This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 10/22/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

October 22, 2007

 

3. Watersheds

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Delta pumps trap thousands of fish; Tiny baitfish caught in system rescued by salvage facilities - Inside Bay Area

 

Supes to lobby state over delta issues - Fairfield Daily Republic

 

Supes want some say on Delta water vision - Woodland Daily Democrat

 

Guest Opinion: Why we should save the delta smelt; The tiny fish is a bigger deal than you think. Saving it is worth a little sacrifice - Los Angeles Times

 

QUAGGA MUSSELS:

Why quagga mussels are dangerous; Prolific species has spread to reservoirs - San Diego Union Tribune

 

STEELHEAD RECOVERY:

Outline for recovery of coast steelhead - Ventura County Star

 

OTTERS IN THE RESERVOIR:

Otters stump PID - Paradise Post

 

THE SALMON RETURN:

Rise of the salmon: Annual fish hatchery festival focuses on education, protecting area species - Redding Record Searchlight

 

ALGAE IN THE RESERVOIRS:

Blue-green algae levels lower in some areas, officials say - Eureka Times Standard

 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA:

Guest Column: Embrace your watershed - Ukiah Daily Journal

 

 

DELTA ISSUES:

Delta pumps trap thousands of fish; Tiny baitfish caught in system rescued by salvage facilities

Inside Bay Area – 10/21/07

By Mike Taugher, staff writer

 

Giant pumps that deliver water to San Joaquin Valley farms trapped hundreds of thousands of threadfin shad this week, raising a vivid reminder of the escalating conflict between water deliveries and crashing Delta fish populations.

 

The episode peaked on Tuesday, when nearly 250,000 shad, a popular baitfish, showed up at the pumps — so many that instead of trucking them all back to the Delta many of the fish had to be buried.

 

"It was so many, all at once. It complicated the operation," said U.S. Bureau of Reclamation spokesman Jeff McCracken.

 

In all, an estimated 370,000 threadfin shad were collected at the federal pumps near Tracy this week.

 

Biologists said the event was not unusual. Threadfin shad swim in large schools, so they tend to arrive at the pumps in bunches.

 

And each year, millions of the fish are trapped in collection buckets before they would otherwise be ground up at the federal pumps near Tracy and at larger, state-owned pumps two miles away.

 

In 2001, for example, the fish salvage facilities at the two sets of pumps collected 10 million threadfin shad.

 

"We had a blip here but it's not that much different from what we historically see," said Perry Hergesell, a water policy advisor for the Department of Fish and Game. "It's not really out of the ordinary."

 

Still, the episode raised anxieties because threadfin shad, though still relatively common, are among the fish that have dwindled in the last five years and have remained at near-record low population levels.

 

Taken together, the two sets of pumps deliver water to millions of acres of farmland and 23 million people from the East Bay to San Diego. They are under heightened scrutiny for their role in the severe population decline of various fish, including the threatened Delta smelt.

 

This week, the pumps were churning at a combined rate of about 7,500 cubic-feet per second, enough to flood 20 square miles, an area the size of Walnut Creek, with more than a foot of water in a day. It is also enough to supply in one day the annual water needs of a city the size of Livermore.

 

"Everything that's down there is getting sucked into the pumps, everything," said Tina Swanson, a fisheries biologist at the Bay Institute, an environmental group.

 

Water deliveries were cut this spring to prevent Delta smelt from being killed, but the federal pumps were kept on full this week because threadfin shad are not an endangered species.

 

Threadfin shad were introduced to the Delta a few decades ago and are among the most common fish in the Delta. But, along with young striped bass and the rarer Delta smelt and longfin smelt, its numbers have fallen dramatically.

 

The fish collected every day in the buckets are returned to the Delta by truck, but how well they survive the rough journey to predator-laden waters is unknown. Water officials contend that the threadfin shad survival rates are probably pretty good.

 

In addition to water pumping, biologists studying the decline of Delta fish say pollution and invasive species disrupting the ecosystem also play a role in the declines. They plan to issue a report further explaining the collapse of fish species by the end of the year.

 

Meanwhile, the pressure on water deliveries is building.

 

A federal judge imposed water cutbacks beginning in 2008 after ruling that a federal permit was too lenient to prevent Delta smelt from going extinct. The Zone 7 Water Agency, which serves Livermore, Pleasanton and Dublin, raised its water rates by 8 percent this week to deal with water supply issues arising from that ruling.

 

The same judge is considering whether a permit to protect salmon and steelhead is legal, and environmentalists are asking regulators to add longfin smelt to the list of endangered species.

 

Concern is also growing among biologists that Delta smelt may have entered a death spiral of sorts toward extinction as the few remaining fish have less chance of reproducing.

 

The latest numbers are discouraging. The September results from the key fall survey for Delta smelt were very low, with only eight fish collected. That number could improve over the course of the survey, which continues through December.  #

http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/ci_7241640

 

 

Supes to lobby state over delta issues

Fairfield Daily Republic – 10/22/07

By Barry Eberling, staff writer

 

FAIRFIELD - More flood waters aimed at Rio Vista, saltier water in Suisun Marsh and poorer-quality drinking water for cities are just a sampling of local concerns over state proposals for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

Now the Solano County Board of Supervisors wants to make certain its voice is heard in Sacramento.

A letter signed by Board Chairman Mike Reagan could just be the beginning. The board on Tuesday will consider various lobbying and information-gathering efforts that could total $130,000 to $200,000.

Board members meet at 9 a.m. in their chamber at 675 Texas St.

California is trying to solve what has long proven an intractable problem: How to get Delta water to 25 million Californians and to farms without hurting the sensitive Delta environment. Deteriorating levees and plunging native fish populations in recent years have exacerbated the situation.

Things are coming to a head. The state's Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is to make initial recommendations by January 2008 and complete a strategic plan by January 2009.

Supervisors until their Oct. 9 meeting had said little publicly about all of that. That changed with a vengeance. They told staff to hire advocates and consultants as soon as possible.

 

"It is absolutely critical we take charge of our own destiny, if that's possible," Supervisor Barbara Kondylis said.

One concern is that using a peripheral canal or some other system to convey fresh water around the Delta would allow the Suisun Bay area to become saltier. County officials are concerned salt water might eventually intrude into the aquifer serving Rio Vista, Collinsville and Birds Landing.

"Prior to state water project exports, the City of Benicia and its Army Base drew its drinking water from the Suisun Bay," Reagan wrote to the task force. "Today, that is no longer possible."

Supervisors are also concerned Delta habitat restoration plans might attract rare fish to the North Bay Aqueduct pumps in the eastern county. These pumps bring water to Fairfield, Benicia, Vacaville, Vallejo, Napa and American Canyon.

Reagan asked that the state help pay to relocate the pumps to the Sacramento River 22 miles to the east.

Talk about enlarging the Yolo bypass also concerns the board. The Yolo bypass takes Sacramento River floodwaters and drains into the Delta near Rio Vista. Reagan asked for further studies before more floodwaters are aimed at this part of the county.

Deteriorating levees near farmland and duck clubs are yet another concern. Reagan suggested stockpiling rock and other materials near Collinsville to make fast repairs during emergencies.

Also Tuesday, the board will consider helping Florida-based Republic Services get $53 million to spend on its trash collection and dumps in California. Of this, $7 million would go to its Solano Garbage Co. operation in Fairfield and to Potrero Hills Landfill.

Republic Services would borrow the money from the California Municipal Finance Authority, which would issue tax-exempt revenue bonds. This can happen only if a local government joins the authority and holds a public hearing.

The county would have no liability for the bonds, wrote Charles Lomeli, the county's treasurer/tax collector/clerk. The authority would give the county $2,000 to $5,000 of the issuance fee and donate a similar amount to a local charity chosen by the board, he wrote.

Republic Services occasionally takes on projects or makes purchases that benefit the environment, Kevin Finn of the company wrote to the county. Those expenditures qualify for tax-exempt financing, he wrote.

The company wants to build new liners and disposal cells at the existing dump, improve systems collecting water leaching from the dump and buy new trucks that pollute less, among other things, he wrote. #

http://local.dailyrepublic.net/story_localnews.php?a=news05.txt

 

 

Supes want some say on Delta water vision

Woodland Daily Democrat – 10/22/07

By Danny Bernardini, staff writer

 

In an attempt to be included in future Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water issues, Solano County staff has created a strategy to stay involved.

 

The Solano County Board of Supervisors will hear this plan Tuesday, as well as review how other counties handle the Delta water vision.

 

Supervisors may also direct staff to develop a set of guiding principles governing the county's position on the Delta vision process.

 

The issues was first raised at the board's last meeting, Oct. 9, when members of the California Delta Protection Commission and other water agencies updated the supervisors on management plans currently taking place.

 

Included in those documents that suggest a wide-range of options for Delta use were two emerging visions from the Stakeholder Coordination Group and eight others submitted by the public.

 

Two additional drafts of a vision will also be sent out to the public this year and implementation is set to take place in 2008.

 

Included in the county's strategy are four main areas:

 

• Lobbying - A multi-pronged approach by lobbyists will attempt to gain more access in the decision process. This aspect is estimated to cost $45,000.

 

• Information gathering - County staff is recommending to extend their contract with the University of California's Agricultural Issues Center to study the economic impacts of changes to the current Delta system in Solano County. The study would likely cost $9,000.

 

• Technical Support - The county is currently in discussions with well-known leaders in flood and water issues and may hire one consultant to represent Solano County at water issue meetings who would then report back to the board. The two to three year commitment would cost between $75,000 and $150,000.

 

• Memberships - One additional step would be for Solano County to become members of the Association of California Water Agencies and the California Central Valley Flood Control Association to be more active in decisions.

 

The Solano County Board of Supervisors meets at 9 a.m. Tuesday in the Board's chamber in Fairfield. #

http://www.dailydemocrat.com//ci_7248275?IADID=Search-www.dailydemocrat.com-www.dailydemocrat.com

 

 

Guest Opinion: Why we should save the delta smelt; The tiny fish is a bigger deal than you think. Saving it is worth a little sacrifice

Los Angeles Times – 10/21/07

By Gordy Slack, author of "The Battle Over the Meaning of Everything."

 

California is a thirsty state. You don't mess with its water, even in a good year, unless you have an excellent reason. Which is why many Californians are shaking their heads in dismay over a federal judge's recent decision to cut by as much as 30% the water sent south from the San Joaquin-Sacramento River Delta this winter. The judge's reason: to save a French-fry-sized fish called the delta smelt.

The delta smelt makes no heroic journey across the ocean or up river rapids to reproduce. Once superabundant, Chinese fishermen used to harvest the fish by net, but the little thing, a weak swimmer, wouldn't put up any fight at the end of a line.

 

And a smelt would not even make a decent snack. Frankly, on first glance, the fish just isn't much to look at either.

So why should millions of Californians who rely on water pumped south from the delta make economic and social sacrifices -- including the possibility of rationing -- for a basically unremarkable fish?

There are at least four good reasons.

First, it is the law. The Endangered Species Act prohibits the government from doing anything that jeopardizes the continued existence of endangered or threatened species, and it forbids any government agency, corporation or citizen from harming, harassing or killing endangered animals without a permit. It is a sound law, put in place by the Nixon administration in 1973 to protect imperiled plants and animals "from the consequences of economic growth and development untempered by adequate concern and conservation."

By drawing a bright legal line this side of annihilating whole kinds of creatures, the law is to thank for saving the bald eagle, the gray whale, the California condor and the Pacific green sea turtle, among other animals. And it's a law that will be especially important in California and beyond as climate change, human population growth, habitat conversion and invasive species increasingly degrade the natural world.

But obeying even a good law may seem unjustified when it comes time to make sacrifices for a ghostlike fish that conveys no clear benefits to mankind. That common perception brings us to the second reason to save the smelt: The goal of the Endangered Species Act is not just to protect single species but also the ecosystems on which they depend. The delta smelt is what Peter Moyle, a fisheries biologist at UC Davis, calls an indicator species: Its condition reflects the overall health of an ecosystem.

In the case of the delta, we're talking about a once-magnificent place that is in serious trouble. It is 16,000 square miles of wetland and open water -- the West Coast's largest estuary -- and the end point of about 40% of California's precipitation. When the Spanish arrived centuries ago, it was teeming with fish, crawling with bears and beavers, its skies periodically darkened with migrating birds.

Twenty-nine known fish species once called the delta home. Twelve of those are either gone altogether or are threatened with extinction. The Sacramento perch, once one of the most abundant fish in the system, was last seen in the 1970s, Moyle says.

 

The thicktail chub disappeared in the 1950s. Many other fish are in rapid decline too, victims of pollution, overfishing and habitat destruction as big portions of the delta were diked and drained for agriculture, and the natural exchange of fresh and salt water was altered by the huge, sucking pumps that send water south. As for the delta smelt, Moyle has been charting its decline for decades. But that decline turned into a nose-dive a couple of years ago because of increased water diversions from the delta. This year's spring survey found 90% fewer fish than in 2006, the previous record low.

Reducing the amount of water sucked from the delta, increasing the release of fresh water upriver and controlling pollutants would help save the delta smelt and help protect spring- and winter-run Chinook, striped bass, steelhead trout, green sturgeon and the entire delta ecosystem. If we don't take these steps, and if we let the delta smelt go down, the longfin smelt, the next most endangered species in the delta, will follow. Then maybe the striped bass and the Sacramento splittail.

Why care? The species in an ecosystem are woven together like characters in a Shakespeare play. Start pulling them out, and the play's integrity is lost. Removing the delta smelt would be like pulling the ghost from "Macbeth." Forever. You'd still have a play, but it wouldn't work. Then pull, say, Banquo and the three witches and replace them with characters who don't belong there. You'd have some kind of absurdist sitcom where you once had a masterpiece. Without the native fish and other species that populate the delta, it won't work either.

A slightly closer look at the delta smelt shows us a third reason to rescue the fish from oblivion -- it's actually pretty impressive. While most fish are hard-wired either for salt or fresh water, the delta smelt tolerates both, a talent that allows it to exploit the brackish zone where the waters meet. Before there were giant aquatic vacuum cleaners in its midst to send water south, it could afford to be a weak swimmer because it mastered the cyclical ebbs and flows of the estuary, exploiting the system's inhalations and exhalations to get where it needed to go.

During the dry season, when the salt water moves up the estuary toward the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers that feed it, the smelt would ride the tidal currents up into the delta's river channels, where it laid its eggs. With the winter rains and consequent outflows, the fish would be carried out to what is called the entrapment zone, where fresh and salt water meet, a place where the zooplankton they feed on is most abundant. The delta smelt's ghostly blue color makes it nearly invisible to predators. It is a triumph of evolution and, believers might say, of creation, as well adapted to the old delta as the bald eagle and the gray whale are to their natural habitats.

Finally, the Torah says that if you save an individual, you save an entire universe. How much truer that is for a whole kind of creature. Nothing else on Earth lives the way the delta smelt does, senses the world the way it does, looks like it, moves like it, fits into an ecosystem the way it does. If we drive it from existence, we will have obliterated an entire world, willingly, in order for a while longer to grow cotton, rice and alfalfa in the desert, to keep our swimming pools topped off and open, to keep the price of water cheap.

If we can face our growing need for water, and our diminishing supply of it, without driving whole species to extinction, it might be more expensive and inconvenient in the short term. But if it saves the fish, saves the delta and saves a world, it would be well worth the price. #

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-slack21oct21,0,2695377.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

 

 

QUAGGA MUSSELS:

Why quagga mussels are dangerous; Prolific species has spread to reservoirs

San Diego Union Tribune – 10/21/07

By Terry Rodgers, staff writer

 

Water managers in the county are trying to coordinate their efforts against quagga mussels, small but hardy mollusks that have invaded the region's reservoirs.

 

The officials hope to release a plan for controlling quaggas before they clog pipes and harm the ecosystem of reservoirs, which provide drinking water to millions of people.

 

Here are answers to some questions about the mussels, based on interviews and other reporting.

 

What are quagga mussels?

 

They are mollusks that reproduce in prolific numbers, clustering together like barnacles. They live in fresh water from the surface to more than 400 feet deep.

 

Quaggas will thrive anywhere – sandy bottoms and hard surfaces – in fresh water that contains calcium. Their larvae are microscopic and hard to detect.

 

Typically, each mussel won't grow much bigger than a thumbnail. The quaggas' sharp, triangular shells can cut bare feet.

 

Adult quaggas have no human food value, and most birds and fish avoid them. However, they can be made into attractive earrings.

 

How do they affect bodies of water?

 

Quaggas are filter feeders that consume vast amounts of phytoplankton that would otherwise feed fish, clams, shrimp and other aquatic wildlife.

 

By concentrating metals and other pollutants in their tissue, they contribute to the accumulation of toxins in the food chain. For instance, ducks have been poisoned by eating quaggas.

 

In addition, bodies of water infested with quaggas become much clearer. While that's great for scuba divers, the increased amount of sunlight penetrating the water promotes the growth of aquatic weeds. This heavy weed presence can sour the taste of drinking water.

 

Why should Californians care about quaggas?

 

Wherever they have spread, quaggas and the closely related zebra mussels have raised the cost of everything from food to electrical power because of the maintenance problems they create.

 

For example, an infestation of zebra mussels in the Great Lakes cost the power industry $3.1 billion from 1993 to 1999. The overall economic hit to that region was more than $5 billion.

 

Once quaggas become established in lakes and reservoirs, it's impossible to eradicate them. The mussels clog intake pipes at power stations, water treatment plants and agricultural irrigation lines.

 

“Our water system is quagga-mussel nirvana,” said Russell Moll, a quagga expert and director of the California SeaGrant Program at the University of California San Diego.

 

Quaggas are troublesome for boat owners, too. They attach themselves to boat hulls, motors and steering components. At rivers and lakes infested with quaggas, boaters have experienced a 50 percent increase in overheated motors. If quaggas continue to spread, California could restrict or ban recreational boating in reservoirs and lakes.

 

How did these mussels reach San Diego County?

 

Quaggas, which are native to Ukraine, were first found in the Great Lakes in 1989. They apparently hitchhiked to the United States in the ballast water of oceangoing ships. (Ballast water is water pumped into the bottom of a ship to keep it stable and upright.)

 

Evidence suggests that quaggas were brought across the Continental Divide a year ago on the hull of a boat that was transported west from the Great Lakes.

 

The mussels were discovered in Lake Mead, Lake Mohave and Lake Havasu in January. Since then, they have spread south to reservoirs fed by the Colorado River. That includes four reservoirs in San Diego County: Lake Dixon, San Vicente, Lake Murray and Lower Otay.

 

What is being done to control the spread of quaggas?

 

Officials statewide are focused on preventing these mussels from spreading to Northern or Central California.

 

Inspections have increased at border checkpoints operated by the California Department of Food and Agriculture. Hundreds of state game wardens and employees of water agencies are learning how to find quaggas at reservoirs and inside boat motors.

 

Portable wash stations have been installed at boat ramps throughout the state.

 

In addition, thousands of educational pamphlets have been sent to boat owners, and informational posters have been put up at lakes and reservoirs.

 

The Metropolitan Water District, which supplies water to 17 million people in Southern California, recently allocated $6 million for efforts to control the quagga infestation. The agency had spent $2.8 million on such measures in the past six months.  #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20071021-9999-1m21quagga.html

 

 

STEELHEAD RECOVERY:

Outline for recovery of coast steelhead

Ventura County Star – 10/21/07

By Russ Baggerly, of Ojai, is on the Casitas Municipal Water District board of directors

 

The National Marine Fisheries Service has published the "2007 Federal Recovery Outline for the Distinct Population Segment of Southern California Coast Steelhead." It is like a road map with clear guideposts for removing impediments to the survival and recovery of steelhead.

 

The Recovery Outline informs the public about major threats to the fish and the actions needed to continue the recovery effort. It sets out specific goals necessary to achieve recovery of the species. To help place the Recovery Outline in perspective, it is not a regulatory document. Communities are responsible for taking the lead on specific recovery actions, but in a framework that will most likely ensure successful recovery and, ultimately, delisting of the species.

 

This is an important point because there have been attempts in the past to stir up hostility about saving the steelhead. Even now, there may be some who will try to discredit the body of scientific information that has been compiled by the National Marine Fisheries Service over the last 10 years to educate the public about steelhead and how its historic role can be re-established in our communities.

 

We are now on the threshold of an environmental and economic success story with something good for most everyone at the end of the final chapter.

 

The travel and recreation industry in California is a multibillion-dollar industry and this was revealed in a study completed in 2001 by the Coastal Ocean Observation System. The report states that: "Tourism-related trip expenditures in coastal counties of California were in excess of $58 billion in 2001. Recreational fishing also generates substantial economic returns with nearly a quarter billion of expenditures spent on fishing trips and an associated $2 billion being spent on related items (including licenses, rods, reels, etc.)."

 

Related to potential positive economic impacts, it is important to keep in mind that the rivers and streams of Ventura County supported an important recreational industry within the lifetime of many current residents. The same rivers and streams can do so again, but it will require a long-term commitment to the vision offered in the recently released Recovery Outline for one of Ventura County's most defining natural resources — the Southern California steelhead. #

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2007/oct/21/outline-for-recovery-of-coast-steelhead/

 

 

OTTERS IN THE RESERVOIR:

Otters stump PID

Paradise Post – 10/20/07

By Paul Wellersdick, staff writer

 

Paradise Irrigation District is stumped with an otter problem at Paradise Lake and the Magalia reservoir. Four otters were first seen by Brian Vickery last year while out on his canoe taking pictures of wildlife for the Department of Fish and Game.

 

"I was on my canoe and I saw these heads bobbing around the shoreline and I thought now what is that," he said.

 

Earlier this month Vickery counted eight of the critters eating fish near the south west section of the lake, near the intake pipe that feeds the Magalia reservoir. They're clearly multiplying, he said.

 

"They've got a home down in a 50-year-old stump," he said.

 

He notified the lake patrolman Greg Dobbs, Vickery said.

 

"I said 'Hey those bloody things are going to eat up all the fish,'" he said.

 

PID cannot legally do anything about the creatures at this time. PID Manager George Barber and the board reviewed options at a meeting Wednesday night. The district is concerned about water quality because otters have been known to carry giardia, a gastric parasite. The district would like to relocate them, Barber said.

 

"That is not an option," he said.

 

Vickery would like them relocated to the Sacramento River, he said.

 

"[If] they get a hold of one of those salmon, it'd take days to eat," he said.

 

Vickery's concerned about the habitat. The otters are destructive to Paradise Lake's habitat because they burrow to make homes and eat fish, he said.

 

"They eat all the fish that the PID people stock the lake with," he said. "I reckon those little buggers need to eat two to three fish a day. That's 24 fish a day times 365, that's (more than) 8,000 fish." Barber said Rick Terrano, PID treatment plant operator, noticed four otters in the Magalia reservoir while observing construction of the Magalia bypass system that draws water to the treatment plant from above the reservoir.

 

PID is unsure at this time what to do about the otters and is unsure if the four otters in the Magalia reservoir are the same ones from Paradise Lake. The district is unsure if the otters are traveling between the lakes through Little Butte Creek.  #

http://www.paradisepost.com//ci_7228490?IADID=Search-www.paradisepost.com-www.paradisepost.com

 

 

THE SALMON RETURN:

Rise of the salmon: Annual fish hatchery festival focuses on education, protecting area species

Redding Record Searchlight – 10/21/07

By Ryan Sabalow, staff writer

 

ANDERSON -- For 4-year-old Ryder Klenk, there are few things as riveting as watching a 30-pound, hook-jawed male chinook salmon trying to lunge up a concrete fish ladder.

 

"It's so cool," the Anderson boy said Saturday before pressing his nose into a chain-link fence, just feet away from the struggling fish. "They keep splashing us."

 

Sure enough, another king-sized buck salmon slapped the water with its nearly foot-wide tail as it gave one final splashing lunge up the ladder into a calmer holding area.

 

"Look at how big they are," Ryder's mother, Megan Klenk, said to the boy. "Look at their large tails. Could you swim up that?"

 

It was a scene that repeated itself again and again Saturday at the Return of the Salmon Festival at the Coleman National Fish Hatchery.

 

Part biology lesson, part street fair, the 17th annual festival drew about 14,000 people last year.

 

Scott Hamelberg, the hatchery's chief administrator, said this year's event could very well match or surpass that number of attendees.

 

Hamelberg said the festival is designed to showcase the hatchery's mission of helping sustain salmon populations, while giving families a chance to gather together and learn more about wildlife.

 

Nearly 60 exhibits made mostly of nonprofit groups, area watershed organizations, wildlife activists and a handful of vendors were on display. Many offered games and activities.

 

Children and their families took turns learning to fly fish, played croquet, watched salmon in a portable, glass-walled tank or painted on model salmon molds.

 

"Fun and informative -- that's our goal," Hamelberg said.

 

The hatchery was built in 1942 to offset the building of Keswick and Shasta dams, which effectively blocked 200 miles of salmon-spawning habitat.

 

The Coleman hatchery collects nearly 15 million fall-run salmon eggs a year, and hatchery workers nurture 12 million fall-run smolts, which are released back into the Sacramento River tributary, Battle Creek. >From there, the fish travel to the Pacific Ocean.

 

In between three and six years, a small percentage of the salmon return to the hatchery to begin the cycle all over again.

 

But it's a one-way trip back for the fish, which don't eat during their long journey and die naturally after breeding.

 

At the hatchery, that process is expedited.

 

Some gasped as they watched salmon being bonked over the head by a club-wielding worker inside the hatchery's spawning room, after the fish were pulled from a carbonated tank, which anesthetizes them.

 

Workers then squeeze sperm-rich milt out of the dead males; others harvest eggs from the females.

 

The sperm and eggs are mixed in plastic tubs, and in a few weeks, baby salmon are born.

 

Nothing goes to waste.

 

The dead fish are sent to a plant in Washington, where they're processed into meat that's returned to American Indian tribes or for stores in Northern California food banks.

 

For 3-year-old Wyatt Bailey of Redding, the process was eye-opening, especially after his aunt, Sasha Seymore, 30, was handed one of the orangish-red eggs by a hatchery volunteer.

 

"That's a baby salmon right there," she said.

 

The boy's eyes were transfixed on the tiny life-to-be. #

http://www.redding.com/news/2007/oct/21/rise-of-the-salmon/

 

 

ALGAE IN THE RESERVOIRS:

Blue-green algae levels lower in some areas, officials say

Eureka Times Standard – 10/22/07

 

Blue-green algae levels are now safe in some areas, but others remain above warning levels, officials said this week.                                                                                                                               

 

Warnings were originally issued on July 3 due to the high levels of toxic algae in Copco and Iron Gate reservoirs, and on Oct. 1 for the Klamath River mainstem below Iron Gate dam.

 

Water sampling by the Klamath Blue-Green Algae Work Group shows that levels of the algae that produce toxins have dropped in the mainstem Klamath River downstream from Iron Gate dam and are no longer potentially harmful to humans and animals.

 

Toxic algae concentrations still remain above warning levels in both the Copco and Iron Gate reservoirs and the health alert for these locations will remain in effect until at least two weeks have passed since sampling showing toxic algae populations and/or toxin concentrations fall below warning levels.

 

While the health alert has been lifted in some areas, the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, State Water Resources Control Board, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services, and the Yurok and Karuk Tribes advise people who use the river to look for signs of algal blooms.

 

People and their pets should avoid water contact if there are visible scums of algae in the water.

 

BOX: For more information, visit:

 

California Department of Public Health:

 

http://www.cdph.ca.gov/healthinfo/environhealth/water/Pages/Bluegreenalgae.aspx

 

State Water Resources Control Board

 

HYPERLINK "http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/bluegreenalgae/index.html" http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/bluegreenalgae/index.html

 

National Center for Disease Control:

 

HYPERLINK "http://www.cdc.gov/hab/cyanobacteria/facts.htm" http://www.cdc.gov/hab/cyanobacteria/facts.htm

County of Humboldt, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Branch

 

http://co.humboldt.ca.us/health/envhealth/

(707) 445-6215

 

Yurok Tribe Real Time Water Quality and BGA Data

http://exchange.yuroktribe.nsn.us/lrgsclient/stations/stations.html

http://www.times-standard.com//ci_7247916?IADID=Search-www.times-standard.com-www.times-standard.com

 

 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA:

Guest Column: Embrace your watershed

Ukiah Daily Journal – 10/22/07

By Rachel Olivieri, member of the Willits Economic Localization project and the leader of the Water Focus Group

 

There are two kinds of solutions -- degenerative or regenerative. The former degrades and becomes obsolete in time and requires energy inputs to function and creates negative impacts. A dam, water diversion, impervious parking lots, streets and sidewalks, and modern urban developments are degenerative.

 

Regenerative solutions grow, improve and produce more resources than it consumes while serving multiple functions. A free-flowing river, forest, grassland, wetland, and urban stormwater raingardens are regenerative.

 

Regenerative solutions come from understanding relationships. Relationships include watershed condition, budget, storage, population, and water requirements for environment, people, industry, and food production.

 

When considering the county s water challenges, each district has it s own particular requirement, yet, when it comes to water literacy, all districts share a common theme -- Retention -- Recharge - Recycle -- Restore. Willits rainfall and specific water issues provide a model to illustrate these themes.

 

An in-depth watershed study conducted by Department of Fish and Game (DFG) chronicling historic land developments was presented to the Willits City Council. It found the watersheds ability to hold water and support life is degenerative. Ridge-to-ridge, Little Lake basin is the most hydrologically altered -- Second only to the Potter Valley Project covering 3,600 square miles of Eel River watershed.

 

Willits rainfall is between 35" to 90" per year -- 58" is average and 35" a drought. Using annual drought figures, 1 million gallons per acre (MGPA) is precipitated annually. Average 58" year is 1.6 MGPA. Less evaporation and infiltration, based on six households per acre, each residential lot produces 77,500 gallons of polluted runoff/yr. Over 2500 households that s 194 MGPY or 600 Acre Feet (AF) not quite half of total reservoir storage and sufficient water to supply 6,500 people a year. An average 58" rainfall year produces 830 AF of runoff, enough to supply 9,000 for a year. Commercial/Industrial runoff is higher still, 80 percent -- Water scarcity or water abundance? -- A design change, anyone?

 

Why would anyone give up on a watershed that produces 1 MGPA in a drought year? Mimicking natural cycles in urban settings is doable -- Retention -- Recharge - Recycle -- Restore.

 

Recharge capability of the valley is known. Two hydrologic studies -- Cardwell 1965 -- Farrar 1986 -- conducted a one year study -- 19 wells -- findings - southern valley has 2000 acre feet of rechargeable aquifer. See full study:

 

www.dpla2.water.ca.gov/publications/water_quality/Willits_doc1.pdf

 

Another study -- City of Willits and Department of Water Resources -- 1987 -- concluded: "With proper groundwater development and treatment, the basin should be capable of producing the additional 2,000 AF/year necessary to meet the 2015 water demands." I shared this information last September with Vice-Mayor Orenstein early in my water research and published the first of over twenty water articles in three local newspapers: Google: Romancing Rainwater.

 

Wells are doable -- but only after paying attention to recharge -- this reasoning accounts for my opposition to the original city well proposal -- it lacked retention foresight -- a view supported by the DFG study. As I expressed in a letter to the city council, "its defeat was the right vote for the wrong reasons."

 

Willits City proper is the most reliable recharge area. Infiltration basins of all sizes for urban areas, cityscapes, parks, and public spaces are documented and employed across the country -- Google -- rain gardens or infiltration basins -- or, Portland's cutting edge retention systems: www.cnt.org/repository/Portland.pdf.

 

Willits has eight pressure points -- large water tanks fed by the reservoir. These tanks could be outfitted with catchment aprons to capture screened rainwater. That much less reservoir water is captured and treated and more water for the creeks. Additional large locally-manufactured tanks could be installed within designated sectors to capture rainfall.

 

As defined by previous studies, strategically placed wells can be a primary water source by capturing and retaining runoff, recharging 600-830 AF per year from runoff alone. That recharged water is earth-cleaned and kept fresh as groundwater storage.

 

Rainwater economics can be as creative as solar buybacks. Watershed Investment for a Sound Ecology-based Economy is WISEE and local. Consider the possibilities of infiltrating stormwater -- There's still straightup conservation, graywater recycling, and residential harvesting to explore.

 

Example -- Every gallon of shower, sink, washer or dishwasher graywater feeds a fruit tree, a garden, or a landscape which cleans the water and the air, produces fruit or vegetables, evapotranspires for more rain, recharges aquifer, becomes underground flow, creeks run year round -- which supports the greatest inland protein energy system known to man, salmon -- Regenerative or Degenerative?

 

Molly Ivins wisdom, "When one finds themselves in hole - stop digging." To: Johnny Pinches, Mendocino County and the Willits City Council -- let's mimic natural systems and be water abundant. Being water scarce is a drag. #

http://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com//ci_7248765?IADID=Search-www.ukiahdailyjournal.com-www.ukiahdailyjournal.com

 

 

No comments:

Blog Archive