This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 5/9/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

May 9, 2008

 

1.      Top Item –

 

 

 

State Senate votes to eliminate entity overseeing delta repair: Questions about almost $5 billion spent on program

The Associated Press – 5/9/08



Canal could increase water supply

The Contra Costa Times- 5/8/08

 

 

Garamendi warns of how climate change may affect Delta

The Stockton Record – 8/9/08

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

State Senate votes to eliminate entity overseeing delta repair: Questions about almost $5 billion spent on program

The Associated Press – 5/9/08

 

Sacramento --- The state Senate voted Thursday to end California's participation in a joint authority created eight years ago to rescue the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta from collapse and resolve persistent water disputes.

 

The bill, which goes to the Assembly, would disband the California Bay-Delta Authority. The entity includes representatives from six state and six federal agencies and had been charged with implementing the California-Federal Bay-Delta Program to repair the delta.

 

The authority was created by a joint agreement between the state and federal governments in 2000 as the governing body for Cal-Fed as part of an effort that began several years before to end infighting between government agencies and interest groups representing farmers, fishermen, cities and environmentalists. It has been plagued ever since by bureaucratic disagreements over funding and priorities.

 

An investigation last year by the Associated Press found that most of the almost $5 billion that has been spent on the Cal-Fed program has gone to projects hundreds of miles from the delta.

 

"The delta is in worse condition today despite the authority," said Sen. Mike Machado, D-Linden (San Joaquin County), the bill's author. "The authority has outlived its usefulness."

 

The influence of the California Bay-Delta Authority has been in decline in recent years, as court decisions, lighter snowpacks and other factors increasingly dictate the direction of water debates.

 

Last year, a federal judge cut water pumping from the delta by a third to protect a native fish, compounding a statewide water shortage. That decision came after the state slashed the authority's administrative budget and reassigned most of its projects and staff to other state agencies.

 

State Sen. Jeff Denham, R-Salinas, who represents a district in the southern delta, said he would like to see an accounting of the authority's spending.

 

"It just hasn't been effective," he said after the Senate voted 25-8 in favor of the bill. "I think a further in-depth look needs to happen to see exactly where all of that money went, because we certainly see the expenditures being made but no improvements being made."

 

Despite the Bay-Delta Authority's many problems, Machado's bill caught a key lawmaker by surprise.

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-San Francisco, who helped craft the Cal-Fed program, said she had asked her staff to talk to the state senator about his bill.

 

"I'm surprised by this," Feinstein said. "I do not understand the rationale."

 

The Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta is crucial to California, acting as the heart of the state's intricate water supply and delivery system. Water that courses through its rivers and channels eventually reaches about 23 million Californians and thousands of acres of farmland.

 

Cal-Fed would continue under the bill passed Thursday but with its environmental programs, contracts and funding being handled by the California Resources Agency.

 

Lawmakers want to replace the authority after seeing recommendations later this year from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's Delta Vision Task Force.

 

Schwarzenegger has not taken a position on whether he would sign the bill. But a spokeswoman for the governor said the state needs a comprehensive water plan that includes conservation, reservoirs and a canal to pipe fresh water around the delta.

 

"We agree that despite billions of dollars in bond money spent on fixing the delta in the last decade, the delta is in worse shape today than it was a decade ago," Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Lisa Page said in an e-mailed statement.#

 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/09/BAGB10JFF8.DTL

 

 

Canal could increase water supply

The Contra Costa Times- 5/8/08

By Mike Taugher

In its first study of a controversial canal around the Delta in nearly a decade, California's statewide water agency concluded that it might be able to squeeze 20 percent more water out of the beleaguered Delta.

 

The report suggests it can do that while better protecting fish and without substantially worsening water quality.

 

If true, the Peripheral Canal could substantially ease pressure on a water system that is facing potentially severe shortages, badly deteriorating fish populations and court orders that have repeatedly found the state's water pumps are operating illegally.

 

But the conclusions of the study, a very early look at what state water managers want to do, are certain to be modified by state engineers and regulators and challenged by critics.

 

"The analysis is biased in a way that disguises the potential impacts of the scenarios they analyze," said Barry Nelson, a water policy analyst with the Natural Resources Defense Council. "There's absolutely no discussion here of what the Delta can accommodate and remain healthy."

 

The report also suggests that state water officials could seek to loosen water quality standards.

 

The report, posted recently on a state Web site, was requested by a panel appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to come up with a master plan for the Delta. The panel, the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, is expected to make a recommendation next month on how best to move water through the Delta region, a subject that harkens back 26 years to one of the most divisive political battles in California history.

 

By taking water from the Sacramento River instead of from pumps near Tracy, the Peripheral Canal would deliver cleaner water and eliminate the deaths of millions of fish each year at the pumps. But it also would partially dewater the Delta and increase the concentration of salt and pollution in the estuary, including where the Contra Costa Water District's intake pipes are located.

 

It also would lower flows on the lower Sacramento River, which could be a problem for declining salmon runs.

 

The first attempt at building a canal was defeated in a 1982 referendum.

 

However, it has received renewed interest in recent years after Delta water deliveries hit new highs, fish populations plummeted and courts ordered water supply reductions.

 

In a twist, the task force and state water managers are leaning toward building a canal but using it in conjunction with the existing pumps near Tracy. A study done last year found that relying solely on a canal would, surprisingly, reduce the amount of available water.

 

The most likely version of the combo plan, called "dual conveyance," would cost $8.6 billion to $17.2 billion, according to the Department of Water Resources study.

 

It would increase Delta water supplies to the Bay Area, San Joaquin Valley, Central coast and Southern California by roughly 1 million acre-feet, or enough for 8 million people, in an average year, the study estimated.

 

The proposed plumbing system could do that by taking water from the Sacramento River through the 43-mile Peripheral Canal and the Tracy pumps. Operators would decide where to take water from based on water quality in the Delta, the location of migrating salmon, smelt and other fish species and whatever operating rules happen to be in place.

 

The 39-page study suggests that state water officials could ask that current salinity standards be revisited because the original regulations were designed largely to keep small fish away from the Delta pumps. If water is being taken from the Sacramento River, the pumps would not be running and there would be no need to keep fish away from them.

 

"That's not a rationale anymore," said water resources department deputy director Jerry Johns.

 

The report says that if the overall salinity regulation is substantially changed, water operations could end up controlled by a regulation that protects water quality at the Contra Costa Water District's intake at Rock Slough.

 

If that were the case, that regulation also could be eliminated if the Contra Costa Water District agreed to participate in the dual conveyance plan.

 

"That's a whole lot of wishful thinking there," said Greg Gartrell, Contra Costa Water District's assistant general manager.

 

Johns objected to the characterization that the result of those changes would be weakened regulations, saying that the intent of those regulations would no longer apply and that regulators would insist on appropriate controls.

 

"It's the beginning of a long, complicated process," he said.#

 http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_9187187?IADID=Search-www.contracostatimes.com-www.contracostatimes.com

 

 

 

 

 

Garamendi warns of how climate change may affect Delta

The Stockton Record – 8/9/08

By Scott Smith, Staff Writer

 

STOCKTON - If left unchecked, the rising sea levels caused by global climate change could leave Stockton under water, California's Lt. Gov. John Garamendi warned Thursday in a talk to members of San Joaquin County's legal community.

 

Garamendi spoke at the San Joaquin County Bar Association's annual Law Day luncheon. He said new laws have to address climate change issues that will impact local residents whose lives are inexorably tied to the San Joaquin Delta.

 

"Yes, Delta water has come up six inches over the last century," he said. "And if you go 56 inches, we're in deep water right here."

 

In addition to capricious flooding and spells of drought driven by climate change, he said California laws have to account for things such as levees and how water is stored in natural aquifers that supply drinking water.

 

Attorneys have a say in how the law is shaped when they take related cases, he said. He recommended a mind-set, drawing upon his experiences in the late 1960s with the U.S. Peace Corps in Ethiopia. He recalled that tribes greeted each other asking, "How are the children?"

 

Making choices that arise from climate change, people often take a short-term approach, brushing aside solutions that set a positive course for years to come, he said.

 

"I think that's really wrong," Garamendi said, harkening back to the Ethiopian tribes of his youth. "We need to think of the generations ahead."#

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080509/A_NEWS/805090335/-1/A_NEWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive