This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY -1/2/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

January 2, 2008

 

4. Water Quality

 

WATER RECLAMATION:

O.C. sewage will soon be drinking water; A $490-million plant will clean effluent to state standards, then inject it into the groundwater basin for further filtration - Los Angeles Times

 

Funding to recycle water is untapped; Millions available should S.D. ask - San Diego Union Tribune

 

 

WATER RECLAMATION:

O.C. sewage will soon be drinking water; A $490-million plant will clean effluent to state standards, then inject it into the groundwater basin for further filtration

Los Angeles Times – 1/2/08

By Dan Weikel, staff writer

 

As a hedge against water shortages and population growth, Orange County has begun operating the world's largest, most modern reclamation plant -- a facility that can turn 70 million gallons of treated sewage into drinking water every day.

The new purification system at the Orange County Water District headquarters in Fountain Valley cost about $490 million and comprises a labyrinth of pipes, filters, holding tanks and pumps across 20 acres.

 

Almost four years after construction began, the facility is now purifying effluent from a neighboring sewage treatment plant run by the Orange County Sanitation District, a partner in the venture.

The finished product will be injected into the county's vast groundwater basin to combat saltwater intrusion and supplement drinking water supplies for 2.3 million people in coastal, central and northern Orange County.

But before that can be done, state health officials must certify that the reclaimed water meets drinking water standards. Officials expect the approval to be granted before opening ceremonies Jan. 25.

"Our sources from the delta and the Colorado River are becoming unavailable," said Michael R. Markus, general manager of the water district. "This will help drought-proof the region and give us a locally controlled source of water."

Last month, for example, a federal judge in Fresno ordered a 30% reduction in fresh water pumped from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to protect the tiny delta smelt, a threatened species. The region, which is facing myriad environmental problems, is the hub of California's water system.

If the reclamation plant's full potential is realized, officials say, up to 130 million gallons a day could be added to the county's fresh water supply, lessening the region's dependence on outside sources.

Basically, the facility takes treated sewage, which would have been discharged into the sea, and runs it through an advanced filtration system.

Officials say the final product is as clean as distilled water and so pure that lime has to be added to it to keep it from leaching minerals out of concrete pipes, thus weakening them.

The effluent is first pumped into the reclamation plant from the sanitation district's sewage treatment facility next door. The brackish water, which smells of deodorizer, flows into 26 holding basins equipped with 270 million micro-filters -- thin straws of porous material with holes no bigger than three-hundredths the thickness of a human hair.

>From there, the water is forced under high pressure through a series of thin plastic membranes housed in rows of white cylinders. Next, it is dosed with hydrogen peroxide and bombarded with ultraviolet light to neutralize any remaining contaminants.

At this point, the water is free of bacteria, viruses, carcinogens, hormones, chemicals, toxic heavy metals, fertilizers, pesticides and dissolved pharmaceuticals.

Though it is good enough to drink, the scrubbing isn't finished. Once the state approves, up to 70 million gallons of treated water a day will be pumped into the county's giant underground aquifer. It will be cleansed further as it percolates through the earth to depths up to 1,000 feet.

"This is as advanced a reclamation system as you are going to get right now," said Krista Clark, director of regulatory affairs for the Assn. of California Water Agencies, a nonprofit organization that represents 450 government authorities. "It will keep Orange County's groundwater basin reliable and produce super-quality drinking water in the future."

At $550 per acre-foot, the recycled water is slightly more expensive than supplies brought in from Northern California. But water district officials predict that the cost of the treated water will become more competitive as the price of imported water rises.

Officials say the reclamation process uses less electricity than moving the same amount of water to Orange County through the state's system of aqueducts. The California State Water Project consumes about a fifth of the energy used in the state.

The reclamation plant also will dramatically reduce the volume of treated sewage discharged daily off the Orange County coast. The sanitation district now releases about 240 million gallons a day through its ocean outfall -- an amount that could be cut by more than half given the potential of water recycling.

If so, the county might not have to build a new $300-million ocean outfall, said James M. Ferryman, chairman of the sanitation district board of directors.

Sanitation and water district officials hope the new plant will become a model for governments trying to cope with water shortages, drought and the increasing demands of growing populations.

Projects similar to Orange County's are under study in San Diego, San Jose, Texas, Florida, Australia and Singapore. Recently, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power began reconsidering plans to recycle waste water.

More than a decade ago, Los Angeles built a small reclamation system in the eastern San Fernando Valley. The $55-million plant was closed in 2000 because of the public's distaste over the so-called toilet-to-tap process.

"Cheap political shots have closed some of these efforts," said Connor Everts, executive director of the Southern California Watershed Alliance, an environmental group based in Santa Monica. "All of Southern California should be doing these projects. They represent an efficient use of local resources. They are cost-effective and one of the most environmentally friendly things you can do."

In Orange County, water reclamation has not faced much opposition thanks to public awareness and the water district's extensive marketing campaign: plant tours, neighborhood pizza parties and hundreds of public meetings to explain the process.

The outreach effort has resulted in endorsements from scores of elected officials as well as civic, community and environmental organizations.

Public acceptance was also helped by the fact that since 1976 the county has been pumping about 15 million gallons of reclaimed sewer water a day into the groundwater basin to protect it from saltwater intrusion.

For decades, the aquifer has been plagued by saltwater that flows in as fresh water is pumped out of underground reservoirs along the coast. The condition can be checked and reduced by injecting treated water back into the ground to act as a shield.

District officials estimate that 90% of the treated water from the district's old reclamation plant -- Water Factory 21 -- has made it into the county's drinking water supply without a risk to public health.

"We are really just helping ourselves," Ferryman said. "Communities are waking up, especially those in semiarid regions. They are beginning to realize that you need reliability in your water supplies."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-reclaim2jan02,1,732425.story?coll=la-headlines-california

 

 

Funding to recycle water is untapped; Millions available should S.D. ask

San Diego Union Tribune – 1/1/08

By Mike Lee, staff writer

 

More than a decade ago, officials in Orange County realized they would need hundreds of millions of dollars to expand their system for recycling wastewater.

 

Undeterred, they secured grants and low-cost loans, and pooled $480 million.

 

The investment will culminate any day as water and sewer agencies in Orange County make final plans to pump highly treated wastewater from their new purification plant to percolation ponds in Anaheim. Eventually, the recycled water will be delivered to about 2.3 million people.

 

In San Diego, Mayor Jerry Sanders has resisted a similar project even though the city imports about 90 percent of its drinking water at a growing expense.

 

Sanders' position rests largely on financial grounds. He said mixing reclaimed wastewater with other drinking water in a city reservoir, an idea dubbed “toilet to tap” by critics, would cost too much. The price tag – $210 million by the city's estimate – would translate into a fraction of ratepayers' current water and sewer bills.

 

Homeowners and businesses could pay even less because the city's financial analysis didn't account for possible grants from federal, state and regional agencies. Those entities have identified tens of millions of dollars for future water-related projects in the San Diego area, but local districts have to ask for that money.

 

Officials at the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation said they probably would help fund a reservoir augmentation program for San Diego but that Sanders and his staff haven't requested assistance.

 

Orange County leaders took an aggressive approach to boosting their drinking water supplies with recycled wastewater. They reduced their construction bill by nearly 20 percent and secured payments to cover more than 10 percent of the annual operating costs for their Groundwater Replenishment System.

 

Most of Southern California, including Orange and San Diego counties, obtains water from the Colorado River and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Over 30 years, the cost of producing recycled drinking water in Orange County will be about the same as buying imported water, according to the project's coordinators in Fountain Valley.

 

The economics differ for every region, but two advantages for Orange County hold true across the parched Southwest: Recycling creates a stable source of water even during drought, and it serves as a hedge against rising prices for imported water.

 

San Diego, in my mind, has more economic reasons and more water supply reasons to do it . . . than we did,” said Philip Anthony, a director of the Orange County Water District and an avocado grower in Fallbrook. “I would strongly suggest (Sanders) take another look at both the finances and the need.”

 

In December, the San Diego City Council voted to override Sanders' veto against a pilot project that would recycle wastewater using reservoir augmentation. It was the first time the council successfully reversed a veto by Sanders on a major issue.

 

The council wants to start a demonstration plant for reservoir augmentation by this summer. It could be a race against time because coast to coast, a growing number of water districts are competing for money to establish water-recycling operations.

 

“I can name dozens” of utilities that are exploring how to recycle wastewater, said Mark Millan, a public relations consultant in Northern California who works with water agencies.

 

In the Bay Area, a consortium of agencies is asking Congress for nearly $36 million to help pay for several water-reuse projects.

 

San Diego is ahead of many other cities considering wastewater recycling. It owns two relatively new plants that treat sewage enough so it can be used for irrigation and certain industrial purposes.

 

But even after accounting for a major sale last year, the two facilities recycle water at about one-quarter of their capacity. The under-production has prompted everyone from business leaders to environmentalists to debate how to increase the plants' use.

 

A 2006 study commissioned by San Diego looked at six options, including one that would send purified wastewater from one of the city's treatment plants to San Vicente Reservoir near Lakeside. The setup would generate about 10,500 acre-feet of recycled water annually, enough to serve about 21,000 homes.

 

The study's authors said that arrangement would cost the most money up front but “appears to be the appropriate choice if the driving decision factors are to maximize recycled water use and have the lowest” per-gallon cost.

 

The San Vicente strategy would cost homeowners about $1.85 per month, or roughly 2 percent of the combined water and sewer bill for the typical household in San Diego.

 

Several interest groups – including politicians, business leaders and engineers – support reservoir augmentation.

 

Sanders remains steadfast in his opposition. During an interview in late December, he restated his dislike of the San Vicente proposal but said he has directed his staff to work on the council's pilot project. The first report from the staff is expected this month.

 

The mayor said he didn't know where the money would come from for a demonstration plant, let alone a major facility.

 

“This has not been one of my priorities,” Sanders said.

 

He prefers using more recycled water for irrigation and industry, among other options, and said San Diego is pursuing state and federal funding for those efforts.

 

In Orange County, leaders spent several years lobbying legislators and agency officials to back their purification plant.

 

“Pretty much 80 percent of the . . . early days were spent on securing funds,” said project manager Shivaji Deshmukh of the Orange County Water District.

 

The payoff was handsome: More than $90 million in construction grants, plus about $3.8 million a year for 23 years to help run the facility.

 

Despite the help, the water and sewer agencies of Orange County still had to come up with nearly $400 million.

 

Officials from the county's sanitation district had been saving up for a new ocean outfall to discharge wastewater. By spending that money on the water recycling project instead, they were able to avoid costly upgrades.

 

The county's water district financed most of its debt for the project through the state's revolving loan program. It got a break there, too, tapping what Deshmukh said was the equivalent of a 1.8 percent interest rate for 25 years.

 

He said water rates for the typical homeowner in the district would rise about $1 per month in coming years, partly to pay for the new purification system.

 

State and federal agencies still offer financial incentives to boost water recycling.

 

California, for instance, continues to give low-cost loans for water works like the one that helped Orange County.

 

In addition, Proposition 84 is expected to make at least $91 million available for water-related projects in the San Diego region starting as soon as July. Voters approved the $5.4 billion state bond in 2006 for ventures involving water, parks and other natural resources.

 

Federal agencies such as the Bureau of Reclamation also extend financial aid. Since 1995, the bureau has issued about $84 million in grants to help pay for water reuse in the San Diego area.

 

Bureau of Reclamation officials said Congress has authorized spending an additional $88 million for similar efforts in the region. The agency pays up to 25 percent of a qualifying project's construction costs – as long as Congress appropriates enough money.

 

“If we received an application for funding for any part of the (reservoir augmentation) project from the city of San Diego, we would probably fund it, assuming the money is available,” said Dennis Wolfe, the bureau's chief engineer for Southern California.

 

San Diego officials emphasized that congressional spending hasn't kept up with their requests, so there is no certainty that a new purification plant would receive major funding.

 

The Metropolitan Water District also helps pay for water recycling programs in Southern California. For 2008, it is offering $21 million to member agencies based on how much recycled water they produce. By 2015, the payments are scheduled to amount to $33 million.

 

The district already funds some of San Diego's water recycling efforts. Those payments constitute about 30 percent of what the wholesaler is willing to pay if the city increased its use of recycled water, said Andy Sienkiewich, a manager for the Los Angeles-based district.

 

“We're quite anxious to work with them in any way to help them get that yield up,” Sienkiewich said. #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20080101-9999-1n1orange.html

####

No comments:

Blog Archive