This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 1/14/08

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

January 15, 2008

 

2. Supply

 

AG WATER:

Rancho California Water District to pay for computerized irrigation for big water users - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER CONDITIONS:

Drought persists despite heavy snow - Lassen County Times

 

WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Column: Severe drought may be only way out of California water crisis - Western Farm Press

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER CONSERVATION:

Column: Nature's water solution - North County Times

 

 

AG WATER:

Rancho California Water District to pay for computerized irrigation for big water users

Riverside Press Enterprise – 1/15/08

By Jeff Horseman, staff writer

 

TEMECULA - A water district wants to help customers with big landscapes save water by paying for the installation of "smart" irrigation systems.

 

The Rancho California Water District recently received an $87,500 grant from the federal government to install the computerized systems, which can adjust water deliveries to take into account the weather, soil and other factors.

 

The district's smart irrigation program is expected to save 1.4 billion gallons of water over the 10-year lifetime of the equipment, enough to quench the indoor water demands of 15,610 families of four for a year.

 

"Our goal always is to sustain our customers with a reliable supply of water," said district spokeswoman Meggan Reed.

 

Smart irrigation is the latest water-saving strategy for the district, which serves Temecula, part of Murrieta and nearby unincorporated areas.

 

The district is also moving to cut back water supplies for agricultural customers. In addition, golf courses and other large-scale users are being required to use recycled water on their greenery.

 

The smart irrigation push comes as the district is boosting water rates for high-use customers. Starting Jan. 1, landscape accounts that use more than 150 percent of their water allotment will be charged $428 per acre foot of water instead of $322 per acre foot.

 

Smart irrigation is an element of many local water conservation plans because it delivers water to plants more efficiently.

 

Rather than spraying water at a constant rate, smart irrigation systems take into account factors such as weather, slopes and the soil.

 

Tom Carrasco, general manger of Environmental Concepts Landscape Management in Temecula, said smart systems can be tailored to account for evaporation and transpiration, the process by which plants use water.

 

Smart irrigation controllers can be programmed via satellites or the Internet, said Carrasco, whose company manages 171 controllers. One controller clock typically runs 12 to 40 valves, he said.

 

The City of Temecula uses two types of smart irrigation systems for its parks and other landscaping.

 

Kevin Harrington, maintenance superintendent with the city's Community Services department, said the city can adjust its controllers with the click of a button. The technology also allows the city to spot water leaks, he said.

 

The Calsense controllers used by Temecula cost between $5,000 and $10,000 apiece. The city has between 25 and 50 of the controllers, Harrington said.

 

A number of communities in Temecula already use smart irrigation, including Redhawk. John Ellett, property manager for the community of about 3,000 homes, said nine of Redhawk's 40 to 50 irrigation timers use smart technology that adjust irrigation schedules based on rainfall.

 

"It definitely is a great system," he said.

 

Rancho California customers with an acre or more of irrigated landscaping can take part in the district's smart controller program. Call the program's contractor, Valley Soil, at 767-2215 to request a free landscape evaluation.  #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_ssmart15.326b2c2.html

 

 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER CONDITIONS:

Drought persists despite heavy snow

Lassen County Times – 1/15/08

 

Jan. 15, 2008 — Despite two feet or more of snow on the ground in some places, Lassen, Plumas, Modoc, and four other counties are still suffering a drought disaster.

The new snow did not impact drought conditions, such as “continued low reservoirs, below-average mountain snowpack, and long-term precipitation deficits,” according to the U.S. Drought Monitor Web site at drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html.


The Secretary of Agriculture and the U.S. Small Business Administration declared a drought in Lassen, Plumas, Modoc, Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama and Trinity counties. The disaster declaration for Shasta and contiguous counties was based on agricultural losses beginning Jan. 1, 2007.


“With both those declarations in place, it does free up small-business loans and some other things that are available through the federal system that normally wouldn’t be available,” said Lassen County Office of Emergency Services Chief Chip Jackson. “Through the secretary of agriculture’s declaration, I believe, it allows for crop losses and a lot of other things.”


Farmers and ranchers who conduct family-sized operations can apply through July 16, 2008, for emergency loans of up to $500,000 for actual losses as a direct result of the disaster. That’s eight months after the two federal agencies declared the drought on Nov. 16, 2007.


The loans will be available at an interest rate of 3.75 percent. Applicants may contact the local Farm Service Agency on Russell Avenue in Susanville at 257-7272 or online at fsa.usda.gov/pas/disaster/assistanc1.htm.


Since the secretary of agriculture and the SBA declared the drought, only the two federal agencies can say when the drought is over.


“They won’t even look at it until spring,” Jackson said.


Federal officials will evaluate all the rainfall and snowfall totals reported by local agriculture departments and take into account the water content in the snow, he said.


Until then, farmers and ranchers may apply for the loans.


“They’re still eligible if they’re ag related (losses) because the crop damages have already happened from last season,” Jackson said.


Small, nonfarm companies that do business directly with growers and producers, such as truckers and agricultural equipment or service providers, and small agricultural cooperatives may apply for SBA economic-injury disaster loans.


To apply, contact SBA at 800-659-2955 or visit the agency’s Web site at sba.gov/services/disasterassistance.


Jackson summarized the drought declarations for the Lassen County Board of Supervisors at its Dec. 11 meeting. The board got drought information in May from Lassen National Forest Fire Chief Lorene Duffey.


“Where we’re doing snow surveys, in some cases there isn’t any snow to survey,” Duffey told the board at its meeting on May 15, 2007. She reported the drought severity index found eastern Lassen County in severe drought and found moderate drought in the west.


In the spring of 2007, the State Water Project estimated the snowpack ranged from 29 percent of average to 46 percent of the normal statewide average — its lowest level in since 1989.


However, the California Department of Water Resources announced no water shortages in the summer of 2007, because reservoirs and groundwater basins were full from the winter of 2005-2006, the fifth-wettest on record in Northern California, according to the Sacramento Bee. #

http://www.lassennews.com/News_Story.edi?sid=4513&mode=thread&order=0

 

 

WATER SUPPLY ISSUES:

Column: Severe drought may be only way out of California water crisis

Western Farm Press – 1/15/08

By Harry Cline, Farm-Press Editorial Staff

 

A severe drought this year may be the only way California can begin to mitigate a protracted, devastating water crisis.

It has been 30 years since a new water project was completed in California. Thirty years ago California’s population was 20 million. Today it is 37 million.

 

For years, inept politicians have failed to resolve the water issues that will eventually bring California’s economy to it knees. This may be the year of the kneepads and, finally, a framework to develop more water supplies for the state that could reach 50 million people by 2025.

 

Agriculture has long had a dog in the California water wars, but no one listens to the people who feed and clothe a nation and world. This year, cities and counties likely will enter the fray because there is a real likelihood cities could run out of water. Already, municipal water suppliers are putting out the word; they are buying water to get through what will most certainly be a water-short spring, summer and fall. Before, there have been willing sellers. If the Delta smelt minnow shuts down the giant pumps moving water through the Delta to 25 million Californians, there may not be any water to sell at any price. Water experts are predicting water deliveries from the Delta will be cut by 30 percent, regardless of how much water is available to move through the Delta from Northern to Southern California.

 

When all that comes out of the home faucets and water hydrants this summer is air in Orange County, Oakland, San Jose and other population centers, the water crisis gridlock may finally be broken.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed a comprehensive water bond measure last fall, but he and lawmakers have failed to broker a deal. Frustrated with the inaction, the California Chamber of Commerce recently announced an effort to launch its own water bond ballot initiatives.

 

The chamber is circulating four versions of an $11.7 billion bond initiative. It would include dams, as well as systems to divert water around and through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This is a resurrection of the Peripheral Canal, a controversial proposal that was defeated by voters in a contentious 1982 ballot initiative.

 

The chamber initiative may provide the only tools for a reasonably quick solution at the polls to the crisis. The solution will not come from the California legislature. The initiative process may once again be the way to move the state forward.

 

The business-backed Chamber measure is similar to a Republican-backed plan that places an emphasis on dams. The Democratic proposal focuses on groundwater storage and conservation.

 

It will take all three — dams, groundwater storage and conservation to provide a reliable water supply for California’s future.

 

Fixing the Delta should be priority No. 1. When the Peripheral Canal was on the ballot almost 25 years ago, it was a water conveyance issue. Today the Delta fix is much more critical with the need to repair fragile levees as well as restore the ecological health of the Delta.

 

The looming water crisis for cities also may bring another benefit to California’s long-standing problem of environmental obstructionism. Small, loud groups like Friends of the River and Environmental Defense have contributed to the lack of solutions to the water crisis by challenging anything and everything anyone proposes.

 

Urbanites have tolerated them, but when the water runs out, some of these environmental groups may find a less than friendly urban audience.

 

“Take a hike” has a nice ring to it.

 

No one wants a crisis to generate a solution, but it may be the only way out of the state’s political morass. #

http://westernfarmpress.com/alfalfa/severe-drought-0108/

 

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER CONSERVATION:

Column: Nature's water solution

North County Times – 1/15/08

By Phil Strickland, resident of Temecula and a regular columnist for The Californian

 

Historian Carey McWilliams wrote in 1946 that "God never intended Southern California to be anything but desert ... Man has made it what it is."

Good job, guys.

 

Here we are, six decades and millions of souls removed from his utterance, wondering once again if we'll be left stranded and parched in the desert.

 

And, it's been a scant 20 years since the last protracted drought as we suffer yet another tightening of nature's spigot.

Since early man settled the region, water, more than anything else, has determined growth.

It was that reality that led to the famous water connivances begun in the early 1900s. It is that reality that keeps us looking to the few clouds in the sky hoping they will share some of the precious element.

Nature is not cooperating. And the elaborate system we've developed to fill our increasing need may fail us too. That would be the State Water Project, which supplies water from Northern California to the nearly 20 million people residing in the south.

Think about it: We have nearly 50 percent of the population in the state, less than 0.1 percent of the stream flow, an early prediction that we may only receive a fraction of our allocation and an artificial impediment.

For that, you can thank a federal judge who has ordered a water-flow limit to protect the tiny delta smelt, a fish being killed by the project's pumps.

You also can thank our unquenchable thirst, but the judge's order has chained the region behind the eight ball.

Given fish, judges and drought, our dams, reservoirs and aqueducts are proving to be inadequate solutions to the increased demand for water.

Short of a mass exodus, there is little we can do to permanently resolve the problem. Even a complete re-evaluation of our water usage likely would not do the trick, but it would help.

Given that the Lord probably won't change the rainfall, we are left with the unpleasant fact that if something is to be done, we must do it.

One way is for us to embrace who we are. That would be desert dwellers.

Here in Southwest County, we are surrounded by housing designed to recall the influence of earlier days.

Thing is, the landscaping has almost uniformly turned from native to lush yards that are not natural to the region.

They look good. In fact, some look great and are a credit to the tenacity of the homeowners in their grooming, but they can have a powerful thirst.

Cities throughout the Southwest are encouraging homeowners and businesses to adopt the native look and thus save, literally, tons of water.

That's only logical.

Trying to make Southern California look like an oasis is a heavy rock to push up that hill.

This is not to suggest that homeowners be forced to turn putting-green lawns into desert landscapes, but some assistance from local or state agencies for folks who are willing to get creative would have a permanent, and no less visually appealing, impact on water usage.

There are technologies -- recycling, turning salt water to fresh, gray water and so on -- that promise to help mitigate the problem, but reducing the unnatural landscapes covering much of inhabited Southern California is a solution that gets cheaper each year. #

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/01/15/opinion/strickland/16_51_351_14_08.txt

####

 

No comments:

Blog Archive