This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 6/01/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

June 1, 2009

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

 

New water use rules for San Diego

San Diego Union-Tribune

 

Everybody into the water

Sacramento Bee

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

New water use rules for San Diego

San Diego Union-Tribune-5/31/09

 

To help preserve San Diego's limited supply of water, new restrictions kick in tomorrow that will require all of us to rethink the way we use water in our lives.

All of us – residents, businesses and government agencies alike – will now be following certain schedules for watering our yards and washing our vehicles. We will limit our outdoor watering to certain hours of the day and certain days of the week. We will also be paying closer attention to the length of time we water, limiting ourselves to just 10 minutes per irrigation station.

 

And, yes, violating these restrictions will carry the potential for citations and fines, though the city will focus on education and changing behaviors, not punitive measures.

 

These new restrictions were put in place by the City Council and me because of real cuts to our water supplies. Our water wholesaler will be trimming what it provides the city, and we need to match our consumption to meet the new supply targets. Missing these targets will lead to surcharges and steeply increased water costs we simply cannot afford.

 

The city is working hard to spread the word about the new restrictions. Reminders are going out in the water bills mailed to our customers. And, the Water Department has begun a public awareness campaign to remind everyone that there is “no time to waste and no water to waste” in San Diego.

 

These efforts are part of a foundation for fundamentally changing the way we think about and use water in San Diego. Unless there are dramatic changes in the long-term forecasts for rain and snowfall, and the state constructs a reliable means of delivering water from the Bay Delta in northern California, San Diego's place at the end of the water pipeline means continued uncertainty about our supply.

 

It is up to each of us to adapt to these new limitations. Following the new restrictions – actually a set of common-sense rules for water use – is the quickest and most effective way to take charge of our water future. This is an opportunity to act as a community, neighbor supporting neighbor, to succeed in conserving water.

The city also will continue working with residents, community groups and business leaders at every level to expand and diversify future water supplies. We are looking at opportunities for extracting groundwater, supporting private investments in desalination and working with the state to craft the rules and regulations necessary to safely turn highly treated wastewater into a future water resource.

 

For now, we must turn our attention to what we are being asked to accomplish starting tomorrow. We need to limit outdoor water use to before 10 a.m. and after 6 p.m., when irrigation is more efficient. So, if you haven't already reprogrammed your sprinkler system, today would be a good day to do that.

 

In addition, we must only wash our vehicles during those same hours, and with a bucket, a hose with a nozzle that automatically shuts off – or at a commercial car wash that recirculates its water. And, we need to fix water leaks – again, just common sense – as quickly as possible.

 

These are some of the new steps toward changing the way we use water. There are others we need to take, like becoming better at preventing the kind of water waste that pollutes our storm water system. We also need to consider what steps we can take should we fall short of the reduced water consumption targets, which would put us at risk for surcharges and increased water rates from our wholesaler.

 

Starting tomorrow, each of us has new responsibilities for ensuring San Diego will continue to have the water it needs to support our economy and quality of life. Tomorrow must mark the end of complacency about our water supplies and must mark the beginning of a new era in which all of us think about water differently, and use it more efficiently. I believe San Diego is up to the challenge.#

Sanders is mayor of San Diego.

 

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/may/31/lz1e31sanders001331-new-water-use-rules-san-diego/?opinion&zIndex=108080

 

 

Everybody into the water

Sacramento Bee-5/31/09

By Mel Shields

As temperatures warm up, thoughts turn to water – swimming in it, floating on it, even taking a few risks on it. Reno-Tahoe is opening the pools and blowing up the rafts for the season.

 

Lake Tahoe has an abundance of public beaches, many of which have pools. This seems strange to first-time visitors. After all, there's all that water and it's summer. The answer is simple. Lake Tahoe is too darned cold for swimming. A hearty few can survive a short while in the shallowest water, but hypothermia will set in quickly not very far from the shore. Tahoe is, after all, an alpine lake.

 

The lake is, however, grand for sailing, an eco-friendly way to enjoy the scenery. You don't have to own a boat to sail at Tahoe. Rentals are available, and you can go with a little luxury aboard the sailboat Tahoe Cruz, which offers two-hour afternoon cruises and romantic sunset voyages. The 50-foot boat furnishes a full galley, marine head and changing berth. The top deck offers comfortable seating for up to 25 people. Refreshments are served.

 

Reno has the Truckee River, and its new recreation area right downtown has become popular for sunbathers, waders and rafters. The river flows too swiftly for much swimming. Alongside Wingfield Park, the Truckee has been dredged, redirected and redesigned to become a world standard kayaking destination. Almost inadvertently, it has also become a destination for anybody wanting to float on anything else. Boating is not allowed, but inflate an inner tube and have at it.

Sunbathers love to lounge on the boulders that were put in place to force the river into the directions and speeds kayakers love. Those who prefer more cushioning find lots of lawn nearby.

 

A warning for those who choose to go in the river: Remember, this is a river with slippery beds, currents, rocks and assorted flotsam. There are no lifeguards at Wingfield.#

http://www.sacbee.com/travel/story/1900804.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

 

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS -WATER QUALITY-6/01/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

June 1, 2009

 

4. Water Quality –

 

Scientists set 2020 goal for reversing Pacific Ocean degradation
Contra Costa Times

 

Utility fined for spilling chemicals into Polhemus Creek, killing steelhead trout
San Mateo County Times

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Scientists set 2020 goal for reversing Pacific Ocean degradation
Contra Costa Times-
05/27/2009 05:55:41 PM

By Suzanne Bohan

 

The world faces well-known milestones for reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the coming decades to reduce the dangers of climate change. Now an international consortium is doing the same to demand action against threats to the Pacific Ocean that they say endangers environmental and human well-being in countries rich and poor.

 

This month, the Center for Ocean Solutions and Stanford University's Hopkins Marine Station released the a scientific consensus that spells out the grim consequences of inaction in reversing the threats of overfishing, pollution and habitat destruction, while providing a road map to recovery.

 

The report calls for measurable improvements to the Pacific Ocean's health by 2020, and it fulfills a key objective set by the International Union for Conservation of Nature's "Pacific Ocean 2020 Challenge." The United Nation's-affiliated group, founded in 1948 and representing 1,000 organizations worldwide, set as its first priority the release of a scientific consensus on threats to the ocean, which covers one-third of the Earth's surface.

 

"This is the first time where there have been scientists and experts around the world saying, 'These are threats, these are the solutions. Let's take some action,'" said Tegan Hoffmann, an Oakland-based consultant. She worked with Center for Ocean Solutions in corralling the 400 signatures from scientists and experts on the consensus, called the "Pacific Ocean Synthesis."

Neil

 

Davies, director of UC Berkeley's South Pacific Research Station in French Polynesia, was one of the signers of the report. In an e-mail from the university's distant outpost, he described the approach of the synthesis.  "It took a holistic approach to understanding the ecological health of the Pacific, with the promotion of human well-being at its heart," Davies said.  "A nonobvious finding was that many of the same challenges are felt across this vast and diverse region," he added. "The recommendations in the synthesis recognize that societies across the Pacific can learn from one another's successes, and failures."

 

Throughout the Pacific, from the South East Pacific to the Pacific North West, pollution from sewage, plastic marine debris, toxic waste, oil spills and agricultural and urban runoff top the list of threats. Destroying productive marine and coastal habitats for development or through poor agricultural practices was next on the list, followed by commercial and recreational overfishing.

 

If left unchecked, this human-caused damage is sure to weaken coastal economies, reduce food supplies while populations expand, compromise public health and increase political instability, the report noted. It would also reduce marine biodiversity and damage natural ecosystems.

But the report paired details on what ails the Pacific with easily-adopted remedies governments across the ocean region can adopt. That's the chief goal of the synthesis: to provide a scientifically-grounded analysis — which experts worldwide support — for developing constructive policies for protecting the ocean's health.

 

"The consensus statement is really giving voice to the scientific community," said Meg Caldwell, interim director of the Center for Ocean Solutions in Monterey. "That there are scientific underpinnings to support strong policies."

"You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out how to address those threats," she added.

 

A straightforward solution for protecting the size of fish populations while also supporting commercial and recreational fishing, for example, is the creation of what are called marine protected areas.

 

California pioneered the concept with the 1999 passage of the Marine Life Protection Act. It permits a temporary or permanent ban on harvesting in designated areas, creating small nurseries where marine species can reproduce and raise their young without human predation. The state law followed a successful program years earlier in the Monterey Bay that set aside small "no-take" zones. Researchers noticed a growth in marine life throughout the bay afterward, as juvenile marine life had a healthier start, and more survived.

 

The 1999 law took a new approach to managing marine resources, Caldwell said. It moved agencies away from "a 150-year-old tradition of single-species management to an ecosystem conservation approach," she said.

Caldwell and Davies also struck an optimistic note.

 

"While the problems are serious, there are signs of hope," Caldwell said, pointing to the establishment of 29 marine protected areas along the Central Coast of California, covering 18 percent of the region's coastal waters between Pigeon Point in San Mateo County to Point Conception in Santa Barbara County. By 2011, these marine protected areas are expected to dot the entire California coastline.

 

"The threats are enormous and often accelerating," wrote Davies from UC Berkeley's oceanfront research complex in French Polynesia. "But there is hope because our ability to learn is also accelerating at an unprecedented rate."#

 

http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_12462210?IADID=Search-www.contracostatimes.com-www.contracostatimes.com

 

 

Utility fined for spilling chemicals into Polhemus Creek, killing steelhead trout
San Mateo County Times-6/01/09

By Julia Scott

 

 

 

SAN MATEO — A private utility that provides drinking water to the city of San Mateo has been fined for spilling chemicals into Polhemus Creek, killing more than 30 protected steelhead trout.

 

Although the incident occurred nearly two years ago, the California Water Service Co. was slapped with a $199,350 fine last week from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board for the fish kill and for failing to report the problem until local biologists noticed dead fish in the creek, according to the complaint.

 

The water board said at least 32 steelhead trout, a federally threatened species, died in September 2007 after two incidents in which the water purveyor accidentally spilled about 93,000 gallons of chloraminated drinking water into Polhemus Creek after a machine malfunctioned. Polhemus Creek flows through a watershed east of Crystal Springs Reservoir and is a main tributary of San Mateo Creek.

 

Chloramines have come to replace chlorine as the principal disinfectant in drinking water. It is harmless to humans but not to aquatic life, and it was discharged into the creek at concentrations well above the amount known to be lethal to fish in a scientific study, according to the water board.

 

"That's the funny thing: People think of drinking water as not being a problem, but when you see the reaction with the species in the creek you realize it can be toxic," said Dyan Whtye, assistant executive officer at the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Whyte said such spills can be fairly common where water pipes leak or systems break down, as was the case with Cal Water.

 

The spills occurred Sept. 25 and Sept. 27, 2007. The first lasted 45 minutes, but the second spill was undetected for seven hours.

To add insult to injury, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, or SFPUC, was in the midst of a major creek restoration project to improve habitat for steelhead and other species when the spills occurred, overwhelming the creek bypass they had created and eroding the riverbank they had been working to restore, according to Whyte.

 

It was only after SFPUC biologists began noticing the dead fish and alerted Cal Water about the magnitude of the chemical spill that the water company took action, according to the complaint. The creek restoration project was not irreversibly damaged.

Cal Water spokeswoman Shannon Dean said the computer problem that triggered the chemical spill has long since been resolved as part of a $500,000 upgrade to the water tank in question, near Polhemus Creek.

 

Dean predicted that the water board would likely reduce the penalty because of the money the company had spent on the upgrades. If it does not, the company plans to appeal the fine.

 

"We do understand the impact that treated water can have on aquatic life, which is why we made this rather large investment. We responded proactively and took it very seriously," she said.

 

Dean also cast doubt on the chloramines as the cause of the fish kill, despite the complaint's allegations.

"It's really unclear whether the fish were killed by the tank overflows or the high turbidity (cloudy water) in the creek," she said. "By all indications there was a rainstorm at the time, and the SFPUC creek restoration project was going on."

 

Less than a half an inch of rain fell Sept. 22, five days before biologists noticed the dead fish. Both the water board and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have ruled out the rainstorm as a likely cause of the fish kill, according to the complaint.#

 

http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_12491133?nclick_check=1

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 6/01/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

May 29, 2009

 

3. Watersheds –

 

Struggling to Find Mitigation as Roads Replace Wetlands

The Voice of San Diego – 5/31/09

By Rob Davis

 

Along the banks of the San Luis Rey River north of Escondido, on a plot of land once mined for sand, weeds are taking over.

There, behind a dilapidated chain link fence and graffitied boulders, woodpeckers flitter and endangered least Bell's vireos warble in the cottonwoods and willows. Endangered arroyo toads come out at night. But tamarisk -- an invasive, water-thirsty bush with purple flowers -- has moved in. So have other weeds: Arundo, a thick reed. Mustard, a thin-stemmed plant with yellow flowers. Brown, desiccated annual grasses, perfect for spreading wildfire, blanket the sandy terrain.

The river's banks are a perfect site for preserving and restoring wetlands, the reason why the San Diego Association of Governments spent $4.7 million for the site's 130 acres. Sandag plans to use the land to mitigate impacts of widening the nearby Highway 76 from two lanes to four, a project that will destroy wetlands to build a bridge over the San Luis Rey River. To offset the damage, Sandag and CalTrans will remove weeds on the mitigation site and plant native species that provide better habitat and serve as a more robust food source. In all, 83 acres will be restored.

While the property is ideal -- it's unused, rundown and situated along a river -- there aren't many more sites like it. Not with willing sellers.

Sandag and CalTrans officials say that finding freshwater wetlands in San Diego County is growing increasingly difficult, particularly in a region where the rich soils along rivers have attracted golf courses and agriculture. "The problem," said Keith Greer, senior regional planner at Sandag, "is that we live in a desert. The opportunities that exist now are very scarce."

Standing near the river bank on a recent afternoon, Bruce April traced his finger along a satellite map of the San Luis Rey watershed, past horse tracks, farms, a golf course. He pointed to the lush fairways sitting on the river's edge. "That'd be great to restore," said April, a senior environmental planner with CalTrans. "But it's not for sale. I don't think the community'd like it too much."

Upriver, April said, has more of the same -- development, the proposed Gregory Canyon landfill and the Pala reservation. Plenty of opportunity for freshwater wetlands restoration, but no landowners who want to sell.

"It's not about cost," April said. "It's about what people want to do with their land."

With $14 billion in transportation projects funded over the next 40 years, Sandag and CalTrans estimate they'll have to find another 412 acres in freshwater wetlands for mitigation -- that's about a quarter the size of downtown San Diego. They'll be destroyed from widening Interstate 5 to add carpool lanes; widening Highway 76; extending Interstate 905 from the Otay Mesa border crossing; and from other projects.

Wetlands mitigation is a serious business. Federal and state regulations require that construction projects ensure "no net loss" of wetlands, a vital part of the ecosystem that filter pollutants and provide habitat for endangered species. Destroy an acre of wetlands one place, and you have to create another acre somewhere else -- preferably in the same watershed. You can't just preserve an acre, you have to make one.

Because of the no net loss rule, road-building agencies have to create 165 acres of freshwater wetlands from scratch. The work will have to be done along the county's creeks and rivers -- not the tidally influenced saltwater lagoons. The agencies aren't yet sure where most of the work will be done.

Letters have been sent to possible sellers and a consultant has been hired to map potential mitigation sites. The road-building agencies are in touch with landowners throughout the area. April said he was hopeful that the economic crash might present opportunities for sales. One nearby mitigation site, being used to offset Highway 76's impact to dry land, had an approved housing subdivision planned before being purchased for conservation.

Therese O'Rourke, chief of the Army Corps of Engineers' San Diego section, the federal agency that oversees local wetlands mitigation, said she believes opportunities for wetlands creation do exist. "There's still land out there, and it's getting cheaper every day," she said. "If you're looking for something quick and cheap, it'll be difficult to find. We just need to be looking throughout the county."

O'Rourke said mitigating the road projects' impacts would likely require pulling some development back from rivers. Those steps could include moving roads or buying parking lots, farms and parks, she said, and converting them into wetlands. She emphasized that using eminent domain wouldn't be acceptable nor would moving homes.

"I don't have anything in mind," she said. "Don't freak everybody out."

 

Michael Beck, San Diego director of the Endangered Habitats League, said he'd like to see regulatory agencies consider whether money spent on wetlands mitigation could be better routed to other habitat types that could help complete the region's habitat preserves.

The lack of wetlands "is going to force us -- I hope -- to reexamine our objectives to ensure these species have a reserve system that meet their needs," he said. "It's not just counting acres of mitigation."

 

Such changes couldn't happen without changes in regulatory requirements designed to protect wetlands. While impacts to differing types of habitat on dry land have flexibility -- impact an acre of chaparral, and you can mitigate by preserving the rarer coastal sage scrub -- wetlands don't have that flexibility. There's a reason for that, said David Lawhead, an environmental scientist with the state Department of Fish and Game.

"Part of the ecosystem is maintaining diversity of habitat types," Lawhead said. "If you're sacrificing one for the sake of another, you're losing habitat diversity. It's important to have that diversity. That's the crude regulatory way of doing it -- wetlands for wetlands."

Along the San Luis Rey, design work is underway and permits are coming in. April, the CalTrans planner, spread out maps showing the locations of the tamarisk, arundo and other weeds. They'll all be removed. So will litter. Cottonwoods and ambrosia, an endangered plant, will be put in their place. And the search for more sites like it will continue.

 

"That," April said, "is going to be my career."#

 

                                                                                                                                                    

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2009/06/01/environment/844wetlands053109.txt

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 6/01/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

June 1, 2009

 

2. Supply –

 

Starting today, L.A. limits water sprinkling to 2 days a week

LA Times

 

My View: Ranch owner: Reservoir is full of promise

Sacramento Bee

 

Drought has made reusing 'gray' water an increasingly popular, and practiced, idea

The Riverside Press Enterprise

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Starting today, L.A. limits water sprinkling to 2 days a week

LA Times- June 1, 2009

By Maeve Reston

A final warning to all you lawn aficionados and green thumbs: Los Angeles' mandatory water conservation restrictions — aimed at reducing the city's water use by 15% — begin today.

That means residents can use their sprinklers only on Mondays and Thursdays, and customers who don't cut their water use could face higher utility bills.

Details on the shortage rate are a bit complex. To determine how to avoid higher rates, customers can call the DWP at (800) DIAL-DWP or log into their account at the DWP website to determine their water allotment. The agency has posted all the details here.

And if your neighbor catches you using those sprinklers — on, say, Tuesday — you might hear from the drought police. The DWP is seeking reports of water waste at (800) DIAL-DWP or via e-mail at waterconservationteam@ladwp.com.#

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/06/dont-even-think-about-it-l-a-water-restrictions-start-today.html

 

 

My View: Ranch owner: Reservoir is full of promise

Sacramento Bee-5/31/09

By Mary Wells
Special to The Bee

 

When my family purchased our ranch 35 years ago in the small foothill community of Sites, we knew there were discussions to flood our land and make it a reservoir. Even so, we hoped we could continue to ranch here for generations to come.

 

We could not predict back then that California would grow so fast and our state's needs would be so great that a reservoir would become an essential part of solving California's current water crisis.

 

It would be sad to see our land and our neighbors' land flooded, but I understand that Californians would benefit from storing this water.

For years, California's leaders talked about solving our state's water crisis. In drought years they focused on this issue, but public attention faded with the next rainfall. That short-term thinking has created a long-term problem for everyone.

 

 

As the great-great-granddaughter of W.H. Williams, the founder of a small town in western Colusa County in the mid-1800s, and being a grandmother, I think about the past but most importantly about the future.

 

My children and grandchildren sit on tractors and harvesters and on horseback in Northern California, managing our lands. I want their lives to be as good as they are now, where we maintain our roots to the land that sustains us all while protecting California's environment. This requires unprecedented commitment to resolve our state's water crisis.

 

Over many years, people have assumed conserving water would solve our crisis. While helpful, conservation alone cannot provide for the future of a growing population.

 

We as a state have done little for decades to expand the amount of water we can store in wet and normal years to ensure we have water available in drought years to meet the needs of citizens, business, agriculture, and fish and wildlife.

 

A partial solution to our problem lies in Colusa County, where a natural bowl formation on the west side of the Sacramento Valley provides what the Department of Water Resources calls the best alternative for increased water storage for California.

 

Known as the Sites Reservoir because the small community bears the name of its earliest landowner, John Lee Sites, some 2 million acre-feet of water – that is 652 billion gallons – could be stored. This offers the most cost-effective and environmentally sound alternative to provide water so that we don't experience shortages each and every year.

 

With this reservoir, excess water that flows down the Sacramento River, sometimes causing serious winter and spring flooding before heading to the Pacific Ocean, could instead be stored and available when we really need it.

 

The water could be used to maintain water flow in our rivers during drought years, water that is critical for both fish and river habitats. The citizens of this state decided to place great value upon protecting our environment for future generations. This water storage supports that effort.

 

The water also would be available to meet the state's contractual obligation to provide water to farming families throughout California, and to protect jobs and the economies of many rural communities. This is especially important for permanent crops, such as orchards and vineyards, where even one year without water is devastating to the survival of the long-term investment in and production of the agricultural land.

 

The water needs of our state's growing population must be addressed without sacrificing agriculture or the environment. Water diverted to farms is only partially used to grow crops. Much of it flows back into our streams and rivers to be used over again by more farms, cities, wildlife refuges and our Bay-Delta ecosystem.

I cherish my ranch and my home in Sites with all the memories that go with it. For me, the time has come to use our land in a different way. We need Sites Reservoir to help solve California's water crisis.

 

Californians need to understand and embrace water storage as part of their future. This requires thinking and acting beyond the kitchen faucet that provided water this morning. We must work together to ensure that future generations have the water they need at their faucets, on their farms and in their environment.#

 

http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/1903373.html

 

 

Drought has made reusing 'gray' water an increasingly popular, and practiced, idea

The Riverside Press Enterprise – 5/30/09

By Janet Zimmerman

 

When Ardis Beckner-Eggebrecht does her four loads of laundry a week, she uses about 30 gallons of water and saves more than 100.

Her secret? Reusing the water from her washing machine to clean several more loads, then dumping it onto the roses, grapefruit trees and grass outside her Redlands home.

 

"I thought, 'Why are we dumping perfectly good water out?' " said Beckner-Eggebrecht, a tanned and toned 75-year-old who scoops countless buckets of spent wash water she collects in two plastic trash barrels and totes them to the yard on wash day.

 

She and other "gray water" enthusiasts say drought-plagued California is missing an opportunity by not using wastewater from bathroom sinks, showers and washing machines to flush toilets and irrigate outdoors; it does not include the drainage from kitchen sinks, dishwashers or toilets, which are high in organic matter and pathogens.

 

The topic is gaining attention in light of the state's water woes, including restrictions on the water exports from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, mandatory cutbacks by water agencies and higher rates to inspire conservation.

 

Beckner-Eggebrecht, whose family recycled gray water on their Wisconsin farm when she was a child, said water rates have gone up, but her bill has remained level since she started recycling in earnest a year ago. There have been no adverse effects of sharing wash water with the plants, and the family's clothes are clean as ever, she said.

 

A typical home with three residents produces about 125 gallons of gray water a day, said Steve Bilson, owner of ReWater Systems, a Chula Vista company that installs code-compliant gray water drip irrigation systems. That's enough to irrigate 2,500 square feet of low-water plants and cut household demand for potable water by 50 percent.

 

But the state plumbing code, one of the most restrictive in the country, doesn't make it easy, Bilson said. Among the more difficult requirements: Gray water irrigation pipes must be buried 9 inches deep, and no surface runoff is allowed.

 

Beckner-Eggebrecht's methods are outlawed under the current code, but that will change as early as this summer, Bilson said. A reworking of the state's plumbing code -- with Bilson's help -- will make it easier and less expensive for homeowners to use gray water.

 

Among the biggest changes: up to two fixtures can be routed outside without a permit, and lines must be under only 2 inches of mulch, he said.

 

"It modifies (regulations) to be so much closer to what's really needed," Bilson said. "There's so much of that going on out there."

 

An estimated 1.8 million households in the state use gray water, but only 200 of them are permitted, according to Art Ludwig, of Santa Barbara, widely considered the guru of gray water. He gives information and advice for making a gray water system on his Web site, www.oasisdesign.net.

 

Many people install unpermitted systems on their own, usually running a hose from their washing machine to the garden, according to Greywater Guerrillas, an Oakland-based group that helps homeowners rig their own systems.

 

In their do-it-yourself guide "Dam Nation: Dispatches From the Water Underground," the group says biodegradable soaps are a must, and that nutrients in wash water are good for plants.

 

But they caution that the water should be used within 24 hours, should not be allowed to pool and that homeowners should minimize contact with the water. Scientific studies on the safety of gray water are scarce.

 

Study In Progress

 

According to the California Department of Public Health, gray water may contain pathogens that can cause illness and death.

 

But there have been no known cases of people becoming ill from gray water, Bilson said.

 

The Water Environment Research Foundation in Alexandria, Va., is sponsoring a study on the long-term effects of using gray water to irrigate landscapes; preliminary results show that gray water is safe for toilet flushing and outdoor irrigation.

 

The Idyllwild Water District is handing out the plumbing code guidelines and urging customers to install approved systems, said Terry Lyons, the general manager, who noticed numerous jury-rigged systems around town.

 

They were often drainpipes coming from a laundry room window into a yard littered with lint or suds that sometimes reach the area's creeks, he said.

 

Under the current code, runoff must be plumbed to an underground leach field or drip irrigation system, and there's a 50-foot setback from creeks.

 

When he first tried to promote gray water four years ago, Lyons said he couldn't get anybody's attention. Now, after three years of drought, the story has changed.

 

"It's a good way to take advantage of water we're putting into the septic that then goes into the groundwater," he said. "It's small scale, but every little drop counts."

 

The process is easier for new homes, said John Raya, a certified green plumber trained in conservation. His company, Plumbing Concepts Inc. in Yorba Linda, installed a gray water system in a Habitat for Humanity home in Riverside last year.

 

He's also testing a retrofit system that captures gray water from the bathroom sink, stores it in a small tank with chlorine treatment and then uses it to flush the toilet. The system, which fits in a bathroom cabinet, costs about $500.

 

"It's like a Prius or the first home computers. As (systems) get more sophisticated and more people buy them, the costs come down. You'll see an acceleration in product development, refinement, availability, and you'll see the municipal codes swinging into line," Raya said.

 

"We're going to see these go from a choice to a mandate very soon, and that will change everything," he said.#

 

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_graywater31.454b497.html

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

 

 

 

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Items for 6/01/09

 

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

June 1, 2009

 

1. Top Items–

 

 

 

Task force sees little progress toward solving Delta's woes
Sacramento Bee-June 1, 2009

By Matt Weiser

 

A panel of officials appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to solve the Delta's water and environmental problems plans to give the state an "incomplete" grade for its progress so far.

The rating, to be presented in a "report card," will be finalized after testimony Monday from environmentalists, water groups and state officials at a meeting in Sacramento.

 

The seven-member Delta Vision Task Force, led by former Sacramento mayor Phil Isenberg, officially doesn't exist anymore. But after releasing its December recommendations, it decided to stay alive as a private group to press for action.

 

Results in the draft report card don't look good: The group finds that the state has made little to no progress on most of its recommendations.

 

The task force called for aggressive action to improve water delivery and ecosystem health in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, a source of drinking water for more than 23 million Californians. Many proposals would be expensive and controversial, such as building a diversion canal around the Delta. Others came with aggressive timetables, such as legislation this year to reform Delta government.

 

Monday's meeting is from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the California State Association of Counties conference center, 1020 11th St., second floor. Go to deltavisionfoundation.org or call (916) 952-7029 for information.#

 

http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/1907125.html?mi_rss=Our%2520Region

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.