This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 5/2/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

May 2, 2008

 

1.      Top Items –

 

 

Sierra snow comes up short

The Sacramento Bee

 

Dry conditions in California reduce Sierra Nevada snowpack

Associated Press

 

Summer may be grim for California's water supply Email Picture: State official says shortage is worst he's seen in 30 years. Fast-shrinking snowpack and below-normal reservoir levels are blamed. -

The Los Angeles Times

 

Final snow survey of year confirms it's dry -

The Contra Costa Times

 

Need to deal with water needs crucial

The San Francisco Chronicle

 

With Sierra snowpack down, does the valley face water woes?

Modesto Bee

 

Snowpack levels now lagging : Bone-Dry April in Sierra tightens summer water supply in valley

San Jose Mercury News

 

Pressure on state to reduce water use: Sierra snowpack levels at 67 percent of normal

San Diego Tribune

 

Drought certain if solutions are absent

The San Francisco Chronicle

 

Call out for conservation: Saving water now could cut risk of future rationing

Stockton Record

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Sierra snow comes up short

The Sacramento Bee – 5/2/08

By Matt Weiser

 

Despite new warnings Thursday that a water crisis is looming in California, state officials continue to maintain that enforceable conservation goals are not necessary.

 

The Department of Water Resources on Thursday took its final Sierra Nevada snowpack survey of the season, and the findings only added to the grim prognosis for the state's water supply.

 

The water content of the snowpack stands at just 67 percent of average for the May 1 date. That's because this year's March and April period proved to be the driest since 1921, when record-keeping began.

 

Though snowfall was about average in January and February, it wasn't enough to make up for the following two months, which were virtually snowless.

 

After drought conditions last year, much of the snowmelt will merely be absorbed by parched soil and won't make its way into the streams and reservoirs.

 

In addition, poor environmental conditions in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and a federal court decision have restricted water exports to 25 million Californians. It's estimated these effects have already cost customers about 600,000 acre-feet of water this year, or enough to serve 1.2 million families for a year.

 

"We're really up against it here in California," said Resources Secretary Mike Chrisman.

 

In February, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger called for a 20 percent per capita cut in water use statewide by 2020.

But as bold as that goal might seem, the conservation target comes with no teeth.

 

On Thursday, during a rare Capitol news conference on the meager snowpack, Chrisman said the administration does not yet have a plan to impose mandates or penalties to ensure that California meets the conservation target.

 

"We're not there yet," he said. "We will be addressing that at some point, but I don't know the answer to that yet."

 

Instead, he expects the target will be met through voluntary measures and by working with local water agencies.

Others say the state should take a much more aggressive stance on water conservation.

 

"The governor didn't just set a target for climate change. He implemented a real policy," said Mindy McIntyre, water program manager at the Planning and Conservation League. "We hope that he'll do the same with water conservation, because it has the potential to work quickly."

 

Until this week, the water crisis has largely been limited to regions that depend on water pumped out of the Delta.

 

But on Wednesday, the city of Roseville was notified by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation that its allocation from Folsom Lake will be slashed 25 percent this year.

 

It's unclear whether the city of Sacramento will be similarly affected at some point this year. Unlike Roseville, which buys water under contract from the bureau, Sacramento has ample water rights in the American River that provide some security.

 

But a federal court decision in April could require the bureau to alter water releases from its dams to protect salmon. If this doesn't affect urban water withdrawals downstream, it might affect the amount of water available in the river for recreation at times.

 

"For California, it's another sign that we are going through a rough patch," said Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. "And it doesn't get better when the rain comes back, because we've got fundamental problems with the infrastructure and our need to manage the system more responsibly for fish."

 

A bill pending in the Legislature, AB 2175, would put teeth into Schwarzenegger's 20 percent conservation target.

 

The bill by Assemblyman John Laird, D-Santa Cruz, would make urban water agencies ineligible for state grants unless they meet the 20 percent conservation target, with benchmarks starting in 2013. The target for agricultural water agencies is a reduction statewide of 500,000 acre-feet.

 

"We've been successful statewide when we've set goals to reduce energy use, and to reduce the waste stream into landfills," said Laird. "I think the bill we're working on is totally consistent with the governor's goal."

 

The Governor's Office has not yet taken a position on the bill.#

http://www.sacbee.com/378/story/907145.html

 

Dry conditions in California reduce Sierra Nevada snowpack

Associated Press - 5/1/08

By Samantha Young , AP

 

SACRAMENTO -- The Sierra Nevada snowpack, a key source of California's water supply, has fallen well below normal levels, state officials said Thursday, increasing the likelihood of water shortages this summer.

 

Department of Water Resources scientists found snowpack water content averaging only 67 percent of normal throughout the 400-mile-long mountain range after the state experienced its driest two-month period on record.

 

Levels were 88 percent of normal in the northern Sierra and about 60 percent of normal in the central and southern regions.

 

Frank Gehrke, the snow survey chief at California's Department of Water Resources, said dry, sunny conditions in March and April melted what was an average snowpack earlier this year. In addition, soils parched from last year's drought are soaking much of the early snowmelt.

 

"It's a knock-out punch to have that combination," Gehrke told The Associated Press in a telephone interview from Echo Summit.

 

At the summit just south of Lake Tahoe, scientists measured 3.3 inches of snow in a meadow on Thursday. That's only 11 percent of what is expected there at this time of year.

 

The amount of water running into streams and reservoirs is only 55 to 65 percent of normal, according to the figures collected by the Department of Water Resources.

 

That's one of the reasons federal and state water managers have reduced water exports this year from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to Southern California and the Central Valley.

 

Water deliveries also have been cut to comply with a federal judge's order that limits pumping from the delta by as much as 30 percent to protect the delta smelt, a threatened fish species. About 600,000 acre feet of water - enough water to supply 4.8 million people for a year - has not been pumped as a result of the restrictions, said Resources Agency Secretary Mike Chrisman.

 

The pumping restrictions, last year's drought and this year's dry conditions have left the state's reservoirs lower than normal. Lake Oroville, the state's principal storage reservoir, is less than half full.

 

"It's going to be a rough decade," said Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. "You will see mandatory rationing, I believe."

 

Officials in Roseville, about 20 miles north of the state capital, issued a drought alert Wednesday because the city is not getting its full allotment of water from Folsom Lake.

 

Officials at the East Bay Municipal Utility District have said water levels are so low that its Board of Directors may have to vote for mandatory water rationing when it meets later this month.

 

Chrisman said it was too early to say whether the state would ask cities and farmers to issue mandatory rationing, but he suggested Californians voluntarily water their lawns less frequently, buy energy-efficient washing machines and low-flush toilets.

 

Last May, the Sierra snowpack was just 29 percent of normal, the lowest since 1988.

 

Although this year's water picture is bleak, hydrologic conditions don't yet merit a drought declaration, said Elissa Lynn, chief meteorologist at the Department of Water Resources.

 

Although the state's rivers are still low, projections show the average flow from this dry spell will be 15-20 percent higher than it was between 1987-1992, California's last drought.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said the most recent snow survey underscores his argument that California should conserve more water and build more dams.

 

"These actions are vital to protect our environment, economy and quality of life," Schwarzenegger said in a statement. "I know that legislative leaders share my goal of comprehensive water reform, but time is running out. The longer we wait, the worse our situation becomes."

 

The Democratic-controlled Legislature has blocked Republican proposals to build dams, favoring increased water conservation measures and water recycling as way to meet the needs of California's population, now at 37.7 million.#

http://www.sacbee.com/114/story/905775.html

 

Summer may be grim for California's water supply Email Picture: State official says shortage is worst he's seen in 30 years. Fast-shrinking snowpack and below-normal reservoir levels are blamed.

The Los Angeles Times- 5/2/08

By Deborah Schoch, Staff Writer

 

California communities face a strong possibility of water shortages and even mandatory rationing this summer because of record dry weather in March and April, a fast-shrinking snowpack and below-normal reservoir levels, state officials said Thursday.

The bleak news, contained in California's final Sierra snowpack report of the snow season, means a second consecutive year of water anxieties in a state heavily dependent on water from the melting snow in the Sierra Nevada.

"I have not seen a more serious water situation in my career, and I've been doing this 30 years," said Timothy Quinn, executive director of the Assn. of California Water Agencies. An outmoded delivery system and court rulings that protect endangered fish are also straining the system, he said.

"This is a harbinger of relatively tough times, not just for this year but for a set of years," Quinn said.

He and others urged Californians to rein in water use.

"We need to recognize that we're in a water shortage and begin to act accordingly," state Resources Secretary Mike Chrisman told reporters at a Sacramento news conference.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger issued a statement urging the Legislature to pass comprehensive water reforms, warning that many communities face shortages and possible rationing.

After a record-dry 2006-07 snow year, water managers had hoped this year would bring ample snow and rainfall to fill reservoirs and ease worries about water shortages. Those concerns have been exacerbated by a long drought in the Colorado River Basin and a federal court ruling curbing water deliveries from Northern California.

Cities throughout Southern California supplement their own local supplies with two major sources outside the region: Sierra water pumped south through the State Water Project, and water transported west from the Colorado River.

Los Angeles traditionally has gotten 30% to 60% of its water from the Eastern Sierra via the Los Angeles Aqueduct, but it still buys water imported from the north and east.

"I think we're all facing a worrisome water picture," said H. David Nahai, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.

Statewide, early hopes of a wet year faltered when snowfall in some areas of the Sierra -- the source of much of the state's water -- virtually stopped in early March. The months of March and April combined were the driest in the northern Sierra since 1921.

The Sierra Nevada snowpack has shrunk to 67% of normal, down sharply from 97% in late March, according to results of the snow survey, released Thursday by the state Department of Water Resources. The May 1 measurements are crucial in forecasting California water supplies as well as hydroelectric production, state officials said.

"That suggests that reservoir levels are not going to recover," state snow survey chief Frank Gehrke said. Lake Oroville, which stores much of the water delivered to Southern California, contains only 58% of the water normally there at this time of year.

Worsening the situation, dry weather last year has left soil inordinately parched, and runoff into streams and reservoirs is only 55% to 65% of normal, state experts said. Spring sunshine and warm weather meant the snowpack melted more quickly and some snow converted directly to vapor, Gehrke said.

State meteorologist Elissa Lin fell short of officially declaring a drought. "It's been a very tough two years for water supply in California," Lin said. "All of these things are pointing in that direction. . . . Certainly, if we go into a third year, we're looking at some critical situations."

Further tightening water supplies, state deliveries to Southern California were slashed in December after a federal court decision last summer aimed at protecting endangered smelt in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger, who ordered those restrictions, is scheduled to hold hearings in June to decide whether to impose further cutbacks to protect chinook salmon and Central Valley steelhead trout.#

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-snowpack2-2008may02,0,6563964.story

 

Final snow survey of year confirms it's dry

The Contra Costa Times 5/1/08

By Mike Taugher, Staff Writer 

California’s snowpack is low for the second year in a row, leaving water managers across the state grappling with the triple threat of a dry year, depleted reservoirs and new environmental restrictions on pumping from the Delta.

 

Thursday’s snowpack measure, the final one of the year, came in at 67 percent of normal.

 

That represents a substantial drop from recent months due mostly to a record-breaking dry spell in March and April.

 

And it has thrown California into a near-drought as concerns mount among water managers that the state could be entering a new era of water instability — with the spectre of water rationing, court fights and fallowed fields — that could last a decade or more.

 

“All of the tools are getting broken,” said Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. “If this isn’t a crisis, I don’t know what is.”

 

Following strong storms earlier in the winter, March and April were the driest those two months have been in the northern Sierra since record keeping began in 1922, state Department of Water Resources chief hydrologist Maury Roos said.

 

“I don’t think we’d call it a drought year,” he said. “Yet.”

 

But it is shaping up as the driest year since 1994, according to early estimates for an index that tracks snowpack and reservoir storage.

The exact figure will be calculated in the coming days or weeks.

 

The low snowpack, which feeds downstream tributaries and reservoirs, comes atop two other challenges.

 

Last year was so dry that reservoirs that had been brimming for years were drawn down significantly. Lake Oroville, a key reservoir for parts of the Bay Area and Southern California, is only half full, the lowest it has been this time of year since 1991, when the state was at the tail end of a severe drought.

 

The second challenge has to do with new restrictions on water pumping and deliveries to farms and cities that are meant to protect threatened fish.

 

The Delta, the largest estuary on the West Coast, is in severe decline with several fish species at near-record low population levels.

 

U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger in December issued new restrictions on water deliveries to protect Delta smelt, and will consider additional restrictions to protect threatened salmon and steelhead runs in the coming weeks.

 

Wanger has said he would not restrict water deliveries to the point of threatening human health and safety, but he ruled that he was compelled to crack down because federal wildlife regulators failed to protect endangered species from the effects of water pumping.

 

Still, the new rules make it more difficult to move water, and that will make it harder to refill some reservoirs when wet weather returns.

 

That California is suddenly facing a water pinch is somewhat of a surprise, because after strong January storms, water officials were hopeful for a good, wet year.

 

But March and April saw just 2.3 inches of precipitation in the northern Sierra, far lower than the previous record low of 3.2 inches, set in 1956.

Average precipitation for the two months is about 11 inches, and in 1995, 31.4 inches fell, said Elissa Lynn, a state water department senior meteorologist.

 

On top of that, overall low precipitation for the year and a dry ground that is soaking up snowmelt are helping to dry out 2008.

 

The convergence of problems are already being felt across the state.

 

For example:

 

The city of Long Beach has imposed mandatory water rationing.

 

The East Bay’s largest water district, the East Bay Municipal Utility District, which serves 1.3 million in Alameda and Contra Costa counties, is expected to follow suit in the coming weeks because of dry conditions in the central Sierra watershed where it gets water.

 

San Joaquin Valley farmers have fallowed hundreds of thousands of acres of farmland.

 

In Southern California, farmers have seen their water supplies cut 30 percent, forcing some to cut back avocado trees and take out citrus trees.

 

In Riverside County, approval of several major development projects has been delayed because of uncertainty about the availability of water to serve them. The projects, which must be redesigned to maximize water use efficiency before the Eastern Municipal Water District determines if it has water available to support them, include millions of square-feet worth of distribution center warehouses and new subdivisions containing thousands of houses.

 

The Contra Costa Water District and the Zone 7 Water Agency in the East Bay are planning to continue urging customers to voluntarily reduce their use of water.

 

At a news conference Thursday in Sacramento, state Resources Secretary Mike Chrisman said it was too early for mandatory, statewide water rationing but warned that it was time to build new reservoirs and aqueducts.

 

If a long-term plan is not embraced, he said, “that’s going to be the bigger regret.”

 

Chrisman, Quinn and other water officials are putting their hopes behind a Bay-Delta Conservation Plan that would reconfigure how water gets through the Delta region. The plan would likely endorse a new aqueduct to take water from the Sacramento River, around the Delta, and then to pumps near Tracy.

 

“We inherited this system that was built in the middle of the 20th century by people who were born in the 19th century,” Quinn said. “They did that without the aquatic environment in mind.”

 

The plan, which is still being formed, is sure to be heavily scrutinized in part because new aqueducts could harm the Delta ecosystem or local water quality.

 

Greg Gartrell, assistant general manager of the Contra Costa Water District, said the outlook “is looking as bad as it did in the early 1990s.” That’s when a severe drought and the designation of Delta smelt and two salmon runs under endangered species laws led to upheaval and, eventually, a state and federal water management program called CalFed.

 

That program was touted as a way to avoid future shortages and fix the environment, but it failed to address some of the core issues facing the state’s water system.

 

“We didn’t deal with the tough questions, and now we’re paying the price,” Quinn said.

 

Gartrell said state water officials have not moved as aggressively to address short-term water supply problems and related ecosystem impacts as they have on repairing levees and pursuing a long-term plan.

 

“They need to have that same proactive action for dealing with fisheries and drought conditions that the state is going to need that in a year or two,” Gartrell said. “A 10-year plan is nice, but there are some immediate actions that need to be taken now.”#

http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_9124919?source=rss

 

Need to deal with water needs crucial

The San Francisco Chronicle- 5/1/08

By Kelly Zito, staff writer

 

Two parched years - punctuated by the driest spring in at least 150 years - could force districts across California to ration water this summer as policymakers and scientists grow increasingly concerned that the state is on the verge of a long-term drought.

 

State water officials reported Thursday that the Sierra Nevada snowpack, the source of a huge portion of California's water supply, was only 67 percent of normal, due in part to historically low rainfall in March and April.

 

With many reservoirs at well-below-average levels from the previous winter and a federal ruling limiting water pumped from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, the new data added a dimension to a crisis already complicated by crumbling infrastructure, surging population and environmental concerns.

 

"We're in a dry spell if not a drought," said California Secretary for Resources Mike Chrisman. "We're in the second year, and if we're looking at a third year, we're talking about a serious problem."

 

Chrisman stopped short of saying the state would issue mandatory water rationing, which appears possible only if the governor declares a state of emergency. Rather, the burden will fall on local water agencies. Many, such as San Francisco and Marin County, have asked residents and businesses over the past year to cut water usage voluntarily by 10 to 20 percent.

 

Others have taken more drastic steps.

 

In Southern California, the water district serving about 330,000 people in Orange County enacted water rationing last year, due in part to a ruling by U.S. Judge Oliver Wanger reducing water pumped from the delta by about a third to protect an endangered fish.

 

The East Bay Municipal Utility District announced in April that it was considering water rationing, price increases and other measures in response to critically low reservoirs. The district, which serves 1.3 million customers in Contra Costa and Alameda counties, will vote on the measures this month.

 

"If you catch a third (dry) year, then you're looking at a supply that's so low you can't manage it well anymore," said Charles Hardy, spokesman for the district. "That's when its starts to hurt businesses and people across the board."

 

No industry faces bigger changes than agriculture, which uses about 80 percent of California's available water; the remainder goes to urban areas. Some experts say they believe the balance could shift toward urban areas.

 

Already, some farmers are switching to crops requiring less water and letting fields go fallow. One water agency official recently talked to a Southern California avocado grower who cut his trees back to stumps and won't begin growing again until water supplies recover.

 

"We have a lot of water, but we also use a lot of water," said Jeffrey Mount, director for watershed sciences at UC Davis. "From an economic perspective, it makes sense moving water from agriculture to urban uses."

 

In fact, some farmers are already selling their water to urban districts. But there is no easy system for transporting that water, and the infrastructure required would be extremely costly.

 

Californians have suffered through droughts before.

 

A deep, two-year drought in the late 1970s drew discussions about dragging glaciers down from Alaska or filling huge plastic bladders at river sources and dragging them by tugboat to users, Hardy said. Consumers endured rationing during a longer drought in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

 

After those dry periods, water conservation initiatives kicked into high gear. Low-flow toilets and showerheads became the norm, and homeowners started filling their yards with drought-resistant plants. Today, that might not be enough in a state with a population expected to reach nearly 50 million by 2030.

 

In addition to possible restrictions on watering lawns and washing cars, water prices could spike - at least for those who use too much.

 

The district serving 330,000 customers in Orange County has developed a type of water profile based on household size, yard size and average temperature in the area. Using that data, water managers have come up with base water allocations; above that level, water bills jump.

 

"If you really want to use more water there, you're going to pay for it - and (the district) uses the extra funds to finance conservation investments," said Ellen Hanak, a senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California in San Francisco. "There's a lot of room for innovating in that area - some places are doing it, but there's hardly any penalty for the extra water."

 

It is unclear whether this dry period is a full-blown drought. Much like economic recessions, droughts can be diagnosed only in retrospect.

 

However, it is certain that if the dry conditions that began with the low 2006-2007 snowpack levels continue, they could have a cascading effect. The dryness of 2006-2007 contributed to this year's poor water supply totals, said Elissa Lynn, chief meteorologist with the California Department of Water Resources.

 

"We're losing a lot of what we did have as snow melted into the ground," Lynn said. "It's either in subsurface, waiting to come down, or it's going into soil moisture because we had a dry fall."

 

There is also a small chance that dry windy conditions blew snow straight from the mountains into vapor, she said.

 

Not all Bay Area agencies face the same challenges, because they get water from various sources: San Francisco and the Peninsula from Hetch Hetchy, East Bay Municipal Water District from the Mokelumne River watershed and the Santa Clara Valley Water District from a combination of reservoirs and the delta. Some local water managers say their supplies look good. Marin County, for instance, said its reservoirs are at more than 100 percent of capacity.

 

Nevertheless, stricter water controls could be a continuing part of California's future. So might large-scale projects that aim to use water in new and better ways.

 

"We're facing some pretty grim circumstances that call for some bold action - recycling water, desalinating water," said Tim Quinn executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. "Above and beyond that, we have to invest in the sustainability of this system that our grandfathers constructed in the middle of the last century. It was developed with the convenience of human beings in mind, not aquatic beings."#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/01/BA9O10F8PK.DTL&tsp=1

 

With Sierra snowpack down, does the valley face water woes?

Modesto Bee – 5/2/05

By Ken Carlson

 

The water outlook for the state and the Northern San Joaquin Valley grew worse Thursday, as state officials released a survey showing the water content in the Sierra snowpack is 67 percent of normal.

 

That erased the optimism of last month's close-to-normal survey for the snowpack, which serves as a chief water supply for cities and farms in California.

 

State officials said it raised the possibility of water shortages and mandatory rationing this summer, but now the state is asking its 38 million residents only to conserve water.

 

"California needs to recognize we are in a water shortage and begin to act accordingly," said Mike Chrisman, the state's secretary for resources.

 

Officials stopped short of declaring a drought, but are worried that a dry season next year could bring severe shortages.

 

Most of California is suffering from a critical lack of precipitation in 2006-07, a dry fall and now a dry spring.

 

In Modesto, March and April were the driest since the Modesto Irrigation District began keeping records in 1888. There was no rain in April and 0.02 inches in March.

 

Although storms dumped on the Sierra in January and February, the dry mountain soil and paltry late-winter snowfall caused the snow reserves to shrink.

 

"We have lost half of the snowpack that we had in mid-March," said Elissa Lynn, senior meteorologist for the state Department of Water Resources. "We could be looking at conditions that are ripe for a serious drought."

 

Officials said runoff into streams and reservoirs is 55 percent to 65 percent of normal.

 

The water content is about 60 percent of normal in the central and southern Sierra, which will mean less water flowing into reservoirs that supply water to farms and cities in the San Joaquin Valley. The survey results were better in the northern Sierra, where the water content is 88 percent of normal.

 

No MID cutbacks for '08

 

Besides the dry weather, a court order to protect salmon migrations has placed restrictions on water transfers through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

 

Officials with the MID and Turlock Irrigation District said the disappointing snowmelt will make it harder to recover from two straight below-normal years.

 

"We have plenty of water for this year; the concern is what happens if 2009 is another dry year," said Walt Ward, assistant general manager of water operations for the MID. "If it's an average year in 2009, it doesn't help you climb out of the hole. You need a series of wet years to pull it back."

 

The MID has no plans to cut water deliveries in 2008, but hasn't ruled it out for next year.

 

Because of the dry spring, the districts expect to carry more than 825,000 acre-feet in Don Pedro Reservoir in the fall after delivering water for farmers and city customers. That carryover is half of what they shoot for.

 

The districts share the storage in Don Pedro, and a wetter spring would have provided 13 percent more water to hold onto for next year, said Wes Monier, strategic issues and planning manager for the TID.

 

If the dry trend continues next year, Monier expects the district will continue with measures to conserve water.

 

TID cap on ag water

 

Last month, the Turlock district put a cap on agricultural water deliveries, the first time it has done so since the 1987-92 drought, and also shortened the spring-to-fall irrigation by two weeks.

 

Turlock farmer Ron Macedo said he made some changes to get by with the 42 inches of TID water. After irrigating his oat silage this spring, he wasn't sure he had enough water to plant corn as a second crop. So, he put a pumpkin field on drip irrigation and moved the TID allotment from that field to his corn crop.

 

More dry weather will make it tougher to maintain orchards and growers will resort to pumping water from the ground. "There is going to be more wells dug," Macedo said. "No doubt about it."

 

Water districts on the valley's West Side are hoping to hold onto their water allocations from the federal canal system. In February, the federal government cut the allocations for West Side growers to 45 percent and made no change in an April notice.

 

"It is not enough water to maintain a crop if you are planting your full acreage," said Anthea Hansen, assistant manager of the Del Puerto Water District, which includes 45,000 acres in western Stanislaus, San Joaquin and Merced counties.

 

Ground is being left fallow and some growers are paying top dollar to buy extra water from other federal water contractors, she said.

 

Not an official drought

 

California's water situation hasn't declined to the level of the last major drought to hit the state. The runoff in the Sacramento and San Joaquin river basins, averaged over the past two years, is 15 percent to 20 percent higher than in 1987-92, said Lynn with the Department of Water Resources.

 

Officials said the dry weather is getting close to an official drought, defined as prolonged below-normal rainfall, resulting in depleted water storage, dry soil and stressed public water systems.

 

On Thursday, Gov. Schwarz- enegger renewed his appeal for the state to invest in water infrastructure, including conservation, more storage and improved conveyance through and around the delta.

 

Chrisman said California residents can conserve water this summer by watering lawns in the evening, planting drought- resistant shrubs and using efficient washing machines and low-flush toilets.

 

"When most folks understand the importance of it, people usually respond to it," he said.

http://www.modbee.com/local/story/286625.html

 

Snowpack levels now lagging : Bone-Dry April in Sierra tightens summer water supply in valley

San Jose Mercury News- 5/2/08

By Paul Rogers

 

Just two months ago, it appeared that Northern California was in store for a nice wet year - or at least a year of normal rain and snow levels - following a dry 2007.

 

But March and April were the driest months in the Sierra Nevada since records were first kept in 1922, state water officials announced Thursday.

 

As a result, the Sierra Nevada snowpack averaged 67 percent of normal for May 1 in the state's final snowpack measurement of the year, down from 95 percent April 1.

 

And while Silicon Valley won't face mandatory water rationing, the bottom line is that Bay Area water supplies will be tighter this summer than anyone had expected.

 

"In March, things were looking pretty good," said Frank Gehrke, chief of the snow survey program for the state Department of Water Resources in Sacramento. "But it stopped snowing in March and April. Bang! It literally just shut off."

 

Hydrologists for the department said conditions aren't bleak enough to describe this summer as a drought. But they worried that if snowfall is low next year, the state will face major water problems.

 

After snow builds up every winter and spring on the Sierra mountains, it melts during the summer, flowing into rivers and San Francisco Bay's delta.

 

But this April and May, only 2.3 inches of rain fell in the Northern Sierra between Lake Tahoe and Mount Lassen - the lowest since 1922.

 

Without rain, there was almost no new snow to follow the heavy amounts from January and February. Worse, said Gehrke, no storms meant lots of sunlight. And that meant more melting.

 

So overall runoff is expected this year to only be about 55 percent of normal.

 

In Silicon Valley, that means concern and caution, but not full-blown crisis.

 

Residents will be asked to continue last year's 10 percent voluntary reductions this summer, said Susan Siravo, spokeswoman for the Santa Clara Valley Water District.

 

"We still have good groundwater reserves and our reservoir levels are pretty good," Siravo said. "March and April have been very dry. But we got a high level of runoff in January and February."

 

The district's 10 reservoirs were 68 percent full Thursday.

 

So far this year, San Jose has received 11.25 inches of rain - 77 percent of normal for this time of year.

 

It would have been more, but April was bone-dry. Only one-tenth of an inch of rain fell in San Jose in all of April - compared with 2.6 inches for the average April.

 

The trick this summer is to focus on lawn and gardens, which use half the water in an average house, Siravo said.

 

"Fix leaks and broken sprinkler heads," she said. "Water at night or early in the morning. Most people can have a healthy lawn watering three days a week. You can easily cut back 10 percent."

 

Some Silicon Valley residents already have started.

 

With the dry spring, sales of drought-tolerant plants are double this year what they normally would be, said Ron Kanemoto, manager of Yamagami's Nursery in Cupertino.

 

"Water is on people's minds, definitely," he said. "Last weekend, I got chastised by a customer for not having drip irrigation equipment. We had discontinued it about five years ago because we weren't selling it. Now you can tell the interest is coming back."

 

Unlike other Bay Area locales, Santa Clara County has the geology that allows huge volumes of groundwater to be stored in underground aquifers. Those supplies make up about half of the water

 

for the district's 1.8 million customers, with the other half coming from the delta.

Other Bay Area water districts are much more strapped.

 

The East Bay Municipal Utility District staff will recommend May 13 that the agency's board impose mandatory summer water rationing of at least 15 percent, said spokesman Charles Hardy. That will be the first time the district's 1.3 million residents from Hayward to Walnut Creek have faced mandatory rationing since 1991.

 

The reason? East Bay MUD has no groundwater storage and its watershed is at a relatively low Sierra elevation.

 

Meanwhile, the 2.4 million people from Milpitas and Hayward to San Francisco who get their water from the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir in Yosemite National Park will be asked this summer for only voluntary cutbacks.

 

That's because last year, they were asked to voluntarily cut use 10 percent and they responded with a 13 percent reduction, said Tony Winnicker, a spokesman for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. Also, that system's reservoirs are 70 percent full.

 

Compounding the nervousness this year, last year's Sierra snowpack - 28 percent of normal on May 1 - was the lowest in nearly 20 years. That meant less runoff to fill the state's large reservoirs, making this year even more critical.

 

Across the state, farmers and large Southern California water districts used the snowpack news to urge state lawmakers to approve more money to build new dams and canals.

 

Because a judge ordered pumping from the delta cut last year by up to 30 percent to protect an endangered fish, farmers are facing wrenching cutbacks, said Laura King Moon, a spokeswoman for the State Water Contractors, a group of 27 agencies that import delta water.

 

"Not only are we facing severe restrictions under the Endangered Species Act on how much water we can deliver, less than average runoff means that water supplies are down as well," she said.

http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_9129180

 

Pressure on state to reduce water use: Sierra snowpack levels at 67 percent of normal

San Diego Tribune- 5/2/08

By Michael Gardner

 

SACRAMENTO – Another Miracle March or even traditional April showers failed to materialize across much of the Sierra this spring, adding pressure on Californians to save more water or risk widespread rationing.

 

Season-closing snowpack figures came in a dismal 67 percent of normal, driven down by record-low precipitation over the last two months, the state Department of Water Resources reported yesterday.

 

Water districts are extra-cautious when broaching the unpopular subject of rationing, but there are indications that some agencies will take the latest snow survey as proof that drastic steps are necessary.

 

“I'm reading the tea leaves,” said Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies, “but it's very clear this industry is going to have to get serious about demand management . . . We have to make sure people use less water.”

 

The San Diego County Water Authority has no immediate plans to ration deliveries, but the dire conditions will be reviewed at its meeting scheduled for May 22, said Jim Barrett, a member of the board.

 

The water authority on Monday will launch a $1.8 million advertising campaign urging conservation and offering advice on how to save, particularly outdoors.

 

“Our water supplies are being cut, and we need everyone to pull together and save more water immediately,” said Fern Steiner, the authority's chairwoman.

 

The giant Metropolitan Water District, which sells water wholesale to various agencies including San Diego, expects to tap reserves to meet commitments. But the Los Angeles-based district also plans to encourage its urban agencies to enforce existing ordinances that limit water use during shortages, said Jeffrey Kightlinger, Metropolitan's general manager.

 

“We're in good shape, reserves-wise, Kightlinger said. “But we can't continue indefinitely.”

 

Confirmation that California's dry spell has extended through a second year also prompted Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to renew his push for a statewide conservation goal of 20 percent by 2020 – a laudable target but one that water managers suggest will be challenging to reach.

 

That's particularly true in Southern California, where conservation has been gospel for some time but rapid growth continues.

 

The governor's conservation call in late February was muffled by disputes over his proposal for reservoirs and a new north-south delivery canal. The conservation plan is short on details, such as how to avoid punishing districts that already have conserved aggressively and how farmers would fit in.

 

Historically, there has been reluctance in some regions to accept water meters, tiered pricing and other controls.

 

“We need to make sure the plan is fair,” Kightlinger said.

 

Southern California is already squeezed by cuts resulting from a seven-state agreement to share the Colorado River and a slowdown in deliveries from the north to comply with a court order to protect the Sacramento delta smelt, a rare fish.

 

So a good season of soaking rain and snow would have been a welcome measure of relief, albeit temporary. The new year started out promising, delivering potent storms in January and February.

 

But the skies closed quickly. March and April turned out to be record-dry for the Northern Sierra, providing sprinkles at best. The last storm that cheered ski resorts and dam operators alike roared into the Shasta-Tahoe region on Feb. 24.

 

“That was the last good shot of snowfall,” said state hydrologist Art Hinojosa.

 

Sierra snowfall is crucial to Southern California, which in normal years draws as much as two-thirds of its supply from the north.

 

Meanwhile, San Diego County registered its driest March and April since 1972, according to the National Weather Service. Fortunately, the Colorado River basin has had a decent year, slightly raising levels at Lakes Mead and Powell.

 

In Southern California, Metropolitan already has taken pre-emptive measures, primarily reducing deliveries to agriculture by 30 percent.

 

The East Bay Municipal Utilities District, which delivers water to Oakland, Berkeley and other cities along the Interstate 680 corridor, will consider mandatory rationing May 13. The city of Roseville near Sacramento just launched a voluntary 10 percent strategy, including reducing lawn watering.

 

But whether voluntary efforts will be enough to carry California through a second-straight dry year remains in doubt. California has not faced such a challenge at the tap since the drought of 1987-1992, which could have been even more disastrous except in 1991, a “Miracle March” delivered storms that hadn't been seen for some time.

 

Twenty years ago, cyclical weather was deemed the primary cause of that drought. Today it is more difficult to assess the cause of shortages and address them. Among the factors: rapid urban growth, climate change and myriad woes threatening the fragile Sacramento delta, the hub of the state's water supply.

 

Barrett, who represents the city of San Diego on the water authority board, suggested that managers could cope with periodical shortages caused by nature. The real dilemma is how to open the bottleneck at the delta pumps.

 

“The problem is not the amount of snow,” Barrett said. “The problem is being able to move the water through the pumps.”

 

Schwarzenegger seized on the dismal outlook to again promote his water plans that have been stymied in the Legislature as too costly and damaging to the environment.

 

“Today's snow survey findings further underscore the need for action now. I have proposed a comprehensive approach to address our statewide water crisis that includes water conservation, more surface and groundwater storage and new investments,” Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

 

“These actions are vital to protect our environment, economy and quality of life. I know that legislative leaders share my goal of comprehensive water reform, but time is running out. The longer we wait, the worse our situation becomes.”

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080502/news_1n2water.html

 

Drought certain if solutions are absent

The San Francisco Chronicle- 5/2/08

Kevin Fagan, Staff Writer

 

Stanford University -- In many ways, Stanford University's huge water system of reservoirs, pipelines and creeks mirrors the crisis facing California as a whole - water resources are in real trouble, but there are ways to handle it.

 

Whether there is the political will in the state to do so stumped a group of eminent historians and scientists participating in Stanford's annual "Walk the Farm" nature hike, which, at 20.8 miles, was more like a sole-blistering tramp.

 

One thing all agreed upon: The state had better get cracking.

 

"There is enough water for people - just not enough for people and the agricultural system the way it's set up now," Richard White, a leading environmental historian, said as he hiked past one of Stanford's two main reservoirs Saturday. "Like with so many things, you may have to make some choices. Hard choices."

 

State water officials agree that the outlook is not rosy.

 

Driest recorded period

California just came through its driest March-April rain period - 2.3 inches of precipitation in the Sierra - since records began being collected in 1859. The biggest reservoir in the state, Lake Shasta, is at 75 percent of its average capacity for this time of year. The second-biggest reservoir, Lake Oroville, is at 59 percent.

 

State officials warned Thursday that widespread water rationing is a very real possibility this summer. Another few years like this, experts say, and we might start running drastically short of water.

 

And that's just if the water demand stays the same - which it won't. California is projected to gain 12 million residents by 2030, enough to consume annually three times the water stored in Pardee Reservoir, the East Bay Municipal Utility District's linchpin 40 miles southeast of Sacramento. That's the kind of water drain that no low-flow toilets or recycling systems can offset.

 

Something major needed

White said the trouble isn't having too many people or too much agriculture in the sprawling regions. It's just that we expect too much of what we have.

 

"My guess is that something major will have to be done in the next 10 years or so, and it will probably take a drastic drought to bring it about," said White, who also is co-director of Stanford's Bill Lane Center for the Study of the North American West.

 

The challenges for California - and indeed, the West - were acutely illustrated on Saturday during Stanford's "Walk the Farm: Stanford Waterways" hike. It was the second annual "Walk the Farm" event conducted by Lane Center experts to educationally explore Stanford, and this year's edition brought together 25 scientists, professors, students and the simply curious to discuss all things water as they tramped.

 

Some water storage facilities on the 8,180-acre campus, they found, are old and filling with sediment. Fish populations are requiring extraordinary care to maintain as water gets siphoned away from creeks, and crops and livestock compete vigorously for supplies.

 

The walk also showcased some of the nation's most innovative conservation methods - from a power plant poised to become the first in Northern California to recycle cooling tower water for use elsewhere, to a watering system that is computer-driven to switch off in rain or cool temperatures. The campus toilets are so low-flow that some use only a pint of water.

 

Water has always been one of the most fought-over commodities in the West, literally determining where cities and agriculture can exist, and the booming population and big-bucks agricultural needs are stressing the existing system, said Jon Christensen, a Western environmental writer who helped organize the hike. And as seen through Stanford's example, he said, handling that stress means we are going to have to "get more creative and flexible than ever about our uses."

 

Sediment settling in

One of the most pressing challenges was illustrated in a nutshell at Searsville Dam, a Lego-looking structure of stacked blocks in the hills west of the campus. When built in 1892, it was among the first dams of its kind in the West. After all these years of sandstone runoff filtering in, however, the reservoir held back by the dam is now 54 feet deep with sediment - and just 10 feet deep with water.

 

If the university lets the sludge spill into the waterway leading away from the dam, it will raise the flood plain all down the line. If it doesn't clear out the sediment, the reservoir will eventually become a marsh. Emptying that much sediment, on the other hand, can be hugely expensive.

 

The same conundrum faces managers of dams all over the West, from the Olympic Peninsula in Washington to Lake Powell in Arizona, which serves California. No easy solutions loom, the scientists said - but the problems will nonetheless have to be acted upon, just like the rest of California's water challenges, despite the inevitable battles over money and entrenched interests.

 

Action is critical

"In the world of water resources, there is no such thing as a do-nothing option," said David Freyberg, a Stanford civil engineering professor who advises internationally on water usages. "Or as they say, the do-nothing option actually does a lot." As in damage.

 

Some local and state water authorities are already trying to take this attitude to heart - carefully.

 

Water managers in the East Bay, Santa Cruz and San Diego are either considering or instituting water-rationing measures this spring, and they expect to tighten their mandates next year. On the state level, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is urging lawmakers to craft a multibillion-dollar measure for a future ballot to pay for new canals, dams or other water projects, and he has reopened the long-dormant - and ever-controversial - discussion of alternatives to a Peripheral Canal to slurp more water from the Delta.

 

Agreement on all these initiatives, locally and statewide, has proved predictably tough.

 

"We need a comprehensive approach to solving the state's water problems, and we need some of everything," Ted Thomas of the state Department of Water Resources said in a phone interview. "We don't have enough water storage, and we need better water conveyance (pipe systems).

 

"Conservation is great, and we preach it all the time, but it won't do much in the sixth or seventh year of a drought," Thomas said. "Because by then, you won't have anything left to conserve."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/02/MNRK10DPD6.DTL

 

Call out for conservation: Saving water now could cut risk of future rationing

Stockton Record -5/2/08

By Hank Shaw

 

SACRAMENTO - Californians need to cut back on water use now or face possible mandatory rationing later this year, so says state Secretary of Natural Resources Mike Chrisman.

 

Nevertheless, state water officials are hesitating to call this second consecutive dry year a drought.

 

"We need to recognize that we're in a water shortage and begin to act accordingly," Chrisman said in a news conference Thursday.

 

Chrisman's boss, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, wants Californians to reduce their water use by 20 percent by 2020.

 

Stockton, Sacramento, Redding and Fresno have all experienced the driest spring on record; Stockton got only six-hundredths of an inch combined in March and April.

 

Earlier this week, local officials said they expect no unusual water restrictions this year, although some cities - such as Stockton - already have annual restrictions by ordinance. For example, restaurants can only offer water by request, and plumbing leaks must be repaired within a day.

 

This local optimism may give way if the public fails to cut back, Chrisman said. While he said the state is not planning mandatory rationing yet, it could happen this year.

 

Chrisman said he's hoping Californians cut back on their own, because the state's main water supplies are well short of normal.

 

The Sierra snowpack is only two-thirds the level it should be at this time of year, and the water behind Oroville Dam is only at 58 percent of where it ought to be at this stage.

 

We can thank La NiƱa for this, according to state meteorologist Elissa Lynn. This weather condition typically cuts off our rainy season midway, she said, adding that it was lucky it did not kick in until March.

 

"It could have been much worse," she said.

 

California is a year away from a real drought. Water levels during the last great drought of 1987-92 on the San Joaquin River averaged 2.75 million acre-feet. Last year, the river was down to 2.5 million acre-feet, Lynn said, but it is up to 3.8 million acre-feet this year.

 

Other parts of California are facing severe water shortages because they rely on the Delta, where legal disputes over endangered fish have reduced the amount of water that can be delivered.

 

Meanwhile, East Bay residents are looking at potential water rationing this summer. They get much of their water from the Mokelumne River, where reservoirs are already dropping even as the snowpack melts.

 

Stockton draws water from two foothill reservoirs, as well as from underground, and thus is less dependent on snow.

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080502/A_NEWS/805020329

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive