=kart

 

 

Editorial:
Every precious drop: Dry weather drives home need for water conservation in California

Stockton Record- 5/5/08

 

'It's a knock-out punch to have that combination."

 

That was the stark assessment of Frank Gehrke, the snow survey chief at California's Department of Water Resources, standing in the Sierra Nevada.

 

Gehrke was taking part in the final snowpack reading of the season. It was not good: The snowpack, a key source of California's water supply, has fallen well below normal levels after California experienced its driest March-April period on record.

 

Snow levels are down, way down, and that means the spring runoff will not fill the massive reservoirs dotting the lower elevations of the Sierra. The amount of water running into streams and reservoirs is only 55 percent to 65 percent of normal, according to the figures collected by the DWR.

 

Most of California's 38 million residents depend on those reservoirs to catch the water in the spring so it can be used during the summer and fall, when the cycle begins anew.

 

Trouble is, the rain/snow cycle is erratic. In fact, we're facing rationing - voluntary rationing at a minimum - because the 2006-07 water season was even drier. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger called for voluntary rationing almost immediately after receiving the snowpack figures Thursday.

 

Others think the situation is much worse.

 

"It's going to be a rough decade," said Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. "You will see mandatory rationing, I believe."

 

Schwarzenegger also renewed his call for the construction of more dams and reservoirs.

 

"I know that legislative leaders share my goal of comprehensive water reform, but time is running out. The longer we wait, the worse our situation becomes," he said in a statement.

 

The Democratic-controlled Legislature has blocked Republican proposals to build dams, favoring increased conservation and water recycling as way to meet the needs of California's population of 38 million.

 

The fact is, conservation, recycling and quite possibly rationing are the only real tools we have, certainly the only tools we have today. We must treat water like the incredibly valuable life substance it is. That is especially true in Cali-fornia, with its huge population, huge farming industry and utter dependence on erratic weather cycles.#

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080505/A_OPINION03/805050313/-1/A_OPINION

 

 

Editorial:

Dry spell raises tensions over state's future

The Sacramento Bee- 5/4/08

By Daniel Weintraub

 

PHILLIPS STATION – Frank Gehrke has been coming to a Sierra meadow here behind an old stagecoach stop for 21 years to check the depth of the snow for the Department of Water Resources, part of a tradition that is California's answer to Groundhog Day.

 

On Thursday, after Gehrke made the short walk from Highway 50, he found not snow but a pencil, one he'd lost earlier this year when he made the same walk along the top of what was then an ample snowpack. That pencil, now lying in the dirt, was bad news for California's water supply.

 

It foretold what Gehrke was about to see all along his walk: very little snow. As he worked his way, 50 feet at a time, through seven stations where he typically shoves a hollow metal tube into the snow until he hits the soil below, five of the spots were completely dry. The other two had just 9 inches and 14 inches of snow. Overall, the snow here averaged just 3.3 inches, and the water content was just 1.7 inches. That was 11 percent of normal for May 1.

 

Elsewhere in the Sierra the findings last week were better, but overall the snow and the water it stores averaged just 67 percent of normal. A March and April that were the driest on record delivered what Gehrke called a "double whammy": no new snow to add to the pack and plenty of sunshine to melt what was there. A year that looked bountiful in late January and still promising by March 1 had turned, in Gehrke's words, "grim."

 

So far, Gehrke's bosses in Sacramento are not calling this a drought. They are wary of all the political and economic baggage that word carries. But the dry spell, now two years running, has a lot of people worried.

 

California's last official drought was from 1987 until 1992. Since then, the state's population has soared, and the courts and environmental regulators have ordered the diversion of a large amount of water to preserve habitat for endangered species. California also now shares far more of the Colorado River water with other southwestern states. So an extended period of below-normal rain and snow could mean water rationing for residents and businesses, and serious hardship for the state's agricultural heartland in the Central Valley.

 

The first to feel the pinch might be the residents of 29 Bay Area cities and unincorporated towns served by the East Bay Municipal Utility District. The district depends heavily on the Sierra snows for its water supply.

 

The district's board of directors is scheduled to meet May 13 to decide whether to adopt restrictions on car washing, outdoor watering and water fountains. Water users might also see a rate increase.

 

In Roseville, meanwhile, officials have declared a "stage one" drought alert because of a 25 percent reduction in water deliveries from Folsom Lake. The city is asking residents and businesses to reduce water use by 10 percent. The only mandatory measure is a prohibition against washing sidewalks, parking lots and buildings with water unless required for public health reasons.

 

It will take at least one more dry year to trigger a similar reaction statewide. The state's reservoirs are at about 80 percent of capacity now but will drop to about 65 percent by the end of the summer. If they are not replenished next winter, it is likely that the entire state will be in a drought emergency a year from now.

 

"What this situation reminds us all of is the need to begin … to deal with the fact that we really have a resource that is a precious resource that needs to be preserved," said Mike Chrisman, secretary of the Resources Agency for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. "We need to recognize that we are in a shortage and begin to act accordingly."

 

With the short-term situation tenuous but not yet critical, Chrisman tried to shift the focus to the long-term. Schwarzenegger has called for a 20 percent reduction in water use by 2020 and also supports the construction of at least two new dams in the Central Valley, along with a canal to move water around the sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Chrisman said the latest news is further evidence that the governor's warnings about the state's future water supply should be heeded.

 

But Democratic Senate leader Don Perata, who opposes new dams, said Schwarzenegger should quickly draw upon more than $600 million the state already has available to protect the Delta, clean up groundwater supplies and promote conservation.

 

California's future is likely to see a worsening of that tension between forces who want to increase the water supply to serve a growing population and economy and those who oppose new water storage because of environmental concerns or as a way to limit growth.

 

If next winter does not bring a healthy dose of rain and snow, that debate is going to move very quickly from the back rooms of the Capitol to boardrooms and living rooms across California.#

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/909339.html

 

 

Editorial:

Water rationing isn't in Bakersfield's (immediate) future

The Bakersfield Californian – 5/4/08

By Robert Price

 

Rationing is an unpleasant word. It conjures up images of angry mobs pillaging relief trucks and humanitarian workers abandoning their distribution stations and running for their lives.

 

The word sounds considerably more palatable through the prism of the American experience. In fact, it has patriotic overtones.

No sugar, no coffee, no tires, no fuel oil? That'll be pretty tough, but our boys in uniform need those things. We can manage.

 

California is not facing anything quite as dire as those two extreme rationing scenarios suggest. Not yet, anyway. But wait.

 

Water rationing could be in California's immediate future -- if not this summer, quite possibly in summers not far distant. The Sierra snowpack is significantly down this year -- again. It's so far down that state and regional water officials have broached the subject of enforced consumption limits.

 

But not in Bakersfield. We've got more water than the typical California city. Surprised? Me too. We're used to getting the short end of things here. The worst air, high rates of asthma, diabetes, infant mortality, you name it. I look at the dry riverbed we call the Kern River and assume we're one harsh summer away from an outright ban on swimming pools.

 

But it turns out we're water-wealthy -- at least as water-wealthy as a desert city can be in the chronically parched American West.

 

"We have built systems that prepare for droughts," says Florn Core, the city of Bakersfield's water resources director. "We store so much of our water underground, we are pretty safe. It's your coastal cities and metropolitan areas that might have problems. They rely on surface water. We're able to store water underground here, thanks to our geography and geology." And our foresight.

 

But the dry conditions are already forcing water officials to pump water from those underground aquifers. Allow those water levels to continue to dwindle each year and, if conditions persist, restrictions become inevitable. The water we've been saving for the proverbial rainy day -- or, in this case, a devastating succession of non-rainy days -- becomes an even more valuable commodity.

 

Water rationing is not pretty. I know, because I saw its effects years ago when I lived through a Bay Area drought.

People reported their neighbors for watering their lawns on odd days instead of the prescribed even days. Hosing down one's driveway became a no-no. Car washes shut down. Golf courses withered.

 

Then there were those toilet guidelines, widely (and probably erroneously) attributed to then-Gov. Jerry Brown: "If it's yellow, let it mellow; if it's brown, flush it down." The idea might seem distasteful now, but 30 years ago, when TV announcers were regularly reminding you to keep your daily shower under two minutes, it made perfect sense.

 

Still does, actually. The average person could save about 10 gallons of water per day by flushing only under the recommended circumstances. Multiply that by the 36 million or so people in California, and over a year's time that's more than 130 billion gallons of water saved. Just by putting up with that yellow tint in the toilet bowl.

 

That kind of water savings sounds even more appealing to me today than it did 30 years ago because I'm paying the monthly water bills these days.

 

It can't hurt to start considering a residential water-savings program right now, before we absolutely have to. Start getting in the habit. We're a city of water wasters. Our lawns are lush, green and large. Faced with swimming-pool problems, we tend to empty and refill as a first resort.

 

What can we do about that mind-set? A hundred little things, rolled out gradually.

 

I'd rather go back to two-minute showers than install shower-head flow restrictors. (And please, no low-flow legislation. That would only create a black market for illicit, full-flow shower heads.)

 

But I could see tax breaks for builders or homebuyers who replace lawns with drought-resistant plants, especially in parts of California that lack our natural water percolation. What else? Drip systems for gardens, gray-water set-ups that reuse (non-toilet) sink, shower and laundry water for landscape irrigation.

 

Some of this stuff might seem unnecessary now, but check back in a few years.#

 http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1491584/

 

 

Farmers struggle with water price, cuts: 'A tree is a wonderful thing to take care of'

North County Times- 5/3/08

By Bradley J. Fikes, Staff Writer

 

VALLEY CENTER ---- Before imported water irrigated North County farmlands, the desert here was anything but fertile.

Instead of groves of citrus and avocado trees and other crops, rocks and scrub vegetation dominated the landscape.

That desert could be returning. Faced with rising water costs and a water shortage, farmers in the breadbasket communities of Valley Center and Fallbrook are cutting back their operations -- and cutting down their trees.

Dead citrus trees and the white-painted stumps of avocado trees ---- avocados are one of the county's biggest cash crops ---- can be found in groves throughout Valley Center, Fallbrook, and other agricultural centers of North County.

"I think eventually there'll be no agriculture in Southern California," said Bob Polito, a Valley Center grower with Polito Family Farms. "There may be little pockets here and there, using local water, but for the most part agriculture in Southern California is going to disappear."

Polito said he's already removed about 1,000 citrus trees from among his roughly 6,000 citrus and avocado trees, cutting them down and turning them into mulch. Stumped avocado trees can regrow, but stumped citrus trees die.

Once trees come down, they're usually not going to be replaced, said Gary Arant, general manager of the Valley Center Municipal Water District. Because agriculture is increasingly marginal in Southern California, growers aren't going to make the investment and take the time to plant and water new trees and wait for them to become productive.

Citrus trees are the first to go because citrus isn't as profitable a crop as avocados, Arant said. But as water prices inexorably rise, growers say avocado trees will also come down in increasing numbers.

About 10 to 15 percent of the 24,000 acres of tree crops in Valley Center have been taken out of production since 2005, Arant said.

If agriculture does mostly vanish from San Diego County, it will involve substantial economic loss. San Diego County's agricultural output is estimated at $5 billion a year. The loss will also be aesthetic, said Eric Larson, executive director of the San Diego County Farm Bureau.

"We have pictures of Valley Center in the mid-50s when the water facility was formed," Larson said. "It was parched and brown. Agriculture in North County has made it green."

Pushed out

Growers say they have been able to cope with water prices until recently --- in large part owing to a program that provides discounted water from the Metropolitan Water District, the water wholesaler for Southern California.

In exchange for a 30 percent discount, growers agree to be first in line to get reductions of up to 30 percent or more if there's a severe enough water shortage. About 80 percent of the agricultural water in Valley Center is purchased under the program, Arant said.

Last year, for the first time in the program's two-decade history, that cutback clause was invoked. So growers with thirsty trees have "stumped" some trees to keep the others in production.

In Fallbrook, growers are stumping about a third of their avocado trees, said Bob Lucy, partner in the Del Rey Avocado Company Inc. Lucy said his company's growers have between 4,500 and 5,000 acres of avocado trees.

Some growers are removing the trees for good, Lucy said. Others are hoping that they'll be able to resuscitate their trees next year, if a 30 percent cut in their water supply is restored.

White-painted stumps are those avocado-tree growers are trying to preserve, Lucy said. These trees need a minimal amount of water while dormant but must be allowed to grow again in a year or two or they die.

Growers are frustrated, Lucy said, because they are not given the option of buying more water at full price. Some growers think they can survive even without discounted water, but aren't being given the chance.

The willingness of local governments to allow continued residential development in the face of a shortage also rankles, Lucy said.

Metropolitan isn't allowing growers to leave the discount program until the current water shortage is ended. The problem is, nobody can tell when that will be.

Environmental balance

The immediate cause of the cut is a court decision requiring a reduction in water exports from Northern California to Southern California, to protect an endangered fish, the Delta smelt. That, coupled with below-average precipitation in the state for the last few years, has already made water supplies precarious.

So with 30 percent less water, growers must cut production by 30 percent, said Keith Lewinger, general manager of the Fallbrook Public Utility District. In Fallbrook, the main crops are avocados, flowers and nursery-grown plants, Lewinger said.

Flower growers and nurseries have large overhead to cover, Lewinger said, "and now you chop off 30 percent of revenue."

He added: "I'm not sure how long they can go producing only 70 percent of their products. That's a business-by-business decision."

Lucy said growers also provide an environmental benefit, and trees should be considered in the equation along with endangered fish.

"Doesn't an avocado tree, as a living organism, have a right?" Lucy said. "It produces food, it gives off oxygen. A tree is a wonderful thing to take care of."#

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/05/03/business/zd71da86990fc694d882574340066cc3.txt

 

 

Editorial

With drought a possibility, it's time for change

The Sacramento Bee – 5/3/08


February came in like a lion and left like a wimp.

 

The next month didn't bring a drop of precipitation to Sacramento until March 29.

 

April? Almost bone dry. And May? Don't waste your time doing a rain dance. It almost never rains in May. The water year is effectively over – and it's a worrisome year indeed.

 

According to the Department of Water Resources, the average snowpack statewide is now about two-thirds of normal. That's better than last year at this time, when the snowpack was at 27 percent. But two years of subpar precipitation means that people and water districts must get serious about how they use and abuse H20. Every gallon they conserve this year will mean more in groundwater basins and reservoirs next year – when we may need it. If California experiences a third year of lousy snowpack, state officials will be using the dreaded D-word – drought.

 

It's been 15 years since California last experienced a drought, and during that time, the state has grown by 6 million people. Some regions have gotten smart about water usage, stretching available supplies without costly infrastructure investments. Others have skated by.

 

Sacramento is among the skaters. There are no water meters in the older parts of our town. Residents pay a flat rate for water. That's one reason that Sacramento tends to be lackadaisical – one of our favorite pastimes is watering the sidewalk. As a result, Sacramentans use 270 gallons of water per person daily, about twice as much as people in Los Angeles.

 

That's going to change, although slowly – perhaps too slowly. Because of a 2004 law, Sacramento and other nonmetered cities must meter all homes and businesses by 2025. The city's utility department is preparing to spend roughly $150 million on this endeavor but, as of last year, fewer than 4,000 of 120,000 households had been retrofitted with meters.

 

For decades, Sacramento leaders have justified the city's extravagant practices by noting that at least half of the water consumed in Sacramento is returned to the river in groundwater, stormwater or treated wastewater. Thus, their argument goes, our wasteful practices are not as detrimental to the state's overall supply as wasteful water usage in coastal regions.

 

That's true, but Sacramento's elected leaders – even the ones who talk frequently about "sustainability" – never note the downside of the city's excess water consumption. A huge amount of energy is needed to withdraw the water and treat it to drinking quality. Energy is also expended treating the resulting wastewater. How much energy? No one knows. The city hasn't analyzed the potential savings.

 

Scientists are projecting that global climate change will reduce the state's snowpack by trillions of gallons each year. That means less water for cities, farms, fish and landscaping.

 

Roseville – a lawn-friendly city that consumes about 300 gallons per person daily – issued a drought alert this week, which was a prudent thing to do. Other cities are also warning about mandatory rationing, and many farmers are bracing for a rough growing season.

 

Yet here in Sacramento, we have yet to hear an elected leader – or a candidate for mayor – make a plea for conservation. Some habits are hard to change. This one will have to.#

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/909233.html

 

 

Roseville Issues a Stage One Drought Alert

YubaNet - 5/1/08

City of Roseville, CA

 

On April 30, 2008, the City of Roseville's Environmental Utilities Department activated a Stage One Drought alert within the Roseville city limits in response to a letter received from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) which reduced Roseville's water supply for the 2008 calendar year by 25 percent. Roseville's normal year water supply from Folsom Reservoir is 32,000 acre feet, with an additional 10,000 acre feet available through a Placer County Water Agency contract and 400 acre feet in groundwater. Current water demand is estimated to be 35,600 acre feet in Roseville, leaving Roseville with a water deficit of 1,200 acre feet of water.

 

A Stage One Drought Alert does the following:

 

- Increases water waste patrols to ensure water is being used efficiently and leaks in residential and commercial properties are repaired per the Roseville Municipal Code;

 

- Requests all city water users to reduce their water use by ten percent (10 percent).

 

-Prohibits the washing of streets, parking lots, driveways, sidewalks or buildings, unless public health requires it. This does not apply to street sweepers.

 

-Requests restaurants not serve water, except upon request.

 

"We are asking our residents and businesses to do their part and make changes in their water use to achieve a 10 percent reduction in 2008,"

said Derrick Whitehead, Director of Environmental Utilities. "We have a whole host of free water conservation programs and generous rebates that residents and businesses can take advantage of that will help us reach the 10 percent reduction in water use."

 

USBR reduced Roseville's water supply due to lower than expected snow melt to Folsom Reservoir, Roseville's main water source, two previous dry years that have brought the lake level to a very low elevation and competing water needs from Folsom Reservoir. Area lakes, like Folsom, provide many functions other than water supply. In addition, they provide cold water for sustaining spawning of endangered species, like Chinook and Steelhead Salmon, provide water quality maintenance for the delta and agriculture water to produce food that California is known for. Water system managers from the USBR are now projecting there may not be enough water to meet all these objectives so a reduction is required

 

Over the past few years, the City of Roseville has been expanding its water conservation programs and has heavily invested in an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Program to add further reliability to Roseville's water supply. The ASR program consists of a series of wells that are capable of injecting treated drinking water in the ground during times of plenty and extract water when the water supply is limited. The ASR program recently finished a test phase and is seeking approval from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board to fully implement the program. "Development of our ASR program has been in preparation of the fact that we knew it wasn't a matter of if there would be a drought, but when," said Mayor Jim Gray. "This multi-year investment in water conservation programs and ASR will help us deal with the situation if it worsens, but we cannot do it alone, everyone in Roseville needs to do their part to help meet the 10 percent water use reduction goal."

 

The city will be mailing letters to all households and businesses in Roseville in the next few weeks regarding the drought stage requirements and will be increasing public outreach and marketing visibility over the next year.

 

Residents and businesses looking to take immediate action to reduce their water use are encouraged to call 774-5761 or go to www.roseville.ca.us/savewater to learn more about the free water saving programs and rebates the city has to offer.#

http://yubanet.com/regional/Roseville-Issues-a-Stage-One-Drought-Alert.php

 

 

Water conservation blitz hits street: But water officials stressing conservation 'more than ever'

North County Times: 5/2/08

By Dave Downey, Staff Writer

 

Following a disappointing end to this year's rainy season and a court order aimed at protecting an endangered fish, Southern California is in line to receive the smallest amount of water from the State Water Project in 16 years.

Ted Thomas, spokesman for the California Department of Water Resources in Sacramento, said in a telephone interview that the state expects to deliver 1.5 million acre-feet of water this year, significantly less than in previous years.

According to department records, deliveries totaled 2.4 million acre-feet last year, 3.5 million in 2006 and 4.05 million in 2005. The last time deliveries approached 1.5 million acre-feet was 1992.

An acre-foot is the amount it takes to cover an acre to a depth of one foot, or nearly 326,000 gallons. It's what two families use in a year.

Bob Yamada, water resources manager for the San Diego County Water Authority, said the sharp decline in deliveries from the massive plumbing system that taps the storehouse of frozen water in the Sierra Nevada will not trigger rationing ---- at least not this year.

Even so, supplies remain tight and suppliers have launched media blitzes to persuade residents to cut back, voluntarily, on how much they water lawns and gardens.

For the first time, the region's giant wholesaler, the Metropolitan Water District, is specifically asking people to turn sprinklers off one day a week. And water agencies in San Diego and Riverside counties have launched similar advertising blitzes in the last few days.

Individual communities also are tackling the issue head on. Poway, for example, declared a "Stage 1" water emergency in January, warning residents that if they don't conserve voluntarily, they could face mandatory restrictions later.

Farmers, meanwhile, already are under mandatory restrictions. That's because Metropolitan invoked a plan that slashes deliveries to agricultural customers who pay discounted water rates during times of strained supplies.

Many avocado, citrus and flower growers in North County have had allocations cut 30 percent in recent months.

No 'March miracle'

Supplies remain strained despite the fact more rain fell this winter than the previous one. It was wet in December, January and February, Yamada said, but not enough to reverse the effects of several years of drought.

And there was no "miracle" this March like the one in 1991 that delivered several inches of rain in one month and broke the back of another drought.

Indeed, hardly a drop fell in March and April. The northern Sierra Nevada, source of much of the water that flows south to San Diego and Riverside counties, recorded the lowest precipitation totals for those two months since records began being kept in 1921, Thomas said.

On Thursday, the state water department reported the total blanket of snow over the Sierra is two-thirds as deep as it usually is this time of year, at the end of the precipitation season, and the amount of water flowing into reservoirs is little more than half-normal.

And not only did someone turn off the spigot that was replenishing the storehouse of frozen water, abundant sunshine has spurred people to water lawns more often than usual for early spring, said Bob Muir, a spokesman for Metropolitan Water District of Los Angeles.

"The storms earlier this year have left many people with the mistaken impression that our water worries are over," said Jeff Kightlinger, general manager for Metropolitan, Southern California's biggest water supplier. "Nothing could be further from the truth."

'Save it or lose it'

Consequently, while area residents aren't likely to see mandatory cuts, they are already seeing ---- and hearing ---- an advertising blitz that is filling the airwaves, cyberspace and newspapers with pleas to conserve.

Metropolitan launched a six-county, $6.3 million "Cut your water use" campaign in April that asks homeowners to avoid watering at least one day a week.

And the San Diego County Water Authority kicked off Thursday a similar, $1.8 million "Water: Save it lose it" campaign that aims to slash residential consumption 10 percent this summer, or 20 gallons a day per home.

Also on Thursday, Riverside County agencies began circulating this message: "A summer must, only water after dusk." They want people to limit watering to 15 minutes a day four times a week, after dark.

Tedi Jackson, a spokeswoman for the Riverside-based Western Municipal Water District, said it makes no sense to water lawns when the sun is out because much of the spray is lost to evaporation.

Neither does it make sense to let water run down the street, said Peter Odencrans, spokesman for the Eastern Municipal Water District, which serves the Interstate 215 corridor of Riverside County. At some point this summer, he said, district residents could find themselves paying $100 fines for watering streets and sidewalks.

The water-wasting penalty is one initiative the Eastern board is to consider in a few weeks, Odencrans said. Another would establish a surcharge for water use above a certain amount to reinforce voluntary conservation efforts.

"We can encourage all we want, but if we get something that affects their wallet, that may be more effective," he said. "We don't want to be water cops, but it has come to that."

Now, more than ever

Likewise, Metropolitan was quick to defend its suggested one-day-a-week rest from lawn irrigation.

"We think it's something that people can do without really sacrificing," Muir said. "In many cases, we are killing our plants because we are overwatering them."

Odencrans said lawns get watered twice as much as they should. He said most need 50 inches of water a year and they tend to get 100.

If people will water less, Muir said, Metropolitan will be able to hold onto much of its 1.8 million acre-feet of reserves in reservoirs such as Diamond Valley Lake near Temecula. If not, as much as 30 percent of those reserves could be depleted this summer.

"Now, more than ever, we're looking for people to help us save our water," he said. "We want to keep water in reserve for an emergency."

Metropolitan is the primary supplier in most of Southern California, quenching the thirst of nearly 20 million people. It distributes imported water from the Sierra Nevada and the Rockies.

While the region is not now in an emergency, there is plenty of cause for concern.

Thomas said that, because a large chunk of the melting snow is soaking into soil still parched from last year, the amount of water flowing into California reservoirs is just 55 percent of normal.

That water eventually reaches the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the hub of the state's gigantic plumbing system.

Making matters worse for Southern California, an August 2007 federal court order restricted the amount that may be piped south there to prevent tiny, endangered delta smelt from being sucked into pumps and killed.

Things look a little better on the Colorado River, the region's other major source, because the Rockies recorded higher-than-average snowfall, said Yamada, of the San Diego authority. But the problem there, he said, is that the river's enormous reservoirs are only, collectively, half-full.

"We're still dealing with the lingering problems of eight years of drought on the Colorado River," Yamada said.#

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/05/03//news/sandiego//z8f419b3ba17944348825743900812f4.txt

 

 

Californians urged to conserve water amid drought worries

The Associated Press – 5/2/08

 

Sacramento, CA (AP) -- Californians are being asked to water their lawns less, plant native shrubs and install more-efficient irrigation systems to stave off water shortages and mandatory rationing amid growing worries about a possible long-term drought.

 

The increasingly urgent call to conserve water comes as state officials said Thursday that the Sierra Nevada snowpack, a key source of the state's water supply, has fallen about one-third below normal levels.

 

"We need to recognize that we're in a water shortage and begin to act accordingly," state Resources Secretary Mike Chrisman said.

 

While officials say it's too early to impose rationing, cities and water districts around California are preparing plans for mandatory conservation to deal with a possible drought.

 

In Southern California, the Metropolitan Water District, which serves 18 million people, recently raised its water rates by 14 percent and has cut deliveries to farmers by nearly a third. It also launched an advertising campaign urging homeowners and businesses to reduce outdoor watering by at least a day.

 

"We're in a pretty painful water supply picture," said Jeffrey Kightlinger, the district's general manager. "We don't want to institute rationing, but if this continues you will see us take a look at that next year."

 

Residents of Long Beach aren't allowed to run fountains, and it's illegal for restaurants to serve customers a glass of water unless they ask for it.

 

New housing and retail developments in Riverside County are on hold because the necessary water supplies cannot be guaranteed.

 

In the Coachella Valley, which includes the sprawling resort communities around Palm Springs, water managers have proposed a tiered water pricing system. The idea is to charge customers who use more than their fair share of water, said Mark Beuhler, assistant general manager of the Coachella Valley Water District, which supplies water to 130 golf courses and about 100,000 homes.

 

"We saw the writing on the wall," Beuhler said. "It is probably the most single effective thing we can do to achieve conservation."

 

The East Bay Municipal Utility District, which serves 1.3 million customers in Contra Costa and Alameda counties with water from the Mokelumne River watershed, are considering rationing because its water supply has been the worst in 17 years. Its board is scheduled to consider a drought management program on May 13.

 

"Some of the things that could happen are not using fountains, requiring use of a shut-off nozzle in the hose at your house, or restrictions on when people can water their lawns," said district spokesman Jeff Becerra.

 

Farmers in Central Valley and cities from the San Francisco Bay Area to San Diego are already coping with significant cutbacks in water deliveries.

 

Pumping out of the Sacramento San Joaquin Delta — the heart of California's water delivery system — has been scaled back this year to comply with a judge's order to protect a threatened fish species.

 

The bleak snowpack exacerbates those pumping cuts, water officials and farmers say.

 

"It's problems stacked on top of other problems," said John Harris, a western Fresno County farmer who isn't farming about a third of his 12,000 acres this year.

 

Growers in northern San Diego County are stumping citrus and avocado trees due to water shortages. Farmers in Fresno and Kings counties haven't planted about 200,000 acres of crops, about a third of the land irrigated by Westlands Water District.

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission will continue to ask customers to voluntarily cut back on usage — a tactic that worked well last summer, when use fell 13 percent, said spokesman Tony Winnicker.

 

"As long as our customers continue to use the same good habits they showed last year, we should be able to get through this year without any cutbacks," Winnicker said.

 

The outlook is brighter for communities along the central coast, which has had plenty of rain to fill their local reservoirs, said Jeanine Jones, the drought coordinator at the Department of Water Resources.

 

For the most part, the state has little authority to impose mandatory rationing. That can only be done if the governor declares a statewide drought emergency, something no previous governor has done, Jones said. In California, rationing and conservation decisions are locally driven.

 

Ellen Hanak, a water expert at the Public Policy Institute of California, said communities should be thinking now about adopting conservation and water pricing programs rather than wait until conditions worsen.

 

"If you're constantly planning to have no cutbacks during dry times, you're probably spending too much on storage," Hanak said. "There's a balance to be struck."#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/05/02/state/n162557D13.DTL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive