This is a site mirroring the emails of California Water News emailed by the California Department of Water Resources

[Water_news] 2. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS: SUPPLY - 12/3/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation of significant news articles and comment 

 

December 3, 2007

 

2. Supply

 

CLIMATE ISSUES:

How does climate change affect valley? - Modesto Bee

 

WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS:

What will La Niña bring? Flip a coin; Weather system's effects on winter Valley rainfall have been varied, unpredictable - Fresno Bee

 

Rainy Season Off To Slow Start; Many Areas Of Sierra Have No Snow Yet - KCRA Channel 3 (Sacramento)

 

SHASTA LEVELS:

Paltry rainfall fails to replenish Lake Shasta - Redding Record Searchlight

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA:

Rains don't satisfy need; Water rationing still a possibility - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

 

Editorial: Keep efforts flowing - Pasadena Star News

 

WATER BANKING:

Water needs put AV at brokers' mercy; Allocations from California Aqueduct cut back severely - Antelope Valley Press

 

WATER SUPPLY PLANNING:

Water use study begins in January; Vineyards, dairies -- largest consumers of well water -- agree to participate in county plan to monitor ground-water use - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 

WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES:

Privies to get more efficient; Are you sitting down? Consider this: During your life, you likely will flush a toilet 140,000 times. A new law aims to start saving water each time you do - Sacramento Bee

 

Guest Column: California Water: The Crisis We Can't Ignore - Santa Clarita Signal

 

Editorial: Water woes trickle down to west-side school coffers - Fresno Bee

 

FARMER WORKSHOPS SET TO PLAN FOR DROUGHT - News Release: Agricultural Water Management Council

 

 

CLIMATE ISSUES:

How does climate change affect valley?

Modesto Bee – 12/3/07

By Martha Conklin and Lara Kueppers, staff writer

 

In the face of global climate change, one important role for science is to investigate the areas in which society is vulnerable to climate warming and to help guide efforts to adapt to changes.

 

What resources might be threatened and how? At the University of California at Merced, we are addressing this question for several important regional resources.

 

A significant fraction of California's water supply comes from the Sierra Nevada snowpack. With our mild winters, temperature increases of only a few degrees will be enough to turn what are now mountain snowstorms into rainstorms. The implications for earlier runoff, more severe spring floods and drier summer soils in mountain forests are motivating a broad-based research effort to understand the mountain water cycle.

 

The foundation for this research is a new generation of measurements to get a quantitative understanding of snow distribution, snowmelt, soil moisture, water use by plants and processes that determine the timing and magnitude of streamflow. Strong academic- applications partnerships, some of which are in place and others still developing, are the key to making this research possible and assuring that results are useful to decision-makers in the state.

 

In addition to the global effects of our carbon emissions, human activities affect the climate on a regional scale. For instance, we have found that in the Central Valley, agricultural irrigation can mask the effects of climate warming.

 

When watered, farmland acts like a giant swamp cooler. Future land-use changes that replace fields with housing and businesses could turn down the air conditioner and make us more vulnerable to the warming climate.

 

Species and ecosystems in the high mountains are especially vulnerable to climate change, driven by the effects of higher temperatures on the water cycle and plant growth. How mountain plant species, such as alpine wildflowers and pine trees, respond to higher temperatures and drier summers is not well-known. It all depends on how climate warming will affect ecosystem interactions, not just plant species in isolation.

 

Already, animals that make their homes on mountaintops, such as the rabbitlike pika, are in danger of extinction. These habitats and species bring millions of tourists to the Sierra each year. We are striving to learn more about these sensitive ecosystems to improve their chances of weathering the changes ahead.

 

Research has shown that increased risk of wildfire in mountain forests is linked to climate warming. Earlier and warmer springs lead to a longer fire season and more dry vegetation that is vulnerable to frequent, large wildfires. Recent surges in wildfires can be explained in part by fire suppression and land-use changes, but climate warming has driven much of the increase.

 

Forests in California's Sierra Nevada are especially vulnerable because they are affected by warming and fire suppression.

 

Mountain wildfire threatens tourism, timber and public disaster response resources. It is an area where we must adapt our systems to the reality of climate change. Research that integrates across forest health, wildlife, water and human concerns is helping to provide the knowledge base for adaptation.

 

Individual, day-to-day changes to reduce emissions and slow climate warming are vital. But climate warming is already under way, thanks to past choices. Research efforts such as these can help draw attention to areas where we must proactively adapt lifestyles, economies and resource management to be better stewards of our resources today and into a warmer future. #

http://www.modbee.com/opinion/community/story/140594.html

 

 

WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS:

What will La Niña bring? Flip a coin; Weather system's effects on winter Valley rainfall have been varied, unpredictable

Fresno Bee – 12/2/07

By Mark Grossi, staff writer

 

A cool-water phenomenon in the Pacific Ocean may help turn a dry autumn into a drought winter in the San Joaquin Valley, climate scientists say.

 

Fewer storms may come to Central and Southern California this winter because of a weather-altering La Niña in the ocean near South America.

 

With reservoirs already dipping after last winter's meager wet season, drought concerns are rippling through the Valley, the state's premier farming region.

 

But meteorologists say it might be too early to worry, adding that La Niña does not necessarily mean a dramatically dry season for the Valley.

 

The global weather force is fickle and hard to predict in this area.

 

"More than half of the La Niña years are near normal for precipitation here," said meteorologist Chris Stachelski of the National Weather Service's office in Hanford.

 

Indeed, some of the 19 La Niña years since 1950 have brought rainfall well above normal.

 

In 1955, for instance, Fresno received its biggest December rainfall ever -- 6.73 inches. Seven years ago, Fresno rainfall set another monthly record -- 6.12 inches for February.

 

But the dry seasons were memorable, too. In the mid-1970s, La Niña had a hand in an intense drought when Fresno had three consecutive dry years.

 

The Weather Service's immediate forecast doesn't offer much comfort: there is a slight chance of rain late this week.

 

Only 0.09 of an inch fell in Fresno in November. Average for November is about 1.10.

 

The city has recorded 0.39 of an inch since July 1, the start of the precipitation year. That is 24% of average for this time of year.

 

But it's not nervous time yet, said meteorologist Jan Null, who runs a private consulting firm called Golden Gate Weather Services in the Bay Area.

 

"The wet season really doesn't get rolling until mid-December," he said.

 

Still, he and other meteorologists are not going too far out on a limb to forecast the Valley's winter. This region is a bit of a void for La Niña-related predictions.

 

It's a lot easier to predict that storms will head toward Northern California and the Pacific Northwest while the moisture will mostly miss Southern California, southern Nevada and Arizona.

 

Sometimes, the Valley gets a piece of the northern storms; sometimes, it gets the dry weather of Southern California. If you were wagering on a dry or wet winter in the Valley, it would be a coin flip.

 

"The deck is stacked for a dry winter in L.A., San Diego and Arizona," said research meteorologist Nicholas Bond of the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle. "But I wouldn't say the deck is stacked for dry weather in the San Joaquin Valley."

 

This discussion takes place every two to five years. That's about how often La Niña, Spanish for "the girl," appears in the Pacific. It is a blob of cool water spreading thousands of miles from the coast of Peru.

 

It is the flip side of warm-water El Niño, which means "the boy" or "the Christ Child," often appearing around Christmas.

El Niño's ocean warming is linked with a higher chance for a wet winter in California and the Valley.

 

La Niña and El Niño are considered weather titans. They alter storm incubation in the Pacific as well as influence flooding and droughts all over the planet. Scientists have studied them for years, and still there is much to learn.

 

La Niña results when winds increase across the equator and blow surface ocean water away from South America, allowing deeper, cooler water to rise. As the surface water cools, so does the air.

 

The cooler air and water hamper formation of rain-producing clouds, affect the high-altitude jet stream and allow high-pressure ridges to bounce storms away from Central and Southern California.

 

The cooler the water gets, the more intense the phenomenon's effects. This year, La Niña's ocean temperatures are moderate.

There have been five moderate La Niñas since 1950, and two contributed to significantly dry seasons in Fresno, according to Golden Gate Weather Services.

 

Both of the dry years -- 1967-68 and 1984-85 -- were less than 75% of average for Fresno. But the three other moderate La Niña years had near normal rainfall.

 

Said Stachelski of the Weather Service: "We're just on the fringe of the drier-than-normal predictions. That makes longer-term forecasting very difficult."  #

http://www.fresnobee.com/263/story/239094.html

 

 

Rainy Season Off To Slow Start; Many Areas Of Sierra Have No Snow Yet

KCRA Channel 3 (Sacramento) – 11/30/07

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Northern California is off to a very slow start to the rainy season, but state water officials said it is too early to tell if the region is facing a drought.

 

Don Stickland, spokesman for the state Department of Water Resources, said if this winter is as dry as last winter, then the state may be looking at conservation measures.

 

But officials point out that precipitation amounts in November are rarely indicators of how wet a winter will turn out. They said they will have a much better idea in about a month when the first snow survey takes place.

 

This week, the state put Central Valley farmers on notice that they may receive only 25 percent of their requested water amounts next year. That means farmers may plant fewer crops that rely heavily on irrigation.

 

Dave Kranz of the California Farm Bureau said farmers on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley may not plant as much lettuce as they have in the past.

 

Voluntary water use cutbacks are already being called for in Long Beach, San Diego and Sonoma County.

 

But the situation is dramatic in the Mendocino County town of Redwood Valley, which on Friday began the process of declaring a water emergency.

 

The level of the lake where the town gets its water is only five feet above the intake. Officials said that without rain or additional conservation, taps in the town may run dry in February.

 

Water levels at Folsom Lake, Lake Oroville and Bullards Bar Reservoir are very low.

 

KCRA 3 Chief Meteorologist Mark Finan said Sacramento saw just 0.98 inch of rain in November, which brings the region up to 49 percent of normal to date.

 

In the northern and central Sierra, the snowpack is listed at zero percent of normal to date. In the southern Sierra, the snowpack is 8 percent of normal.

 

Last year at this time, the Sierra snowpack was anywhere from 21 percent to 50 percent of normal for that time of year. #

http://www.my58.com/weather/14742381/detail.html

 

 

SHASTA LEVELS:

Paltry rainfall fails to replenish Lake Shasta

Redding Record Searchlight – 12/1/07

By Dylan Darling, staff writer

 

With the rainy season seemingly on hold, Lake Shasta's waterline continues to drop.

 

"It's going to keep going down until we get some substantial rain," said Sheri Harral, spokeswoman for the Northern California Area Office of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

 

The water Friday was more than 126 feet below the high-water mark at Shasta Dam, the lowest it's been in 15 years.

 

A dry winter and spring left the lake with a low pool that continued to drop throughout the summer, prompting marinas to move docks and the Shasta County Sheriff's Office to implement boating restrictions. Officials said they expected the lake to start rebounding with an influx of water at the end of October on through November.

 

Despite some rain in October, the big rainstorms needed to refill the lake haven't come yet, Harral said.

 

Even with flows from Shasta Dam being cut close to the minimum outflow of 4,000 cubic feet per second, the lake is dropping almost two inches per dry day.

 

Rain is in the forecast starting Sunday and lasting, off and on, through early next week. But the lake will need a whole series of storms to lift water levels again, Harral said.

 

The lake's all-time minimum level is 230 feet below the crest, set in 1977 during a severe drought. #

http://www.redding.com/news/2007/dec/01/paltry-rainfall-fails-to-replenish-lake-shasta/

 

 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA:

Rains don't satisfy need; Water rationing still a possibility

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin – 12/2/07

By William Bighma, staff writer

 

Though the rain the past couple of days provided a welcome respite from record dry conditions, local water officials say an extended rainy period is needed to avoid rationing policies and potential rate hikes.

 

"One day of rainfall, we're happy to see it. But we're not getting too excited about it," said Kirk Howie, assistant general manager at Claremont-based Three Valleys Municipal Water District. "We need to have this consistently during the winter season to have an impact."

 

If dry conditions resume, rationing policies - such as limits on landscape watering - could be implemented in the Inland Valley as soon as March, water officials say.

 

And if water continues to be scarce from both local and imported sources, price figures on water bills could rise as well.

 

About 2 inches were expected to fall locally by the end of rainstorms Saturday, said Philip Gonsalves, forecaster for the National Weather Service.

 

The rainstorm's total is by far the highest in this year's dry season. More rain is needed, though water officials can't quantify how much, said Bob Muir, spokesman for the Metropolitan Water District.

 

"It's not as though we can point to one number, and say that would be the answer to our water-supply issues in 2008," Muir said.

 

"We need what's happened in Southern California (Friday) to be duplicated for all of our water sources, on a continuous basis."

 

As drought conditions have worsened, many local water agencies have called for voluntary conservation and have offered rebates to those who switch to water-friendly appliances.

 

Very few cities have instituted rationing policies, but if dry conditions continue, more will follow suit.

 

The MWD, which imports water from Northern California and the Colorado River for use in Southern California, anticipates that its water supplies in 2008 will be 30 percent lower than normal.

 

If the agency delivers less water to its subsidiaries across the region, it may mandate reduced water consumption. If that happens, rationing policies will likely follow.

 

For that to be avoided, "It would have to probably be a better than average year in rainfall in Northern California," said Muir. "That would be a start, and maybe if we had improved conditions on the Colorado River as well."

 

Rationing policies, if they are implemented, would have a greater impact on water customers than rate hikes, which will likely be muted, said Tom Love, executive manager of engineering for the Inland Empire Utilities Agency.

 

"Rates might need to go up a little bit because of the water shortage, but not a large amount," Love said. "Because most, if not all, water agencies have a rate-stabilization fund.

 

"In years when they do sell a lot of water, they put some of that money aside for down years," Love said. "So if it's a water shortage that lasts for one or two years, they won't have to make a big adjustment to their rates."  #

http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_7613683

 

 

Editorial: Keep efforts flowing

Pasadena Star News – 12/2/07

 

LET'S hear it for the rains of Friday and Saturday!

 

Mother Nature, take a bow.

 

(Belated applause).

 

Finally, the high pressure gave way to the rainy weather system from the north, splashing Southern California (including San Gabriel Valley and southeast Los Angeles County, etc.) with a steady dousing of rain as heavy as one-half inch per hour in some parts of Los Angeles County.

 

But wait, what will this do for the drought? Does it mean one more storm in the Southland and we can all go back to overwatering our lawns and brushing our teeth with the faucet running? Not!

 

Conservation is what put Southern California in a much better position for handling the current drought than we were during the last six-year-drought of 1987-1992, that according to the Metropolitan Water District and its chairman, Pasadena's Timothy Brick.

 

It's true.

 

Now - or ever - is not the time to abandon conservation efforts. That means homeowners planting more xeriscapes and using drip irrigation systems or systems they can "pause" before, during and after a storm. That means homeowners buying more low-flush toilets and water-stingy washing machines and dishwashers. And then running them only when full. Conservation should be a way of life.

 

After 1992's "March Miracle" the water engineers were saying the huge storms that broke that drought cycle weren't enough.

 

That the rain was falling mainly on the plain - i.e. here in Southern California - instead of as snowpack up North (where the water supply begins its journey south). They were blaming Mother Nature for their own Rube Goldberg-like rainwater collection systems.

 

That was then. Now, there's more storage and more water saving.

 

We give the water folks credit. They've built-in more water conservation by flooding the market with low-flow toilets and low-flow showers. Free giveaways are a steady option at the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District. In the last 15 years, Metropolitan and others have invested in some extensive water storage systems, both above and under ground. This has increased water storage here in Southern California. MWD reports currently has 2.5 million acre-feet "in surface and groundwater storage accounts, including Diamond Valley Lake (in Perris)," while during the last drought Southern California had 225,000 acre-feet of water stored at one time. (One acre-foot of water equals 326,000 gallons, about what's used by two families in a year).

 

In addition to that new reservoir, the San Gabriel Valley and Whittier Narrows' underground basins are getting cleaned up, albeit slowly. That means, more local water can be stored underground and less water is imported from Northern California or the Colorado River.

 

While it's a way better water storage picture, things can still improve. Southern California water agencies must find the money to add spreading grounds much like the ones at the 210/605 junction. These soak up rain water and help it percolate downward until it reaches the aquifer. Thousands of gallons are wasted down the Los Angeles, Rio Hondo and to a lesser extent, the San Gabriel River.

 

Better water collection systems, combined with more water conservation and water recycling are what will sustain life in our region. And oh yeah, occasional gifts from Mother Nature. #

http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/search/ci_7619068?IADID=Search-www.pasadenastarnews.com-www.pasadenastarnews.com

 

 

WATER BANKING:

Water needs put AV at brokers' mercy; Allocations from California Aqueduct cut back severely

Antelope Valley Press – 11/28/07

By Alisha Semchuck, staff writer

 

Antelope Valley water suppliers expect significant wheeling and dealing to go in the water world in 2008, with allocations of water from the California Aqueduct severely limited.

 

California's Department of Water Resources announced that state water contractors - including the Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Palmdale Water District and Littlerock Creek Irrigation District - will receive only 25% of their entitlements from the State Water Project next year.

 

"After facing some of the most significant obstacles in terms of California's water supply and delivery system in 2007, this low initial allocation makes it all the more apparent that we will continue to face unprecedented challenges in the upcoming year," said Laura King Moon, assistant general manager of the State Water Contractors Association.

 

"There are many uncontrollable factors, such as drought, that affect water supply reliability, but there are many factors we can control, such as upgrading and maintaining our statewide infrastructure," King Moon said. "Unless we make necessary improvements to our state's crumbling water delivery system, in coming years we will only face increased risks."

 

In years when rain is abundant, the Department of Water Resources has granted as much as 100% of a contractor's entitlement.

 

For PWD that equates to 21,300 acre-feet. An acre-foot equals 325,851 gallons, the amount used by an average single-family household in a year.

 

The 25% allocation means Palmdale Water District will get 5,325 acre-feet, said Greg Dluzak, production manager for the district.

 

AVEK, a water wholesaler that supplies other water districts such as the Los Angeles County Waterworks District 40, is entitled to 141,400 acre-feet of water each year at 100% allocation, said Mike Flood, the agency engineer. At 25%, the agency only will receive 35,350 acre-feet of water, he said.

 

AVEK normally uses about 50% of its entitlement, on average 70,000 acre-feet, to supply its municipal, industrial and agricultural customers. So, Flood said, they all will be cut back by 50%.

 

The 25% allocation, compared to the 60% allocated in 2007, "is the lowest initial allocation since 2003 due to this year's continuing dry conditions," stated a news release from Ann Newton, a spokeswoman for the State Water Contractors Association. For 2003, the DWR initially allocated 20% of the State Water Contractors' entitlement.

 

That allocation, along with growing impacts of the state's failing water delivery system, court-ordered cutbacks in water deliveries, a struggling ecosystem in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and climate change result in greater challenges for California's "already overtaxed water supply," Newton wrote.

 

"One of the most daunting problems confronting our state today is the growing uncertainty of our water system," said Timothy Quinn, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. "This forecast is indicative of the widespread challenges we face in delivering a reliable supply of water to cities, farms, businesses and ecosystems."

 

Quinn said the association has been conducting a statewide education program to raise awareness among Californians about the critical water challenges since September.

 

The topic on Tuesday at an association conference in Indian Wells focused on the State of the State Water Project.

 

"They talked about the fact there's a 25% allocation," said Palmdale Water District Director Gordon Dexter, an operations team manager for Metropolitan Water Districts of Southern California.

 

The allocation "typically starts low and goes up as the winter progresses," Dexter said. "But, the feeling (among) water purveyors at the ACWA conference, this won't be a typical year."

 

PWD Director Raul Figueroa called the allocation announcement "very disappointing. That tells us we have a big job ahead.

 

The general manager and staff have a huge task ahead of them. But they are looking out for our customers.

 

"We have to continue looking for places to supplement the water supply," Figueroa said.

 

"We knew it was going to be a tight year," Dluzak said. "We are pursuing at least three other avenues to get water."

 

Palmdale Water District board members recently approved an agreement through the State Water Contractors Association to participate in a supplemental dry-year water transfer program that could yield PWD as much as 10,000 acre-feet of water from rice farmers north of the delta. PWD paid an initial $150,000 as a down payment to firm the deal. The actual cost of water could be at least $160 per acre-foot.

 

"What Palmdale has done is an insurance policy," Flood said. "They (gave) a down payment. I think a bunch of our customers will want to do the same."

 

Because only state water contractors are eligible to enter into the agreement, Flood said AVEK would act on behalf of its customers, which include Quartz Hill Water District and Los Angeles County Waterworks District 40.

 

"They can't buy (rice farmers' water) directly, but they can buy it indirectly through us," Flood said. "I believe they are looking at doing that. I'm sure the county will."

 

"If some of the less expensive water can't make it across the delta," Flood said "a lot of suppliers will turn to the San Joaquin water banks, or farmers and others south of the delta who have access to water and are willing to sell it, possibly at a premium.

 

We always thought south of the delta water would be three to four times as costly as the water north of the delta."

 

Dluzak, Dexter and Figueora agreed a lot of posturing will take place, with suppliers scrambling to find water sources to meet their customers' demands.

 

But will wheeling and dealing really occur?

 

"Oh yeah," Dluzak said. "The negotiation that goes on is so dynamic. It depends on who the players are. It's supply and demand."

 

"Every entity is going to try and do what they can for their customers," Figueora said. "That's the obligation.

 

"A lot of suppliers (will be) going for those same sources," Figueroa said. "The water banks do have the upper hand. We'll see if they sell to the highest bidder, or what. They have the product that's in demand."

 

Dexter said agencies and districts that already have their own water banks will rely on those supplies.

 

However, Palmdale Water District will have to count on another transfer deal. In the summer, the water district negotiated with West Kern Water District for roughly 6,000 acre-feet of water to meet customers' needs through the end of 2007.

 

Now, Dexter said, transfer deals will become "highly competitive."

 

He said Metropolitan Water Districts "put out a press release a couple of weeks ago" announcing they were looking to purchase additional water supplies.

 

"Met's the biggest water supplier in the state," Dexter said, adding the agency is also the state water contractor with the largest entitlement from the State Water Project. "Met is so large and involved in the water industry that what Met is willing to pay for water kind of sets the going rate. The small guys have to be willing to pay more than that to beat out Met on a deal."

 

"The overall message," Flood said, "we're sure we're going to have water. We're just not sure what it's going to cost."

 

Figueroa emphasized that the water shortage is not just in the Antelope Valley, but hitting cities and towns throughout Southern California. Even other states have been suffering water shortages, he noted.

 

Flood concurred: "Georgia and North Carolina were both having water issues. Atlanta was in rough shape."

 

While 25% was the initial projection from DWR, the situation gets reviewed and reassessed on a month-by-month basis depending on winter rainfall and snow. So that 25% projection "can go up," Flood said. "It can also go down. But it's our feeling that the 25% is probably going to be a minimum."

 

The final word from DWR will come in April or May, Dluzak said.

 

In the meantime, the water officials stressed the importance of continued water conservation measures. If the situation grows worse, mandatory water rationing would probably take effect.

 

"It would be great if, by some miracle, it just started pouring and snowfall would start accumulating," Figueroa said. "Pray for rain." #

http://www.avpress.com/n/28/1128_s4.hts

 

 

WATER SUPPLY PLANNING:

Water use study begins in January; Vineyards, dairies -- largest consumers of well water -- agree to participate in county plan to monitor ground-water use

Santa Rosa Press Democrat – 12/3/07

By Bleys W. Rose, staff writer

 

A disputed monitoring plan for ground-water usage in the Sonoma Valley will get started in January after agriculture interests agreed to participate.

ADVERTISEMENT


Operations such as vineyards and dairies account for about 70 percent of the valley's use of ground water, so including them in the monitoring program was crucial to efforts aimed at reducing demand and ensuring water quality.

"Without ag, this wouldn't work," said Bob Anderson, executive director of the United Winegrowers for Sonoma County. "The wine families in the valley and the old-guard dairy operators had to be convinced the county was not out to steal their water."

Ground-water monitoring has been a contentious issue in recent years, evidenced by an especially prickly debate over 2020 General Plan proposals to monitor usage of well water. Environmentalists say ground-water sources are being depleted and contaminated, while property rights advocates staunchly defend their land and water rights against government regulation.

Proponents of a ground-water management plan for an area that spreads from Kenwood to San Pablo Bay praise the "nonregulatory" nature and say the plan could be a model for other areas of the county where ground water is an issue.

County supervisors recently approved establishing a ground-water management plan for the Sonoma Valley, a step essential for a Sonoma County Water Agency application for a state grant for $250 million to pay for dedicated monitoring wells.

Jay Jasperse, the Water Agency's chief deputy engineer, said the monitoring plan will cobble together measurements taken at about 50 existing wells.

"A ground-water management plan will allow us to expand monitoring, with our goal being roughly 75 to 80 wells that will provide the data for scientific monitoring of the basin," Jasperse said.

Supervisor Valerie Brown, who represents the Sonoma Valley, said that when discussions of the need for ground-water management began in June 2006, she wasn't sure "the stakeholders even agreed there was a problem they wanted to solve."

A couple of months later, the Sonoma County Water Agency convened a 20-member Basin Advisory Panel with members representing "stakeholders" such as agriculture and business interests, citizen and environmental groups, well owners and representatives of the Valley of the Moon Water District and city of Sonoma. During 13 meetings, the panel developed monitoring protocols and debated the technical aspects of ground-water measurement.

"We had our own ideas and concerns, and we were less than certain that they would be respected or understood," said Vicky Mulas of Schellville's dairy ranching family. "If we could do this, then the ground-water problem in Sonoma County can be addressed."

Much of the impetus behind ground-water management stemmed from a joint Water Agency and U.S. Geological Survey study that had determined there was a decline in ground-water levels in different areas of the valley. Overall, the study found demand had increased from 6,000 to 8,500 acre-feet annually between 1974 and 2000 while there was a 17,300 acre-foot decrease in storage.

Similar studies in the Alexander Valley and Santa Rosa Plain are likely to raise red flags among environmentalists concerned about draw-down of the aquifer and could rattled landowners worried about adequate supply as well as government regulation.

Jane Nielson of the Sebastopol Water Information Group said she attended about half the basin panel's sessions as an observer because "eventually, this is an issue that is going to reach the Santa Rosa Plain and beyond."

"This was a group of people that was pretty divided according to where they came from," Nelson said. "Each community really got educated about water."

Schellville vintner Tito Sasaki, representing the North Bay Agricultural Alliance, a group of ranchers and landowners dedicated to farming and property rights, said, "In the big picture, we wholeheartedly support ground-water sustainability. (The plan) does this without putting the brakes on our economic progress." #

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20071203/NEWS/712030302/1033/NEWS01

 

 

WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES:

Privies to get more efficient; Are you sitting down? Consider this: During your life, you likely will flush a toilet 140,000 times. A new law aims to start saving water each time you do

Sacramento Bee – 12/2/07

By E.J. Schultz, staff writer

 

In your lifetime, you likely will flush the toilet 140,000 times, according to government estimates.

 

A new state law seeks to make each flush a little more efficient, saving California about 8 billion gallons of water a year.

 

The legislation did not get much attention when it was signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger last month, but its implications will trickle down to new home builders and buyers in the next several years.

 

By 2014, all toilets installed in most new buildings and homes will have to use no more than 1.28 gallons of water per flush, down from the current 1.6-gallon standard. The standard for urinals will change from 1 gallon to a half-gallon.

 

The regulations will phase in beginning in 2010, when half of all toilets sold in the state must be high-efficiency models.

 

"The last generation of toilet efficiency has produced immense savings across the state, and this is the next generation," said Assemblyman John Laird, D-Santa Cruz, who wrote the bill.

 

The law comes as California deals with an ongoing drought that state officials say could lead to restrictions on water deliveries to cities and farms.

 

Scientists predict the situation could worsen if climate change attributed to global warming reduces the mountain snowmelt that the state relies on to fill reservoirs.

 

The toilet savings will not be enormous; 8 billion gallons is less than one-sixth of the annual water use in Fresno alone. Laird said the bill is part of a larger conservation push that he hopes to follow up on next year with more legislation.

 

California's toilet standards were last updated in 1992. The 1.6-gallon limit soon became the national standard.

 

At first, those new toilets lacked power, prompting complaints from consumers.

 

Manufacturers went back to the drawing board. And now most everyone agrees that 1.6-gallon toilets – as well as the 1.28-gallon "high-efficiency toilets" – are just as good as older toilets.

 

The newest toilets send water to the bowl at faster speeds, allowing for a forceful flush with less water.

 

Wathen-Castanos, one of Fresno's largest home builders, installs high-efficiency toilets in all its new homes. Consumers have never complained and none has asked for a new toilet, said Laura Mather, the home builder's director of sales and marketing.

 

"There's just more education going on about green building and energy efficiency," she said.

 

Consumers aren't likely to pay more for a high-efficiency toilet, because prices are based on style rather than flushing action, according to toilet maker American Standard.

 

The company's "FloWise" high-efficiency toilet lists for $359. As proof of the toilet's power, American Standard features a video on its Web site of the toilet easily flushing down golf balls, wads of paper towels and other items.

 

Laird's legislation faced minimal industry opposition.

 

The state plumbers association – which fought previous attempts to tighten toilet standards – supports the new flush limit and plans to spread the word about high-efficiency models.

 

"We've just done a complete 180 in where we were a year and a half ago," said Stephen Lehtonen, executive vice president of the Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors of California.

 

Lehtonen credits his conversion to a recent trip to rain-starved Australia. The country's plumbers association runs a "GreenPlumbers" training program aimed at promoting environmentally friendly plumbing.

 

Upon his return, Lehtonen helped launch a similar program in California, which aims to train some 15,000 plumbers in the next four years, he said.

 

"It's time that plumbers got involved in being conscious of the environment," he said.

 

Homeowners who install high-efficiency toilets are not likely to see a significant drop in their water bills. But if enough residents install them, it could free capacity at municipal wastewater treatment plants. That could stave off costly expansions that eventually would lead to rate increases, said Lon Martin, who oversees the city of Fresno's water system.

 

Many homes still are using 3- and 5-gallon toilets, Martin said. #

http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/535991.html

 

 

Guest Column: California Water: The Crisis We Can't Ignore

Santa Clarita Signal – 12/2/07

By William Pecsi, President of the Castaic Lake Water Agency Board of Directors

 

It's pretty simple, isn't it? You turn the knob, and water comes out. Turn the knob on the right side of the faucet, and you get cold water. Turn the knob on the left, hot water. It works whether you're taking a shower, doing the dishes or just getting a cold drink.

 

Every time. Like clockwork. Turn the knob, get water. Never fails.

 

Simple?

 

Not really.

 

Will it always be that way?

 

Good question. Especially now. Especially in California.

 

We're fortunate here in the Santa Clarita Valley: We don't have to turn the knob only to discover ... nothing. But that doesn’t mean it's a simple process to make sure your tap never runs dry. On the contrary, securing and delivering a reliable supply of quality water is a complex proposition fraught with its own unique environmental, political and technical challenges, even in the best of times.

 

Here at the Castaic Lake Water Agency, we have been planning ahead, securing water supplies that not only meet the "normal" demands of our customers (that's you), but also help us weather the storm - or, lack of one - when our region is hit with an extended dry spell, as it is enduring now.

 

Like the rest of California, we are concerned about our future water supply. But unlike many areas, we have a sufficient supply to ensure that we can absorb the dry spell - for now - without resorting to extreme measures like rationing.

 

However, the relative calm over the water situation here in the Santa Clarita Valley belies the bigger problem for our state as a whole, and it's important that all of us not only recognize the dire nature of the bigger picture, but also do our part to help improve it.

 

The Association of California Water Agencies is in the midst of a crucial public outreach campaign to increase awareness among all Californians about the statewide water crisis.

 

As the association puts it, this is a crisis we can't ignore.

 

"Despite intense media attention and focus by the governor and legislators, the public is largely unaware of the state's water problems," the water agency association says on its new public-awareness Web site, www.calwatercrisis.org.

 

For the first time in California history, the statewide water supply and delivery system may not be able to meet the state's growing needs, warns the Association of California Water Agencies, of which Castaic Lake Water Agency is a member.

 

There are multiple factors in this crisis: an ongoing drought, climate change, aging infrastructure, continued population growth, and environmental issues such as the debate over how best to manage the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

 

The delta has made many headlines statewide over the past few months, as a U.S. District Court judge has ordered a dramatic reduction in the amount of water being pumped from the delta while the federal government sorts out ways to protect an endangered fish, the delta smelt.

 

It's potentially the largest manmade water supply reduction in California history.

 

Yet the general public seems largely unaware of the urgent nature of the crisis.

 

The Association of California Water Agencies is seeking to change that, with a public outreach effort that includes not only the Web site calwatercrisis.org, but also a series of print and broadcast public-service announcements that bring the crisis home to Californians.

 

If you were to ask yourself, "What can I do about it?" the odds are the first thing that would come to mind would be conservation.

 

That's a good place to start, and you can find some valuable conservation tips at clwa.org.

 

From a local perspective, anything we can do to conserve this precious resource not only helps improve the "big picture" of water supply and demand, but also improves our ability on a local level to continue delivering water reliably for a lengthier period of time, even as the crisis continues.

 

Unfortunately, however, just reducing our usage isn't enough. As the water agency association says, "We cannot conserve our way out of this crisis."

 

While conservation is of paramount importance, it alone will not solve the problems facing our water supply.

 

How will the delta smelt affect the ability of the State Water Project and Central Valley Project to pump delta water for delivery to millions of Californians? And, beyond that, what are the best ways in general to manage the delta's water and environmental resources?

 

How will climate change and future droughts impact our supplies?

 

How will our state plan for future water delivery and storage, as delta levees and other infrastructure continue to age, becoming more vulnerable to natural disasters such as earthquakes?

 

These issues and more are the focus of a rather intense debate in Sacramento as the governor and state lawmakers wrangle over the details of various proposals that are likely to result in one or more ballot initiatives in which voters will be asked to approve construction of new water infrastructure.

 

The problem, it turns out, is much more complicated than what could be addressed by a few years of good rainfall. All of the crisis' various factors create challenges when it comes to supply, storage and delivery, and their impacts are magnified when viewed cumulatively.

 

It's important, then, for every Californian - including those of us in the Santa Clarita Valley - to not only use water more efficiently at every available opportunity, but also to become increasingly aware of the crisis, its ramifications and its potential solutions. (To stay informed, you can get on ACWA's mailing list at calwatercrisis.org.)

 

After all, you don't want to be surprised one day to go to your kitchen faucet and turn the knob only to find ... nothing.

 

The ACWA campaign puts it bluntly, but accurately: We can't take water for granted. #

http://www.the-signal.com/?module=displaystory&story_id=52008&format=html

 

 

Editorial: Water woes trickle down to west-side school coffers

Fresno Bee – 12/3/07

 

As the west side of the Valley dries up, so do the treasuries of local school districts. The impact is serious in some districts, and raises several public policy questions.

 

A lack of water and salt contamination have led the federal government to pull 300 square miles of land from agricultural production on the west side, and as the land dries up, so do farmworker jobs. Families leave the area, and that causes school enrollments to decline. That, in turn, reduces the amount of money the school districts get from the state.

 

The easy response is that, with fewer students, schools need fewer resources. But it's not that simple. Many of the costs of running a school district are fixed -- grounds and buildings, a certain minimum level of maintenance and capital expenditures to replace older buildings and equipment.

 

It becomes a budget nightmare for some districts. And the answers they've been forced to adopt in many cases -- cutting honors, Advanced Placement, music, art and elective classes -- are unacceptable.

 

Many of the schools on the west side have student populations much poorer than some of their urban counterparts. These are the children most in need of the opportunities that such classes offer. These days, for instance, not having AP classes is the kiss of death when it comes to admission to many universities.

 

It isn't fair that poor, rural children should be robbed of opportunities that are taken for granted by their wealthier urban peers. Clearly not.

 

But what to do? Certainly state and federal resources could be increased. For decades, the federal government has made payments to districts near military bases to make up for revenues that aren't available locally to educate the children of service personnel. There is an obligation on the part of state and federal agencies to pay for similar impacts of other actions they take.

 

A rational state water policy would help, at least insofar as it made things more predictable for rural ag communities. And a better method of funding education would help, too -- but as we've seen for some time, asking the governor and the state Legislature to find answers to our biggest problems is a waste of breath.

 

Part of the answer may be found in those west side communities that haven't seen enrollments drop, such as Kerman and Mendota. In those communities, efforts to diversify the local economy away from such strong dependence on ag appear to be paying off, though in some cases, it's the proximity to jobs in Fresno that have led people to move there, seeking cheaper housing.

 

In any case, the problem is real, and it's not likely to be fully solved at the local level. The state and federal governments are largely responsible for the problem and are obligated to help. #

http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/story/239097.html

 

 

FARMER WORKSHOPS SET TO PLAN FOR DROUGHT

News Release: Agricultural Water Management Council – 11/30/07

Contact: Kathryn Charlton. (916) 849-5023

 

Farmers will gather this week at a series of workshops designed to prepare them for next year’s expected drought.  The anticipated drought results from water-short weather forecasts and reduced pumping flows from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, as ordered by a federal judge to protect an endangered fish.

 

The workshops are hosted by the Agricultural Water Management Council, a non-profit organization that assists farm water districts in managing and using water more efficiently. 

 

“Last year was one of the driest in California history during the past 20 years,” said Executive Director Mike Wade.   “Long-range weather forecasts predict another dry year in southern and central California while a wet season is expected in northern California.  But the flow of water from the north to the south must pass through the Delta and court-ordered restrictions will reduce those flows from February through June.”

 

Representatives from local irrigation districts will talk about expected water allocations for the upcoming year during the workshops.  UC Cooperative Extension representatives will provide planning tools for farmers to use during critical times of the growing season.  The UC representatives will also review irrigation practices geared to improve water quality and stretch limited water supplies.

 

There is no cost to attend the workshop and a complimentary lunch will follow each workshop.

 

The workshops will be conducted at the following times and locations:

 

Wednesday, December 5, 2007; 9:30 -11:30 AM; lunch to follow

Fresno County Farm Bureau Office

1274 W. Hedges Avenue

Fresno, CA 93728

 

Thursday, December 6, 2007; 9:30- 11:30 PM; lunch to follow

Tulare County Farm Bureau Office

737 North Ben Maddox Way

Visalia, CA 93292

 

1 hour of DPR Continuing Education credits will be available.  RSVP is requested.  If you have questions or to reserve your seat, contact the Agricultural Water Management Council at (916) 849-5023.

http://www.agwatercouncil.org/

####

 

[Water_news] 1. DWR'S CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS - Top Items for 12/3/07

Department of Water Resources

California Water News

A daily compilation for DWR personnel of significant news articles and comment

 

December 3, 2007

 

1.  Top Items

 

Governor's panel seeks water, habitat changes in delta - Associated Press

 

Changes urged in moving water through Delta - Sacramento Bee

 

State panel calls for new California water delivery system - San Francisco Chronicle

 

Task force doesn't resolve Delta issue; Detailed recommendations put off until next year - Inside Bay Area

 

Proposals to repair delta flow outlined; New canal for water headed south urged - San Diego Union Tribune

 

Finding a cure to NorCal's delta problems - ABC Channel 7 (Bay Area)

 

 

Governor's panel seeks water, habitat changes in delta

Associated Press – 12/1/07

By Samantha Young, staff writer

 

California must build new dams and change how it channels water to more than two-thirds of the state's residents through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, a panel appointed by the governor said Friday.

 

The seven-member Delta Vision task force stopped short of saying where dams should be built or whether water should be piped around or through the delta to cities, farmers and wildlife. The report, which comes 10 months after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed his task force, says the state should assess the various routes that could funnel water to Southern California and the San Francisco Bay area.

 

"These are tough political decisions," said Phil Isenberg, chairman of the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force. "Still unanswered are the basic questions how big is the size, what does it cost?"

 

Changing how California moves water was one of 12 strategies the panel said should be followed to restore the ailing delta and secure the state's water supplies.

 

Drinking water for two-thirds of the state's residents passes through the delta, a tangle of rivers, canals, estuaries and islands that stretches from the foot of the Sierra Nevada to San Francisco Bay.

 

Members of the task force as well as water experts throughout the state have said building some sort of canal or pipeline to move river water around the delta would safeguard deliveries against levee breaks, rising sea levels and wildlife needs.

 

Studies in the last few years have shown large parts of the delta's 1,600-mile levee system could crumble during an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 or greater. That could cut off water deliveries for several years.

 

Task force members will spend next year coming up with a more detailed plan for the delta, and they directed California Federal Bay-Delta Program to assess the design and cost of piping water through and around the delta. The panel gave themselves until June to make a final recommendation on the best system.

 

The recommendations embrace key initiatives that Republicans and Democrats have promoted in a bid to get a water bond on the February 2008 ballot. However, those talks have stalled over disputes about dams.

 

Schwarzenegger has promoted building two new dams and expanding a third to shore up the state's water supplies as part of his $10.3 billion water bond proposal. But his proposal lacks any money for building a canal even though he supports the concept.

The task force said dams and changes in how the state moves water must be linked.

 

Aaron McLear, the governor's spokesman, said Schwarzenegger's proposal requires the Department of Water Resources to consider the task force's recommendations including changes in how water is routed as it develops a statewide water plan.

 

"We can't afford to wait any longer to invest in new surface and groundwater storage, new conveyance facilities, conservation measures and increased regional water self sufficiency," McLear said in a statement.

 

Democrats have been skeptical about dedicating state money to build dams without any legislative oversight. Instead, their $6.8 billion bond proposal would allow cities and counties to compete for state money and create their own solutions, which could include building local reservoirs or pumping water into underground aquifers.

 

The legislative drive behind a water bond comes in part by a federal court order that will force California to cut its water deliveries from the delta by a third starting in December. The reduced pumping is intended to protect the threatened delta smelt.

 

Assemblywoman Lois Wolk, D-Davis, chair of the Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee, said lawmakers should wait until the task force has completed its full analysis before the Legislature crafts a bond.

 

"They still have another year of work to do," Wolk said. "Once we have examined their vision, then we fund their recommendations."

 

Whatever design is selected to move water from north to south, task force members said California must immediately invest in fortifying its existing system of levees and pumping operations. At the same time, the local and state government must encourage conservation and more efficient water use, which the report describes as the fastest way to get additional water.

 

The report concludes that water deliveries which task force members say will be reduced in the future should no longer take priority over the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta's wildlife. Instead, the panel said both interests are of equal value.

 

However, exports could be increased if the delta's ecosystem is restored and a new system is put in place to send water to cities and farmers, said Laura King Moon, assistant general manager of the State Water Contractors Association.

 

The report also discourages new housing in the floodplains of the delta, asks local and state governments to develop emergency response plans and recommends creating a new entity to govern the region.

 

"If there's a lesson the nation learned from Hurricane Katrina, it's the price of waiting," said task force member Raymond Seed, a civil engineer who headed a team of investigators in New Orleans for the University of California at Berkeley. #

http://www.pe.com/ap_news/California/CA_Troubled_Delta_317673C.shtml

 

 

Changes urged in moving water through Delta

Sacramento Bee – 12/1/07

By Matt Weiser, staff writer

 

California must find another way to move its drinking water through the fragile Delta, a committee appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger decided Friday, but the estuary also needs immediate help before anybody leaps into new plumbing projects.

 

The Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force said there is no mythical single fix for the complex estuary, such as the "peripheral canal" rejected by California voters in 1982. New plumbing is needed, it said, but too little is known about costs and environmental effects to choose now.

 

Instead, the task force calls for a study that will lead to that kind of decision by June 2008. In particular, it wants the governor to authorize an assessment of what has come to be called the "dual conveyance" approach.

 

This involves building an isolated canal for a portion of Sacramento River flows around the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, while also improving water flows through the estuary and boosting upstream water storage.

 

Task force members said the conflict between environmental threats in the Delta and water shortages statewide makes simple solutions unrealistic.

 

"Everybody knows we're in a stalemate. They're looking for a way out," said task force Chairman Phil Isenberg, a former Democratic assemblyman. "The assessment we're talking about is really to compel the players to act."

 

The seven-member task force was appointed by the governor in February and charged with developing a "sustainable vision" for the 740,000-acre Delta. It is deliberating during an era of great stress in the Delta.

 

Fish species are crashing, and scientists have been unable to explain why. Water quality is poor. Court decisions likely will rein in state and federal pumping systems that export Delta water.

 

At least two-thirds of state residents depend on the Delta for a portion of their drinking water. The Delta also irrigates more than 2 million acres of farmland.

 

Levee failures could contaminate this water supply and jeopardize the nearly 400,000 residents of the Delta, a population growing rapidly on the floodplain.

 

The task force report consists of seven immediate actions and 12 core policies.

 

Immediate actions are needed to sustain the Delta, the task force asserts, until plumbing solutions are chosen. These seven steps include creating an emergency management plan for the region and improving the efficiency of water conveyance.

 

The task force also urges the governor to start buying up floodplain land and discourage further development.

 

"There are moments when the stars are aligned and you can make decisions people have been unwilling to make in the past," said task force member William Reilly, a partner in the Aqua International investment group and former administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "We've recommended a number of things that we hope will be acted on tomorrow."

 

The task force report will be formally presented to Schwarzenegger later this month.

 

Spokesman Aaron McLear hinted the governor is prepared to act swiftly. "We can't afford to wait any longer," he said in a statement.

 

The 12 longer-term measures are a linked plan that the task force says should be pursued as a whole.

 

"This problem is not about conveyance. It's not about the estuary," said task force member Monica Florian, a former executive at the Irvine Company, a major land developer in Southern California. "It's about a big picture of how do you deal with water in the state."

 

These policies include a recognition that water exports from the Delta probably must be reduced, or the pattern of those diversions must be changed.

 

A new government entity to oversee the Delta also is proposed, one with clear powers and dedicated funds. It might oversee a Delta with larger legal boundaries, to reflect the risks of flooding and higher sea levels.

 

The panel also places a major emphasis on water conservation. The members believe California needs more water storage, but they found that conservation can create more supply, and faster, than building new dams.

 

"The state as a whole can vastly improve the efficiency with which it uses water," said Reilly. "This state has not done for water what it has done for energy."

 

The task force was advised by a 41-member "stakeholder group" that includes water managers, farmers and environmentalists. Several said Friday they are pleased with the overall vision statement, but not necessarily all the details.

 

"The task force has set itself the goal of making conservation important at every level," said Gary Bobker, program manager at The Bay Institute.

 

"They want to make sure whatever we pick in terms of (water) conveyance meets the needs of the larger Delta ecosystem."

 

Laura King-Moon, assistant general manager of the State Water Contractors, said she wanted the panel to take a more project-specific approach to studying water conveyance options.

 

"I think they've made a major step forward in owning the problem," she said.

 

"We haven't seen people do that in the political arena for a long time."

 

The panel next begins developing a strategic plan, which will contain specific steps to carry out the vision. That is due to the governor in October 2008. #

http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/534428.html

 

 

State panel calls for new California water delivery system

San Francisco Chronicle – 12/1/07

By Tom Chorneau, staff writer

 

A state advisory panel called Friday for a new system of delivering water to urban users from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, but stopped short of backing an updated version of the peripheral canal proposed in 1982.

 

The much-anticipated report from the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, which Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed in February, said the current system for providing delta water to cities in the East Bay, the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California is no longer sustainable.

 

The panel, which will undertake the job now of trying to put their plan into motion, asked state and federal water officials to assess the options for a new water-delivery system and report back to them by June.

 

But the panel said any new facilities aimed at fixing delivery issues must be built in concert with measures that restore the delta's ecosystem.

 

"The two are co-equals," said Phil Isenberg, chairman of the task force. "You cannot address the water supply issues without also addressing the restoration issues."

 

All water-delivery options should be considered, the panel said, including a separate diversion such as the peripheral canal. But the panel said their preferred option is a combination system - one that might operate within the delta at some points and outside in a separate channel at other points.

 

The panel did not endorse or reject a new form of the peripheral canal - a controversial diversion, defeated by voters in an epic 1982 campaign, that would have taken water from the Sacramento River before it reached the delta for export to cities.

 

As the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, the delta is the source of fresh water for more than 25 million people - most of them in Southern California. But it is also one of California's most precious natural resources, providing habitat for dozens of species including salmon and perch and flocks of ducks and geese.

 

The conflicting uses sparked a federal court order in August that threatened to shut down water exports unless state officials could protect a tiny endangered fish, the delta smelt, from being ground up in two giant pumps near Tracy.

 

While some lawmakers and water system managers might have hoped that the panel's recommendations would provide more immediate relief, most of their plan will take time and money to implement.

 

Most interest groups and lawmakers gave the panel's final report high marks.

 

"The task force clearly said that the delta's ecosystem is something that is unique and needs to be protected - and that we are not protecting it," said Gary Bobker, program director at the Bay Institute of San Francisco, an environmental group active on water issues.

 

"They recognize that we need to plan for less water coming out of the delta," he said. "I think this is a balanced plan."

 

Laura King Moon, assistant general manager of the State Water Contractors, an association representing many of Southern California's largest water agencies, was also supportive.

 

"Our organization applauds the task force's recommendation to move forward with an analysis of a new water delivery system in early 2008," she said in a statement. "This is a major step forward."

 

Moon said, however, that she was disappointed the task force did not call for the launch of an environmental impact study of a new water-delivery system to run simultaneously with the assessment - because such a study will be needed before a canal or some other system can be built.

 

Aaron McLear, a spokesman for Schwarzenegger, said the Republican governor has not received the final version of the report and could not comment.

 

The report was released as Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders continue to debate a proposed water bond measure of as much as $9 billion that could go before voters next year. Both Schwarzenegger and majority Democrats favor spending billions of dollars for delta improvement but they are stuck on the governor's plan to use as much as $5 billion more for dam construction.

 

Both sides agree that the estimated $4 billion cost of building a new delta water canal would be paid for largely by those who benefit from it - ratepayers in Southern California. #

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/01/BA0GTM7OB.DTL

 

 

Task force doesn't resolve Delta issue; Detailed recommendations put off until next year

Inside Bay Area – 12/1/07

By Mike Taugher, staff writer

 

New housing development should be discouraged in the Delta region and more funding is needed to increase the state's ability to store and move water, according to an independent commission charged with creating a new vision for the troubled Delta.

 

The Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force offered little hope for water agencies that want to restore water supplies to the record levels of recent years and did not definitively answer the most controversial, and perhaps pivotal, question before it: how to move water through or around the Delta.

 

Instead, the task force, appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in February, said its vision lays the groundwork for more detailed recommendations next year.

 

"We've tried to turn the water debate on its head" by addressing the big picture of state water use and trends in the Delta before recommending specific water projects, said task force Chairman Phil Isenberg, a former legislative leader and mayor of Sacramento.

 

The panel wants a focused assessment of how best to move water both through and around the Delta via canals, a "dual conveyance" proposal that has been gaining support this year.

 

The Delta is a major source of drinking and irrigation water for the state, but it is unraveling on several fronts. The Delta ecosystem is almost literally dying, with several fish species in decline and one, delta smelt, in such bad shape some biologists are beginning to warn that it could be nearing extinction.

 

Water supplies, meanwhile, have been compromised as courts have stepped in to cut water supplies to save the environment. There is mounting pressure on aging levees — a risk that gained new attention after Hurricane Katrina caused catastrophic flooding.

 

The 30-plus pages of the vision adopted Friday were short on concrete recommendations, but task force members said more specifics would be developed next year when they write an implementation plan.

 

The governor's office issued a statement saying it had not seen the final report but looked forward to the panel providing "a Delta management plan that reflects the critical need to fix the ailing Delta while addressing California's outdated water infrastructure."

 

Water user groups and environmentalists, traditional adversaries, both called the report a good first step. Water agencies were pleased with the call for an expedited study of a new water conveyance system, while environmentalists were happy about a commitment to restoring the Delta environment.

 

"These guys took the right tack. We can't solve California's water supply problems by milking the Delta," said Gary Bobker, program director for the Bay Institute, an environmental group. "The question now is, is the governor prepared to embrace this?

 

Is the Legislature prepared to embrace this?"

 

The task force included business leaders, legal and engineering experts, a former U.S. EPA administrator and Sunne Wright McPeak, a former Contra Costa County supervisor who, like Isenberg, was a veteran of Northern California's war against the Peripheral Canal in the early 1980s.

 

"Even an old grump like me changes his mind," said Isenberg, referring to his willingness to consider new ways of moving Delta water.

 

Task force members said the vision's 12 recommendations were intended to be integrated, not cherry-picked.

 

The report says the Delta environment should no longer be an afterthought to water deliveries and that water supplies from rivers pouring into the Delta, within the Delta and from pumps that take water out of the Delta will almost certainly shrink. It did, however, leave open a slight possibility that new water storage and conveyance projects such as dams and canals might address that.

 

"In our hearts, we don't expect to see diversions maintained at current levels," said Ray Seed, a civil and environmental engineering professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and task force member.

 

It calls for more serious efforts to conserve water and use the resource more efficiently but it did not set specific goals.

 

It also called on state government to begin purchasing flood-prone land to prevent development. The task force considered recommending a crackdown on new housing, but backed off and instead said development in flood plains should be discouraged.

 

But it was the task force's conclusions on water conveyance that were the most highly anticipated. Members said they hope to have a more specific proposal by June.

 

Water conveyance has been highly controversial for decades because a large aqueduct upstream of the Delta that is built to carry water around the Delta could deplete it, leaving its waters stagnant and polluted with farm runoff.

 

But the existing method of moving water relies on pumps in the south Delta that kill millions of fish a year and alter the natural Delta flows in ways that dramatically affect fish habitat.

 

Dual conveyance, while untested, is gaining favor because it would modify Delta levees to reduce the impact of the pumps on habitat when used some of the time and also build an aqueduct to use at other times.

 

The call for an assessment of how such a system might work best "is a major step forward in the right direction," said Laura King Moon, assistant general manager of the State Water Contractors, an association of water agencies that serve millions of Californians.

 

The vision is not the first attempt to address Delta problems. In 1994, then-Gov. Pete Wilson and then-Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt agreed to a joint effort that led to a 2000 plan known as CalFed, which was billed as the largest ecosystem management program and water management group in the world. #

http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/localnews/ci_7609782

 

 

Proposals to repair delta flow outlined; New canal for water headed south urged

San Diego Union Tribune – 12/1/07

By Michael Gardner, staff writer

 

SACRAMENTO – Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's hand-picked advisory team yesterday released a series of sweeping proposals to repair the ecologically and economically critical Sacramento delta, including general support for reservoirs and a new canal to take water to Southern California.

 

However, the committee put off taking positions on where to build storage facilities and what type of plumbing project would be best to move water through or around the delta.

 

The Delta Vision Committee backed away from an earlier draft that proposed a moratorium on construction in flood-prone areas of the region, instead suggesting that new housing close to levees be “discouraged.”

 

The committee called for the creation of a new agency that would allocate water supplies and collect fees from agencies tapping the delta. The committee urged the state to begin buying land in floodways to provide a buffer zone as well as marshy habitat.

 

“Our recommendations are controversial. If they were not, they would be of little consequence,” the seven-member committee wrote in its draft cover letter to the governor.

 

The committee is expected to launch a second phase next year that could produce more defined positions on reservoirs, delivery systems and other nagging issues.

 

The committee, noting the importance of the delta to the entire state's well-being, went so far as to suggest that the region be renamed the “California Delta.”

 

Two-thirds of the state's drinking-water supply, including more than one-third of the San Diego region's, flows through the delta, a 1,100-mile maze of waterways. The water nourishes millions of acres of farmland and keeps the Silicon Valley computer mecca humming.

 

Moreover, the delta is a vast estuary for wildlife, including numerous rare and endangered species.

 

Pressure is building for the state to come to grips with the delta's many woes: large-scale water diversions, growth, pollution and invasive species. There is a court-ordered water delivery cut to protect a tiny, endangered fish. Global warming threatens to bring more floods. And there is the constant threat of a natural disaster disrupting a vital network of canals, levees, power lines and highways.

 

The idea of a separate canal has been a political untouchable for some time. Voters in 1982 defeated the “Peripheral Canal,” and attempts to resurrect the project have been quickly scuttled.

 

But with a delta crisis at hand, the state's mood is changing, said panel chairman and former Assemblyman Phil Isenberg. The committee took a modest step by calling for an assessment that would include whether a canal would improve delivery reliability and water quality, along with cost and funding sources.

 

Environmentalists, this time, do not recoil at reopening the canal debate. They see the committee's work as a commitment to fixing the delta first, which could then reduce the scare factor of a new plumbing system to take water south.

 

The committee suggested that the state work to “improve” supplies, calling existing capacity “inadequate.” But members stopped short of endorsing any particular project. They also called for more conservation. #

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20071201-9999-1n1water1.html

 

 

Finding a cure to NorCal's delta problems

ABC Channel 7 (Bay Area) – 11/30/07

By Tomas Roman

Finding solutions to California's water problems is a challenge made more difficult by bureaucracy. It's like having too many cooks in the kitchen. It seems that every agency has a stake in the debate over the delta.

 

Governor Schwarzenegger's Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Panel was fine tuning its final list of 12 recommendations for the Northern California delta this morning. One major recommendation is to create a delta management district and only one agency to manage it efficiently.

 

"You have 200 different government agencies fiddling around with the delta. We're calling for one delta authority to determine questions like water flow, eco system spending, and improvements," says Phil Isenberg, Chair, Delta Vision Panel.

 

Former assemblyman Phil Isenberg chairs the panel. It has taken a year for this group of experts from environmental, government, conservation and legal groups to come up with how to improve the complicated 1,300 mile long levee system.

 

"If you don't deal with the delta's eco system and get it right, the courts will stop the diversion of water," says Isenberg.

 

Panel member Sunne Wright McPeak is now with the California Emerging Technology Fund. He says "you have to move forward very aggressively in the state for protection of the estuary on conservation as well as improving facilities."

 

One of the immediate concerns of the Delta Vision Panel is water conservation. They say without it, these plans just won't work.

 

The panel also wants to discourage new sub division development in the delta, saying no one should be living in flood plains so susceptible to earthquake, floods, and weak levees. The panel is also recommending new and larger water storage facilities above and below ground. The group sidestepped the issue of proposing another peripheral canal like the one defeated by voters in 1982.

 

"If you say will you sign up or support any delta peripheral canal, regardless of size, price, location, or cost, then the answer is no."

 

The panel will present its recommendations to the Governor by December 31. A strategic plan is due in one year. #

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=5804834

####