This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY - 10/9/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

October 9, 2007

 

4. Water Quality

 

PERCHLORATE:

State to limit toxin in water - San Gabriel Valley Tribune

 

Rialto lawsuits raise questions - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

REGUALTION:

Vista, Carlsbad: Sewer-spill fine to pose hardship; Rate hikes, project delays might loom - San Diego Union Tribune

 

DRINKING WATER:

In Rialto, UV rays treat the water - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

 

PERCHLORATE:

State to limit toxin in water

San Gabriel Valley Tribune – 10/7/07

By Elise Kleeman, staff writer

 

PASADENA — This month, for the first time, the state will begin regulating the amount of the toxin perchlorate in drinking water.

 

As of Oct. 18, California will require that water contain no more than six parts per billion of the rocket-fuel additive, putting regulatory force behind what had been just a suggested limit for the past five years.

 

That amount is about the same as a tablespoon of ink in an Olympic-sized pool.

 

The change, lauded by some environmentalists, will make California only the second state, behind Massachusetts, to regulate the chemical in drinking water.

 

But there are also concerns that even the seemingly minuscule amount set by the new limit is still too high.

 

Perchlorate has been shown to block the release of thyroid gland hormones critical for normal growth and nervous system development, making it particularly dangerous for pregnant women and young children.

 

"We believe there is really no safe level of rocket fuel in our drinking water," said Bernadette Del Chiaro of the advocacy group Environment California. "We are disappointed."

 

The Association for California Water Agencies, however, supports the new standard. It notes that the state's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has declared that the six-parts- per-billion limit would cause no ill effects even after 70 years of water consumption.

 

"Six parts per billion has been a good, health-effective, cost-effective number," said Krista Clark, the association's director of regulatory affairs. "There's no justifiable reason to have a standard lower than that. To treat lower than that would be to spend public tax dollars on a standard that provides zero net health benefits."

 

However, the chemical's health impacts remain under debate.

 

In a 2002 study, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommended a maximum limit of one part per billion for perchlorate in drinking water, a limit which Massachusetts adopted last year.

 

The EPA estimates perchlorate contamination exists in at least 25 states.

 

In Los Angeles County alone, according to the California Department of Public Health, 67 water sources have exceeded six parts per billion of perchlorate at some point during the past five years. Several of those sources are in the San Gabriel Valley.

 

In Pasadena, the major sources of perchlorate contamination are waste pits used at JPL during the 1940s and 1950s.

 

At a treatment plant on the laboratory grounds, water drawn from beneath the surface has perchlorate levels of about 400 parts per billion, said Steve Slaten, the plant project's manager for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

 

After treatment, he said, the water is returned to the ground with a concentration of less than two parts per billion.

 

Drinking water from wells in Altadena tainted by the plume of JPL toxins is cleaned until it has less than six parts per billion of perchlorate.

 

Although some of Pasadena's water sources do contain perchlorate, the new regulations will have little impact on Pasadena Water and Power, said Shan Kwan, the agency's director of water.

 

Six parts per billion "is what we originally thought that the maximum contaminant level would be, so we were already keeping that in mind," he said. "When we blend (water sources), we always put a big safety factor in there."

 

But although Pasadena has been "pretty careful," said Tim Brick, chairman of the Metropolitan Water District, "I, frankly, believe that there are some agencies that are blending water for whom this will be a problem."

 

Still, he said, "personally, I have concerns that six parts might not be fully protective for the health of pregnant women and children."

 

Despite a historical reluctance to advocate for more regulatory standards, he said, MWD is supporting legislation by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Rep. Hilda Solis, D-El Monte, that would press the federal government to establish its own perchlorate standards.

 

California's new regulations are at least a start, Brick said.

 

"I think it's progress that a level has been set because it gives a standard that we can really work with, and now I think a lot of clean up programs that have really lagged can get going," he said. #

http://www.sgvtribune.com/news/ci_7108503

 

 

Rialto lawsuits raise questions

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 10/8/07

By Jason Pesick, staff writer

 

RIALTO - Most people like to show up to fights with friends. But when Rialto finds itself in a court fight that could have a wide impact, it's often all alone.

 

Rialto is not a rich city. In fact, officials are relying on voters to extend its 8 percent utility tax in November to avoid major budget cuts. But when it comes to taking people to court, the city has spared few expenses.

 

"Well, I think we have to get a little bit smarter about how we take on legal battles," said City Councilman Joe Baca Jr.

 

Recent lawsuits - one to get local water contamination cleaned up, another to gain a better theoretical understanding of state law - raise the question: Is Rialto a little trigger happy when it comes to going to court?

 

Last week, word came from the Fourth District Court of Appeal that the city lost its appeal against its police officers' union. The case involved the minutiae of how a city can go about eliminating its police department.

 

In September 2005, the Council voted to replace its Police Department with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's office. It went back on that vote less than a year later but kept fighting the lawsuit, even bringing in an outside law firm to help.

 

The union beat the city in San Bernardino County Superior Court when it filed suit, saying Rialto broke the law in the way it went about abolishing the Police Department.

 

Councilman Ed Scott said the League of Cities encouraged Rialto to pursue the case.

 

"Basically, the main reason (Rialto continued with the appeal) is because it's a case that could affect a lot of cities," he said Friday.

 

Baca disagreed.

 

"I have a hard time paying for legal fees when the issue was already moot," he said.

 

And then there's perchlorate, the toxic substance contaminating the local drinking water.

 

A number of agencies are affected by perchlorate, but Rialto officials say they've been hit the worst and decided to clean up the Rialto Basin on their own. So instead of forming a coalition with those agencies or asking the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for help, the city decided to go after dozens of polluters in court and gather all the evidence against the suspected polluters on its own.

 

So far, that's cost the city and its water department customers, who are paying a perchlorate fee on their bills, at least $15 million.

 

"They're not experienced or in the business of cleaning up the basin," said Barry Groveman, an attorney for the West Valley Water District, another local water purveyor.

 

Rialto's job is to provide clean water to its customers while other state and federal agencies exist to take care of extensive water pollution, he said.

 

Councilwoman Winnie Hanson said the city has a special responsibility to pursue the suspected polluters in part because the source of the pollution is in Rialto.

 

"We knew we had to," she said.  #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/search/ci_7123038?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.dailybulletin.com

 

 

REGUALTION:

Vista, Carlsbad: Sewer-spill fine to pose hardship; Rate hikes, project delays might loom

San Diego Union Tribune – 10/6/07

By Matthew Rodriguez, staff writer

 

NORTH COUNTY – Faced with a potential $1.1 million fine over a massive sewage spill into Buena Vista Lagoon last spring, Vista and Carlsbad officials said yesterday that paying the penalty could force them to raise rates or delay projects.

 

The fine money could be better spent on buying new sewer lines, they said.

 

The San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board proposed the fine last week for the two cities, which jointly own the sewer line that ruptured.

 

The break in late March and early April sent 7.3 million gallons of raw sewage into the lagoon between Oceanside and Carlsbad, killing 1,700 fish and four birds.

 

Vista owns nearly 90 percent of the faulty sewer line and would pay that portion of a fine; Carlsbad owns the rest.

 

The cities issued a news release yesterday saying the amount could affect their capital improvement programs.

 

In addition to citing the hardship the fine could cause, the cities said in the release that they plan to submit more information on the spill to the regional board. Carlsbad and Vista have until Nov. 13 to submit that information; a hearing is set for Dec. 12.

 

The cities plan to provide an accounting “that demonstrates that the spill repairs and clean-up response actions have already cost the cities a considerable amount,” the news release said.

 

Glenn Pruim, public works director for Carlsbad, said the cities are working to tally that amount.

 

The proposed fine, city officials said, could be better spent on improving the lines. “A million dollars still buys a lot of pipeline,” said Larry Pierce, Vista's director of engineering.

 

“All the work that we do on the sewer system to keep it maintained and the right size ultimately is to protect the environment from a sewer spill and to be able to provide that service,” Pierce said.

 

Two Vista City Council members said the proposed fine was too high.

 

“The way I look at it, it was an accident,” Councilman Steve Gronke said. “We shouldn't have to pay a fine if it was an accident.”

 

Gronke said the city worked to clean up the spill “as diligently as we could.” He said the proposed fine, though, is much less than the $73 million the board gave in its report as the possible maximum.

 

The spill was caused by a rupture in a 24-inch pressurized sewer line that sends sewage from the Buena Vista Pump Station to a treatment plant in Carlsbad. A consultant's report in August concluded that the rupture was likely caused by external corrosion to the pipe's polyethylene encasement. The pipe was expected to last several more decades.

 

Councilwoman Judy Ritter said the proposed fine could end up costing residents.

 

“It may impact sewer fees,” she said. “Absolutely it is a concern.”

 

Ritter said the money from any potential fine could be spent improving the city's ability to monitor its sewer system or replacing some of its pipes.

 

“I can think of a lot of things a million dollars could do for our sewer system,” she said. “I don't want to take the chance that something else is going to fail.”  #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20071006/news_7m6reply.html

 

 

DRINKING WATER:

In Rialto, UV rays treat the water

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 10/6/07

By Jason Pesick, staff writer

 

RIALTO - Before it's served to customers, all the water treated at the West Valley Water District's Oliver P. Roemer Water Filtration Facility runs through one of three disinfection tubes.

 

But there's no chlorine or other chemicals in the tubes - just light.

 

West Valley is one of the first water purveyors in the state to treat water by zapping it with ultraviolet light.

 

"The UV is emerging technology for drinking water," said Ken Sikorski, West Valley's superintendent and chief operator.

 

Shining light on water might seem a fruitless cleaning method, but ultraviolet light disrupts the DNA of organisms in the water.

 

West Valley officials are waiting for state permits so they can ramp up their usage of the UV reactors, which cost about $400,000 each, so they can use less chlorine at the Roemer facility. All the water treated at the plant already runs through the UV reactors on top of undergoing the standard treatment processes.

 

Though it takes more energy to run a UV system than dosing water with chlorine, which the plant generates on-site, there are no byproducts. Chlorine produces leftover disinfection byproducts, which are carcinogens and can be harmful to people.

 

West Valley can't eliminate all the chlorine from its treatment process, however. Chlorine and UV rays each work better against different types of organisms. But Sikorski said the UV system will allow the plant to cut its chlorine use to a third of its current level.

 

"You have to use them in combination," he said.

 

Whether it's done by light, chemical or both, disinfection is only one part of the overall treatment process.

 

Roemer, which opened in 1995, can treat 14.4 million gallons of water a day. The water comes in from Lytle Creek and the State Water Project and then makes its way to pretreatment. During pretreatment, the plant removes 80 percent of the solids in the water, Sikorski said.

 

Then the state water and the water from Lytle Creek are blended together before being filtered and disinfected. After being sent to another reservoir to sit for a few more hours, it moves on to customers around northern Rialto and Fontana.

 

UV treatment is gaining in popularity among sewage treatment plants in addition to water treatment plants, said Kurt Berchtold, assistant executive officer of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.

 

"Chlorine is a very hazardous chemical, so there are significant dangers and risks associated just with having tanks of that around."  #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/search/ci_7097352?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.dailybulletin.com

####

No comments:

Blog Archive