Department of Water Resources
A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment
December 21, 2007
1. Top Item
Editorial note:
Residents file suit over levee project
By Matt Weiser, staff writer
A coalition of
The Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency approved the $400 million Natomas levee project Nov. 29. The agency's board, made up of city and county elected officials, approved both an environmental impact report and the first phase of construction, planned for summer 2008.
The project would raise and widen nearly 25 miles of levees bordering the Natomas basin to satisfy federal flood control officials.
In 2006, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced that Natomas levees don't meet new underseepage criteria.
Subsequently, the Federal Emergency Management Agency declared that the region will lose its 100-year flood safety certification, forcing the basin's 70,000 residents to buy flood insurance and likely causing development restrictions.
The project aims to correct these deficiencies by 2010.
But the
Many homes along the road are built on the water-side of the levee, which follows the
The lower floors of these homes routinely flood when the river swells, and many are elevated to accommodate this.
But the SAFCA project will raise the levee as much as 3 feet, and residents fear their flood depths also will rise as a result, causing more damage.
Some also worry that deep seepage walls proposed in parts of the project could halt the flow of groundwater and compromise their drinking water wells.
"The Garden Highway Community Association wants flood protection for Natomas just like the people of Natomas," said the group's spokesman, Patrick Tully. "Unfortunately, SAFCA has been dismissive of our very real concerns, including the true impact of this monstrous project."
SAFCA chairwoman and Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo said the lawsuit was "disappointing." She noted that the design for the project was chosen, in part, to benefit
Army Corps rules could take a hard line on so-called levee "encroachments." This includes the
The proposed project involves what SAFCA calls a new "adjacent" levee that would widen the existing levee structure by as much as 300 feet on the inland side. This would shift the regulated levee profile away from the
This design,
"I'm sorry they don't understand that and don't agree,"
The
Tully's group argues SAFCA should have analyzed more alternatives, including a setback levee or modifications to the Yolo Bypass. They want the court to impose a restraining order and require new environmental studies.
Today the state Reclamation Board will consider granting a construction permit for the first stage of the project, which involves improvements to
http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/584036.html
####
No comments:
Post a Comment