This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 5. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, PEOPLE - 3/2/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 2, 2009

 

5. Agencies, Programs, People –

 

 

Editorial: Larger Los Vaqueros Reservoir would ease Bay Area water problems

MediaNews editorial – 3/1/09

 

AN EXTENSIVE environmental report issued last Monday makes clear what should have been known years ago: A larger Los Vaqueros Reservoir near Brentwood would do much to alleviate the Delta's ailing ecosystem and provide a stable water supply to much of the Bay Area.

 

The report by the Contra Costa Water District and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation comes at a critical time when the state and region are in the third year of a drought.

Although the drought is not particularly severe, water supplies are low enough to cause water districts in the area to consider rationing later this year.

Adding to the area's water problems are court orders to sharply reduce supplies to farmers and other users of water coming from the Delta to protect the estuary's ecological balance.

 

It isn't only farmers and urban water users who are suffering. The numbers of many species of fish in the Delta have declined to the point where they are threatened with extinction.

 

The cause of all the area's water problems is a lack of dependable fresh water supplies during dry periods, much less periodic droughts.

Even with extensive conservation and more efficient use of water by farmers, there simply is not enough stored water to meet urban, agricultural and environmental needs.

 

Continued conservation, desalination, and use of underground aquifers can help ease water shortages, but these alone will not solve a serious and worsening threat to California's environment and economy.

 

What has been needed for some time is more aboveground water storage in new or enlarged reservoirs. That conclusion is supported by the latest environmental report, which examined four options to increase the capacity of Los Vaqueros reservoir. Three of them would boost the reservoir's capacity from the current 100,000 acre feet to 275,000 acre feet. A fourth option would add 60,000 acre feet to Los Vaqueros' capacity.

 

All four options call for adding to the current dam. An earlier proposal to increase Los Vaqueros to 500,000 acre feet would have required an entirely new dam and is no longer in contention.

 

The most extensive option in the environmental report, and the one that looks the most promising, would add 175,000 acre feet of storage capacity to Los Vaqueros Reservoir.

 

It is designed to improve both environmental water management and water supply reliability to several water districts in the Bay Area.

 

This option would include the largest number of potential beneficiaries (and cost sharing) of the reservoir expansion. Also, it would protect Delta fish with improved screening of water diversions.

 

Under this plan, water would move thought the enlarged reservoir into the State Water Project system at Bethany Reservoir, which serves all three South Bay water agencies that serve parts of Alameda and Santa Clara counties.

 

However, by far the largest portion of the added storage capacity would be used for environmental purposes, increasing the flow of fresh water into the Delta during dry months and dry years.

 

This would reduce salinity, which is a major suspected cause of fish depletion.

 

The estimated cost of the water would be about $330 per acre foot. That is considerably less than the cost of other water supplies, conservation, recycling or desalination.

 

The total cost of a 275,000 acre-foot Los Vaqueros Reservoir is estimated at $900 million.

 

The fate of the project depends on potential financing from Bay Area water agencies that benefit as well as state and federal water agencies and environmental regulators.

 

We believe it is an investment well worth pursuing. A larger reservoir could be built in three years after environmental studies and permits have been approved. The sooner action is taken the better. The area's water problems are only going to get worse — far worse if nothing is done.#

http://www.contracostatimes.com/opinion/ci_11792151?nclick_check=1

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 4. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS -WATER QUALITY-3/2/09-nothing significant

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 2, 2009

 

4. Water Quality – nothing significant

 

 

 

[Water_news] 3. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: WATERSHEDS - 3/2/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment

 

March 2, 2009

 

3. Watersheds –

 

 

Richmond hopes to protect 5 miles of wetlands

San Francisco Chronicle – 3/2/09

By Carolyn Jones, staff writer

 

The north Richmond shoreline has seen its share of blasts and explosions - from the dynamite factory, shooting range, oil refinery and a century of political fireworks.

 

But negotiations are under way to make the 5-mile stretch of wetlands - among the last undeveloped swaths of San Francisco Bay shoreline - a much quieter, calmer place.

 

Developers, city officials and park advocates are working to transform three parcels of private property into permanent open space, most likely part of the Eastshore State Park.

 

"We see it as inevitable, let me put it that way," said Robert Cheasty, former Albany mayor and head of Citizens for East Shore Parks. "People are finally getting it. They're seeing what this space can be. It's going to happen."

 

The land, a marsh that's home to egrets, herons and 15 threatened species, stretches from the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill, just north of the Chevron oil refinery, to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline. The Richmond Rod and Gun Club occupies the southern portion, and the rest is zoned for light industrial uses. The Giant Powder Co., which made dynamite, and the town of Giant, both now vanished, once occupied the northern end.

 

The area has remained mostly undeveloped because, until the Richmond Parkway was built 10 years ago, the land was almost completely inaccessible. City leaders and developers had once envisioned office parks and warehouses along the shoreline, but those dreams ended with the dot-com bust in 2001.

Developers now hope the city will change the zoning to allow housing, despite the abysmal housing market, but also are open to selling the land to the East Bay Regional Park District or another open space agency.

 

"Right now we're working on a price," said Josh Genser, a lifelong Richmond resident who owns one of the shoreline parcels. "Although I'm not as convinced as they are that they'll come up with the money."

 

Cheasty and other park supporters said they're close to securing ample funding to purchase the land, and are also working on deals to swap development rights and possibly seize the land through eminent domain.

 

"We can do this without harming the developers' financial interests," Cheasty said. "We're not out to crush anyone."

 

More meetings are scheduled and city staff is working on possible zoning changes - to residential or open space - as part of revamping the city's general plan.

Not everyone thinks open space is the best use of the shoreline. Richmond City Councilman Nathaniel Bates says the city already has too many parks.

 

"We need jobs and economic development," he said. "Instead of just buying more land, I'd like to see the park district spruce up the parks they already have."

Point Pinole, which is an undeveloped expanse of eucalyptus forest, grassland and marsh, should have a skate park, soccer fields, horse stables and more paths, he said.

 

"Richmond is a deprived city," he said. "We need jobs, taxes and large-scale development more than we need the park district to just grab a bunch of land and sit on it."

 

But Richmond City Councilman Tom Butt says that open space is exactly what the city needs. He's been working with developers and park advocates to arrange a deal.

 

"A city is defined by its parks and open space," he said. "What would San Francisco be without Golden Gate Park and Crissy Field? The value of land in San Francisco would be a lot less without parks."

 

Because so much of it is privately owned, the north Richmond shoreline is a critical piece in possibly expanding a continuous shoreline greenbelt from San Jose to Crockett, Cheasty said.

 

Maria Rivera, a San Pablo attorney who was walking her shih tzu Leo at Point Pinole Thursday afternoon, said she'd love to see the park expanded south toward the refinery.

 

"It would be fabulous," she said. "It's such a lovely resource. I just can't imagine this wonderful shoreline wasted on buildings."#

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/03/01/MNJO165QOI.DTL&feed=rss.bayarea

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 3/2/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

March 2, 2009

 

2. Supply –

 

 

Sacramento sewage agency looks at selling wastewater

Sacramento Bee – 3/2/09

By Matt Weiser

Californians have grown accustomed to digesting odd ideas that routinely flow out of Sacramento, many of them not so palatable.

But are they ready for this one?

 

Last week, amid a third year of a statewide drought, the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District adopted a strategy to sell treated sewage as drinking water. The buyer would hypothetically partner with the district to recycle wastewater from the capital-area's 1.4 million people into a new municipal water source.

The idea is not so far-fetched. Orange County last year opened the world's largest wastewater recycling plant and is now serving treated effluent as high-quality drinking water to 2.3 million residents.

 

The technology is simpler and cheaper than desalinating seawater. State regulators are working to adjust policies to encourage more such projects.

What's different about Sacramento's plan is that local leaders want somebody else to buy treated sewage and pay to make it drinkable.

 

"It's kind of like taking lemons and creating lemonade," said Mike McGowan, a Yolo County supervisor and sanitation district board member.

 

At the heart of the issue is the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The estuary is suffering a puzzling ecosystem collapse that threatens extinction of several fish species.

Suffering along with the fish are 23 million Californians who depend on Delta water supplies, from the Bay Area to San Diego.

 

These diversions have been curtailed to protect the environment, and may be reduced further this year in response to drought.

 

One culprit in the Delta's decline is water pollution. Sacramento's treated effluent is the largest single source of urban wastewater in the Delta, though the harmful effects of this source are a matter of dispute.

 

A key component of the Sacramento waste stream is ammonia, a common byproduct of human urine and feces. Ammonia in Sacramento's wastewater has more than doubled since 1985 because of rapid urbanization, and is now about 125,000 gallons per month.

 

Recent research suggests ammonia may be disrupting the Delta by limiting blooms of phytoplankton, tiny animals that form the foundation of the aquatic food chain.

The sanitation district questions the scientific findings so far, and has gone on the offensive to forestall modernizing its treatment process. It estimates treatment upgrades could cost as much as $1 billion, requiring household sewer rates to triple to $90 a month.

 

The idea to instead sell effluent is a creative wrinkle in the district's strategy.

 

The region's total wastewater discharges amount to a lot of water – about 180,000 acre-feet per year. That's enough to serve nearly 400,000 average households.

"We cannot simply sit back and complain and say this Delta is going to cause us problems, and expect things to go away," said District Manager Stan Dean. "We need to set ourselves up to be part of a broader solution."

 

Even district critics admit the recycling scheme is a clever approach that could help the Delta. But they also note a potential for negative side-effects.

The most obvious is that a buyer could divert the water out of the Delta watershed, causing another drain on an already stressed ecosystem.

 

"We would have serious issues with diverting that water out of the watershed," said Bill Jennings, executive director of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance and longtime water-quality watchdog. "In all fairness, I want to see their proposals. It's an intriguing concept, in the sense that the important thing is to get the water adequately treated so it doesn't degrade the Delta."

 

District officials said they are willing to negotiate with any interested party, whether a local water agency or the sprawling Los Angeles metropolis. It could serve the latter, for example, by pumping recycled wastewater into a controversial canal proposed to divert a portion of the Sacramento River around the Delta.

"When you shift your point of view from looking at effluent as a waste product to looking at it as a valuable commodity, that changes your whole thinking on who your potential customers could be," said District Engineer Mary Snyder.

 

Another key question is whether the district has a legal right to sell the water at all. The district maintains that it does, and state law appears to support that.

Gregory Weber, an expert in water law at McGeorge School of Law, said a provision of the state Water Code holds that a water treatment entity gains an ownership stake in the water it treats.

 

The diversion issue is a thornier one, he said, which would have to be reviewed to avoid harm to the environment.

 

"There are potential downstream impacts on fish, wildlife and habitat," Weber said. "Downstream water rights holders who have already been appropriating the discharges may be complaining as well."

 

In other words, the recycling plan could be perceived as an attempt to take more water out of an estuary where there is none to spare.

McGowan cautioned fellow board members, all of them local elected officials, of a possible political backlash.

 

"If that's what we're going to do, we're picking a big fight," he said. "But to do nothing will see us complaining in a couple years." #

http://www.dailycal.org/article/104613/state_of_emergency_declared_due_to_drought

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.

 

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Item for3/2/09

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

March 2, 2009

 

Top Items–

 

 

Delta cutbacks put Valley farm town on edge

Sacramento Bee

 

CALIFORNIA'S WATER: A VANISHING RESOURCE

State of emergency expands in hopes of relieving drought

San Diego Union Tribune

 

AGRICULTURE: Avocado, citrus may be on the way out

Drought, cutbacks, price increases could deal final blow

North County Times

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Delta cutbacks put Valley farm town on edge

Sacramento Bee – 3/2/09

By Susan Ferris

MENDOTA – In the San Joaquin Valley, the most productive farmland on earth, panic is more abundant than the crops that usually blanket the ground.

Drought and environmental concerns have led to severe cuts in irrigation water deliveries from Northern California over the past year, and unemployment in this town of 10,000 is approaching 40 percent.

 

Mendota may be proud to call itself the Cantaloupe Capital of the World, but with California in danger of a third year of drought and more water cuts planned, people wonder if they'll get enough rice and beans to scrape by. It took volunteers at the Westside Youth Center's monthly food giveaway less than three hours, not the normal two days, to distribute a record 750 boxes of a few days' worth of groceries.

 

Much of the debate over how much water to pump out of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta for thirsty farms to the south has focused on the fish endangered by deteriorating conditions in the estuary.

 

But thousands of people here and in other little San Joaquin Valley towns are worried about the human toll: They fear that without water, they won't be called back to work as the growing season heats up.

 

"They're worrying about the fish but not about the humans' life," said Jose Ruiz, 42, a foreman still clinging to the job he's had since 1979 with a vegetable firm in Mendota.

 

At one end of town, Maria Avila de Romero can't believe that in America's cornucopia, she has had so little work for so long that she has to ration milk and boil it to stretch it past the expiration date. Her $61 weekly unemployment has run out.

 

In another neighborhood, Luis Cervantes, 38, and a father of four, stared into the brand-new house he lost to foreclosure in October that now stands empty. Cervantes was a vegetable farm foreman who earned good money, but his hours were steadily cut until he also was laid off.

 

The crisis in Mendota offers a glimpse into a sober future.

 

Without a major restructuring of how water is moved in California, the Central Valley's anchor industry faces a dramatic decline.

 

"Why is nobody helping?" asked Mendota Mayor Robert Silva, who has a message for urban folk: "Get away from your lattes and see the real world. This is California, too."

 

Plantings, harvests, jobs cut

American consumers may not realize that a vast quantity of their food comes from here, Silva and others say. And if it isn't going to come from here, then consumers, too, must prepare to swallow some big changes. It's no bluff, the farm industry warns, that food from other countries will fill the vacuum.

 

For decades, water has been diverted from the Delta via canals to Los Angeles. That water created a farm behemoth in the Central Valley that produces more than 250 products.

 

Eighty percent of the world's almonds grow in the Central Valley, and the land fanning out around Mendota yields most of California's processed tomatoes, which are 45 percent of the world total. Western Fresno County alone produces 95 percent of U.S. lettuce sold in April and October.

 

Probably half the 600,000 acres in the area's Westlands Water District will not be planted or brought to harvest this year, district managers estimate. Spring lettuce plantings are at 9,000 acres, compared with 16,000 last year, said Fresno County Supervisor Phil Larsen.

 

About 130,000 acres are permanent nut and pomegranate trees and grapevines that must be watered to survive. Some farmers will buy water on the open market to keep orchards alive but not invest in developing a crop.

 

Farmers with wells can irrigate, and those who can are sinking new wells at more than $600,000 each. But drawing from groundwater also raises environmental concerns.

 

A University of California study takes stock of what to expect: Up to $2.2 billion could be lost in the Central Valley this year, and up to 80,000 jobs.

The shock will inevitably reverberate through a regional economy staggering from the housing collapse and recession.

 

"I want (Gov.) Schwarzenegger to list me on the California endangered species list," said farmer Todd Allen, whose family has farmed outside Mendota for more than 30 years. #

http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/1663578.html?mi_rss=Top%20Stories

 

CALIFORNIA'S WATER: A VANISHING RESOURCE

State of emergency expands in hopes of relieving drought

San Diego Union Tribune – 2/28/09

By Michael Gardner

— Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger yesterday broadened a previous emergency drought declaration, flexing his power to sidestep environmental protections to expedite deliveries to thirsty cities and parched farms.

 

Schwarzenegger and his advisers also reiterated warnings that mandatory rationing may be ordered unless Sierra snowstorms bring enough water to refill depleted reservoirs.

 

Leaders of Southern California's giant water agencies applauded the action but sent strong signals that forced cutbacks could be imposed starting as early as July 1.

“These are vital steps to help San Diego County and the rest of California mitigate the impacts of the shortage, but mandatory water-use restrictions are still very likely this year,” said Bud Lewis, chairman of the San Diego County Water Authority board.

 

Timothy Brick, chairman of the Metropolitan Water District board, said directors are expected to authorize a new allocation plan “that likely will reduce water supplies to its member agencies, leading to mandatory conservation.”

 

Meanwhile, Schwarzenegger administration officials and public water agency managers renewed a call for legislation that would authorize and pay for construction of new reservoirs, which deeply troubles some Democrats and environmentalists. At least four water-related bond measures, some approaching $10 billion, have been introduced in the Legislature.

 

The governor's proclamation again pleads for more conservation, requires state agencies to cut their own use, makes it a priority to assist drought-stricken regions, and takes steps to improve water quality in the Sacramento delta, among other directives.

 

“This drought is having a devastating impact on our people, our communities, our economy and our environment, making today's action absolutely necessary,” Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

 

Storms over the past two weeks have brightened the outlook somewhat. State officials are expecting even better news Monday when they take another snow survey high in the Sierra. A bountiful storm is expected there tomorrow.

 

To date, statewide precipitation is 86 percent of average, but just 59 percent of what's needed for the entire season, which ends June 30. More ominous: Reservoirs are at their lowest level since the early 1990s. Most are less than half full.

 

“We are still very far behind,” said Lester Snow, director of the state Department of Water Resources.

 

In response, the state is preparing to deliver just 15 percent of normal supplies to its customers, and the federal government has temporarily shut down deliveries to most farms in the San Joaquin Valley.

 

Economists at the University of California Davis estimate that the drought could cost 95,000 jobs and $2.8 billion in revenue this year. Much of the pain is centered in the San Joaquin Valley, where idle fields idle workers.

 

While this is considered the fourth-worst drought on record in terms of actual water shortages, “it may be the worst in terms of economic impact,” Snow said.

The governor last year issued a more modest emergency declaration to help nine hard-hit counties in the San Joaquin Valley, from Kern to Sacramento, shortly after he declared a statewide drought in June.

 

To develop emergency supplies, the state is putting together a drought water bank program to broker sales between agencies that have water and those that need it.

But the program could run afoul of the California Environmental Quality Act, known as CEQA. For example, the endangered giant garter snake survives in rice fields. If farmers do not plant so they can sell the water, the snakes could be harmed. Also, firing up diesel pumps to draw groundwater could violate clean-air standards.

To clear those obstacles and others, the governor has invoked his authority to pursue some projects immediately and repair any environmental damage later.

“We can shortcut the CEQA process,” Snow said.

 

But Snow added that impacts on fish and wildlife would be alleviated over time, and none of the newly exerted authority would be used to speed up construction of nonemergency reservoirs and canals.

 

“There's no intention to use this for construction of any permanent, controversial facilities. It really is oriented to streamline response to the drought,” Snow said.

The state has not determined which water projects would be exempt from the safeguards, but officials promise public disclosure.

 

Schwarzenegger yesterday also directed state agencies to “prioritize and streamline permitting and regulatory compliance actions” for water-producing projects such as desalination and recycling.

 

The governor said that if the water picture does not significantly improve by March 30, he will order “additional regulatory relief or permit streamlining.”

Barry Nelson of the Natural Resources Defense Council said alternatives to dams could boost supplies by capturing storm water, recycling, reusing wastewater and improving groundwater.

 

“These tools have the potential to provide more water than we've ever pumped out of the Sacramento delta” for farms and cities, Nelson said.

The administration insists that dams must be part of any overall solution, given the crisis.

 

“Now is the time to act,” said Mike Chrisman, natural resources secretary. Snow agrees that even minimal conservation could save at least 1 million acre-feet of water, enough to serve 2 million households for a year, “without anybody changing their lifestyle.”

 

While the administration is hesitant to order Californians to use less water, that view may change.

 

“If it is a deteriorating situation, we could see for the first time the state invoking mandatory conservation,” Snow said. “The strong preference, however, is that local jurisdictions implement their own plans.” #

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/feb/28/1n28drought005141-state-emergency-expands-hopes-re/?uniontrib

 

AGRICULTURE: Avocado, citrus may be on the way out

Drought, cutbacks, price increases could deal final blow

North County Times – 3/1/09

By BRADLEY J. FIKES - Staff Writer

 

Avocado and citrus groves have adorned the hilly landscape of rural North San Diego and Southwest Riverside counties for decades. But in just a few years, their lush, semitropical foliage could be replaced by nature's original desert landscape.

Water is the reason.

Its shortage is becoming a permanent condition of California's economy. Even after the current drought is over, court-imposed environmental restrictions on water transfers will ensure there won't be enough to go around, water officials and growers say.

"This is what happens when the state doesn't develop its water supply," said Gary Arant, general manager of the Valley Center Municipal Water District, pointing to a stand of dead avocado trees.

Critical decisions on water supply and pricing expected during the next 12 months will affect the fate of growers not only in Valley Center but in other major centers of production such as Fallbrook, Rainbow and Riverside County.

The effects of these decisions could be seen as early as this summer, when the avocado trees are most in need of water.

-- Courts are expected to rule this spring on further restricting water shipments from the critical Sacramento River Delta, source of 40 percent of Southern California's water, to protect endangered fish there.

-- In April, Metropolitan Water District, Southern California's main water wholesaler, is scheduled to consider whether it will cut water deliveries. Metropolitan imports water from the delta.

-- Next January, Metropolitan is scheduled to consider imposing a wholesale cost increase of from 20 to 35 percent on water agencies, cities and farmers who buy directly from Metropolitan. The bulk of water for San Diego and Riverside counties comes through Metropolitan.

The drought has been caused by below-normal rainfall in Northern California along with several years of inadequate snowfall in the Sierra Mountains, which supplies reservoirs as snow melts in the spring and summer.

It's made worse, Arant said, because California hasn't developed major new sources of water since the 1970s. So the state is trying to support a population with water sources developed more than 30 years ago.

Even if California began immediately to develop new sources of water, it would take at least a decade to put them in place, Arant said. By then, production of both avocado and citrus will be mostly gone from Valley Center.

With about 14,000 acres of avocado groves containing about 100 trees per acre, that's 1.4 million potentially doomed avocado trees in Valley Center alone.

Dying trees

California's production of avocados, valued at $251 million in 2007, would be crippled if San Diego County's avocado groves are abandoned.

About half the crop comes from San Diego County, most from Valley Center, Fallbrook and Rainbow. Avocado sales from the county's 24,000 acres of groves totaled $127 million in 2007. By comparison, citrus is a minor crop in the county.

Already, thousands of avocado and citrus trees have been cut down or left to die in Valley Center, Arant said.

Touring Valley Center with a North County Times reporter and photographer, Arant pointed out areas of dead groves dating back to the early 1990s, along with more recent groves of newly dead or dying avocado and citrus trees.

Some avocado trees have been "stumped" to temporarily take them out of production, which reduces their water needs.

Valley Center grower Al Stehly said stumped avocado trees can regrow if enough water is available during the hot summer months. If not, they'll die.

"Everybody has to make that decision whether or when they'll give up," Stehly said. So far, he said, his fellow growers are hoping those trees can be saved.

Ben Drake, a grove manager with Temecula-based Drake Enterprises, said growers are looking at how much water they can get, at what price and what their budget will be.

If Metropolitan charges more for delivering less water, as seems likely, avocado production will fall, Drake said.

"If you've had any kind of root rot, or are in an area where you've had marginal production, I think a lot of those growers will go out of business," Drake said. "Those cutbacks and the rate increases will affect all of Riverside and San Diego counties, because we all receive water from Metropolitan."

One-way road

If the trees are left to die, they're not likely to be replaced.

Unlike annual crops, trees take years to bring into production, so the up-front expense is much greater, Arant said. With the cost of water going up and the supply going down, growers aren't going to replant areas they've had to abandon.

"If Metropolitan calls for a 20 percent reduction (in water use), we think our region will experience a 10 to 12 percent reduction" in water, Arant said.

The reduction would be even worse, he said, except for additional water supplies from the Imperial Irrigation District, which make up some of the shortfall.

Arant and Keith Lewinger, general manager of the Fallbrook Public Utility District, agreed that growers will be disproportionately affected, because agricultural water use is a low priority.

About half the avocado growers in Valley Center and Fallbrook buy discounted water, which is first to be reduced in a shortage. Most water in those communities goes to agriculture. Last year, growers in the program were given 30 percent less water than in 2007.

And if Metropolitan imposes reductions of 15 percent or more, growers in the "interruptible" water program will get additional cuts on top of the 30 percent.

Those percentage cuts translate into dead trees, since avocado trees can't survive without irrigation, Arant said.

"Let's say they go to 15 percent. Growers in the interruptible program will go to 40 percent," Arant said. "If Met goes to 20 percent for (municipal and industrial customers), these guys will go to 50 percent. And it gets worse from there."#

http://www.northcountytimes.com/articles/2009/03/01/business/z7e2407af8d51592f8825756600656fe0.txt

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.