This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 7/31/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

July 31, 2009

 

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

Goodwill planting helps victims of water shortage

One farming family's gesture has yielded 237,760 pounds of produce for the Valley's needy.

Fresno Bee

 

Shasta County takes steps to save Kilarc Reservoir

The Record-Searchlight

 

S.F., U.N. partner on global warming center

San Francisco Chronicle

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Goodwill planting helps victims of water shortage

One farming family's gesture has yielded 237,760 pounds of produce for the Valley's needy.

Fresno Bee – 7/29/09

By

A 15-acre plot may not seem like much of a farm on the west side, where crops stretch for miles.

But the produce grown here isn't for sale. It goes to help some of the Valley's neediest families.

The Woolf Farming Co. planted 15 acres near Huron in early June to supply fresh produce to workers who have lost jobs or hours because of the Valley's water shortage.

Because of drought and environmental restrictions, farmers in the Westlands Water District have received less water this year, forcing them to fallow thousands of acres and lay off workers in Huron, Firebaugh and Mendota.

Morgan Woolf, a 20-year-old member of the farming family and a UC Davis student, organized the project that has produced about 119 tons of vegetables, including squash, three types of corn, jalapeƱo peppers and bell peppers.

The "garden," as Woolf calls it, has provided produce for the farming company's workers and countless families on the west side and throughout the Fresno area.

"We knew that people were suffering, and we wanted to do what we could," Woolf said.

"We also want to make it clear that the farming community does care about what is going on in these communities."

The Woolf family operates Los Gatos Tomato Products in Huron and also grows crops including pistachios, almonds, wheat, garlic and grapes.

"Although the drought has not hit us as bad as some other farms, we wanted our employees to take home some food because we knew that everyone knows someone who has lost a job or has had their hours cut," Woolf said.

Woolf, who is studying regional and community development, began working with several social service agencies, including FoodLink for Tulare County, the Salvation Army in Hanford and the Community Food Bank in Fresno.

Lisa Quiroz, food resource coordinator for the food bank in Fresno, welcomed the help.

The organization supplies food to 150 agencies in Fresno County.

"It is pretty unique to have someone set aside land and donate all the produce that comes from it," Quiroz said. "We are very lucky to have such generous people in the Valley."

Dana Wilkie, chief executive officer for the Fresno food bank, said the garden project comes at a time when the donations from some farmers have declined.

"It is not that there is a lack of interest -- the problem is that there are so many people who can barely stay in business because of the drought," Wilkie said.

Woolf said the project would not have been possible without the help of other agriculture companies that stepped in to help pick the crops and provide supplies.

Other farmers who have not been deeply hurt by water shortages also have come forward with donations of their own or have helped in the project, including Crop Production Services, Syngenta, TS&L, Pro Plant, Huron Ag, La Jolla Farms, Red Rock Ranch, Dresick Farms, Vasto Valley Cold Storage, Antonini Fruit Express, Hall Ag, Harris Ranch and Borba Farms.

"I got a call from a guy who wants to donate 5 tons of carrots and potatoes," Woolf said.

"And the more farmers are getting to know what we are doing, the more they want to help."

http://www.fresnobee.com/1093/story/1566209.html

 

 

Shasta County takes steps to save Kilarc Reservoir

The Record-Searchlight – 7/31/09

By Amanda Winters

A popular east county fishing reservoir could be saved after Shasta County joined Tetrick Ranch and the Abbott Ditch Users to try to stop its pending demolition.

The county filed a motion with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to intervene in the process started by Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

The company signed an agreement for demolition with state and federal water and wildlife departments in 2005, and released the outline for a removal plan in September 2008. The plan would remove dams from Old Cow Creek and drain Kilarc Reservoir, which is a popular fishing hole, and remove most diversions and canals.

Charles White, PG&E spokesman, said the utility company began the process of giving up the operating license for the plant in March, which was required after an application for reoperation of the plant was not made with FERC. White said the license was open for other entities to take over for a period of time, but none came forward.

On June 30, the Shasta County Board of Supervisors voted in closed session to intervene in the project, and on July 14 the county filed an affidavit with FERC.

"I don't think anyone in this county wanted to see it taken out," said Supervisor Glenn Hawes, whose district includes Kilarc. "A lot of people use it for fishing and recreation."

Hawes said when his children were younger, they often would go to the reservoir as a family to fish, and many families continue to do so today.

The county had to act fast before FERC approved the license surrender and PG&E began demolition, he said.

"I don't think FERC really wanted these things to go, and by our intervening, it kind of stops the time clock of the decommissioning project," Hawes said.

But the county's financial woes may put a damper on keeping the area as it is.

"The county strongly desires to retain the existing project features at Kilarc ... but its finances are not adequate to assume the maintenance and other costs associated with these facilities, and it does not have the capability to own and operate the power facilities," wrote Shasta County Administrative Fiscal Chief Bebe Palin in the affidavit.

The hope is that Evergreen Shasta Power LLC, run by Steve Tetrick, would pay for maintenance with money from the company's project revenue in agreement with the county, officials said in a news release.

Tetrick could not be reached for comment.

White said the process of taking out the hydroelectric project, which generates enough electricity to provide for 3,750 homes, would take years and questioned the feasibility of the county's late intervention plan.

Tamara Young-Allen, spokeswoman for FERC, said a motion to intervene can be made at any time, but the county may have to show the commission they had good cause to file late.

The Shasta Historical Society has filed a similar motion, citing the historical significance of the old powerhouses.

"The Kilarc Canal and Forebay and associated structures are features eligible for listing in the NRHP (National Register of Historic Places) and the CRHR (California Register for Historical Places), and consequently should be preserved from decommissioning and the proposed demolition," Sandy Winters, a volunteer with the society, wrote in the motion.

For Richard Jones, whose family has lived on South Cow Creek since 1910, the important issue is water rights.

"My biggest concern is keeping our irrigation water," he said. "If they can do it by keeping everything existing, that's fine. If not, then we have to find a way to get water to our ditch."

Jones had signed a letter in 2004 to the PG&E Kilarc-Cow Creek project manager emphasizing water rights that residents have had since before World War I and the importance of water continuing to flow down the Abbott Ditch. #

http://www.redding.com/news/2009/jul/31/shasta-county-takes-steps-to-save-kilarc/

 

S.F., U.N. partner on global warming center

San Francisco Chronicle – 7/30/09

By Heather Knight

San Francisco's Hunters Point Shipyard - so toxic it's listed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a Superfund site - will be the future home of a U.N.-sponsored think tank to study solutions to global warming and other environmental crises plaguing the planet.

Due to open in 2012, the facility is envisioned by Mayor Gavin Newsom's administration as the centerpiece of a new green technology campus, akin to Mission Bay serving as a biotech hub.

The 80,000-square-foot United Nations Global Compact Center will include office space for academics and scientists, an incubator to foster green tech start-ups, and a conference center.

The center is expected to cost $20 million. Lennar Corp., the developer partnering with the city to rebuild large swaths of the shipyard and Candlestick Point, will donate the land and infrastructure. The city hopes the remainder of the funds will come from corporate sponsorship, state and federal grants and foundation money.

"Locating the U.N. Global Compact Center in San Francisco will reinforce our city's commitment to global justice and sustainability," Newsom said in a statement.

Michael Cohen, director of the Mayor's Office of Economic Development, said San Francisco is the perfect site for a green tech campus because the Bay Area is university-rich, heavily tech-driven and has a wealth of venture capitalists willing to invest in startups.

He said the one missing piece was a brand name anchor - like UC San Francisco at Mission Bay - and that the United Nations provides it in spades.

The announcement comes weeks after the Santa Clara City Council approved financing for a 49ers stadium - but Cohen said the U.N. center is not meant to be a big-name replacement if San Francisco dumps its plan to build a new stadium at the shipyard.

"The opportunity to establish the Hunters Point Shipyard as a major job generator and as a place where environmental problems can be addressed may be more important than a football stadium," Cohen said.

The partnership between San Francisco and the United Nations dates to June 26, 1945, when the U.N. Charter was signed at the city's War Memorial Veterans Building. Four years ago, mayors from around the world gathered at City Hall to sign the U.N. Global Compact, a set of 21 urban environmental accords. San Francisco and Milwaukee are the only two American cities that signed the compact.

Synergy needed

Gavin Power, deputy director of the U.N. Global Compact, said San Francisco's long track record of environmental awareness makes it the perfect spot for the United Nations' first center to study global warming.

"We hope it will be a vibrant laboratory bringing together leading academics, researchers, social entrepreneurs and others who will collaborate and work on solutions," Power said.

He said the United Nations is well positioned to take whatever technological innovations emerge from the center and spread them worldwide.

Dan Adler is the president of California Clean Energy Fund, a nonprofit venture capital fund that invests in early-stage clean energy technologies. He said the industry is so heavily regulated that innovation can sometimes be hampered, and having key players working in close proximity is critical.

"You have to have more players at the table to make the technology work - you have to have regulators, you have to have legislators, you have to have entrepreneurs, large-scale capital and the innovation community itself," Adler said.

Transforming Bayview

The green tech campus will be built on Parcel C, which sits along the waterfront on the shipyard's eastern edge. The U.S. Navy is cleaning up the toxic shipyard and transferring the cleaned parcels to the city. The entire development project, including the U.N. center, must be approved by various city commissions and the Board of Supervisors.

Malik Looper, executive director of the Hunters Point nonprofit Literacy for Environmental Justice that works with neighborhood youth, said the U.N. center sounds like a fine idea, but he's more concerned that the land it's built on be thoroughly cleaned first. The Navy has said it will cap some parts of the land rather than fully excavate the toxics, which Looper said may be insufficient.

"The big issue in my mind is resolving the matter around what standards will be adhered to in terms of the cleanup, and until that matter is resolved, it's hard for me to be excited about a press release about a potential partnership," he said.

Cohen said the Navy will clean the land so it's safe to live and work there and city officials are satisfied with the process. The campus will help create jobs for Bayview-Hunters Point residents, he said, and local hiring requirements will be put in place.

However, Saul Bloom, executive director of Arc Ecology, an environmental nonprofit that helps communities close and clean up military bases, said the jobs can't go to neighborhood residents without the proper training.

"We can't lose sight of the fact we're trying to provide jobs for people who are in Bayview-Hunters Point, a substantial number of whom don't have that skill set and need to get there," he said. #

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/30/MN7O1913JU.DTL&feed=rss.bayarea

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS-WATERQUALITY-7/31/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

July 31, 2009

 

 

4. Water Quality –

 

Joint meeting for water agency plants seeds of cooperation;

Draft team-up will meet again in Sept. to become official

Woodland Daily-Democrat

 

Bay Area beach water pollution study

San Francisco Chronicle

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Joint meeting for water agency plants seeds of cooperation;

Draft team-up will meet again in Sept. to become official

Woodland Daily-Democrat – 7/30/09

By Melody Stone

 

Editor's note: This is one of a continuing series about the Woodland-Davis Surface Water Project and the JPA.

 

A rare joint meeting of the Woodland and Davis City Councils discussed joining forces under a new agency to solve the cities' water problems.

 

Both cities have been looking to diversify water sources for more than a decade now but have only recently began officially working together to create a reliable and quality source drawn from the Sacramento River, instead of their failing well systems in place now.

 

"It's been a long collaboration -- so this meeting is a historic one," said Davis Mayor Ruth Asmundson, at the Tuesday night meeting.

 

The surface water project dates back to 1994 when the Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District turned in an application for water rights to the Sacramento river.

 

With water quality and reliability issues now affecting both cities it makes sense for the communities to find a joint solution.

 

One element of the plan involves tearing down an existing water intake structure on the Sacramento river, on the Yolo side near highway I-5. Reclamation District 2035 owns the current pumping station, but has a mandate to remove the 100-year-old structure.

 

Once the old structure is torn down the plan is to build a new state of the art intake valve and a pipe system to transport the water to the two communities.

 

"Where we are right now is a pivotal point for setting up structure for management for this issue," said Davis City Manager Bill Emlen.

 

That structure would be known as a Joint Powers Agency, the membership of which would consist of representatives from Davis and Woodland.

 

This JPA will oversee the demolition of the current pumping station and building of a new structure with state of the art fish screens. Other environmental issues also came up, and were discussed in brief at the meeting. The fish issues are solved for the most part, according to staff with the respective cities, but there an environmental impact on laying miles of wide tubing, and the JPA intends to solve that problem, and others, as they arise.

 

Each member questioned staff regarding the project and potential JPA. The staff presented the pros and cons of the agency, which were reviewed by city officials.

The pros basically came down to the flexibility of the agency, easier funding opportunities, and being generally more efficient. The primary problem seemed to be that the agency would require mutual trust coupled with the voluntary nature of the agreement itself.

 

The JPA would be structured with two members from each city council. The councils discussed if there should be a tie-breaking party or if members of the JPA board would have to reconcile differences to move forward with action.

 

Councilmembers also talked about who should serve as alternate members. Most councilmembers agreed it should be someone held accountable by the public and therefore another council member.

 

Transparency was stressed by both staff and councilmembers.

 

Gregor Meyer, Woodland Public Works director, said "the team realized the magnitude of the project and we want to have complete transparency available to the public."

 

The team is building a web site, www.daviswoodlandwatersupply.org, as an attempt to keep the public informed every step of this huge project.

 

Davis Councilman Lamar Heystek said he hoped the JPA board meeting would be televised for further transparency.

 

The overall feeling for the combined agency, however, was positive. Davis Councilman Stephen Souza said, "I don't want to be part of a city council that misses this opportunity."

 

Most vocal about her concerns was Davis Councilwoman Sue Greenwald, who felt the money needed to fund the project was coming at a hard time for Davis, which is also facing two other costly water-related projects. She spoke about Davis getting its waste water treatment up to regulation standard, and rebuilding the current ground water system.

 

She called the costs "unheard of for a city for out size," and wanted to see more pro-activity on the part of the Davis council and staff to address the problems.

However, the Davis City Council voted to adopt the JPA draft with everyone in favor, except Greenwald, who abstained.

 

The Woodland City Council voted last week to approve the agency.

 

The councils will meet separately in September to vote the JPA into existence and move forward with the surface water project.

 

Woodland City Councilman Jeff Monroe also proposed a toast, " To a day when no one in either of our communities can say, 'It must be the water.'"

 

http://www.dailydemocrat.com/news/ci_12944468

 

 

Bay Area beach water pollution study

San Francisco Chronicle – 7/30/09

By Kelly Zito

 

Beach closures and advisories tied to water contamination in the Bay Area plunged nearly 25 percent from 2007 to 2008, according to an annual report by a leading environmental group.

 

However, several local counties ranked among the highest for exceeding U.S. health standards for human or animal waste in California.

 

The Natural Resources Defense Council's "Testing the Waters" study called coastal contamination a serious problem in California, in part because the source of a vast majority of the pollution is unknown. Of the known sources, the No. 1 culprit is storm-water runoff, which fills waterways with pesticides, heavy metals and pathogens. Sewage spills are the other primary source.

 

Swimmers and surfers exposed to such toxic materials are at risk for stomach, skin, lung and neurological disorders. The health of marine mammals, fish, mollusks and birds also suffers.

 

On Wednesday, NRDC officials, scientists and lawmakers gathered by San Francisco's Crissy Field beach, where they called for increased pollution monitoring.

The state's 426 beaches "are our gems, our jewels," said Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, D-San Francisco. "We need to do whatever we can to maintain the beauty of our beaches."

 

The report studied about 90 beaches along the Bay Area coast, including popular Stinson Beach in Marin County, Ocean Beach in San Francisco and Montara State Beach in San Mateo County.

 

While Stinson Beach showed virtually no pollution, other beaches failed the tests. Forty percent of the water samples taken at Marina Lagoon in San Mateo County, for instance, violated federal health standards. A section of San Francisco's Baker Beach exceeded standards 17 percent of the time it was tested. Los Angeles had the highest countywide rate at 20 percent, followed by 13 percent for San Francisco and 12 percent for Contra Costa County.

 

For the first time, the report also detailed how climate change is likely to exacerbate pollution: More severe storms will increase runoff, warmer ocean temperatures will spur pathogen growth and sea level rise will submerge former wastewater treatment plants.

 

There were, however, some positives.

 

Beaches in six coastal counties - Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo and Sonoma - had a combined 832 days of closures or pollution advisory days in 2008, compared with 1,106 days in 2007.

 

Statewide, there were more than 4,100 such days, down 13 percent from 2007.

 

Still, the study's backers warned against too much optimism.

 

Budget cutbacks have reduced beach water monitoring, and California's drought may be masking a worsening water quality problem, they said. What's more, testing is very limited, said Dr. Mark Renneker, clinical professor at the UCSF. Renneker started an advocacy group for surfers' health 25 years ago after falling sick from surfing at Ocean Beach.

 

For instance, the study's tests would not detect the chemical fallout from the November 2007 Cosco Busan spill, which dumped 53,000 gallons of fuel oil into San Francisco Bay.

 

"We really don't know what's going on in this environment because we're only testing certain things," Renneker said. "We're really just at the tip of the iceberg."

To read the report

Online: The report can be found at links.sfgate.com/ZBAO  #

 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/29/MNMV1912KQ.DTL

 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS -7/31/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

July 31, 2009

 

3. Watersheds –

 

Residents’ reactions mixed over federal-funded project ;

Funds flow for Antelope Creek fix-up

Placer Herald

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Residents’ reactions mixed over federal-funded project ;

Funds flow for Antelope Creek fix-up

Placer Herald – 7/30/09

By Jon Brines

 

City lobbying efforts have pushed a new federal grant through Congress that will pour hundreds of thousands of dollars into a local creek, but some residents have mixed emotions about the project.

One of the reasons Tim and Debra Page bought their current home on Bryce Way 21 years ago was the appeal of Antelope Creek and the nearby Sunset East Park that backs up to their house.

“It is a beautiful area,” Debra Page said.

Wheelock Oliver enjoys the creek from the other side of the bank from his home on Allen Drive.

“There are salmon running through and trout,” Oliver said. ”There is a lot of turkey there, fox and hawks and all sorts of wildlife.”

City officials lobbied Senator Diane Feinstein to include a $500,000 grant to fix-up Antelope Creek in the 2010 Senate Agriculture Appropriations bill, which passed out of committee two weeks ago and now awaits a final vote in the Senate.

“The erosion problem has been an issue for many years,” said Vice Mayor Scott Yuill who represented the city in February when he traveled to Washington, D.C. to help secure the grant. “Because this erosion affects habitat throughout the entire Dry Creek Watershed, there is an interest on a federal level to correct it,” he said.

According to the city funding request, the project consists of moving the current channel away from the steep, cliff-like banks that are being eroded, which will improve water quality for salmon habitat, and will also decrease the incidence of flooding upstream from Sunset East Park.

Tim Page said flooding isn’t an issue for his property.

“I don’t see the benefit,” Page said. “My wife and I believe the city of Roseville had resolved all this 10 years ago. When we first moved here it flooded quite frequently but since (Roseville) took care of Linda Creek there hasn’t been any flooding.”

The recreated channel is expected to improve the existing fish habitat and restore native plant species, according to the city. Oliver said he thinks the improvements may get in the way of the natural look.

“I don’t see where it needs any work.” Oliver said. “It is a waste of money. They could take that $500,000 and help some children or take care of some families instead of fix a creek that doesn’t need to be fixed.”

Oliver’s next-door neighbor Brett Carlson agrees and said the plan for the money should be rethought in this down economy.

“I just don’t think now is the time to be doing it,” Carlson said. “You can see some of the banks that erode out, but it is not like chunks are missing. I’ve lived in Rocklin all my life and that creek hasn’t changed much.”

Debra Page understands the appeal of the improvement the tax money would bring literally to her backyard, but believes the recession should be more of a priority.

“This is not the time to be thinking about fixing the creek,” she said. “I’d rather see them spend the money on something we really need in California.”

The city is experiencing decreased tax revenue and increased pressure to lower costs during the recession. The new federal grant is seen as a bonus for the city struggling to balance the budget even though it will not have any effect on the city’s bottom-line.

“The federal government worries about salmon and endangered species,” said City Manager Carlos Urrutia. ”If we can help implement the federal programs at the local level, then we can use the money they have available for that particular purpose.”

The project also calls for a cobble weir to be installed at an existing gas and sewer pipe crossing over the creek to reduce down cut and increase pipe stability. Councilman Brett Storey said the project is very positive for surrounding residents and the city at large.

“This is going to help the tax payers of Rocklin tremendously,” Storey said. “If you have ever been out there, it is deteriorating really fast. We’re keeping the park as it should stay.”

Antelope Creek snakes through Rocklin from Loomis off Sierra College Boulevard all the way through Johnson Springview Park passing under Sunset Boulevard to Sunset East Park before heading into Roseville.

Franklin Burris lives upstream in the Yankee Hill subdivision and believes the federal money will go elsewhere if the city doesn’t go and get it.

“It is either going to go here or some other watershed,” Burris said. “If Rocklin can attract that money locally and have those improvements, it’s fantastic.”

Yuill said citizens will not be aware of the savings the city will gain from this project.

“The reality is that if the city didn’t secure these funds now and make the repairs, the erosion problem will deteriorate over time to a point that either a state or federal regulatory body might force Rocklin to make the repairs on its dime,” Yuill said. “ I can hear people criticizing the city then for not securing federal funds when it had the chance.” 

If the bill becomes law, the city could start work as early as next spring. #

http://placerherald.com/detail/125967.html

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 7/31/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

July 31, 2009

 

2. Supply –

 

Drought-Proofing California by 2020;

Higher water bills spark ratepayer revolts but may also dampen Californians' proclivity to use more wet stuff than necessary.

Miller-McCune

 

Moorpark considers water desalination plant;

With water rates rising, city hopes to curb future costs

Ventura County Star

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Drought-Proofing California by 2020;

Higher water bills spark ratepayer revolts but may also dampen Californians' proclivity to use more wet stuff than necessary.

Miller-McCune – 7/29/09

By Melinda Burns

California lawmakers are working on a historic plan — the first of its kind in the United States — to require a 20 percent reduction in per-capita urban water use by the year 2020. It signals the end of cheap water for water wasters, a change that's bound to come as a shock to some residents in the Golden State.

This spring, more than 2,000 people living in and around the populous High Desert community of Palmdale — 60 miles north of Los Angeles — wrote letters of protest after their water district, teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, dramatically raised hikes in rates and service charges. Residents are just now getting their bills, and the district's phone is ringing off the hook with customers asking for waivers.

The city of Palmdale announced drastic cuts to irrigating local parks in response to what it said were "extreme hikes in water rates." And it filed suit against the Palmdale Water District, arguing that the increases were illegal and the formula for computing customers' bills was incomprehensible.

"They perceive that they're being the champions of the people," district General Manager Randy Hill said of city officials, "but we don't have sufficient water supplies. We're at the point that our demand is dangerously close to our supply. We should have been raising rates all along, and we didn't."

It's a conservation rule of thumb that if a resource is underpriced, it will be overused. And California needs every drop, experts say, to cope with recurring droughts, serve the growing population and restore the fragile Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, the source of much of the state's fresh water, including Palmdale's.

"Sooner or later, California will be hit with the same kind of prolonged, severe drought that Australia is facing now," said Rick Soehren, assistant deputy director for water use efficiency at the state Department of Water Resources and co-chair of the "20x2020" planning team. "Either we're going to be ready, or the economy takes a terrible hit and people lose a huge investment in landscaping."

The draft plan was made public this year by a state and federal team under a directive from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. It opens with the statement that California's "overall demand for water has exceeded our reliable developed supply." In just over a decade, it proposes to reduce California's urban water use — residential, commercial and industrial — from an average 192 gallons per person per day to 154 gallons. That would be an annual savings of about 1.7 million acre-feet, equivalent to more than a two-year supply for Los Angeles. (The national urban per-capita use is 101 gallons per day, reflecting the higher average rainfall in many states.)

Palmdale residents use 200 gallons per capita daily. John Mlynar, a city spokesman, said the city has been trying hard to cut water use on its own property, reducing it 27 percent in recent years, even installing artificial grass in front of city hall.

"We have gone to great lengths to conserve water," Mlynar said. "The district needs to look at cutting some expenses before passing on costs."

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge declined to temporarily halt Palmdale's water rate increases this month, but the city's lawsuit is going forward. In the meantime, the water district is spending tens of thousands of dollars on legal costs — money that Hill, the general manager, said he could be using to pay residents to put in low-flow toilets and take out grass.

Statewide, experts say, water districts like Palmdale will have to change the way they do business to meet the proposed 20 percent reduction in urban water use. It's an average: State Assembly bill AB 49 would allow water districts to use different formulas for meeting the goal, taking into account differences in climate and levels of conservation already achieved.

"In areas where there has been more aggressive conservation, the reduction could be 17 percent, whereas in other areas it could be as high as 30 percent," said Chris Brown, executive director of the California Urban Water Conservation Council, a nonprofit group that helped develop the plan.

After some fine-tuning by a joint committee of the state Assembly and Senate, AB 49 is expected to go to vote this fall. It is sponsored by the National Resources Defense Council, a national environmental group, and the giant Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. It also has the support of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce and numerous other business and environmental groups and water agencies.

Proponents of the 20x2020 plan say it means cutting back on water waste, not lifestyle — fixing leaks; installing low-flow toilets, showerheads and washing machines; adjusting irrigation; and putting in drought-tolerant plants.

"Most homeowners in California still have grass," Soehren said. "We're starting to chip away at that, either by persuading people to water their lawn more efficiently, or convincing them they don't need a lawn in the front where no one plays on it. There definitely is a water crisis, and it's hard to justify using all you want just because you can get a hold of it."

Bob Wilkinson, a University of California, Santa Barbara professor who serves on the technical advisory committee for the California Water Plan, believes residents could easily achieve as much as a 30 percent reduction in just a few years.

"The No. 1 source for new water is urban water use efficiency," Wilkinson said. "It's not a sideshow, and it's important that people not think of this as a sacrifice. It wouldn't take draconian measures. We just need to get price signals in place to help people understand the real price and cost of water."

That's what's happening in Montecito, a wealthy community on the coast northwest of Los Angeles, where residents were paying three times as much for water as in Palmdale but didn't care about the cost because they could afford it. Newcomers who had no memory of the drought of 1986-91 tended to build big homes with big lawns.

While water demand flattened out in the rest of Southern California, including Los Angeles, Montecito's grew until it reached a local record in 2007 of more than 350 gallons per capita per day. That's one of the highest per capitas in the state, equivalent to that of people living in California's Sonoran Desert, near the border with Mexico.

"Everybody put in their lush landscaping," recalled Tom Mosby, the Montecito Water District general manager. "Money wasn't an issue. I would see trucks going up the street with sod and I was just having a heart attack."

Suddenly, Montecito was confronting the possibility of a chronic, long-term water shortage. In the short term, the district spent nearly $900,000 buying surplus water from the state aqueduct to make ends meet. For the long term, it set a limit on water for new development and restored a tiered rate structure similar to the one it had implemented during the last drought. Now customers are charged progressively more for each successive tier or "block" of water they use — a pricing method recommended by the state.

Montecito is on track to achieving a 10 percent reduction in water use by this October, a year after the new rates went into effect, Mosby said.

"At first, the bills were a major shock for everyone," he said. "The community's got the message, and we are very pleased."

Yet even with a 10 percent reduction, Montecitans would still be using nearly three times as much water per capita as the residents of Goleta, a suburban community just 12 miles up the coast. At 111 gallons per capita per day, the customers of the Goleta Water District are among the most conservationist in the state.

During the last drought, Goleta gave out $50 rebates for 15,000 low-volume toilets, importing them from Sweden. It was the first toilet rebate program in the country: The slogan was, "You're Sitting on the Solution." In addition, the district gave away 40,000 low-flow showerheads. It implemented water rates that went up steeply in the highest tiers. Many homeowners took out their lawns. Water demand dropped by 40 percent, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency singled out the district as a model in conservation.

After the last drought ended in 1991, Goleta's water rates stayed high. Although not as high as Montecito's new rates, they are easily twice the average rate in California today. Goleta faces no water shortages today, even in the current drought. Residents here are on the lookout for waste: Every week, someone calls the district to report a neighbor who's letting water run down the street.

"Historically, this district has been preaching conservation and, in my humble opinion, doing a damn good job," said Jack Cunningham, a member of the Goleta Water District board of directors. "It's taking hold and being retained by a lot of users because they can remember the last drought. We don't feel an urgent need for '20x2020.' I do my own rationing as a house owner in Goleta." #

http://www.miller-mccune.com/SCIENCE_ENVIRONMENT/DROUGHT-PROOFING-CALIFORNIA-BY-2020-1367

 

 

Moorpark considers water desalination plant;

With water rates rising, city hopes to curb future costs

Ventura County Star – 7/30/09

A water agency serving Moorpark is looking into building a groundwater desalination plant to reduce the city’s dependence on imported water and stabilize water rates in the future.

Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1, which serves Moorpark and unincorporated areas north and west of the city, is looking to build the desalter to treat South Las Posas Basin groundwater for use by its customers.

The Ventura County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 last month, with Supervisor Linda Parks abstaining, to approve a $189,000 contract with Kennedy/Jenks, a local engineering and environmental sciences consulting firm, for a preliminary design report on the desalination plant.

Kennedy/Jenks recently helped the city of Oxnard complete its $100 million groundwater desalination plant.

Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 currently gets its water from local sources and imported water supplied by Calleguas Municipal Water District. Calleguas gets its water from the Metropolitan Water District, a wholesale water supplier.

About three-fourths of Moorpark’s water is imported and the remainder is from local groundwater, supplied from five groundwater wells operated and maintained by the Waterworks District.

Because of rising costs from its suppliers, Moorpark residential and industrial customers saw their basic, or Tier 1, water rates increase by 15 percent in February; agricultural customers’ rates increased 22.7 percent.

Another double-digit water rate increase is anticipated next year, according to water officials. This month, customers throughout Ventura County were required to cut consumption by 15 percent or see their rates double or triple.

At the county’s Board of Supervisor’s meeting, Reddy Pakala, director of the county’s Water and Sanitation Department, said the Los Posas Basin is full, but to be potable the water must be treated because of the relatively high total of dissolved solids, sulfate and chloride concentrations. The only way to remove those concentrations is through a membrane treatment process such as “desalting,” which uses reverse osmosis.

Pakala said that the cost to construct the desalter would be $15 million to $30 million, depending on how much water it could pump. Operation costs would be extra.

“(The desalter project) is very expensive but with imported water rates going up, we think this will be an economically feasible project,” Pakala said.

Pakala said the report will identify what kind of desalting treatment is needed, as well as funding options, which include low interest loans and grants. New growth and a portion of the water rates would also fund the project.

“Instead of sending that money to Metropolitan, we will be using that money here for this project,” Pakala said.

The district is also looking into using solar power to reduce energy costs.

The desalination plant could be located near Hitch Boulevard and West Los Angeles Avenue, which is in the Las Posas Basin area and close to the existing district’s water distribution system.

It would also be near Calleguas’ proposed Brine Line, renamed the Regional Salinity Management Conveyance Pipeline. The pipeline is proposed to run from Simi Valley to the ocean at Port Hueneme. The water would come from local wastewater treatment plants and be reused after it is treated at desalting plants. Unused water would be discharged into the ocean.

Calleguas is working on a plan where cities take part ownership of regional desalination plants in Camarillo, Moorpark and Simi Valley. Oxnard already has opened its plant.

Pakala said the Waterworks District is taking the lead role with its desalter project, but is still working with Calleguas to make use of the pipeline. They are independent projects, but the two agencies are working together.

Ventura County Supervisor Linda Parks abstained from voting in favor of the Moorpark desalter report because she felt that other, less-expensive solutions could be available.

The project would still need to be approved by the Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency, which manages the groundwater basins within the district’s service area and controls groundwater extraction. A California Environmental Quality Act report would also need to be completed. #

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2009/jul/30/moorpark-considers-water-desalination-plant/

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

Blog Archive