This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 8/31/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

August 31, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

WATER SHORTAGES:

Water shortage hurts Upvalley vineyards; St. Helena's lower reservoir at less than half its capacity - Napa Valley Register

 

WATER CONSERVATION:

New plans to curb water usage - Desert Sun

 

CVWD approves water-saving landscape ordinance for new developments and golf courses

Desert Sun

 

 

WATER SHORTAGES:

Water shortage hurts Upvalley vineyards; St. Helena's lower reservoir at less than half its capacity

Napa Valley Register – 8/31/07

By Jesse Duarte, staff writer

 

Water conservation measures and the threat of rationing have made St. Helena residents aware of the drought’s effect on Bell Canyon reservoir. But the city’s lower reservoir is hurting even more.

Spring Mountain Vineyard and Robert Louis Stevenson Middle School have agreements with the city to use water from the lower reservoir. After the last rainy season yielded little rainfall, Public Works Director Jonathon Goldman told the vineyard and school that 2007 would be a difficult year.

 

Unlike typical years when the lower reservoir spills over, it never got beyond 38 percent of its 160-acre-foot capacity this year, said Ron Rosenbrand, vineyard manager at Spring Mountain Vineyard.

According to Rosenbrand, the drought will result in a 10 percent to 15 percent crop reduction at Spring Mountain Vineyard, although quality is not expected to suffer.

“In the last two years we’ve used about 50 acre-feet,” Rosenbrand said. “But so far through this July we’ve used about 10, and the reservoir’s almost empty.”

Spring Mountain Vineyard’s 225 acres account for about 25 percent of the vines in the Spring Mountain American Vitivultural Area.

The shortage is exacerbated by Spring Mountain Vineyard’s steep slopes of up to 50 percent. Hillside vineyards are usually affected more by droughts than valley floor vineyards because they have less topsoil and more rocks, limiting the moisture the soil can hold, Rosenbrand said.

He said that even if the vineyard switches to the Bell Canyon reservoir, it would still be subject to water restrictions, and would have to pay about five times what pays now.

RLS Middle School isn’t hurting as bad. According to Principal Mary Allen, irrigation has been reduced — except at the school’s field, which continues to be watered at a normal rate because it’s used by the entire community. Even the St. Helena Saints have used the field for practices while the high school’s field is replaced.

“We have some dry spots, but everybody’s had to cut back, and that’s OK,” Allen said. “Overall it hasn’t been that bad.”

The lower reservoir wasn’t always so dependent on the whims of Mother Nature. The city regularly diverted water from York Creek into the reservoir until the mid-’90s, when the Department of Fish and Game imposed new regulations.

That stretch of York Creek is one of the most popular in the county for steelhead, and the regulations were aimed at protecting that population. The city would have been allowed to divert water to the reservoir only when the creek’s flow reached a certain level, and a $500,000 facility with fish screens would have had to be built to protect the steelhead.

“The only time we would have been able to divert was during the wet season when, in normal years, the reservoir fills by itself,” Goldman said. “We wouldn’t be allowed to divert water into the reservoir now.”

Given the cost of the necessary facility and the prohibitive regulations, the city opted to discontinue the diversion.

This has been the first drought year since those diversions stopped, Rosenbrand said.

He said he’s impressed with how well the vines have held up given the reduced irrigation. A second consecutive dry year might damage them further, but Rosenbrand isn’t overly concerned with the forecasts predicting another drought.

“I’m not counting on a drought in ‘07-08,” he said. “But if it happens, there’s not a whole lot we can do. You have to roll with the punches.”

Keeping the lower reservoir filled is complicated further by the city’s water rights, which require the city to use the water, not just keep it for the sake of habitat or appearance, Goldman said. In rainy years, the reservoir’s leftover water is made available for construction and irrigation purposes within the city.

This year, that won’t happen.

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/08/31/news/local/doc46d7b64638e38761470801.txt

 

 

WATER CONSERVATION:

New plans to curb water usage

Desert Sun – 8/31/07

By Colin Atagi, staff writer

 

COACHELLA VALLEY - As drought conditions continue to plague Southern California, Coachella Valley water suppliers have created conservation plans that will change how local developers landscape their projects.

 

A revised Coachella Valley Water District landscaping ordinance, which goes into effect Oct. 1, reduces the amount of water new developments can use to create features within their existing plans.

 

Under the new plan, a project site can have enough water for areas equivalent to 25 percent of the overall project.

 

That's down 12 percent.

 

Agency officials say this will force developers to pay more attention to where they'll use grass and water-efficient landscaping such as plants indigenous to the desert.

 

"This really offers (developers) some flexibility to be creative," CVWD Conservation Coordinator David Koller said this week.

 

It also regulates sprinkler systems, which - under the new plan - need to be 24 inches from curbs and driveways to prevent water from running off into streets. The sprinklers have to be operated by control systems that adjust to climate changes.

 

The revised ordinance is expected to save 1,770 acre feet of water per year. One acre foot would supply a year's worth of water to a family of four living in the desert, Koller said.

 

Experts say water conservation in the desert is a top priority because of increased demand due to a combination of drought and development.

 

In addition, the Colorado River's water supply has diminished, and levee problems have affected the Sacramento-San Joaquin river delta, which supplies much of California with water.

 

"It's become immediately apparent we need to be more judicious about how we're using water as a resource," said Fred Bell, executive director of the Southern California Building Industry Association's Desert Chapter. "We need to look at water as a commodity and manage that commodity so we can continue to grow."

 

He said he doesn't expect the revisions to affect home prices or a person's daily showering or housekeeping rituals.

 

"About 70 percent of a resident's water is used outside a home," he said. "The real area we need to conserve water is on the exterior of the house."

 

Desert Water Agency General Manager Dave Luker said his organization is aware of CVWD's ordinance and has considered pursuing similar methods.

 

In the meantime, the DWA is selling new customers irrigation system controllers that adjust to weather patterns.

 

The agency also is installing water-efficient landscaping outside its building.

 

"You would certainly understand people's disdain if you say, 'Do as we say, not as we do,'" Luker said.

 

The DWA is installing artificial grass next to real grass so people may compare the two and see how real it looks, Luker said.

"Artificial grass, we hope, will take off," he said.

 

Under CVWD's ordinance, golf courses are limited to 4 acres of grass per hole.

 

"For an average golfer, that's what you need," La Quinta Resort and Club Golf Course Superintendent Glenn Miller said.

 

He added golf courses around the valley support water conservation installed sprinkler systems with lower trajectory.

 

Also, many use water-efficient turf.

 

"It is our part. We're on board with it," Miller said. #

http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070831/NEWS01/308310003&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL

 

 

CVWD approves water-saving landscape ordinance for new developments and golf courses

Desert Sun – 8/29/07

 

Coachella Valley Water District's (CVWD) board of directors approved a revised landscape ordinance on Tuesday that requires all new developments and golf courses to use more water-efficient landscaping to help conserve water.

Originally adopted in 2003, the landscape ordinance has three key objectives: reduce overall water use; eliminate water waste flowing down the streets; and establish limited grass allowances for golf courses.

“Because outdoor water use accounts for the majority of domestic water use in the Coachella Valley, this ordinance will play an important role in CVWD meeting its ultimate goal of eliminating overdraft of the aquifer,” said Steve Robbins, general manager-chief engineer. “It will also help the Coachella Valley do its part to help alleviate the State of Emergency in Riverside County, declared by Governor Schwarzenegger on July 19, because of prolonged drought conditions.”

The following are some of the ordinance's requirements:
• New developments must use irrigation systems run by “smart controllers,” such as weather-based controllers that self-adjust based on the climate changes. CVWD currently has a successful program that offers these controllers to home owners for a reduced rate. More than 400 controllers have been installed to date with program participants experiencing an average 26 percent reduction in water use.

• Grass areas in new developments that are irrigated with a spray system must be set back 24 inches from curbs, driveways and sidewalks in an effort to eliminate runoff of water onto streets. The buffer area between the grass and curb should be designed with rock, cobble or decomposed granite. It can be landscaped with suitable shrubs or groundcover, but only if irrigated with a drip system.

• The maximum water allowance for landscapes in new developments has been reduced, which further restricts the amount of grass that can be designed into the landscape. Currently, developers are given a maximum amount of water available for landscaping that provides some design flexibility, but ultimately restricts the amount of high-water using elements, such as grass or fountains. The new maximum water allowance will result in 20-25 percent grass landscaping and 75-80 percent water-efficient landscaping.

• Golf courses are limited to four acres of grass on average per golf hole and 10 acres of grass for the driving range and practice areas. All other, non-playable acreage must meet the ordinance's other requirements.

“When you drive around the Coachella Valley you can see the results of the original landscape ordinance in new developments with water-efficient landscaping. This revised ordinance will have an even greater impact,” Robbins said.

The requirements apply to new and rehabilitated golf courses and developments (including housing developments with five or more homes) within CVWD's boundaries. The ordinance does not apply to existing developments or single-family homes where the homeowner provides the landscaping. It goes into effect Oct. 1.

In drafting the revised ordinance, CVWD staff solicited input and support from representatives of the Building Industry Association, golf course superintendents, other area water districts, landscape architects and local municipalities.

CVWD is a public agency, governed by a five-member board of directors, that provides domestic and irrigation water, agricultural drainage, wastewater treatment and reclamation services, regional stormwater protection, groundwater management and water conservation across 1,000 square miles, primarily in Riverside County but also in portions of Imperial and San Diego counties.

http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070829/NEWS01/70829019/1006

####

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 8/31/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

August 31, 2007

 

1.  Top Item

 

Court could devastate water supply; Half of Southland's imported resources from north at risk

LA Daily News – 8/30/07

By Alex Dobuzinskis, staff writer

 

Southern California officials are bracing for a federal judge's ruling that could cut back the local water supply from Northern California by up to 50 percent.

 

U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger could rule as early as today after hearing evidence this week in a case brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council that, to protect the endangered smelt fish, could force the state to temporarily shut down pumps in the San Joaquin-Sacramento River Delta.

 

Local water officials have not ruled out the possibility of rationing if the judge orders drastic cutbacks.

 

"Conservation, rationing - those are the types of things that are always on the table to look at," said Jeff Kightlinger, general manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which supplies water to Los Angeles and other cities and water districts serving about 18 million residents.

 

Speaking at a recent water summit meeting, U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Wanger could order cutbacks of 20-50 percent.

 

"This is massive," Feinstein said. "It is major for some water districts in the state."

 

If Wanger sides with the Natural Resources Defense Council, it could affect water supply throughout Southern California from the end of this year and into next, officials said.

 

When the pumps are running, some parts of the delta flow backward, which draws smelt fish into the pumps and kills them.

The state already shut down the pumps for nine days starting May 31 to protect endangered smelt that were migrating past them.

 

When that happened, the state drew on the San Luis Reservoir in the San Joaquin Valley, leaving the reservoir only a quarter full, with what one state official described as a "bathtub ring" along its sides.

 

"If the pumps are shut down to protect the fish, it really doesn't matter if it's wet or dry, I can't move (the water)," Kightlinger said. "And so that's why we need to get into the smart infrastructure that keeps the fish and the pumps away from each other."

 

Among the options is a "peripheral canal" that would go around the delta, a proposal voters rejected in 1982. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has revived discussion of it.

 

The governor also appointed a blue-ribbon panel that is expected to produce recommendations in October on how to manage the delta.

 

Two-thirds of the Southland's imported water comes from the delta via the north-south California Aqueduct, up from more than one-third several years ago, Kightlinger said.

 

The rest comes from the Colorado River, which used to provide 60 percent of the district's imported water but is now going through an unprecedented dry spell.

 

If the water district imposes rationing, it would be up to the cities it serves to decide how much to force residents to cut back. Meanwhile, cities are already asking residents to use less water.

 

In June, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa issued the city's first water conservation goal in more than a decade, urging residents to cut their use by 10 percent. That came as L.A. finished its driest rain season ever, with just 3.21 inches.

 

That's why the focus has to be cutting back on consumption, said David Nahai, president of the Department of Water and Power board. The city has called on residents to do everything from taking shorter showers to not using their toilets as a "wastebasket."

 

"I think we're looking at a worrisome picture here," Nahai said. "However, it's not panic time, because we have more than adequate storage and because we had a very wet year" in 2006.

 

But, "at the end of the day, we are still a city of 4 million people sitting atop a desert area," he said. "We're going to need water imported to the area, especially as we grow." #

http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_6764956

####

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 8/30/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 30, 2007

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People

 

IMPERIAL VALLEY LITIGATION:

Water cases to flood court

Imperial Valley Press – 8/30/07

By Darren Simon, staff writer

 

After a two-year delay, a series of lawsuits over one of the most hotly debated water pacts in the Imperial Valley’s history is about to return to court.

At stake is not only the 75-year water pact — the Quantification Settlement Agreement — but also a question of whether water remains a public resource in the Valley, Imperial Irrigation District officials say.

“What it comes down to is whether IID is the trustee of Imperial Valley’s water rights,” district spokesman Kevin Kelley said.

To some farmers who are part of a local organization called the Imperial Group, it’s a question of whether the IID board in signing the 2003 QSA negotiated a pact that best serves the interest of both landowners and the Valley as a whole.

“Our fight is to keep the water rights pertinent to the land,” said Mike Morgan, a local farmer and a leading member of the Imperial Group.

 

Come Sept. 14 all parties involved in QSA litigation will be back in the Sacramento Superior Court to discuss how to move forward with the legal battle.

THE HISTORY

In 2003, the IID Board of Directors was a signing party along with state and federal authorities and other water agencies to the QSA, a far-reaching water pact that cut both the state’s and the Valley’s Colorado River supply.

The action was meant to prevent future water wars between water agencies across states that depend on the Colorado River.

IID officials who signed the QSA said it was the best way to protect the Valley’s water supply into the future, but from the outset there were critics of the water deal.

As the district sought court validation of the QSA, the Imperial Group filed a lawsuit challenging the district and the water pact.

Morgan said the litigation is not meant to remove the district as the governing entity that holds the water rights in trust. What the litigation does seek, he said, is to have those water rights tied to the land rather than to the public.

He acknowledges that would equate to water privatization.

“People shouldn’t fear privatization,” Morgan said, adding if water rights were tied to the land that would serve as better protection of the Valley’s water rights.

“It secures the water staying in the Valley,” Morgan said, adding the farming community would look to build up local communities rather than sell the water as some IID officials have alleged.

IID Director John Pierre Menvielle disagrees.

He said there are those farmers, in particular those with the Imperial Group, who want to control the water supply so they can sell it.

Menvielle said it is critical that the QSA lawsuits move forward.

“The sooner we get going the better off we will all be,” he said.

THE COORDINATED CASES

The litigation filed by the Imperial Group was not the only legal challenge to the QSA.

There was other litigation brought by Imperial County and by environmentalists that also raised concerns over the water pact.

Eventually the cases were all joined into what has become known as the coordinated QSA cases.

Two years ago the coordinated cases came to a halt as one of the water lawsuits filed by Imperial County was dismissed.

The county’s effort to seek an appeal is what led to the delay and it was just earlier this year that its appeal was dealt with by a state appellate court that dismissed the matter.

Morgan said as the QSA cases move forward he is looking to see a settlement reached with the district that would bring about a renegotiated QSA — one that would increase the value of the Valley’s water supply.

Kelley said it is time to bring the QSA debate to a close.

“It’s important no matter what side of this question you are on that there be a definitive resolution,” Kelley said.

DWR's California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff, for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader's services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost1.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news. DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATER QUALITY - 8/30/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

August 30, 2007

 

4. Water Quality

 

PERCHLORATE:

Environmental groups find fault with state's perchlorate standard proposal - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

Rialto's toxic perchlorate plume may prompt emergency decree - Riverside Press Enterprise

 

Council members talk water pollution in capital - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

LOS OSOS:

Supervisors OK $25,000 tax for Los Osos homeowners; That would be in addition to a $40 monthly bill for maintenance and a one-time expense to hook up to the wastewater treatment system - San Luis Obispo Tribune

 

GROUNDWATER CLEANUP:

Editorial: What's the delay? Clean up refinery pollution - Bakersfield Californian

 

 

PERCHLORATE:

Environmental groups find fault with state's perchlorate standard proposal

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 8/30/07

By Jason Pesick, staff writer

 

The state is in the final stages of setting a standard dictating how much perchlorate can be in your drinking water.

 

The cap on the amount of the widespread contaminant that can be in the drinking water could be in place within weeks.

 

But the proposal of 6 parts per billion is not one that will sit well with the environmental community.

 

It could also lead to hikes in water rates, as water purveyors are forced to begin cleaning perchlorate from the water they serve.

 

"We're disappointed that in light of all the accumulating evidence that perchlorate is harmful at levels well below this that California decided to stick with 6 ppb," said Bill Walker, vice president for the Environmental Working Group's West Coast office.

 

Perchlorate has been discovered in drinking water throughout areas of Southern California used for agricultural, industrial and military purposes.

 

On Aug. 6, the state Department of Public Health submitted a standard of 6 ppb to the state Office of Administrative Law. Once its review is complete, it will send the regulation to the secretary of state to sign off on.

 

Since the state began developing the standard, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study showing that even at low levels, perchlorate can affect hormone levels in a large percentage of women.

 

The proposed standard is also higher than the 2 ppb set by Massachusetts last year.

 

Perchlorate is used in the production of explosives like fireworks and rocket fuel.

 

Chilean fertilizer used in agricultural areas around the Southland is also thought to be responsible for perchlorate contamination.

 

It can affect the functioning of the thyroid, which is important for metabolism and neurological development.

 

Between August 2002 and August 2007, 251 wells had reported having perchlorate at a level of 4 ppb or higher in California.

Of those, 114 are in San Bernardino and Riverside counties.

 

The process of setting a standard began in August last year when the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment set a public health goal of 6 ppb.

 

Its task is to only take public health into consideration when setting that goal. Then the Department of Public Health takes into account how practical the proposed standard would be.

 

A few months after the public health goal was set, the CDC study came out in October.

 

"This is going to be important information for those people who are setting acceptable levels (for perchlorate)," one of the study's co-authors James Pirkle, said when the study came out.

 

Massachusetts officials said they came to a level of 2 out of caution and a difference of a opinion with California officials over how much perchlorate people ingest from other sources besides water, like food.

 

Massachusetts officials said they thought people take in a fair bit of perchlorate from other sources besides water, so they wanted to set a lower standard for perchlorate in water.

 

While environmentalists aren't satisfied with California's proposed standard, because they see it as too high, some water purveyors have a very different complaint.  

 

It will cost them millions of dollars to clean perchlorate out of water and lead to rate hikes.

 

The East Valley Water District will have to spend tens of millions of dollars building facilities to treat perchlorate ranging from levels of 6 to 12 ppb in some of its wells, said General Manager Bob Martin.

 

He said there will be an 11 percent rate increase this year, and that's just the beginning.

 

"For us it's more of a nuisance," said Ken Manning, CEO of the Chino Basin Watermaster.

 

A combination of treatment systems, blending contaminated water with clean water, and shutting down some wells has worked for his agency, he said.

 

If California adopts Massachusetts' standard of 2 ppb, that would have presented more of a challenge, he said.

 

Agencies around Rialto, where industrial sites on the city's north end have led to perchlorate contamination of up to 10,000 ppb, say they aren't too concerned over the new standard.

 

This is because with the help of grant money, they've been treating the water to the point where they can't detect perchlorate in it.

 

"We're pretty well geared up for it," said Anthony "Butch" Araiza, general manager of the West Valley Water District.

 

Representatives of water purveyors said that if California set a standard of 2 ppb, the costs would have been much higher because of the low levels of perchlorate found throughout the region and the fact that the Colorado River, a major source of water in Southern California, is contaminated with low levels of perchlorate.

 

The level in the river has been decreasing, but it is still at about 2 ppb, said Mic Stewart, water quality manager for the Metropolitan Water District.

 

After the CDC study came out, environmentalists asked the state to review the proposed standard early and start the process over again, but the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment declined, citing a lack of information.

 

The next review of the standard will be in 2009, said Sam Delson, deputy director of the office.

 

Last year, Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill authored by then-state Sen. Nell Soto that included provisions allowing the state to compare its standard with other states' standards and would have made the process of determining a standard more transparent.

Walker called the new standard a compromise.

 

"I think frankly it's a political calculation by the Schwarzenegger administration that there are obviously lots of voices out there in industry and much more powerfully in the military establishment who don't want a strong perchlorate standard set because it's going to cost a lot more to clean it up," he said. #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/search/ci_6755145?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.dailybulletin.com

 

 

Rialto's toxic perchlorate plume may prompt emergency decree

Riverside Press Enterprise – 8/30/07

By Jim Miller, staff writer

 

SACRAMENTO - Rialto officials will consider declaring a local state of emergency in an attempt to get state aid to clean up a steadily moving perchlorate plume.

 

Aides to Gov. Schwarzenegger suggested the action during a meeting Wednesday in which Rialto leaders said perchlorate contamination poses a growing threat to the city's drinking water.

 

Both sides will follow up early next month.

 

Rialto leaders have become increasingly frustrated with delays in getting cleanup funds from the alleged sources of the underground pollution. The city has spent more than $18 million on legal fees, special water-filtering systems and other costs, and still lacks a cleanup order.

 

A Los Angeles County judge recently declared an indefinite halt to state water board hearings on the matter.

 

In a letter to Schwarzenegger on Wednesday, Rialto Mayor Pro Tem Winnie Hanson and Councilman Ed Scott complained that the city and its residents are the victims of a "brilliant joint multimillion-dollar scorched earth legal assault" by companies potentially responsible for the pollution.

 

In a related action, the Senate Rules Committee refused Wednesday to confirm two Schwarzenegger appointees to the state Water Resources Control Board.

 

"What has become absolutely clear is the state is woefully inept at enforcing its clean water laws," Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, wrote in a letter to Schwarzenegger that mentioned the perchlorate problems in Rialto.

 

City officials said they need at least $25 million to drill wells around the plume to block its migration.

 

Governor's spokesman Bill Maile called the meeting with Rialto officials "positive and informative."

 

The perchlorate plume stretches about six miles from a 160-acre Rialto site where Goodrich Corp. and other companies operated in the 1950s and 1960s.

 

Patrick Palmer, a Goodrich spokesman, said the company has been cooperative. The company has spent more than $10 million to investigate and treat the perchlorate contamination, he said.

 

"What the city might call unfair legal tactics we call due process. That remains a fundamental tenet of our Constitution," Palmer said.

 

Perchlorate disrupts the thyroid's ability to absorb iodide, a component of brain and nerve development in fetuses and babies.

Pregnant women are vulnerable to the chemical.  #

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_R_bperch30.5368f3.html

 

 

Council members talk water pollution in capital

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 8/30/07

By Jason Pesick, staff writer

 

RIALTO - Two members of the City Council met on Wednesday with the Governor's Office in Sacramento to discuss perchlorate, a substance polluting the area's drinking water.

 

Mayor Grace Vargas and Councilwoman Winnie Hanson were scheduled to meet with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's office.

 

In a letter to Schwarzenegger from two members of the council, Hanson and Ed Scott - members of the council's perchlorate subcommittee - asked for cleanup money and complained about delays the city has faced trying to get the perchlorate cleaned up.

 

"While we wait, the equivalent of a toxic forest fire moves across our drinking water storage system unabated," the letter reads.

Perchlorate, which was used in industrial sites on the city's north end, is flowing through the city.

 

The estimated cleanup cost is $300 million.

 

Perchlorate can be harmful to human health by interfering with the thyroid gland, which is important for metabolism and neurological development.

 

A spokesman for Schwarzenegger couldn't be reached for comment Wednesday evening. #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/search/ci_6755141?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.dailybulletin.com

 

 

LOS OSOS:

Supervisors OK $25,000 tax for Los Osos homeowners; That would be in addition to a $40 monthly bill for maintenance and a one-time expense to hook up to the wastewater treatment system

San Luis Obispo Tribune – 8/30/07

By Sona Patel, staff writer

 

County supervisors have signed off on an engineer’s report that establishes how much in taxes most Los Osos property owners can expect to pay for a long-awaited sewer in the coastal town.

 

If paid in a lump sum, that assessment would be about $25,000 on average for a single-family home, according to the report approved Tuesday.

 

But county officials expect most homeowners to pay in twice-annual installments of $960 on their property tax bills.

 

With interest and administrative costs, that would amount to $57,600 if the county finances it for 30 years, according to figures given to The Tribune by Public Works officials Wednesday.

 

That would be on top of a monthly bill estimated at $40 on average, according to new county figures, to pay for ongoing operation and maintenance.

 

The amount of monthly bills was wrong in a Tribune front-page story Tuesday.

 

In addition to the assessment on property tax bills and the $40 estimated monthly bill for operation and maintenance, homeowners would have to pay a one-time expense to decommission their septic tanks and hook up to the sewer system.

 

That one-time expense — called “on-lot costs” — could range between $1,600 and $9,600, depending on the property, according to county estimates.

 

All these expenses—the assessment, the one-time expense and monthly bill for operation and maintenance — would total about $200 a month, county officials said Wednesday.

 

That assumes that a homeowner would pay the $25,000 assessment in twice-annual installments and would finance the one-time “on-lot” costs with a 20-year home-equity loan at 8.25 percent interest, according to an Aug. 14 Public Works Department report to the county Board of Supervisors.

 

Though county officials expect combined sewer costs to be about $200 a month, they explained in their report to supervisors that the costs could vary between $100 and $275.

 

That’s because the cost of construction would eventually depend on the technology and treatment plant site chosen, as well as methods of financing.

 

County officials also hope that state or federal grants or low-interest loans could lower the cost of the system. #

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/story/129364.html

 

 

GROUNDWATER CLEANUP:

Editorial: What's the delay? Clean up refinery pollution

Bakersfield Californian – 8/29/07

 

"Pretty please" works well enough when you're asking for the last slice of pie. It's considerably less effective when you're trying to convince industry to undertake expensive and time-consuming clean-up efforts.

 

"Pretty please" just isn't good enough when your charge is protecting the public's drinking water. Few responsibilities could be greater. Yet, over the years, "pretty please" seems to have been the primary enforcement strategy employed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board when it came to leaking contaminants at a Bakersfield oil refinery.

 

That strategy had to stop.

 

The regional water board has now issued a formal order requiring the current and past owners of the Big West Oil refinery on Rosedale Highway to clean up a toxic leak that dates to the mid-1980s. The regulating agency will force the owners to clean up contaminated soil and tainted groundwater beneath the facility.

 

It's about time. Where was the agency's order two decades ago when the first of these leaks was detected? Sidetracked by polite requests, apparently.

 

Letters between the water board and Shell, the refinery's former owner, are a study in comic ineffectiveness, with the board's strategy -- pushing for voluntary removal of soil contaminants, such as oil, gasoline, diesel, benzene and MTBE -- netting precious little in the way of meaningful action.

 

In one instance, Shell, and not the water board, was allowed to set its own deadlines for restarting a treatment system that had been shut down. The company missed all three of its self-imposed deadlines, with no apparent consequences.

 

City officials say some of the leakage could contaminate public drinking water supplies, including a Bakersfield well and the Kern River.

 

State Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter, has now jumped into the fray, asking Attorney General Jerry Brown to take legal action against Shell. Brown's office is studying the situation.

 

Water board officials say neither The Californian's investigation nor Florez's involvement were factors in the recent decision to toughen up, but the coincidental timing of the twin spotlights and the board's subsequent baring of its regulatory teeth make that position a little hard to believe.

 

Kern County Deputy District Attorney John Mitchell has seen the board in action several times over the years, most memorably when he was prosecuting the now-defunct Sunland Refinery for numerous groundwater violations. He discovered the water board had been writing letters to the refinery for more than 10 years asking that management take action, with no meaningful results.

 

Water board officials have complained that they are too understaffed to aggressively pursue polluters. But Florez said he could find no evidence of agency officials asking for significant staffing help. The water board, Florez said in his letter to Brown, "has a history of inaction." Pamela Creedon, the board's top officer since early 2006, disputes that characterization and promises more aggressive action. Good.

 

The board's past approach can't continue. It's been well documented that Bakersfield's air quality is among the worst in the nation. Now we learn that the city's water quality is at risk, too. The agency assigned to protect it must step up -- now. #

http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/editorials/story/224216.html

####