This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 3/28/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 28, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

Editorial: More leaky levees

West Sac gets a better handle on flood risk

Sacramento Bee

 

Flood advice expected

State panel to study safety of building on flood plains

San Bernardino County Sun

 

The looming sinkhole crisis

Aging pipes badly needing repair are to blame for craters cropping up in cities worldwide.

Los Angeles Times

 

City locked in struggle for marina

San Leandro hopes to revitalize yacht harbor, but costs becoming too high

Oakland Tribune

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

Editorial: More leaky levees

West Sac gets a better handle on flood risk

Sacramento Bee – 3/28/07

 

It looks as if West Sacramento will be joining the growing ranks of communities in the Central Valley that are finding flaws in their flood control systems because they are looking harder for problems.

 

Based on a recent review of its levee system, the city is learning that a widespread weakness in the flood walls -- underseepage -- affects West Sacramento as well. Standards that identify seepage-prone levees are tougher than they used to be. It's doubtful that most levees will pass the underseepage test unless they have been upgraded recently. The news coming from West Sacramento is not surprising.

West Sacramento's major problem is one that boils down to advertising. Based on an outdated review of its levee system (before that underseepage test got tougher and more realistic), the city claimed it had 300-year protection from floods along the Sacramento River. The city didn't change that claim when the levee standards changed. After Hurricane Katrina (who knows -- maybe those stories in The Bee about flood control issues had an effect as well), West Sacramento officials made the right decision to conduct a new round of geotechnical studies of the levees.

 

"Virtually every segment of our levee system will need one form of work or another," said Caroline Quinn, assistant director of public works and community development. "We do have significant work to do. It is not unexpected."

 

So West Sacramento is laudably changing the message to its residents. The city isn't as safe from floods as previously advertised. Any solution would almost certainly require a new local property assessment to help the city qualify for outside funding. That mirrors what's happening on the other side of the river. There, the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency is now holding an election (by mail, for property owners in the floodplain only) to secure the local share of funding for a host of necessary projects along the Sacramento and American rivers.

 

It is essential for residents in harm's way to invest in their own public safety. Governments on both sides of the river are doing their jobs to identify the problems. It takes a concerned public to do something about them.#

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/144957.html

 

Flood advice expected

State panel to study safety of building on flood plains

San Bernardino County Sun – 3/28/07

George Watson, Staff Writer

 

Community leaders finally can expect to receive useful information about building on hazardous flood plains found in the foothills below the many mountain ranges across Southern California.

 

That's because the state has reached a deal to partner with the Water Resources Institute at Cal State San Bernardino to study alluvial fans.

 

The fans - the buildup of sediment that flows off mountains and fills the canyons below - are becoming home to more and more people, leading to concerns about safety for residents and vast property damage.

 

It's been a long time coming. About 2 1/2 years have passed since the Legislature approved a bill later signed into law for the Alluvial Fan Task Force. Still, results won't be arriving anytime soon because the task force has yet to convene.

 

But after much delay, the deal between the state and the institute shows that the plan is finally moving forward, said Susan Lien Longville, director of the Water Resources Institute.

 

"We have a huge task ahead of us," Lien Longville said. "But this is really important. It's going to be more of a risk to people as we continue toward sprawl."

 

The term "alluvial fan" became part of this region's lexicon in 2003 when a Christmas Day flood of raging water, trees and boulders killed 16 people - including nine children - and destroyed homes and other property below the San Bernardino Mountains.

 

Approximately 15 people will be asked to join the task force, said Ricardo Pineda, chief of the state Department of Water Resources' flood-plain-management branch.

 

Members will include scientists, consultants, planners, elected leaders, flood-control authorities, builders and conservationists.

Lien Longville said she wants to have "some major players on board" to ensure the task force's efforts are received well by city council members and county supervisors throughout Southern California.

 

Pineda hopes to begin scheduling meetings of the task force by summer.

 

The goal? To create a model ordinance for communities that face the potential of alluvial-fan flooding.

"Hopefully, we'll be making wiser decisions," Lien Longville said.

 

Pineda and Lien Longville discussed how the task force's role will be advisory, not regulatory. That had been a concern for at least one local building leader who wondered whether the task force would lead to another level of government.

 

Bureaucratic red tape has held up the formation of the task force, officials say. So much time has passed that the law, signed in October 2004 by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, expired Jan. 1. Assemblyman Bill Emmerson, R-Redlands, is expected to file a new bill with the same language, enabling the task force to continue having the backing of the Legislature.

 

Understanding alluvial fans' role in flooding is critical for this region because of the wildfire phenomenon.

 

For up to five years after a destructive wildfire, experts say, the power of a debris flow made up of water, dirt, brush, trees and boulders can increase by a factor of 40. The increase is so dramatic because denuded slopes don't have vegetation to slow the flow's path.

 

"We're still not out of the woods, in terms of flooding dangers, from the Old Fire and Grand Prix Fire of 2003," Pineda said.

 

And as population growth in Orange and Los Angeles counties continues, more people are expected to be moving directly onto flood-prone areas that builders avoided in the past.

 

By 2020, developers are expected to have built homes for up to 4 million more people on alluvial fans in San Bernardino, Riverside and neighboring counties, flood-plain-management estimates show.#

http://www.sbsun.com/ci_5536148

 

 

The looming sinkhole crisis

Aging pipes badly needing repair are to blame for craters cropping up in cities worldwide.

Los Angeles Times – 3/28/07

By Thomas Rooney

WHEN THEY SAW the recent pictures of a giant sinkhole in Guatemala, some folks in Los Angeles may have thought: "It could never happen here."

They're wrong.

The Guatemala City sinkhole that killed three people and swallowed dozens of homes was formed by the same thing that creates sinkholes in Los Angeles. Not weather. Not an act of God. Not strange rock. Bad sewer pipes created this sinkhole. And the problem is getting worse, around the world and in the United States.

Last year was the worst ever in the U.S. for sinkholes. Almost every state in the country experienced record problems.

In San Diego, the mayor held a news conference near a yawning abyss. A 64-year-old Brooklyn woman fell into a 5-foot-deep sinkhole in front of her house.

In Los Angeles, a broken water main created a sinkhole 30 feet deep and shut down half of Pacific Coast Highway near Malibu. At the same time, a broken sewer pipe shut down the adjacent beach.

In Northern California, an 8-foot-deep sinkhole stunned the occupants of a nearby office building. In Grand Rapids, Mich., residents had to boil water after a sinkhole cut off their water service.

And this year is shaping up to be even worse. From Hawaii to New York, Alaska to North Carolina and everywhere in between, an epidemic of breaking pipes is causing unprecedented havoc.

Yet for all this damage, few people understand how broken pipes create sinkholes. Most water and sewer pipes in the United States were built 60 years ago — but were meant to last 50 years. Do the math. Pipes are breaking as they get older.

When pipes break, two things happen: Water or sewage gets out, and water or dirt gets in. Havoc results when dirt enters a broken pipe and is whisked away, as though on a magic carpet ride. Soon, even if only by a spoonful a day, the dirt disappears from above the pipe and below the sidewalk — or below the road, park, building, etc.

We also know that rainwater entering broken pipes can overload sewage systems, causing even more sewage spills. Rain, though often cited as the culprit in sewage spills, is frequently just an innocent bystander.

Even when bad pipes don't lead to a sinkhole catastrophe, they can cause major problems. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that last year 3.5 million people became ill from E. coli and other toxins released from 40,000 sewage spills. A study last year by UCLA and Stanford University found that, every year, bacterial pollution in ocean water off beaches, much of it coming from broken pipes, makes 1.5 million people sick in Southern California.

Pipes are not that hard to fix anymore. With video cameras to find the leaks and new trenchless technology to fix them without the need for digging up streets, there is only one reason why so many broken pipes are forming so many huge sinkholes: We are not paying attention.

This may be changing. Mayors in Atlanta, Pittsburgh, San Diego, North Kansas City, Mo., and other cities are making sewage and water pipe repair a top priority.

That's the good news. The bad news is that the pipes are getting worse faster than people are catching on.#

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-rooney28mar28,0,7397605.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail

 

City locked in struggle for marina

San Leandro hopes to revitalize yacht harbor, but costs becoming too high

Oakland Tribune – 3/28/07

By Martin Ricard, STAFF WRITER

 

SAN LEANDRO — In 1993, the City Council brought together a group of developers to come up with a plan that would not only salvage the San Leandro Marina but also tap into its unrealized potential.

 

The big ideas began to unfold: attached housing, a community center, restaurants, hotels and a scaled-down harbor allowing small sail boats, rowing and houseboats. More big ideas would follow.

 

Those ideas never materialized. The plan was never adopted. Other plans have remained stagnant because the

city hasn't been able to attract the right funding to complement the hefty price tag.

 

Even as the developers attempted to help the city realize the marina's full potential, they projected that the cost to dredge and maintain the yacht harbor would someday become too costly.

 

That day has come. But now that the council has formed a standing committee and opened its meetings on the marina to the public, they have been determined to find a way to keep the marina as the "crown jewel" of the city — even though the jewel has long since lost its glimmer.

 

"We can see that the problems are complex," Mayor Tony Santos said Monday night at a work session studying the marina shoreline and 45-year-old yacht harbor. "But I'm not sure they're insoluble."

 

The City Council heard more details Monday about the marina's problems.

The city doesn't have any immediate plans to dredge the two-mile channel and harbor, which have been silted up for several months.

 

But closing the harbor also would carry a debt that would haunt the city for years, city staff said.

 

Developing a "master development" plan that would examine all of the environmental, financial and regulatory constraints associated with operating the marina without a yacht harbor is the council's best option, city staff said.

 

Council members also got a glimpse of how that plan might look compared with other Bay Area marinas, which all in some way are struggling to stay afloat.

 

But while other marinas operate at a loss — mainly because of high dredging costs — most have something San Leandro lacks: a residential component and other types of development that generate a steady stream of revenue.

 

City officials have intentionally kept that option — and, consequently, most developers — at bay, citing the city's general plan policies and residents' objections as the reason.

 

The dilemma council members now face, Santos said, is whether the city is prepared to put down its guard and accept mixed-use development at the marina — as well a multi-million dollar liability.

 

"How can we put all these things together to make the marina as financially viable as possible?" Santos asked in reference to the hypothetical situation.

 

Although council members were divided over which direction they should take the marina, residents were adamant in their responses: Past mistakes never can be made again.

 

Paul Nahm, chairman of the Chamber of Commerce's Marina Task Force, thanked the council for including the public in their discussions of the marina but challenged council members to get their priorities in order.

 

City officials have tried twice before to develop the marina, "but we should keep the opportunities open if we want to put the necessary development into the marina," he said. "We should keep the marina alive until we have somebody to put the millions into it."

 

John Manuel, president of the Marina Action Committee, said the council's efforts seemed too little too late, but he didn't want to see another development move forward without politicians and residents being on the same page.

 

"Let us all work together toward a conclusion that leaves no doubt as to how we feel about the marina being compromised, and that involvement in the decision making process be all inclusive," Manuel read from a statement before submitting it to the council.

 

In the end, council members agreed they didn't want to get burned again with another set of stalled plans — and they vowed the marina dilemma will be solved under their watch.

 

"We're going to have to make a decision," Santos said. "It's tough sometimes to make a choice, but I believe we will do the right thing."#

http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/ci_5537754

 

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

No comments:

Blog Archive