This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for 1/23/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

January 23, 2009

 

Top Item –

 

Salmon press conference at ISE drops a few bombshells

The Oroville Mercury

 

Extinction imminent for California salmon?

The Napa Valley Register

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Salmon press conference at ISE drops a few bombshells

The Oroville Mercury – Register – 1/23/09

By Steve Carson


Last week's International Sportsmen's Exposition show at Cal-Expo in Sacramento featured a panel discussion on the current state of California's salmon fishery. The panel included Dr. Josh Israel of UC Davis, Barry Nelson of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Jared Huffman of the California State Assembly Sixth District and Chair of the Water (Parks and Wildlife Committee), Michael Jackson of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Zeke Grader of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman's Associations, and Dick Pool of Water4Fish.

 

Each participant delivered a prepared statement based on their area of expertise or concern, although time constraints allowed only a few questions from the audience. The participant's statements are excerpted below.

 

Israel (UC Davis): "It is possible that 65 percent of the 31 native California species of trout and salmon will become extinct soon. California has such tremendous species diversity due to the Pacific's California Current and other factors, but human development has affected those species adversely.

 

"At this time, only 10-percent of California's ocean population of salmon are wild, the rest are hatchery-produced. This tends to reduce the fitness of the natural population, we need to consider ways to adapt and reform hatcheries. We also know that many ocean-harvested fish are from endangered runs. Marking all hatchery fish may be a possible strategy.

 

"Bio-complexity is important. We have had self-sustaining salmon populations because of locally-adapted stocks. If we want to keep self-sustaining populations, we should take advantage of this. Right now it is not possible to differentiate between stocks in the ocean."

 

"We may also need to re-connect landlocked populations. It may be necessary to look at taking trout, steelhead and salmon, and passing them into historic habitats. In Southern California this could mean moving steelhead over dams. We will really have to adapt over the next 50 years, and will have to decide what kind of societal changes we will have to make."

 

During a brief one-on-one discussion with Dr. Israel, this writer asked why the salmon population on Butte Creek could be doing so well. Dr. Israel replied, "It may be because the salmon from Butte Creek summer over in the stream, and exit as larger sub-yearlings. They [Butte Creek juvenile salmon] may also put on some additional growth in the Sutter Bypass."

 

Nelson (NRDC): "The Chinook salmon is California's iconic fish [displays a California flag with a salmon replacing the bear], and we've come to the remarkable conclusion that fish need water. We hope to restore a dead salmon river, the San Joaquin, by re-watering it for the first time in 60 years. Water needs to be managed first for the needs of fish, and second for the needs of people."

 

Grader (PCFFA): "Right now we have another opportunity for change. Some 40 years ago when the negative effects of the Red Bluff Diversion Dam were first being felt in the salmon population, the proposal from Pauline Davis in the Assembly was just to 'close down the fisheries'. Since then of course, we have found that the foundation for restoring salmon is water.

 

"The Delta is collapsing, there is not enough water. In the future, we must not get things out of order; instead we need to go from the foundation up. We must say no to new dams and the peripheral canal."

 

Huffman (CA Assembly Sixth District): "We are looking at an unprecedented second year in a row for salmon fishing closure, primarily caused by the Delta pumps and upstream reservoirs that don't allow enough cold water downstream. A fishery can't be managed just by restricting the take of endangered species. If we don't come together on this, it will be handled by the courts, which can be abrupt and draconian.

 

"It is important that the voices of fishermen be heard in Sacramento this year. Not just because of endangered species like Delta smelt, but because of the simultaneous decline of many Delta species. We must take bold action on the stressors. The National Marine Fisheries Service biological opinion says that extinction of winter-run Chinook salmon and others is primarily due to Delta pumping and dams.

 

"Governments have not fulfilled their responsibilities, the system is failing. As we reach critical mass, we must act in enlightened self-interest. It should also be made clear that economic activity related to fishing amounts to millions of dollars. The decline and loss of jobs is equally bad. Nationwide, at least $200 million is collected for fishery restoration in the form of excise tax on fishing tackle. Some $12 million of that comes back to California.

 

"It is important that the voices of fishermen be heard in Sacramento this year. Not just because of endangered species like Delta smelt, but because of the simultaneous decline of many Delta species. We must take bold action on the stressors. The National Marine Fisheries Service biological opinion says that extinction of winter-run Chinook salmon and others is primarily due to Delta pumping and dams."

 

"Governments have not fulfilled their responsibilities, the system is failing. As we reach critical mass, we must act in enlightened self-interest. It should also be made clear that economic activity related to fishing amounts to millions of dollars. The decline and loss of jobs is equally bad. Nationwide, at least $200 million is collected for fishery restoration in the form of excise tax on fishing tackle. Some $12 million of that comes back to California."

 

Jackson (CSPA): "There are four things we must do within five years, or salmon will go extinct. We must reduce the water export from the Delta from 6 million acre-feet to 2.5 million acre feet per year. The water that is pumped should be given an 'urban preference', to keep the city dwellers from becoming hysterical.

 

"You can't equate urban requirements with growing cotton in the San Joaquin Valley, and this will break up 'Big Ag'. It also allows us to isolate where water with real value will go.

 

"We have got to get those fish above the dams. All it takes is one natural disaster, like a catastrophic fire or even Mount Lassen erupting, and we will lose the fish in Butte Creek, Mill Creek and Deer Creek.

 

"Last, the outflow must increase at cross channel gates during the ingress and egress of fish. It happens now or they're [salmon and steelhead] gone."

 

Dick Pool([Water4fish): "In the past year almost nothing has happened. No water has been reserved for fish. This industry is going to die if we don't change. So far we have 64,000 people signed up on our website, but we need 264,000! We need the public behind us and support for conservation organizations." #

 

http://www.orovillemr.com/sports/ci_11535387

 

Extinction imminent for California salmon?

The Napa Valley Register – 1/23/09

By Guy Carl

 

The treasured salmon runs of California’s rivers are in real danger of disappearing forever.

The return numbers for the 2008-09 spawning season are not yet final, but preliminary counts show no improvement over the previous year’s dismal figures. There is every indication that the recreational salmon fishing season will remain closed for all of 2009.

 

At last weekend’s International Sportsmen’s Exposition in Sacramento, a panel of experts and public officials was brought together to discuss the outlook for California’s salmon runs.

The consensus was clear — without immediate action, the California salmon will be extinct within the next couple of decades.

 

The salmon have already been in trouble for years. We have been keeping the runs on life support (so to speak) through extensive hatchery programs.

The truth is the majority of returning fish were reared in hatcheries. Only a small population of wild-born salmon still survives today.

 

This is hardly the self-sustaining species that thrived in these waters for millennia before humans arrived!

Out of Water

Water is at the heart of the issue. Salmon require consistent flows of cold, fresh water in the rivers and streams in order to successfully spawn.

Prior to human influence, winter rainstorms would create massive river flows, making for just the conditions salmon need to migrate upstream to their spawning grounds.

But in modern days, a combination of upstream dams and diversion programs has drastically reduced flows in most river systems. In many cases, so much water is extracted or held back that the salmon are left with far less-than-ideal habitats for spawning, and have great trouble even reaching the spawning grounds.

These issues become painfully evident in seasons of drought like we are experiencing right now. In wet years, there is enough water to go around to irrigate all the farms, supply all the cities, and leave good flows for the fish.

But when the rains don’t come, the demands on our state’s water resources become far greater than the supply. Farms have always been the “sacred cow” in this country, so their water deliveries are a priority.

And we selfish humans bristle at being inconvenienced with water rationing, so our local governments find ways to keep the water flowing to their people.

It is the fish, then, who get left high and dry.

There is no greater example of this than the San Joaquin River. Dams and diversion pumps have taken every last drop of water out of a 60-mile stretch of the river. Several hundred thousand Chinook salmon once spawned here each spring, but this run has now been completely eradicated.

More rivers may face this same fate. The state’s human population continues to expand, most dramatically in regions which Mother Nature had designed as a desert and suitable for only a small community of people.

These new desert-dwellers demand more water, and that water now comes from river systems in the north part of the state.

The California State Water Project transports billions of gallons around the state each year. Much of this goes to the farms of the San Joaquin Valley and the urban areas of Southern California.

But a significant allocation also goes to Northern California cities, including the city of Napa. Napa uses this water to supplement its own supplies, allowing it to avoid completely draining Lake Hennessey and Milliken Reservoir.

So before we go blaming L.A. for sucking dry all of our rivers, keep in mind that even in Napa we are part of the problem.

And we can be part of the solution.

Save Some For the Fish

Recycled urban storm runoff as well as treated sewage water can be used for many kinds of irrigation. Another great solution is good ol’ common-sense conservation. Cut back on the lawns and other water-intensive landscaping.

Use the low-flow shower heads and efficient plumbing fixtures.

And just generally be responsible with your water usage.

A potential solution that’s seldom mentioned is the concept of desalination.

For all of Southern California’s need for water, the most plentiful supply in the world is right on its front doorstep — the Pacific Ocean.

The problem is that removing the salts from seawater and making it suitable for drinking is very expensive and energy-intensive. But some cities in the state are already doing it, including Santa Barbara and Avalon.

Desalination plants are commonplace in extreme desert regions like northern Africa and the Middle East, where there is no immediate source of fresh water.

At some point it will make economic sense for California to use this process on a wider scale, reducing the demands on our river systems and eventually restoring them to historic flow levels that are adequate to sustain a salmon run.

Take Action Now

But the salmon can’t wait for “eventually” to arrive.

Immediate action is necessary to save them from extinction. So far the only measures taken have been the closures of the fishing seasons. As the 2008-09 runs have proved, that is not enough.

An organization called “Water For Fish” has stepped to the forefront of the effort to demand more action from state and federal governments.

Anglers and environmentalists alike have joined forces through Water For Fish to save the salmon runs.

The organization has created a petition to demand specific government actions on certain rivers, along with enforcement of environmental protection laws that are already in place but are being ignored by water agencies.

To read the petition details and learn more about the organization, visit the Web site at www.water4fish.org.

You can also sign the petition and send letters to government representatives right from the Web site.

California’s salmon issue has become a salmon crisis.

It is nearing the point of no return, after which there will be nothing we can do to save them from extinction.

It took all of us Californians to break the system, and it will take all of us to fix it.

Let’s get started.#

 

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2009/01/23/sports/guy_carl/doc49794bed9d08e827408077.txt

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

No comments:

Blog Archive