This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 3/3/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 3, 2009

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

 

 

Endangered Species Act change under review

Obama may reverse a Bush-era revision that loosened environmental rules for federal projects.

Los Angeles Times

 

A lot to CHEER about

Gilroy Dispatch

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Endangered Species Act change under review

Obama may reverse a Bush-era revision that loosened environmental rules for federal projects.

Los Angeles Times – 3/3/09

By Jim Tankersley

 

Reporting from Washington -- The White House will announce today that it is reconsidering another controversial last-minute environmental rule by President George W. Bush, an Obama administration official said Monday night.

The Bush-era rule loosened the way the Endangered Species Act guides federal projects, such as roads and dams. The change, finalized in December, eliminated a requirement that federal agencies consult with experts about potential effects on endangered plants and wildlife before allowing projects to go ahead. Instead, federal agencies can determine on their own whether their projects would harm protected species.

 

A major spending bill speeding through Congress includes language that would empower President Obama to reverse the rule. Without congressional action, the administration would need to undertake a lengthy process to roll back the rule.

The move is Obama's latest step toward reversing Bush's environmental policies. Shortly after his inauguration, Obama ordered all pending Bush regulations to be frozen, including the loosening of some air quality standards and the removal of the gray wolf from the endangered species list. Obama's Interior Department has canceled oil and gas drilling leases near national parks and paused efforts to open coastal areas for drilling and Mountain West oil shale for development.

Obama also directed the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider its denial of California's request to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles. The EPA will hold a public hearing this week, which could result in the state imposing stricter regulations on automakers.

The chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, Rep. Nick J. Rahall II (D-W. Va.), lauded Obama on Monday night for moving "to restore the protections for endangered species that the Bush administration spent so many years trying to undermine."

Environmentalists said Bush's decision removed a crucial layer of protection for endangered species. Business and industry lobbyists countered that it eliminated unnecessary delays in projects without harming species.

Then-Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne admitted that the move divided Interior officials. The new Interior secretary, Ken Salazar, said in a January interview that he wanted to reconsider the rule.#

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/environment/la-na-epa-species3-2009mar03,0,5920274.story?track=rss

 

A lot to CHEER about

Gilroy Dispatch – 3/3/09

By Chris Bone, staff writer

 

Herman Garcia and his loyal band of volunteers rely on elbow grease, prayer and homeless people to save endangered fish.

 

Workers with Coastal Habitat Education & Environmental Restoration regularly visit the stretch of Uvas Creek west of Santa Teresa Boulevard, where a dozen or so homeless people camp outside the gates of Eagle Ridge. Volunteers routinely pick up crack pipes, syringes, batteries, broken bottles, sodden clothes and other junk littering the creek bank. They filled two truck beds this past month - the most important time to clean because recent showers not only facilitate the endangered steelhead trout CHEER is trying to save, they also wash rubbish into the creek that flows into the Pajaro River and ultimately the Monterey Bay.

 

Rather than just pick up after folks, CHEER has teamed up with homeless people such as Nicole Boscacci, 19, and Oscar Martinez, 26. They bag their refuse for Garcia in exchange for the canned food he brings them from St. Joseph's Family Center.

 

"They definitely help, like this here," Garcia said, pointing to a pile of bags as Boscacci smiled behind him.

 

"We clean up every day," she said. "It's important to think about the fish, and right now it's not that bad, but there are more people who come down here and just leave their trash everywhere."

 

It's not just an environmental or aesthetic issue either. In fact, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - with which CHEER works closely along with the California Department of Fish and Game, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, the Gilroy Unified School District and the city - is under part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, something Garcia likes to remind people of.

 

"Everything that happens here eventually affects the local, state and national economies," he said. "Who wants to live near a polluted river? Who wants to fish in this?"

As children, Garcia, his brother Benny and retired Gilroy Police Officer and long-time CHEER volunteer Bob Brem said they would sometimes catch 10 fish an afternoon. Breakneck development buried those days and if any kids still fish, creek conditions and stricter laws limit them to catch-and-release, Garcia said. A 1991 American Fisheries Society report, which relied on data from some drought years, estimated that between 100 to 200 steelhead trout ran up the Pajaro River each winter. That's a 96-percent drop from a 1965 report that counted 4,600.

 

For this reason, Garcia has declared Uvas Creek CHEER's principle "battle line," and in the fight against extinction, the group seems to be winning lately.

"It was an awesome year," Garcia said of 2008, during which he and volunteers transported more than 23,000 steelhead - ranging from babies, known as "young of the year," to adults - from evaporating enclaves to more stable environments.

 

"I absolutely believe CHEER has saved that many fish," said Jonathan Ambrose, a biologist with NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service. "I've been out there to these sites and helped, and while 23,000 seems like a lot, you have to remember 31 out of 62 adults are females carrying anywhere from 500 to 5,000 eggs."

The water district has a long-standing agreement with fish and game to release about 3,000 acre-feet, or $825,000 worth, of water from the Uvas Reservoir in addition to the 7,500 acre-feet it pours out for humans, according to water district Spokesperson Susan Siravo. An acre-foot is enough water to supply two families of five for one year.

 

For those fish that are stranded, CHEER volunteers load as many as they can into a specially designed tank and then make a 50-mile round trip to the mouth of the Pajaro for every 1.5 adults and a 10-mile round trip for the bunches of babies they take upstream toward the Uvas Reservoir. All this driving caused Garcia's Jeep Cherokee with more than 200,000 miles to catch fire recently. Such dedication from a program specialist with FIRST 5 Santa Clara County - a publicly funded program that provides health insurance for children up to 5 years old - was part of the reason Redway-based nonprofit Salmonid Restoration Foundation recently named him restorationist of the year.

 

In Uvas Creek, a baby steelhead spends anywhere from one to three years maturing into a smolt, but only about 10 percent make it to the ocean, where they spend another couple of years before 10 to 30 percent return upstream in the late winter and spring to spawn, Ambrose said.

 

With a lack of funding for fish-tracking cameras or infrared that also require professional review and a shortage of volunteers, Ambrose described CHEER and other Bay Area volunteers as invaluable resources for NOAA.

 

"Herman is the only person that I work with that I've given my home number to," Ambrose said. "We need partners like CHEER. They're absolutely essential."

So is prayer.

 

After the first week of regular rain last month, Rev. Edward Fitz-Henry joined CHEER volunteers atop a trestle that crosses the creek near Bolsa Road south of Gilroy. There, he "blessed" unseen fish in the muddy flow with holy water after weeks of his San Juan Bautista parish praying for rain, among other things, he said.

"I can't seem to find any steelhead prayers," Fitz-Henry joked before reading from Psalm 8, which acknowledges "all that swim the paths of the seas."

For the humans on land, though, Ambrose encouraged people to follow Garcia's example.

 

"I can't emphasize enough that it's not too late," Ambrose said. "If you get the ecosystem fixed, the animal should take care of it itself."#

http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/254211-a-lot-to-cheer-about

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

 

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS -WATERQUALITY-3/3/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 3, 2009

 

4. Water Quality –

 

 

EPA drills wells in Visalia, hunts toxic chemical

Fresno Bee – 3/2/09

By Lewis Griswold, staff writer

 

The federal Environmental Protection Agency will begin drilling monitoring wells around downtown Visalia today to look for the source of a dry cleaning chemical that has contaminated drinking water supplies.

 

The six wells will allow the EPA and the state Department of Toxic Substances Control to search for perchloroethylene, or "perc." The chemical is used in dry cleaning, and has shown up in drinking water in Visalia.

 

Exposure to the man-made substance, especially through breathing vapors, can cause liver and kidney damage, and is believed to increase cancer risk.

Advertisement

California Water Service said it has four wells in Visalia that have water contaminated with perc.

 

District manager Phil Mirwald said Monday that the water from the wells is treated with activated carbon to remove the chemical. Perc was first detected by Cal Water in one of its wells in 1991, Mirwald said.

 

All drinking water in Visalia comes from wells. But an EPA spokeswoman said that the drinking water in Visalia meets federal and state standards for safety.

The EPA is paying for the $207,000 cost of drilling.

 

But after the drilling is done and water and soil samples are collected and analyzed, it's up to the state to identify owners of property where the contamination occurred and ask them to pay for the cleanup, said Mike Vivas, a Department of Toxic Substances Control project manager.

 

"By the end of the summer, we expect to identify some responsible parties," Vivas said.

 

Vivas said the most common cleanup method is to drill a hole in the soil and vacuum out the vapors. Contaminated water is run through carbon filters to clean it.

Visalia was chosen to look for sources of perc because the contamination has been spreading and city residents get all of their water from wells, state officials said. Over the last quarter century, contamination has been detected in 25 water wells, including some owned by private operators or small companies, and more recently buried monitors have found vapors.

 

The state Air Resources Board has banned dry cleaners from buying new machines that use perc, but existing machines can continue using the chemical until 2023.#

http://www.fresnobee.com/local/story/1234157.html

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 3/3/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 3, 2009

 

3. Watersheds –

 

 

Overfishing imperils ocean life, study says

San Francisco Chronicle – 3/3/09

By Jane Kay, staff writer

 

 

The stars of the ocean - bluefin tuna, salmon, whales and seabirds - suffer from dwindling food supplies as a result of heavy fishing driven by the demands of fish farms and climate change, according to a study released Monday.

 

Seven of the world's 10 largest commercial fisheries include small fish such as herring, anchovy, pollock, mackerel and whiting, which support the vast ocean web of big fish, marine mammals and birds, said the study by Oceana, a worldwide environmental group.

 

The loss of food at the bottom of the ocean food chain harms a range of species, resulting in malnutrition, death of offspring or disruption in migration and breeding patterns, Margot Stiles, lead author and Oceana marine biologist, said Monday.

 

"These fish may be small. They're not glamorous. But they do all of the work in the ocean," Stiles said. "They're the foundation of the food web. Without them, we would lose the things we really care about - the seabirds, whales, tuna and salmon."

 

Most small prey, or forage fish, are being caught at maximum levels or are currently overexploited, the study said.

 

Oceana and another group, Ocean Conservancy, are asking for catch limits that would protect existing fisheries. They also want prohibitions on starting new fisheries of prey species.

 

A ban on krill fishing adopted three years ago by the Pacific Fishery Management Council, which regulates federal waters off California, Oregon and Washington, has been held up by the U.S. Commerce Department's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

 

Scientific and environmental groups are asking officials in the Obama administration to approve the West Coast ban on krill fishing and to extend catch limits to other prey species.

 

The study's release Monday coincides with the issuance of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization's State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture biennial report, which documents the gradual decline in the wild catch and the depletion of important fisheries.

 

Fish farms, known as aquaculture, are overtaking commercial fishing as the prime supply of the world's seafood, the U.N. report said.

The Oceana study, entitled, "Hungry Oceans: What Happens When the Prey Is Gone," focuses on three threats:

 

-- Overfishing of prey species are going unregulated, including immense stores of squid and krill. Whole schools of fish that feed tuna, whales and other long-lived animals and drive migrations are caught in nets, particularly by industrial fishing vessels.

 

-- Fish farms are driving the need for small species, which are turned into oil or feed. They use more of the ocean's protein than they produce. An estimated 4 to 11 pounds of prey fish are consumed to grow 1 pound of farmed salmon.

 

Warming ocean temperatures in the past century - and projected to rise in the coming decades - affect sea life survival. Changes in temperature and prevailing currents may sweep away newly hatched eggs and larvae, and hurricanes can wipe out a generation of larval fish.

 

Climate change also interferes with the timing of life cycles. The food for seabirds and salmon, for example, must be available when they need it. If not, seabirds don't reproduce or their offspring die, and salmon don't survive when they get to the ocean.

 

Oceana has lobbied for bans on commercial fishing of krill in the Antarctica, Japan and British Columbia and the Gulf of St. Lawrence in Canada.#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/03/03/BAGQ167VF6.DTL

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 3/3/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

March 3, 2009

 

2. Supply –

 

 

California farms, cities warned they may lose access to state's creeks, rivers

Sacramento Bee

 

Water supply decisions delayed; officials pray for more rain

Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

California farms, cities warned they may lose access to state's creeks, rivers

Sacramento Bee – 3/3/09

By Matt Weiser

Thousands of California farms and cities have been warned that their permission to pump water from rivers and creeks could be cut back if the drought worsens.

Such a warning, mailed to about 7,000 water rights holders on Thursday by the state Water Resources Control Board, has not been issued since 1988 amid the state's last prolonged drought.

 

The state did not release a list of all cities and farms that will receive the warnings. But state officials said Monday the list includes every city and farm with state water rights in the watersheds of the Sacramento, San Joaquin and Russian rivers as well as the central coast and the Tule Lake region of Lassen County. That would include the city of Sacramento.

 

The warning is a reminder that a California water right is not absolute. In fact, state regulators have the power to cut off water diversions in the public interest – whether to protect the environment or to stretch a precious natural resource thinned by drought.

 

"We are giving you fair warning that even if you start the season with water, by the end of the season you may not have water," said Bill Rukeyser, spokesman for the water board. "People would be able to continue to boil their spaghetti, brush their teeth, take showers, drink water. They would not be able to water their lawns."

The state has not actually cut water rights en masse because of drought since 1977, an even more severe drought. And there's no certainty it will do so this year. That depends entirely on weather.

 

On Monday, there was a glimmer of good news in the latest snow survey by the state Department of Water Resources. It showed the Sierra Nevada snowpack at 80 percent of normal for the season so far.

 

Thanks to recent storms, that's a big improvement over February, when the snowpack was 61 percent of normal. But it's not enough to recover from two prior drought years.

 

Rukeyser likened the problem to a Las Vegas gambler who is $6,000 in the hole after two days of bad luck. On the third day, he might win $2,000, but he still leaves town $4,000 poorer.

 

"With really generous luck, the dice will keep on turning up just right, and eventually we'll break even or maybe pull ahead. But we're a long way away from that now," he said.

 

Water rights are actually nothing more than a permit to pump or divert water from a naturally flowing source. They are ranked according to seniority, a complex area of state law.

 

The most senior water rights are called "riparian" rights – typically those attached to land adjacent to a waterway that has a verified historical claim to that water. Many of these rights date back to the period of Spanish settlement, long before California attained statehood.

 

If diversion rights are cut, the least-senior water rights would be cut first. Affected farmers would have to plant different crops or let fields go fallow, drill deeper wells or find another water supply. Cities would limit water consumption to essential health and safety purposes.

 

Some of the state's most senior water rights exist in the Sacramento Valley, a region of year-round river flows and a lucrative rice-growing trade.

"Where fallowing crops makes sense, that is certainly something that can be done," said Donn Zea, president of the Northern California Water Association, which represents farmers and water agencies in the valley.

 

But he said the public must consider long-term solutions.

 

"This drought situation that we're in will happen again," he said. "This water system of ours, above Sacramento, has not been added to in any major way since before shag carpeting and refrigerators were avocado in color. It's time we fixed it."

 

The curtailment warning is different from delivery forecasts announced recently by state and federal water agencies. Those affect agencies that buy water under contract.

 

Instead, the warning affects all other water users in the state who have a permit to divert water at no cost.

 

The city of Sacramento, for instance, depends on diversion rights in both the American and Sacramento rivers. Some of these rights are considered to have high seniority, but this may not protect the city from cutbacks later this year if the drought worsens.

 

"It's not a property right," said Ronald Stork, senior policy advocate at Friends of the River.

"Providence has to provide the water. And if she doesn't, your water right is not going to be anything more than a piece of paper." #

http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/1666458.html?mi_rss=Top%20Stories

 

Water supply decisions delayed; officials pray for more rain

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 3/3/09

By Bob Norbert, staff writer

 

Recent heavy rains prompted North Bay water officials on Monday to delay for a month decisions on how much less Russian River water will be available this summer for residents and businesses from Windsor to San Rafael.

 

 “What we don’t know is the climate situation in 30 days; it could pour buckets and our reservoirs would be replenished,” said Santa Rosa Mayor Susan Gorin.

February has been wet. Santa Rosa received 8.76 inches of rain, 44 percent more than the average of 6.08 inches. Nearly as much, 8.45 inches, fell at Coyote Dam at Lake Mendocino, a critical part of the regional water supply. Total rainfall since July 1 still remains well below normal.

 

Gorin also said that wet weather makes it harder to sell residents on conservation. “There is a disconnect,” said Gorin, who is vice chairwoman of the Sonoma County Water Agency’s advisory committee.

 

The committee represents the agency’s major buyers: Windsor, Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Sonoma and Petaluma and Valley of the Moon, North Marin and Marin Municipal water districts. Those cities and districts serve about 600,000 residents.

 

The cost of water will also go up as water sales are cut back, largely because of the fixed costs of operting the delivery system. That is the case even though the Water Agency said it has laid off 25 percent of its staff and shut three of six pumping stations.

 

The cost of water per acre-foot is expected to increase 20 percent for Santa Rosa and Windsor, 10.5 percent for Rohnert Park, Cotati, Petaluma and the Marin Municipal and North Marin water districts and 29 percent for Sonoma and Valley of the Moon.

 

The water allocation agreement calls for the delivery of 52,000 acre-feet for the year, about 10 percent less than last year, but approval was delayed Monday until April 6.

 

During the critical months of June through October, the agency would deliver 5,000 acre-feet per month, which is 70 percent of normal demand.

 

That would require conservation measures of up to 30 percent, depending on how the cities and districts use wells and other reservoirs to supplement their allocations.

While Lake Sonoma is now about 85 percent full, the Water Agency can deliver only 5,000 acre-feet a month down Dry Creek and into the Russian River without harming fish habitat. Lake Mendocino, which in a normal year provides 30 percent of the water to the major customers, this year is critically low, and that water will be available only for customers from Ukiah to Healdsburg.

 

Chris DeGabriele, general manager of the Northern Marin Water District, said waiting a month is wishful thinking. “We are in a drought, we need to respond accordingly,” he said. “That Lake Mendocino might fill is unlikely. We are in March and it is half of what it was last year,when we had 15 percent conservation.”#

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20090302/articles/903020962

 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for3/3/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

March 3, 2009

 

Top Items–

 

 

Wet February helps water supply, but not enough

San Francisco Chronicle

 

Storms help, don't end drought

Contra Costa Times

 

State's in a drought, but it's not the worst ever

Not only have a series of February storms pushed up mountain snowpack levels, but by historical standards the current three-year dry spell is far from the most severe.

Los Angeles Times

 

+++++++++++++++++++++=

 

Wet February helps water supply, but not enough

San Francisco Chronicle – 3/3/09

By Peter Fimrite, staff writer

 

(03-03) 04:00 PST Phillips, El Dorado County -- The storms pounding the Bay Area and blanketing the Sierra Nevada with snow have brought California back from the brink of the worst drought in state history, but the drenching is not enough to assure adequate water supplies this summer, state water officials said Monday.

 

The water content of the Sierra Nevada snowpack - the backbone of the state's water supply - is about 80 percent of normal for this time of year, according to measurements of water content at several backcountry spots.

 

That's a turnaround from a month ago, when the water content measured just 61 percent of normal after the eighth-driest January on record had the state teetering on a the edge of its worst-ever water crisis.

 

"While the storms that we had in February have certainly improved our circumstances over the first of last month, we still have a long way to go," said Frank Gehrke, chief of snow surveys for the California Department of Water Resources. "Reservoir storage is still way below average, and the likelihood of large-enough storms to have significant recovery drops way off as we move into March."

 

Elissa Lynn, a meteorologist for the Department of Water Resources, said the water content in the snow would have to be between 120 to 130 percent of normal by April 1 to replenish the state's reservoirs, the largest of which are less than half full.

 

"That's just the snowpack," Lynn said. "We need to have rainfall in the mountains continuing through the spring, contributing to the total water supply. That's what we had hardly any of last year."

 

Rain and snow would have to fall virtually every day this month to get back to normal, a highly unlikely scenario, according to Steve Anderson, meteorologist for the National Weather Service.

 

Couple of feet of snow

He said rain is expected to continue until Thursday. A couple of feet of snow probably will fall above 7,000 feet in the coming days. The weekend and the first half of next week should be dry, and precipitation is expected to be about average for the next two months, he said.

 

So far, 25 California water agencies have imposed mandatory water restrictions, including the East Bay Municipal Utility District; 66 others - including San Francisco - have voluntary restrictions in place.

 

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a statewide drought emergency last week and urged cities to reduce water use by 20 percent as experts predicted that snowmelt runoff this spring will be just 57 percent of normal. The latest snow survey does not change the dire predictions, Gehrke said Monday.

 

Still, the measurements of snow depth and water content at Phillips Station, a state measuring site next to the Sierra-at-Tahoe resort, left Gehrke and his colleagues at least moderately optimistic, especially after meager results earlier in the year.

 

The snowpack was 101 percent of normal at the station, a privately owned cabin off Highway 50. Most of the other surveys came in a bit below normal for an overall average of 80 percent, Gehrke said.

 

Such measurements are a key indicator of how much water will be available during the dry summer months because as much as 60 percent of the state's water is contained in its snow-covered mountains during the wet season.

 

When the snow melts in the spring and summer, the water is used to irrigate 775,000 acres of farmland and quench the thirst of California's 36 million people. About one-fourth of the state's power comes from hydroelectric plants that count on heavy mountain runoff.

 

The measurement at Phillips Station is considered the key measure of water availability in the state. If snowpack is abundant, chances are there won't be a drought.

 

But nature rules

But nature showed last year that it makes it's own rules. On March 1 the snowpack was 136 percent of normal. Then it stopped snowing, and the state ended up the year with water supplies far below average, Gehrke said. Runoff last year was 58 percent of normal.

 

January was the Achilles heel of 2009. Lynn said January storms usually douse California, accounting for 18 to 20 percent of the state's annual precipitation. Instead, the month delivered a string of dry, sunny days this year.

 

The recent storms have left San Francisco at 88 percent of its normal amount of rainfall for this time of year; Oakland is 91 percent of normal. San Jose is just behind, at 86 percent of normal and Santa Rosa is 69 percent of normal.

 

Two - and maybe three - consecutive dry years come at a difficult time for the state's water supply system. Also hampering water distribution has been aging infrastructure and court-ordered reductions in water pumped through the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta - and the state's population continues to grow.

"We can look at this storm and say 'this is good,' but it doesn't mean we can count on it to alleviate the drought conditions," Lynn said. "Last year the rain shut off March 1. We don't want to see that happen again."#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/03/02/BAVA167R2M.DTL&feed=rss.bayarea

 

Storms help, don't end drought

Contra Costa Times – 3/2/09

By Mike Taugher, staff writer

 

 

Despite a fantastic February that dropped nearly 12 feet of snow in parts of the Sierra Nevada, California's snowpack remains 20 percent below normal, state water officials announced Monday.

 

Reservoirs that were drained to just one-third of capacity a month ago are slowly refilling but remain well below where they would normally be this time of year.

The bottom line: California is still in a drought. Water rationing is still expected in the East Bay and in Southern California, and farmers in the San Joaquin Valley are still looking at getting little, if any, Delta water.

 

Still, February's snowfall in the northern Sierra Nevada was nearly 50 percent above normal and went a long way toward making up lost ground for the 11th-driest January on record in that region.

 

In February, the snowpack was about 60 percent of normal. Today, it is about 80 percent of normal.

 

Last month, things looked so bleak that the state's top water official warned of the possibility of "the worst California drought in modern history." On Monday, Department of Water Resources Director Lester Snow toned it down a bit, saying, "California remains in serious drought."

 

The state's major reservoirs, which were generally about one-third full or about half of normal for this time of year, have crept up somewhat. Among the key reservoirs, Lake Shasta is now about 60 percent normal and Lake Oroville is about 55 percent normal.

 

What makes this drought especially problematic is that 9 million more residents have arrived since the last drought ended in 1992, farmers have planted more permanent crops, including grapes and nuts, and environmental considerations have become more urgent and complex.

 

Lake Shasta, for example, is the primary storage site for water that is delivered to Contra Costa and the San Joaquin Valley. Water managers are required to reserve 1.9 million acre-feet at the end of the summer to maintain cold water in salmon spawning grounds. Today, there is only about 2 million acre-feet of water in Lake Shasta. More water will certainly flow into the reservoir, but there will not be much left for Contra Costa and San Joaquin Valley farmers after other water rights holders get their share.

 

Delta pumps also are restricted in how much water they can pump during spring, a condition put in place to prevent the endangered Delta smelt fish from going extinct.

 

"Our problem is not lack of snow. Our problem is the wrong system and the way it's colliding with endangered species issues," said Tim Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies.

 

State water officials have told their contractors, which include some agencies that serve the Tri-Valley, Silicon Valley and Southern California, to only expect 15 percent of their normal water supply this year.

 

"We're hopeful that will go up, but it depends on what Mother Nature does," said Jerry Johns, Department of Water Resources deputy director.

 

In the East Bay, water rationing remains likely. The East Bay Municipal Utility District has been rationing water since summer.

 

The Contra Costa Water District, which serves 500,000 in the east and central parts of the county, is calling for voluntary conservation now but warns that mandatory conservation of as much as 25 percent is expected.

 

"We will have a better idea at the end of March," Greg Gartrell, assistant general manager, said.

Storms are expected to continue through Wednesday.

 

"After that, it looks pretty dry," said Elissa Lynn, a senior meteorologist with the Department of Water Resources.

She said that it would take about 12 feet of snow in March to bring snowpack to average depths.#

http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_11819991?source=rss

 

State's in a drought, but it's not the worst ever

Not only have a series of February storms pushed up mountain snowpack levels, but by historical standards the current three-year dry spell is far from the most severe.

Los Angeles Times – 3/3/09

By Bettina Boxall

The warnings have been ominous this winter: California is headed into the worst drought in modern history. The water supply is drying up. Or, as one water association declared last week, "Things just keep getting worse and worse."

Is it really that bad?

 

If you look at the numbers, the answer is no. Not only have a series of February storms pushed up mountain snowpack levels, but by historical standards the current three-year drought is far from the worst.

Monday, the state Department of Water Resources announced that the mountain snowpack that feeds the state's reservoirs has reached 80% of normal for the date. Precipitation in the northern and southern Sierra has climbed above 90% of average and another storm is on the way.

"Right now it doesn't look too bleak," said Maury Roos, the state's chief hydrologist. "I think we'll have more runoff than last year."

The water interests who have spit out grim news releases the last two months were silent Monday in the face of the growing snowpack.

Those who would like to build new reservoirs and canals and to weaken environmental regulations have invoked the drought like a mantra in recent weeks.

A recently introduced congressional bill that would allow federal officials to relax endangered-species protections in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is titled the California Drought Alleviation Act.

"For over 100 years in California, the drought argument has been used consistently to justify actions, and I think this is no exception," said Robert Wilkinson, director of the Water Policy Program at UC Santa Barbara's Bren School of Environmental Science and Management.

In late January, a public relations firm representing state water contractors trumpeted: "California's water supply dries up." It was highlighting the need for a delta "fix," including a canal bypass.

Sen. Dave Cogdill, a Republican who represents agriculture-dependent Modesto, called the drought "epic" when he introduced a $10-billion water bond package last week that includes funding for new reservoirs and other infrastructure.

State and federal water managers earlier this year sought to relax delta water quality standards, arguing that because of the drought, it needed to hold more water in upstream reservoirs to preserve cold water flows for salmon in coming months.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa last month called for fee increases and outdoor watering restrictions, citing the state's "severe water shortages."

The state is in a drought. But it's "not the worst we've had," said Roos, chief hydrologist for two decades.

Roos looks at two water supply criteria to determine whether the state is in a drought: Runoff from the state's major river systems has to be in the bottom 10% of the record, and total statewide reservoir storage has to be at or below 70% of average.

By that definition, 2007 and 2008 barely made the drought category.

In 1977, the water year (which ends Sept. 30) was the driest on record. Back then, statewide reservoir storage was 35% of average. Statewide storage was more than twice that by the end of September last year, and in 2007. Roos estimated it is about 70% of the norm now, a little less than halfway into the water year.

Roos said it was prudent for water managers to be conservative. "But some of the statements have been pretty grim . . . The climate can change pretty fast."

Said Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute in Oakland and one of the world's leading experts on water issues: "The state is still dry, but it's a lot less dry then it was three weeks ago and decisions about water allocations and water policy ought to be done with the best current information."

Even as reservoir and snowpack levels were rising, federal water managers announced last week that they might not make deliveries to some big Central Valley farms -- a scenario Gleick doubts will play out.

"It's extremely likely that the allocations for the [federal Central Valley Project] are going to go up . . . The idea that they'll give zero water to farmers -- that's not going to happen."

Lester Snow, director of the state Department of Water Resources, defended his agency's characterizations of the drought, saying that though it may not be the worst hydrologically, other factors are accentuating its seriousness.

There are more people in the state, more farmers have switched to permanent crops that can't be fallowed and growing environmental problems in the delta have restricted water deliveries.

"So the same level of hydrology [that the state experienced] in 1991 produces more severe impacts," Snow said. "That's what spurs us to talk about the potential for the worst drought."#

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-drought3-2009mar03,0,7581459.story?track=rss

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.