Department of Water Resources
A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment
December 6, 2007
5. Agencies, Programs, People
FloodSAFE MEETING ANNOUNCED:
DWR to Hold Workshop on FloodSAFE
Bidding heats up on control of resorts - Napa Valley Register
RELOCATION COSTS:
Rainbow water district ratepayers could get dinged with relocation costs, officials say - North County Times
FloodSAFE MEETING ANNOUNCED:
DWR to Hold Workshop on FloodSAFE
News Release, Department of Water Resources – 12/6/07
Contacts: Ricardo Pineda, Chief, Floodplain Management Branch (916) 574-1475; M. Elizabeth Scott, DWR Information Officer (916) 653-0979
DWR staff will present information on upcoming consulting contracts with an emphasis on large-scale planning efforts and the necessary support services expected to be required to conduct the planning. The presentation will include information on likely types of work, need for specific services, and timing. Following the presentation, staff will be available to answer general questions.
The workshop is open to any interested firm or individual. Attendance is not required for submittal of bids/proposals for the anticipated contract work, and will not satisfy any requirement to attend future mandatory pre-bid conferences.
The State of
Accomplishing the vision of FloodSAFE will require broad participation from residents, businesses, non-governmental organizations, and local, state, and federal agencies. DWR will provide leadership and will collaborate with a large group of partners and other participants statewide to improve flood management and emergency response throughout
A great deal of work must be done quickly in order to fulfill the goals of FloodSAFE
The Department of Water Resources operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. #
Bidding heats up on control of resorts
By Kerana Todorov, staff writer
Six companies have submitted bids to run
The Bureau of Reclamation, which manages the reservoir and the shoreline, said three of the bidders have applied to become the concessionaires for five or more resorts. The decision could be announced early next year, said Pete Lucero, the bureau’s chief of reclamation resources at
The bids were announced even as mobile homes from the existing resorts — which will see their contracts expire over the next two years — continued to be hauled to the dump, destroyed or transported elsewhere.
The concessionaires would operate under new rules the Bureau of Reclamation issued last summer for the lake.
Among the six are current concessionaires, including the owners of Rancho
The owners of Rancho
Lago Resorts would operate Rancho
The plan, explained White, includes spending $90 million to remodel, upgrade and build new facilities at the resorts while keeping the resorts open.
The plans, designed in part by Dangermond Group of
Altogether, Lago Resorts would operate 1,100 docks, two restaurants, 250 campsites, 350 RV sites, 740 cabins.
The other applicants are: Recreation Del Sol Enterprises LLC; Pensas Group LLC; FX10 LLC; Steele Park Resort Inc. and Pleasure Cove Marina LLC.
Pleasure Cove Marina LLC., which only bid to operate Pleasure Cove Marina, is a subsidiary of Forever Resorts Inc., an Arizona-based company that operates houseboats at Pleasure Cove Marina as well as campgrounds, inns and other facilities at federal recreational parks in the
In another development,
Berryessa For All, a group of mobile home owners, trailers and their allies, filed suit last January, alleging the Bureau of Reclamation’s plans for the lakeshore violated federal environmental law.
In her order issued Nov. 27, United States District Judge Susan Illston, turned down Berryessa For All’s temporary injunction. At the same time, Illston decided that Berryessa For All’s case against the Bureau of Reclamation can move forward at this stage.
In e-mails this week, lawyers on both sides said the case will be heard in the spring.
In another legal fight, the owners of four resorts who lost their claim in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims last month, are not giving up. The owners argued that the government’s bidding process for selecting new concessionaires is unfair because it favored larger companies that can bid on more than one property.
One issue is the assessment value of the improvements done at the resorts over the years.
White and attorney Gregory Jaeger said they are appealing the ruling with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. #
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/12/06/news/local/doc4757899c01c86733981801.txt
RELOCATION COSTS:
Rainbow water district ratepayers could get dinged with relocation costs, officials say
By Darryn Bennett, staff writer
FALLBROOK -- Relocating water and sewer lines to accommodate a project that would widen a 6-mile stretch of Highway 76 between
Moving district pump stations and pipelines within the proposed project area could cost between $10 million and $20 million, an expense that would probably be passed on to the district's 7,400 ratepayers in Rainbow, Bonsall and a portion of Fallbrook, a Nov. 21 letter sent to Caltrans planners by district General Manager Dave Seymour states.
Determining who is responsible for the moving costs is tricky because Highway 76 was probably first built in the 1930s, but realigned and incorporated into the county road system later, Caltrans spokesman Allan Kosup said Wednesday. Caltrans isn't obligated to pay relocation costs for infrastructure put in place after a highway is built, Kosup said.
The $250 million project would widen and straighten the highway from
The letter, a copy of which was obtained by the North County Times, states that the rural district can't afford the relocation costs unless ratepayers vote to approve a bond measure or a special assessment tax. Failing that, the only option the district has is to raise water and sewer rates to cover the expense, the letter states.
"Requiring the ratepayers of the Rainbow Municipal District to fund relocation of existing facilities is unreasonable and unacceptable, and places an unfair burden of cost on our customers," the letter goes on to say.
The letter asserts that a $10 million relocation expense, described as a "conservative estimate," would cost each water customer at least $1,350 in increased water bills over an extended period of time, and that sewer customers would be subject to even higher rate hikes.
Seymour said Wednesday that the district's cost estimates are preliminary and would fluctuate depending on how many facilities have to be moved once Caltrans finalizes an alignment for the expanded highway sometime next year.
Nonetheless, the district says in its letter that any relocation expenses should be funded as part of the highway improvement project, arguing that district ratepayers are already paying for the project through a half-cent sales tax for transportation approved by
In a process
DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of
No comments:
Post a Comment